Research in Higher Education

, Volume 49, Issue 5, pp 403–419 | Cite as

How Do Transfers Survive after “Transfer Shock”? A Longitudinal Study of Transfer Student Departure at a Four-Year Institution

Article

Abstract

Prompted by the notion of “Transfer Shock”, numerous studies examined academic performance of transfer students at senior institutions. However, few studies are found that examine how the varying nature of semester GPAs impact subsequent persistence behavior of transfer students after the initial drop in their college GPAs. Using an institutional data set, this study longitudinally investigated departure behavior of transfer students at a senior institution. Particular attention was given to how entry at different times and semester GPAs affected transfer student departure. Results indicate that during their first semester, sophomore and junior transfer students were 73% less likely to depart than freshman transfer students. After controlling for explanatory variables, higher semester GPAs were positively associated with higher persistence rates throughout the observation period.

Keywords

Transfer students Academic persistence Event history modeling 

References

  1. Allison, P. D. (1984). Event history analysis: Regression for longitudinal event data. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  2. Avakian, A. N., MacKinney, A. C., & Allen, G. R. (1982). Race and sex differences in student retention at an urban university. College and University, 57(2), 160–165.Google Scholar
  3. Bean, J. P. (1980). Dropouts and turnover: The synthesis and test of a causal model of student attrition. Research in Higher Education, 12(2), 155–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bean, J. P. (1983). The application of model of turnover in work organizations to the student attrition process. Review of Higher Education, 6(2), 129–148.Google Scholar
  5. Braxton, J. M., Duster, M., & Pascarella, E. T. (1988). Causal modeling and path analysis: An introduction and an illustration in student attrition research. Journal of College Student Development, 29(3), 263–272.Google Scholar
  6. Braxton, J. M., Milem, J. F., & Sullivan, A. S. (2000). The influence of active learning on the college student departure process: Toward a revision of Tinto’s theory. Journal of Higher Education, 71(5), 569–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cabrera, A. F., Nora, A., & Castaneda, M. B. (1993). College persistence: Structural equations modeling test of an integrated model of student retention. Journal of Higher Education, 64(2), 123–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Caison, A. L. (2004). Determinants of systemic retention: Implications for improving retention practice in higher education. Journal of College Student Retention, 6(4), 425–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Conference Board. (2006). Are they really ready to work? Employers’ perspectives on the basic knowledge and applied skills of new entrants to the 21st century U.S. workforce, Retrieved October 10, 2006, from the Conference Board Web site: http://www.conference-board.org/pdf_free/BED-06-Workforce.pdf.
  10. DesJardins, S. L. (2003). Event history methods: Conceptual issues and an application to student departure from college. In J. C. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 18, pp. 421–471). New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
  11. DesJardins, S. L., Ahlburg, A. A., & McCall, B. P. (1999). An event history model of student departure. Economics of Education Review, 18(3), 375–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. DesJardins, S. L., Ahlburg, D.A., & McCall, B.P. (2006). The effects of interrupted enrollment on graduation from college: Racial, income, and ability differences. Economics of Education Review, 25(6), 575–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Diaz, P. E. (1992). Effects of transfer on academic performance of community college students at the four-year institution. Community/Junior College Quarterly, 16(3), 279–291.Google Scholar
  14. Gao, H., Hughes, W. W., O’Rear, M. R., & Fendley, W. R. (2002, June). Developing structural equation models to determine factors contributing to student graduation and retention: Are there differences for native students and transfers? Paper Presented at the Annual Forum of the Association for Institutional Research, Toronto, ON, Canada.Google Scholar
  15. Hill, J. R. (1965). Transfer shock: The academic performance of the junior college transfer. Journal of Experimental Education, 33(3), 201–215.Google Scholar
  16. Ishitani, T. T. (2003). A longitudinal approach to assessing attrition behavior among first-generation students: Time-varying effects of pre-college characteristics. Research in Higher Education, 44(4), 433–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ishitani, T. T. (2006). Studying attrition and degree completion behavior among first-generation college students in the United States. Journal of Higher Education, 77(5), 861–885.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ishitani, T. T., & DesJardins, S. L. (2002). A longitudinal investigation of dropout from colleges in the United States. Journal of College Student Retention, 4(2), 173–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Johnson, I. Y. (2006). Analysis of stopout behavior at a public research university: The multi-spell discrete-time approach. Research in Higher Education, 47(8), 905–934.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Liu, R., & Liu, E. (2000, May). Institutional integration: An analysis of Tinto’s theory. Paper Presented at the Annual Forum of the Association for Institutional Research, Cincinnati, OH.Google Scholar
  21. McCormick, A. C. (1997). Transfer behavior among beginning postsecondary students: 1989–94. (NCES 97–266). U.S. Department of Education, NCES. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  22. McLendon, M. K., Hearn, J. C., & Deaton, R. (2006). Called to account: Analyzing the origins and spread of state. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 28(1), 1–24.Google Scholar
  23. Menard, S. (1995). Applied logistic regression analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  24. Murtaugh, P. A., Burns, L. D., & Schuster, J. (1999). Predicting the retention of university students. Research in Higher Education, 40(3), 355–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. National Center for Education Statistics. (1996). Descriptive summary of 1989–90 beginning postsecondary students: Five years later (NCES 96–155). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, NCES.Google Scholar
  26. National Center for Education Statistics. (2003). The condition of education: Transfers from community colleges to 4-year institutions. (NCES 2003–067). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, NCES.Google Scholar
  27. Nora, A., Attinasi, L.C., & Matonak, A. (1990). Testing qualitative indicators of pre-college factors in Tinto’s attrition model: A community college student population. Review of Higher Education, 13(3), 337–355.Google Scholar
  28. Pascarella, E. T. (1997). It’s time we started paying attention to community college students. About Campus, 1(6), 14–17.Google Scholar
  29. Pascarella, E. T., & Chapman, D. (1983). A multi-institutional path analytical validation of Tinto’s model of college withdrawal. American Educational Research Journal, 20(1), 87–102.Google Scholar
  30. Pascarella, E. T., Duby, P., & Iverson, B. (1983). A test and reconceptualization of a theoretical model of college withdrawal in a commuter institution setting. Sociology of Education, 56(2), 88–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. (1983). Path analytic validation of Tinto’s model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75(2), 215–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Peng, S. S., & Bailey, J. P. (1977). Differences between vertical transfer and native students in four-year institutions. Research in Higher Education, 7(2), 145–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Porter, S. R. (1999, May). Assessing transfer and native student performance at four-year institutions. Paper Presented at the 43rd Annual Forum of the Association for Institutional Research, Seattle, WA.Google Scholar
  34. Schartman, L., & Rhee, B. (2000, May). Linking student retention model with institutional planning: The benefits and limitations of a student matrix model. Paper Presented at the Annual Forum of the Association for Institutional Research, Cincinnati, OH.Google Scholar
  35. Tinto, V. (1975). Dropout from higher education: A theoretical synthesis of recent research. Review of Educational Research, 45(1), 89–125.Google Scholar
  36. Yamaguchi, K. (1991). Event history analysis. Applied social research methods series, Vol. 28. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Counseling, Educational Psychology and ResearchThe University of MemphisMemphisUSA

Personalised recommendations