Many institutions of higher education increasingly are concerned with retention and graduation rates. Focusing on private Baccalaureate Liberal and General colleges and universities, the purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between institutional selectivity and institutional expenditures and retention and graduation rates. Framed by Berger’s (2001–2002) view that organizational behavior can impact student departure, this inquiry examined if expenditures for instruction, academic support, student services, facilities, institutional support, and institutional grants (i.e. student financial aid) could predict retention and graduation rates at baccalaureate-granting institutions. Institutional selectivity and institutional expenditures, specifically those that directly contributed to students’ academic integration, were found to contribute significantly to retention and graduation rates. Recommendations are suggested, including using the results to inform resource allocation strategies that can enhance retention and graduation rates.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Alexander F. K. (2000). The changing face of accountability: Monitoring and assessing institutional performance in higher education. Journal of Higher Education 71:411–430
Astin A. W. (1993). What Matters in College? Four Critical Years Revisited. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco
Astin A. W. (1984). Student involvement: A developmental theory for higher education. Journal of College Student Personnel 25:297–308
Astin A. W., Korn W., Green K. (1987). Retaining and satisfying students. Educational Record 68:36–42
Astin A.W., Scherreri R. A. (1980). Maximizing Leadership Effectiveness. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco
Barron’s Educational Series (2000). Barron’s Profiles of American Colleges of 2001. Barron’s Educational Series, Hauppauge NY (24th ed.)
Berger J. B. (2001–2002). Understanding the organizational nature of student persistence: Empirically-based recommendations for practice. Journal of College Student Retention 3:3–21
Berger J. B. (2000). Organizational behavior at colleges and student outcomes: A new perspective on college impact. The Review of Higher Education 23:177–198
Berger J. B., Braxton J. M. (1998). Revising Tinto’s interactionalist theory of student departure through theory elaboration: Examining the role of organizational attributes in the persistence process. Research in Higher Education 39:103–119
Blau P. M. (1973). The Organization of Academic Work. John Wiley & Sons, New York
Bowen H. R. (1980). The Costs of Higher Education: How Much Do Colleges and Universities Spend per Student and How Much Should They Spend?. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco
Bruning S. D. (2002). Relationship building as a retention strategy: Linking relationship attitudes and satisfaction evaluations to behavioral outcomes. Public Relations Review 28:39–48
Burke J. C. (1998). Performance funding: Present status and future prospects. In: Burke J. C., Serban A. (eds). Performance Funding for Public Higher Education: Fad or Trend (New Directions for Institutional Research, n. 97). Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, pp. 5–14
Cabrera A. F., Nora A., Castaneda M. B. (1992). The role of finances in the persistence process. Research in Higher Education 36:595–612
Cameron K. S. (1978). Measuring organizational effectiveness in institutions of higher education. Administrative Science Quarterly 23:604–632
Carpenter S. (1996). Philosophical heritage of student affairs. In: Rentz A. L., and Associates (eds.), Student Affairs Practice in Higher Education. C. C. Thomas, Springfield IL, pp. 3–27
Clark B. R. (1972). The organizational saga in higher education. Administrative Science Quarterly 17:178–184
Cunningham, A. F., Wellman, J. V., Clinedinst, M. E., and Merisotis, J. P. (2001). Study of college costs and prices, 1988–89 to 1997–98, Vol. 1. Retrieved September 22, 2002 from National Center for Education Statistics web site, http://www.nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2002157
Dickmeyer N. (1996). Budget. In: Breneman D. W., Leslie L. L., Anderson R. E. (eds). ASHE Reader on Finance in Higher Education. Simon & Schuster, Needham Heights MA, pp. 539–561
Eyler J., Giles Jr. D. E. (1999). Where’s the Learning in Service-Learning? Jossey-Bass, San Francisco
Goetz J. L. (1996). Academic advising. In: Rentz A. L., and Associates (eds.), Student Affairs Practice in Higher Education. C.C. Thomas, Springfield IL, pp. 88–107
Gordon V. N., Habley W. R., Associates. (2000). Academic Advising: A Comprehensive Handbook. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco
Hamrick, F. A., Schuh, J. H., and Shelley, M. C., II. (2004). Institutional Characteristics and Resource Allocation: Predictors of Graduation Rates. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Hayek, J. C. (2001). A student-centered approach for identifying high performing colleges and universities. Dissertation Abstracts International, AAT 3024295.
Hearn J.C. (1991). Academic and nonacademic influences on the college destinations of 1980 high school graduates. Sociology of Education 64:158–171
Kerr C. (2001). The Uses of the University (5th ed.). Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
Kuh G.D. (2001–2002). Organizational culture and student persistence: Prospects and puzzles. Journal of College Student Retention 3:23–39
Kuh G. D., McAleenan A. C. (1986). The future of student affairs work in small colleges. In Kuh G. D., McAleenan A. C. (eds). Private, Dreams Shared Visions: Student Affairs Work in Small Colleges (NASPA Monograph Series V. 6). National Association of Student Personnel Administrators, Inc., Washington, D.C. pp.105–119
Lee, J. B. (2001). Undergraduates Enrolled with Higher Sticker Prices. Retrieved January 15, 2004 from National Center of Education Statistics web site, http://www.nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2001171
Lenning, O. T., and Ebbers, L. H. (1999). The Powerful Potential of Learning Communities. ASHE-ERIC Report volume 26, no. 6. Washington, DC: The George Washington University, Graduate School of Education and Human development.
Leslie L. L., Rhoades G. (2001). Rising administrative costs: Seeking explanations. In: Yeager J. L., Nelson G. M., Potter E. A., Weidman J. C., Zullo T. G. (eds). ASHE Reader on Finance in Higher Education. Pearson 2nded, Boston, pp. 337–352
Massy W. F. (2001). Improvement strategies for administration and support services. In: Yeager J. L., Nelson G. M., Potter E. A., Weidman J. C., Zullo T. G. (eds). ASHE Reader on Finance in Higher Education. Pearson, Boston, pp. 316–336 2nd ed
Mayer-Foulker D. (2002). On the dynamics of quality student enrollment at institutions of higher education. Economics of Education Review 21:481–489
Meeth L. R. (1974). Quality Education for Less Money: A Sourcebook for Improving Cost-Effectiveness. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco
Mendenhall W., Sincich T. (1996). A Second Course in Statistics: Regression Analysis. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River NJ (5th ed.)
Merante J. A., and Ireland R. C. (1993). The competitive edge: Why some small colleges succeed. The College Board Review, 169(3), 8–13, 28.
Mertler C., Vannatta R. (2001). Advanced and Multivariate Statistical Methods: Practical Application and Interpretation. Pyrczak, Los Angeles
Miller T. K. (ed.) (1997). The Book of Professional Standards for Higher Education. Council for the Advancement of Standards in Higher Education, Washington, D.C
Mitrano, T. (2002). The Patriot Act and Higher Education. Message posted to http://www.chronicle.com/colloquylive/2002/02/patriot/
Nagda B. A., Gregerman S. R., Jonides J., von Hippel W., Lerner J. S. (1998). Undergraduate student-faculty research partnerships affect studen (sic) retention. Review of Higher Education, 22:55–72
National Center for Education Statistics. (2002a). Digest of Education Statistics. Available from National Center for Education Statistics web site, http://www.nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d02_tf.asp
National Center for Education Statistics. (2002b). Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System, 2002 [Data file]. Available from National Center for Education Statistics web site, http://www.nces.ed.gov/ipeds
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). (2004). OSHA compliance assistance: Laws and regulations. Retrieved March 26, 2004 from http://www.osha.gov/dcsp/compliance_assistance/laws_regs.html
Pace C. R. (1974). The Demise of Diversity: A Comparative Profile of Eight Types of Institutions. Carnegie Commission on Higher Education, Berkeley
Pascarella E. T., Terenzini P. T. and Blimling G. S. (1994). The impact of residential life on students. In: Schroeder C. C., Mable P., Associates (eds). Realizing the Educational Potential of Residence Halls. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, pp. 22–52
Perna L. W. (1998). The contribution of financial aid to undergraduate persistence. Journal of Student Financial Aid 28:25–40
Reason, R. D. (2001). The Use of Merit-Index Measures to Predict Between-Year Retention of Undergraduate College Students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Iowa State University.
Rhodes F. (2001). The Creation of the Future: The Role of the American University. Cornell University, Ithaca, NY
Ryan J. F. (2005). Institutional expenditures and student engagement: A role for financial resource in enhancing student learning and development?. Research in Higher Education 26:235–250
Ryan J. F. (2004). The relationship between institutional expenditures and degree attainment at baccalaureate college. Research in Higher Education 45:97–114
Smart J. C., Ethington C. A., Riggs R. O., Thompson M. D. (2002). Influences of institutional expenditures patterns on the development of students’ leadership competencies. Research in Higher Education 43:115–132
Stevens J. (1996). Applied Multivariate Statistics for the Social Sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ (3rd ed)
John St. E. P., Cabrera A. F., Nora A., Asker E. (2002). Economic influences on persistence reconsidered: How can finance research inform the reconceptualization of persistence models?. In: Braxton J. M. (eds). Reworking the Student Departure Puzzle. Vanderbilt University Press, Nashville TN, pp. 29–47
Tabachnick B. G., Fidell L. S. (1983). Using Multivariate Statistics. Harper & Row, New York
The Institute for Higher Education Policy [IHEP]. (1998). Reaping the Benefits: Defining the Public and Private Value of Going to College. The New Millennium Project on Higher Education Costs, Pricing, and Productivity [On-line]. Retrieved August 15, 2003 from http://www.ihep.com
Thompson M. D., Riggs R. O. (2000). Institutional expenditure patterns and the facilitation of mission. Community College Review 27:1–15
Tinto V. (1998). Colleges as communities: Taking research on student persistence seriously. The Review of Higher Education 21:167–177
Tinto V. (1993). Leaving College: Rethinking the Causes and Cures of Student Attrition. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL (2nd ed.)
US News and World Report. (2003). America’s Best Colleges, 2004. [Data file]. Available from US News and World Report web site, http://www.usnews.com/usnews/edu/college/rankings/rankindex.htm
Vandament W.E. (1989). Managing Money in Higher Education: A Guide to the Financial Process and Effective Participation Within it. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco
Wolanin, T. R (ed.). (2003). Reauthorizing the Higher Education Act: Issues and Options. [On-line]. The Institute for Higher Education Policy. Retrieved February 2, 2004 from http://www.ihep.org/Pubs/PDF/ReAuthHEA.pdf
Wright R. A. (1986). Professorial role strains in the small college. In: Wright R. A., Burden J. A. (eds). Teaching in the Small College: Issues and Applications. Greenwood, New York, pp. 27–37
Young R. B. (1986) Notes on student affairs administration in the small college. In: Kuh G. D., McAleenan A. C. (eds) Private Dreams, Shared Visions: Student Affairs Work in Small Colleges (NASPA Monograph Series V. 6). National Association of Student Personnel Administrators Inc., Washington, D.C., pp. 71–81
APPENDIX A: DEFINITIONS OF INDEPENDENT AND DEPENDENT VARIABLES
APPENDIX A: DEFINITIONS OF INDEPENDENT AND DEPENDENT VARIABLES
Academic Support Expenditures. Expenditures for the support services that are an integral part of the institution’s primary mission of instruction, research, or public service. Includes expenditures of libraries, museums, galleries, audio/visual services, academic computing support, ancillary support, academic administration, personnel development, and course and curriculum development (NCES, 2002b, p. 12).
Institutional Grants. Amount awarded to students from restricted and unrestricted institutional resources for the purpose of student aid, such as scholarships or fellowships funded by gifts or endowment return (NCES, 2002b, p. 7).
Institutional Selectivity Ratings: Degree of admissions competitiveness. Ratings factor in incoming students’ average median entrance examination scores (e.g. SAT/ACT), high school rank, high school grade point average and the percentage of applicants who were accepted (Barron’s, 2000).
Institutional Support. Expenditures for the day-to-day operational support of the institution, excluding expenditures for physical plant operations. Includes general administrative services, executive direction and planning, legal and fiscal operations, and public relations/development (NCES, 2002b, p. 12).
Instruction Expenditures. Expenditures of the colleges, schools, departments, and other instructional divisions of the institution and expenditures for departmental research and public service that are not separately budgeted. General academic instruction, vocational instruction, special session instruction, community education, preparatory and adult basic education, and remedial and tutorial instruction conducted by the teaching faculty for the institution’s students (NCES, 2002b, p. 11).
Student Services. Funds expended for admissions, registrar activities, and activities whose primary purpose is to contribute to students’ emotional and physical well-being and to their intellectual, cultural, and social development outside the context of the formal instructional program (NCES, 2002b, p. 12).
First-Year Retention Rate. First-year retention rates are commonly computed as a percentage. It is calculated by taking the total number of first-year students who returned their second year at a specific institution divided by the total number of the same group of students at the institution who started their first year. (US News, 2003).
6-year Graduation Rates. Percentage of freshmen who graduated within a six-year period. (Note: This excludes transfers into the school) (US News, 2003).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gansemer-Topf, A.M., Schuh, J.H. INSTITUTIONAL SELECTIVITY AND INSTITUTIONAL EXPENDITURES: Examining Organizational Factors that Contribute to Retention and Graduation. Res High Educ 47, 613–642 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-006-9009-4
- higher education
- small colleges