Skip to main content

INSTITUTIONAL SELECTIVITY AND INSTITUTIONAL EXPENDITURES: Examining Organizational Factors that Contribute to Retention and Graduation

Research in Higher Education volume 47, pages 613–642 (2006)Cite this article

Abstract

Many institutions of higher education increasingly are concerned with retention and graduation rates. Focusing on private Baccalaureate Liberal and General colleges and universities, the purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between institutional selectivity and institutional expenditures and retention and graduation rates. Framed by Berger’s (2001–2002) view that organizational behavior can impact student departure, this inquiry examined if expenditures for instruction, academic support, student services, facilities, institutional support, and institutional grants (i.e. student financial aid) could predict retention and graduation rates at baccalaureate-granting institutions. Institutional selectivity and institutional expenditures, specifically those that directly contributed to students’ academic integration, were found to contribute significantly to retention and graduation rates. Recommendations are suggested, including using the results to inform resource allocation strategies that can enhance retention and graduation rates.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

REFERENCES

  • Alexander F. K. (2000). The changing face of accountability: Monitoring and assessing institutional performance in higher education. Journal of Higher Education 71:411–430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Astin A. W. (1993). What Matters in College? Four Critical Years Revisited. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Astin A. W. (1984). Student involvement: A developmental theory for higher education. Journal of College Student Personnel 25:297–308

    Google Scholar 

  • Astin A. W., Korn W., Green K. (1987). Retaining and satisfying students. Educational Record 68:36–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Astin A.W., Scherreri R. A. (1980). Maximizing Leadership Effectiveness. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Barron’s Educational Series (2000). Barron’s Profiles of American Colleges of 2001. Barron’s Educational Series, Hauppauge NY (24th ed.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger J. B. (2001–2002). Understanding the organizational nature of student persistence: Empirically-based recommendations for practice. Journal of College Student Retention 3:3–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger J. B. (2000). Organizational behavior at colleges and student outcomes: A new perspective on college impact. The Review of Higher Education 23:177–198

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger J. B., Braxton J. M. (1998). Revising Tinto’s interactionalist theory of student departure through theory elaboration: Examining the role of organizational attributes in the persistence process. Research in Higher Education 39:103–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blau P. M. (1973). The Organization of Academic Work. John Wiley & Sons, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowen H. R. (1980). The Costs of Higher Education: How Much Do Colleges and Universities Spend per Student and How Much Should They Spend?. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruning S. D. (2002). Relationship building as a retention strategy: Linking relationship attitudes and satisfaction evaluations to behavioral outcomes. Public Relations Review 28:39–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burke J. C. (1998). Performance funding: Present status and future prospects. In: Burke J. C., Serban A. (eds). Performance Funding for Public Higher Education: Fad or Trend (New Directions for Institutional Research, n. 97). Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, pp. 5–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Cabrera A. F., Nora A., Castaneda M. B. (1992). The role of finances in the persistence process. Research in Higher Education 36:595–612

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron K. S. (1978). Measuring organizational effectiveness in institutions of higher education. Administrative Science Quarterly 23:604–632

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter S. (1996). Philosophical heritage of student affairs. In: Rentz A. L., and Associates (eds.), Student Affairs Practice in Higher Education. C. C. Thomas, Springfield IL, pp. 3–27

  • Clark B. R. (1972). The organizational saga in higher education. Administrative Science Quarterly 17:178–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, A. F., Wellman, J. V., Clinedinst, M. E., and Merisotis, J. P. (2001). Study of college costs and prices, 1988–89 to 1997–98, Vol. 1. Retrieved September 22, 2002 from National Center for Education Statistics web site, http://www.nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2002157

  • Dickmeyer N. (1996). Budget. In: Breneman D. W., Leslie L. L., Anderson R. E. (eds). ASHE Reader on Finance in Higher Education. Simon & Schuster, Needham Heights MA, pp. 539–561

    Google Scholar 

  • Eyler J., Giles Jr. D. E. (1999). Where’s the Learning in Service-Learning? Jossey-Bass, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Goetz J. L. (1996). Academic advising. In: Rentz A. L., and Associates (eds.), Student Affairs Practice in Higher Education. C.C. Thomas, Springfield IL, pp. 88–107

  • Gordon V. N., Habley W. R., Associates. (2000). Academic Advising: A Comprehensive Handbook. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco

  • Hamrick, F. A., Schuh, J. H., and Shelley, M. C., II. (2004). Institutional Characteristics and Resource Allocation: Predictors of Graduation Rates. Manuscript submitted for publication.

  • Hayek, J. C. (2001). A student-centered approach for identifying high performing colleges and universities. Dissertation Abstracts International, AAT 3024295.

  • Hearn J.C. (1991). Academic and nonacademic influences on the college destinations of 1980 high school graduates. Sociology of Education 64:158–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerr C. (2001). The Uses of the University (5th ed.). Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuh G.D. (2001–2002). Organizational culture and student persistence: Prospects and puzzles. Journal of College Student Retention 3:23–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuh G. D., McAleenan A. C. (1986). The future of student affairs work in small colleges. In Kuh G. D., McAleenan A. C. (eds). Private, Dreams Shared Visions: Student Affairs Work in Small Colleges (NASPA Monograph Series V. 6). National Association of Student Personnel Administrators, Inc., Washington, D.C. pp.105–119

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J. B. (2001). Undergraduates Enrolled with Higher Sticker Prices. Retrieved January 15, 2004 from National Center of Education Statistics web site, http://www.nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2001171

  • Lenning, O. T., and Ebbers, L. H. (1999). The Powerful Potential of Learning Communities. ASHE-ERIC Report volume 26, no. 6. Washington, DC: The George Washington University, Graduate School of Education and Human development.

  • Leslie L. L., Rhoades G. (2001). Rising administrative costs: Seeking explanations. In: Yeager J. L., Nelson G. M., Potter E. A., Weidman J. C., Zullo T. G. (eds). ASHE Reader on Finance in Higher Education. Pearson 2nded, Boston, pp. 337–352

    Google Scholar 

  • Massy W. F. (2001). Improvement strategies for administration and support services. In: Yeager J. L., Nelson G. M., Potter E. A., Weidman J. C., Zullo T. G. (eds). ASHE Reader on Finance in Higher Education. Pearson, Boston, pp. 316–336 2nd ed

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer-Foulker D. (2002). On the dynamics of quality student enrollment at institutions of higher education. Economics of Education Review 21:481–489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meeth L. R. (1974). Quality Education for Less Money: A Sourcebook for Improving Cost-Effectiveness. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendenhall W., Sincich T. (1996). A Second Course in Statistics: Regression Analysis. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River NJ (5th ed.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Merante J. A., and Ireland R. C. (1993). The competitive edge: Why some small colleges succeed. The College Board Review, 169(3), 8–13, 28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mertler C., Vannatta R. (2001). Advanced and Multivariate Statistical Methods: Practical Application and Interpretation. Pyrczak, Los Angeles

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller T. K. (ed.) (1997). The Book of Professional Standards for Higher Education. Council for the Advancement of Standards in Higher Education, Washington, D.C

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitrano, T. (2002). The Patriot Act and Higher Education. Message posted to http://www.chronicle.com/colloquylive/2002/02/patriot/

  • Nagda B. A., Gregerman S. R., Jonides J., von Hippel W., Lerner J. S. (1998). Undergraduate student-faculty research partnerships affect studen (sic) retention. Review of Higher Education, 22:55–72

    Google Scholar 

  • National Center for Education Statistics. (2002a). Digest of Education Statistics. Available from National Center for Education Statistics web site, http://www.nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d02_tf.asp

  • National Center for Education Statistics. (2002b). Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System, 2002 [Data file]. Available from National Center for Education Statistics web site, http://www.nces.ed.gov/ipeds

  • Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). (2004). OSHA compliance assistance: Laws and regulations. Retrieved March 26, 2004 from http://www.osha.gov/dcsp/compliance_assistance/laws_regs.html

  • Pace C. R. (1974). The Demise of Diversity: A Comparative Profile of Eight Types of Institutions. Carnegie Commission on Higher Education, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascarella E. T., Terenzini P. T. and Blimling G. S. (1994). The impact of residential life on students. In: Schroeder C. C., Mable P., Associates (eds). Realizing the Educational Potential of Residence Halls. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, pp. 22–52

  • Perna L. W. (1998). The contribution of financial aid to undergraduate persistence. Journal of Student Financial Aid 28:25–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Reason, R. D. (2001). The Use of Merit-Index Measures to Predict Between-Year Retention of Undergraduate College Students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Iowa State University.

  • Rhodes F. (2001). The Creation of the Future: The Role of the American University. Cornell University, Ithaca, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan J. F. (2005). Institutional expenditures and student engagement: A role for financial resource in enhancing student learning and development?. Research in Higher Education 26:235–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan J. F. (2004). The relationship between institutional expenditures and degree attainment at baccalaureate college. Research in Higher Education 45:97–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smart J. C., Ethington C. A., Riggs R. O., Thompson M. D. (2002). Influences of institutional expenditures patterns on the development of students’ leadership competencies. Research in Higher Education 43:115–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens J. (1996). Applied Multivariate Statistics for the Social Sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ (3rd ed)

    Google Scholar 

  • John St. E. P., Cabrera A. F., Nora A., Asker E. (2002). Economic influences on persistence reconsidered: How can finance research inform the reconceptualization of persistence models?. In: Braxton J. M. (eds). Reworking the Student Departure Puzzle. Vanderbilt University Press, Nashville TN, pp. 29–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Tabachnick B. G., Fidell L. S. (1983). Using Multivariate Statistics. Harper & Row, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • The Institute for Higher Education Policy [IHEP]. (1998). Reaping the Benefits: Defining the Public and Private Value of Going to College. The New Millennium Project on Higher Education Costs, Pricing, and Productivity [On-line]. Retrieved August 15, 2003 from http://www.ihep.com

  • Thompson M. D., Riggs R. O. (2000). Institutional expenditure patterns and the facilitation of mission. Community College Review 27:1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tinto V. (1998). Colleges as communities: Taking research on student persistence seriously. The Review of Higher Education 21:167–177

    Google Scholar 

  • Tinto V. (1993). Leaving College: Rethinking the Causes and Cures of Student Attrition. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL (2nd ed.)

    Google Scholar 

  • US News and World Report. (2003). America’s Best Colleges, 2004. [Data file]. Available from US News and World Report web site, http://www.usnews.com/usnews/edu/college/rankings/rankindex.htm

  • Vandament W.E. (1989). Managing Money in Higher Education: A Guide to the Financial Process and Effective Participation Within it. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolanin, T. R (ed.). (2003). Reauthorizing the Higher Education Act: Issues and Options. [On-line]. The Institute for Higher Education Policy. Retrieved February 2, 2004 from http://www.ihep.org/Pubs/PDF/ReAuthHEA.pdf

  • Wright R. A. (1986). Professorial role strains in the small college. In: Wright R. A., Burden J. A. (eds). Teaching in the Small College: Issues and Applications. Greenwood, New York, pp. 27–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Young R. B. (1986) Notes on student affairs administration in the small college. In: Kuh G. D., McAleenan A. C. (eds) Private Dreams, Shared Visions: Student Affairs Work in Small Colleges (NASPA Monograph Series V. 6). National Association of Student Personnel Administrators Inc., Washington, D.C., pp. 71–81

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Office of Institutional Research, Grinnell College, Grinnell, IA, USA

    Ann M. Gansemer-Topf

  2. Iowa State University, Ames, IA, USA

    John H. Schuh

Authors
  1. Ann M. Gansemer-Topf
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. John H. Schuh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ann M. Gansemer-Topf.

APPENDIX A: DEFINITIONS OF INDEPENDENT AND DEPENDENT VARIABLES

APPENDIX A: DEFINITIONS OF INDEPENDENT AND DEPENDENT VARIABLES

Independent Variables

Academic Support Expenditures. Expenditures for the support services that are an integral part of the institution’s primary mission of instruction, research, or public service. Includes expenditures of libraries, museums, galleries, audio/visual services, academic computing support, ancillary support, academic administration, personnel development, and course and curriculum development (NCES, 2002b, p. 12).

Institutional Grants. Amount awarded to students from restricted and unrestricted institutional resources for the purpose of student aid, such as scholarships or fellowships funded by gifts or endowment return (NCES, 2002b, p. 7).

Institutional Selectivity Ratings: Degree of admissions competitiveness. Ratings factor in incoming students’ average median entrance examination scores (e.g. SAT/ACT), high school rank, high school grade point average and the percentage of applicants who were accepted (Barron’s, 2000).

Institutional Support. Expenditures for the day-to-day operational support of the institution, excluding expenditures for physical plant operations. Includes general administrative services, executive direction and planning, legal and fiscal operations, and public relations/development (NCES, 2002b, p. 12).

Instruction Expenditures. Expenditures of the colleges, schools, departments, and other instructional divisions of the institution and expenditures for departmental research and public service that are not separately budgeted. General academic instruction, vocational instruction, special session instruction, community education, preparatory and adult basic education, and remedial and tutorial instruction conducted by the teaching faculty for the institution’s students (NCES, 2002b, p. 11).

Student Services. Funds expended for admissions, registrar activities, and activities whose primary purpose is to contribute to students’ emotional and physical well-being and to their intellectual, cultural, and social development outside the context of the formal instructional program (NCES, 2002b, p. 12).

Dependent Variables

First-Year Retention Rate. First-year retention rates are commonly computed as a percentage. It is calculated by taking the total number of first-year students who returned their second year at a specific institution divided by the total number of the same group of students at the institution who started their first year. (US News, 2003).

6-year Graduation Rates. Percentage of freshmen who graduated within a six-year period. (Note: This excludes transfers into the school) (US News, 2003).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gansemer-Topf, A.M., Schuh, J.H. INSTITUTIONAL SELECTIVITY AND INSTITUTIONAL EXPENDITURES: Examining Organizational Factors that Contribute to Retention and Graduation. Res High Educ 47, 613–642 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-006-9009-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-006-9009-4

KEY WORDS:

  • higher education
  • finance
  • retention
  • graduation
  • small colleges