This study examines the variables that are the most strongly associated with institutional prestige and reputation and presents an exploratory model. This research expands earlier efforts by including more recent data on larger populations of public and private universities, as well as on liberal arts colleges. The analysis draws upon data from U.S. News & World Report (USNWR), the Institute for Scientific Information Web of Knowledge, IPEDS, AAUP, and four college guidebooks: Barron’s, Peterson’s, the Princeton Review, and the Fiske Guide. Finding general support for the model, the robust regression results explain about 90% of the variance in USNWR peer reputation score.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
A. Adams J. Krislov (1978) ArticleTitleEvaluating the quality of American universities: A new approach Research in Higher Education 8 IssueID2 97–109 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00992112
American Association of University Professors. (2002). Facts and Figures, Faculty Salaries, 2001–02. Retrieved on Feb. 2, 2004 from http://chronicle.com.ezproxy.libraries.psu.edu/stats/aaup/2002/.
A. W. Astin (1970) ArticleTitleHow colleges are rated Change 2 IssueID1 11–86
A. W. Astin C. B. T. Lee (1972) The Invisible Colleges McGraw-Hill New York
A. W. Astin L. C. Solomon (1981) ArticleTitleAre reputational ratings needed to measure quality? Change 13 IssueID2 14–19
Barron’s Profiles of American Colleges (25th ed.). (2003). Hauppauge, NY: Barron’s Educational Series.
P. M. Blau (1994) The Organization of Academic Work EditionNumber2 Transaction Publishers New Brunswick, NJ
D. Brown (1967) The Mobile Professors The American Council on Education Washington, D.C
J. M. Burke (Eds) (2004) 2004 Higher Education Directory Higher Education Publications, Inc Falls Church, VA
H. Groot Particlede W. McMahon J. F. Volkwein (1991) ArticleTitleThe cost structure of American research universities Review of Economics and Statistics 73 IssueID3 424–431
N. J. Dorans C. F. Lyu M. Pommerich W. M. Houston (1997) ArticleTitleConcordance between ACT assessment and recentered SAT I sum scores College and University 73 IssueID2 24–35
R. G. Ehrenberg (2000) Tuition Rising: Why College Costs so Much Harvard University Press Cambridge, MA
R. G. Ehrenberg (2003) ArticleTitleReaching for the brass ring: The U.S. News & World Report rankings competition The Review of Higher Education 26 IssueID2 145–62
R. Ehrenberg P. Hurst (1998) ArticleTitleThe 1995 NRC ratings of doctoral programs: A hedonic model Economics of Education Review 17 IssueID2 137–148 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0272-7757(97)00038-1
E. B. Fiske R. Logue (2003) The Fiske Guide to Colleges 2004 Sourcebooks, Inc Naperville, IL
R. L. Geiger (2004) Knowledge and Money: Research Universities and the Paradox of the Marketplace Stanford University Press Stanford, CA
H. D. Graham N. A. Diamond (1997) The Rise of American Research Universities: Elites and Challengers in the Postwar Era Johns Hopkins University Press Baltimore, MD
S. D. Grunig (1997) ArticleTitleResearch, reputation, and resources: The effect of research activity on perceptions of undergraduate education and institutional resource acquisition Journal of Higher Education 68 IssueID1 17–52
D. Hossler (2000) ArticleTitleThe problem with college rankings About Campus 5 IssueID1 20–24
D. Hossler E. M. Foley (1995) Reducing the noise in the college choice process: The use of college guidebooks and ratings R. D. Walleri M. K. Moss (Eds) Evaluating and Responding to College Guidebooks and Rankings, New Directions for Institutional Research NumberInSeriesVol. 88 Jossey-Bass San Francisco 21–30
L. H. Litten A. E. Hall (1989 July/August) ArticleTitleIn the eyes of our beholders: Some evidence on how high school students and their parents view quality in colleges Journal of Higher Education 60 IssueID3 302–324
A. Machung (1998 July/August) ArticleTitlePlaying the rankings game Change 30 IssueID4 12–16
M. D. McGuire (1995) Validity issues for reputational studies R. D. Walleri M. K. Moss (Eds) Evaluating and Responding to College Guidebooks and Rankings, New Directions for Institutional Research Jossey-Bass San Francisco, CA 45–60
J. Monks R. G. Ehrenberg (1999) ArticleTitleU. S. News & World Report’s college rankings: Why they do matter Change 31 IssueID6 42–51
E. T. Pascarella P. T. Terenzini (1991) How college affects students: Findings and insights from twenty years of research Jossey-Bass San Francisco, CA
E. T. Pascarella P. T. Terenzini (2005) How College Affects Students: A Third Decade of Research NumberInSeriesVol. 2 Jossey-Bass San Francisco, CA
Peterson’s. (2003) Four-year Colleges 2004 EditionNumber34 Thomson-Peterson’s Princeton, NJ
Porter, S. R., and Toutkoushian, R. K. (2002). Institutional research productivity and the connection to average student quality and overall reputation. Paper presented at the 2002 annual meetings of the Western Economic Association, Seattle, WA.
S. R. Porter P. D. Umbach (2001) ArticleTitleAnalyzing faculty workload using multilevel modeling Research in Higher Education 42 IssueID2 171–196 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1026573503271
C. C. Schmitz (1993) ArticleTitleAssessing the validity of higher education indicators Journal of Higher Education 64 IssueID5 503–521
S. Sklaroff (Eds) (2003) America’s Best Colleges 2004 Edition. U.S. News & World Report Washington, D.C
L. C. Solomon A. W. Astin (1981 April) ArticleTitleA new study of excellence in undergraduate education – Part one: Departments without distinguished graduate programs Change 13 IssueID1 22–28
L. C. Strauss J. F. Volkwein (2002 April) ArticleTitleComparing student performance and growth in two-year and four-year institutions Research in Higher Education 43 IssueID2 133–161 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1014495823183
L. C. Strauss J. F. Volkwein (2004 March/April) ArticleTitlePredictors of student commitment at two-year and four-year institutions Journal of Higher Education 75 IssueID2 203–227
Szelest, B. P. (2003). A systems dynamic assessment of organization strategic goal realization: Case study of a public research university, Dissertation, State University of New York at Albany.
P. T. Terenzini E. T. Pascarella (1994, Jan/Feb) ArticleTitleLiving with myths: Undergraduate education in America Change 26 IssueID1 28–32
InstitutionalAuthorNameThe Princeton Review (2003) Complete Book of Colleges 2004 Edition Princeton Review Publishing New York
R. T. Toutkoushian S. R. Porter C. Danielson P. Hollis (2003) ArticleTitleUsing publications counts to measure an institution’s research productivity Research in Higher Education 44 IssueID2 121–48 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1022070227966
United States Bureau of the Census. (2002). Cost of living index – selected metropolitan areas: Fourth quarter 2001, Statistical abstract of the United States, 2002.
J. F. Volkwein (1989) ArticleTitleChanges in quality among public universities Journal of Higher Education 60 IssueID2 136–151
J. F. Volkwein (2003) Using and enhancing existing data to respond to campus challenges Francis K. Stage Kathleen Manning (Eds) Chap 12 in Research in the College Context: Approaches and Methods Brunner-Routledge New York 183–207
J. F. Volkwein S. D. Grunig (2005) Reputation ratings in higher education: double, double, toil and trouble Burke Joseph (Eds) Achieving Accountability In Higher Education: Balancing Public, Academic, and Market Demands, Chapter 11 Jossey-Bass San Francisco, CA 246–274
J. F. Volkwein S. Malik (1997) ArticleTitleState regulation and administrative flexibility at public universities Research in Higher Education 38 IssueID1 17–42 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1024996511954
R. D. Walleri M. K. Moss (Eds) (1995) Evaluating and responding to college guidebooks and rankings. New Directions for Institutional Research, 88 Jossey-Bass San Francisco, CA
H. Y. Zheng A. A. Stewart (2002) ArticleTitleAssessing the performance of public research universities using NSF/NCES data and data envelopment analysis technique AIR Professional File 83 1–21
W. Zumeta (1996) ArticleTitleMeeting the demand for higher education without breaking the bank: A framework for the design of state higher education policies for an era of increasing demand Journal of Higher Education 67 IssueID4 367–425
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
*This manuscript is a revised version of a research paper delivered at the 45th Annual Forum of the Association for Institutional Research, San Diego, CA, May 30, 2005.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Volkwein, J.F., Sweitzer, K.V. Institutional Prestige and Reputation among Research Universities and Liberal Arts Colleges*. Res High Educ 47, 129–148 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-005-8883-5
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-005-8883-5