Advertisement

Research in Higher Education

, Volume 45, Issue 8, pp 891–920 | Cite as

Gender, Children and Research Productivity

  • Steven Stack
Article

Abstract

The “productivity puzzle,” or gender gap in research productivity, is often thought to be due, in part, to gendered child care responsibilities. The time, energy, and money devoted to child-rearing can reduce the research productivity of scholars, especially women. However, there is little systematic research on this issue. The present study contributes to the literature by exploring the productivity puzzle in light of the influence of eight age sets of children. Data are from the National Research Council's 1995 Survey of Doctoral Recipients. They refer to 11,231 PhDs, in the sciences and engineering, who are employed in academia. Controlling for children, structural factors and personal characteristics of the PhDs, the present study finds that women still publish significantly less than men. Second, productivity is higher for PhDs with children less than 11. Third, productivity is relatively low for women with young children. Fourth, for the social sciences, the area with the highest proportion of women PhDs, gender is unrelated to productivity, but women in the social sciences who have young children have relatively low productivity. The leading predictors of productivity included location in a research university and effort (hours worked). The full model explains 39% of the variance in productivity. Children are not a strong predictor of productivity, but the influence that they do have followed a gendered pattern.

children parenting publishing research research productivity 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Allison, P. D., and Scott Long, J. S. (1990). Departmental effects on scientific productivity. American Sociological Review. 55 (August): 469–478.Google Scholar
  2. Allison, P. D., and Stewart, J. A. (1974). Productivity differences among scientists: Evidence for accumulative advantage. American Sociological Review. 39 (August): 596–606.Google Scholar
  3. Astin, H. S. (1969). The Woman Doctorate in America, Russell Sage, New York.Google Scholar
  4. Becker, G. (1991). A Treatise on the Family, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  5. Bianchi, S., Milkie, M., Sayer, L., and Robinson, J. (2000). Is anyone doing the housework:Trends in the gender division of housework. Social Forces 79 (September): 191–228.Google Scholar
  6. Bittman, M., and Wajcman, J. (2000). The rush hour:The character of leisure time and gender equity. Social Forces 79 (September): 165–189.Google Scholar
  7. Blackburn, R., and Lawrence, J. (1995). Faculty at Work:Motivation, Expectation, Satisfaction. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.Google Scholar
  8. Brown, P. (1997). Methodological Report of the 1995 Survey of Doctorate Recipients. Office of Scientific and Engineering Personnel, National Research Council: Washington.Google Scholar
  9. Bryson, R., Bryson, J. B., and Johnson, M. (1978). Family size, satisfaction, and productivity in dual career couples. Psychology of Women Q. 3(1): 67–77.Google Scholar
  10. Budig, M. J., and England, P. (2001). The wage penalty for motherhood. American Sociological Review. 66 (April): 204–225.Google Scholar
  11. Cole, S. (1979). Fair Science: Women in the Scientific Community, Free Press, New York.Google Scholar
  12. Cole, S., and Singer, B. (1991). A theory of limited differences. In: Zuckerman, H., Cole, J, and Bruer, J.T. (eds.), The Outer Circle:Women in the Scientific Community, Norton, New York, pp. 277–310.Google Scholar
  13. Cole, S., and Zuckerman, H. (1984). The productivity puzzle:Persistence and change in patterns of publication of men and women scientists. Advances in Motivation and Achievement 2: 217–258.Google Scholar
  14. Cole, S., and Zuckerman, H. (1987). Marriage, motherhood, and research performance in science. Scientific American 256(2): 119–125.Google Scholar
  15. Cole, S., and Zuckerman, H. (1991). Marriage, motherhood, and research performance in science. In: Zuckerman, H., Cole, J., and Bruer, J. T. (eds.), The Outer Circle:-Women in the Scientific Community, Norton, New York, pp. 157–169Google Scholar
  16. Epstein, C. (1974). Reconciliation of womens' roles. In: Coser, R. (ed.), The Family: Its Structure and Function, St. Martins, New York, pp. 473–489.Google Scholar
  17. Ferber, M., and Huber, J. (1979). Husbands, wives, and careers. Journal of Marriage and the Family. 41 (May): 315–325.Google Scholar
  18. Fox, M. F. (1983). Publication productivity among scientists: A critical review. Social Studies of Science. 13(2): 285–305.Google Scholar
  19. Fox, M. F. (1991). Gender, environmental milieu and productivity in science. In: Harriet Zuckerman, H., Cole, J., and Bruer, J. T. (eds.), The Outer Circle: Women in the Scientific Community, Norton, New York, pp. 189–204.Google Scholar
  20. Fox, M. F. (1995). Women and scientific careers. In: Jasinoff, S. (ed.), Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp. 205–223.Google Scholar
  21. Fox, M. F. (1999). Gender, hierarchy, and science. In: Chafetz, J. (ed.), Handbook of the Sociology of Gender, Kluwer, New York, pp. 441–457.Google Scholar
  22. Fox, M.F., and Faver, C. (1985). Men, women, and publication productivity among social work academics. Sociological Q. 26(4): 537–549.Google Scholar
  23. Hamovitch, W., and Morganstern, R. (1977). Children and the productivity of academic women. Journal of Higher Education 48(6): 633–645.Google Scholar
  24. Hargens, L., McCann, J. C., and Reskin, B. F. (1978). Productivity and reproductivity: Fertility and professional achievement among research scientists. Social Forces 57 (September): 154–163.Google Scholar
  25. Helmreich, R. L., Spence, J. T., Beane, W. E., Lucker, G. W., and Matthews, K. (1980). Making it in academic psychology: Demographic and personality correlates of attainment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 39(5): 896–908.Google Scholar
  26. Hertz, R. (1986). More Equal than Others: Women and Men in Dual Career Marriages, University of California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar
  27. Hochschild, A. R. (1997). The Time Bind: When Work Becomes Home and Home Becomes Work, Henry Holt, New York.Google Scholar
  28. Keith, B., Layne, J. S., Babchuk, N., and Johnson, K. (2002). The context of scientific achievement:sex, status, organizational environments, and the timing of publication on scholarship outcomes. Social Forces 80 (June): 1253–1282.Google Scholar
  29. Kyvik, S. (1990). Motherhood and scientific productivity. Social Studies of Science 20 (1): 149–160.Google Scholar
  30. Levin, S., and Stephan, P. (1998). Gender differences in the rewards to publishing in academe: science in the 1970's. Sex Roles 38(11/12): 1049–1064.Google Scholar
  31. Long, J. S. (1990). The origins of sex differences in science. Social Forces 68 (June): 1297–1315.Google Scholar
  32. Long, J. S. (1992). Measures of sex differences in scientific productivity. Social Forces 71 (September): 159–178.Google Scholar
  33. Long, J. S., Allison, P., and McGinnis, R. (1993). Rank advancement in academic careers:Sex differences and productivity. American Sociological Review 58 (October): 703–722.Google Scholar
  34. Long, S., and Fox, M. F. (1995). Scientific careers: Universalism and particularism. Annual Review of Sociology 21: 45–71.Google Scholar
  35. Lotka, A. J. (1926). The frequency distribution of scientific productivity. Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences 16: 317.Google Scholar
  36. National Science Board (2000). Science and Engineering Indicators (Vol. 2), National Science Foundation, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  37. Neter, J., Kutner, M. H., Nachsheim, C., and Wasserman, W. (1996). Applied Linear Statistical Models, McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  38. Reskin, B. (1978). Scientific productivity, sex, and location in the institution of science. American Journal of Sociology 83(5): 1235–1243.Google Scholar
  39. Spenner, K., and Rosenfeld, R. (1990). Women, work, and identities. Social Science Research 19(3): 266–299.Google Scholar
  40. Stack, S. (1994a). The effects of gender on publishing: The case of sociology. Sociological Focus 27(1): 81–83.Google Scholar
  41. Stack, S. (1994b). The class of 1976: Publication and type of location. Sociological Spectrum 14(2): 293–298.Google Scholar
  42. Stack, S. (1994c). An analysis of the impacts of books and journal articles. International Review of Modern Sociology 24 (Autumn): 119–125.Google Scholar
  43. Stack, S. (2001). The effect of field of terminal degree on scholarly productivity:An analysis of criminal justice faculty. Journal of Criminal Justice Education 12 (Spring): 19–34.Google Scholar
  44. Stack, S. (2002a). Gender and scholarly productivity: 1970–2000. Sociological Focus 35 (August): 285–296.Google Scholar
  45. Stack, S. (2002b). Gender and scholarly productivity: The case of criminal justice. Journal of Criminal Justice 30(2): 175–182.Google Scholar
  46. Suitor, J. J., Mecom, D., and Feld, L. (2001). Gender, household labor, and scholarly productivity among university professors. Gender Issues 19(4): 50–67.Google Scholar
  47. Sweet, L., and Bumpass, L. (1993). A National Survey of Families and Households. Center for Demography and Ecology, University of Wisconsin, Madison.Google Scholar
  48. Ward, K. B., Gast, J., and Grant, L. (1992). Visibility and dissemination of women's and men's sociological scholarship. Social Problems 39 (August): 291–298.Google Scholar
  49. Ward, K., and Grant, L. (1995). Gender and academic publishing. In: Smart, J. (ed.), Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research (Vol. XI), Agathon Press, New York, pp. 172–212.Google Scholar
  50. Xie, Y., and Shauman, K. (1998). Sex differences in research productivity. American Sociological Review 63 (December): 847–870.Google Scholar
  51. Xie, Y., and Shauman, K. (2003). Women in Science. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  52. Zhang, C.-X., and Farley, J. (1995). Gender and the distribution of household work. Journal of Comparative Family Studies 26(2): 195–205.Google Scholar
  53. Zuckerman, H. (1988). The sociology of science. In: Smelser, N. (ed.), Handbook of Sociology, Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA, pp. 511–574.Google Scholar
  54. Zuckerman, H. (1991). The careers of men and women scientists: A review of current research. In: Zuckerman, H., Cole, J., and Bruer, J. T. (eds.), The Outer Circle:-Women in the Scientific Community, Norton, New York, pp. 27–56.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Steven Stack
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Criminal JusticeWayne State UniversityDetroitUSA

Personalised recommendations