Skip to main content

Faculty do Matter: The Role of College Faculty in Student Learning and Engagement

Abstract

This study uses two national data sets to explore the relationship between faculty practices and student engagement. Our findings suggest that students report higher levels of engagement and learning at institutions where faculty members use active and collaborative learning techniques, engage students in experiences, emphasize higher-order cognitive activities in the classroom, interact with students, challenge students academically, and value enriching educational experiences.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. 1.

    A. Astin (1993) What Matters in College:Four Critical Years Revisited Jossey Bass San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    A. Astin (1996) ArticleTitleInvolvement in learning revisited:Lessons we have learned. Journal of College Student Development 37 123–134

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    R. B. Barr J. Tagg (1995) ArticleTitleFrom teaching to learning: A new paradigm for undergraduate education. Change 27 IssueID6 12–25

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    R. Blackburn J. Lawrence (1995) Faculty at Work:Motivation, Expectation, Satisfaction The Johns Hopkins University Press Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    E. B. Boyer (1990) Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities of the Professoriate The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching Princeton, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Braxton, J. M., Sullivan, A. V., and Johnson, R. M. Jr. (1997). Appraising Tinto’s theory of college student departure. In J. Smart (ed.), Higher Education Research, Agathon Press, pp. 107–164

  7. 7.

    A.W. Chickering (1969) Education and Identity Jossey Bass San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    A.W. Chickering L. Reisser (1993) Education and Identity (2nd ed.) Jossey Bass San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    A. W. Chickering Z. F. Gamson (1987) ArticleTitleSeven principles for good practice in undergraduate education AAHE Bulletin 39 IssueID7 3–7

    Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Education Commission of the States (1995). Making Quality Count in Undergraduate Education, Education Commission of the States, DenverCO.

  11. 11.

    C. A. Ethington (1997) A hierarchical linear modeling approach to studying college effects J. Smart (Eds) Higher Education Handbook of Theory and ResearchVol. 12 Agathon Edison, NJ 165–194

    Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    P. Ewell (1997) ArticleTitleOrganizing for learning: A new imperative AAHE Bulletin 50 3–6

    Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    P. Ewell D. Jones (1996) Indicators of “good practice” in undergraduate education:A handbook for development and implementation National Center for Higher Education Management Systems Boudler, CO

    Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    J. Fairweather (1996) Faculty Work and Public Trust: Restoring the Value of Teaching and Public Service in American Academic Life Allyn and Bacon Boston

    Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    J. Fairweather (2002) ArticleTitleThe mythologies of faculty productivity: Implications for institutional policy and decision making The Journal of Higher Education 73 26–48

    Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    J. Hattie H. W. Marsh (1996) ArticleTitleThe Relationship between research and teaching: A meta-analysis Review of Educational Research 66 507–542

    Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    S. Hurtado Carter (1997) ArticleTitleEffects of college transition and perceptions of the campus racial climate on Latino college students sense of belonging Sociology of Education 70 324–345

    Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    A. Kezar (1999) Higher Education Trends:Faculty ERIC Clearinghouse on Higher Education Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    G. King (1999) A Solution to the Ecological Inference Problem: Reconstructing Individual Behavior from Aggregate Data Princeton University Press Princeton, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    I. Kreft J. De Leeuw (1998) Introducing Multilevel Modeling Sage Publications Thousand Oaks, CA

    Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    G. D. Kuh (2001) ArticleTitleAssessing what really matters to student learning: Inside the National Survey of Student Engagement Change 33 IssueID3 10–17

    Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    G. D. Kuh (2003) ArticleTitleWhat were learning about student engagement from NSSE Change 35 IssueID2 24–32

    Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    G. D. Kuh E. J. Whitt (1988) The Invisible Tapestry: Culture in American colleges and Universities The George Washington University, Graduate School of Education and Human Development Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    D. Leslie (2002) ArticleTitleResolving the dispute: Teaching is academe’s core value Journal of Higher Education 73 IssueID1 49–73

    Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    H.W. Marsh J. Hattie (2002) ArticleTitleThe relation between research productivity and teaching effectiveness: Complementary, antagonistic, or independent constructs? The Journal of Higher Education 73 604–641

    Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    The National Center for Public Policy Higher Education (2000). Measuring Up 2000: The State-by-State Report Card for Higher Education, AuthorWashington, D.C.

  27. 27.

    The National Center for Public Policy and Higher Education (2002). Measuring Up 2002: The State-by-State Report Card for Higher Education, AuthorWashington, DC.

  28. 28.

    R. Menges (2000) Shortcomings of research on evaluating and improving teaching in higher education K.E. Ryna (Eds) Evaluating Teaching in Higher Education: A␣Vision for the Future. (New Directions for Teaching and Learning No. 83) Jossey-Bass San Francisco 5–11

    Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    E. T. Pascarella (2001) ArticleTitleIdentifying excellence in undergraduate education:Are we even close? Change 33 IssueID3 19–23

    Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    E. T. Pascarella G. C. Wolniak T. M. Cruce C. F. Blaich (2004) ArticleTitleDo liberal arts colleges really foster good practices in undergraduate education? Journal of College Student Development 45 IssueID1 57–74

    Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    E. T. Pascarella P. Terenzini (1991) How College Affects Students: Findings and Insights from Twenty Years of Research Jossey-Bass San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    G. R. Pike (1999) ArticleTitleThe constant error of the halo in educational outcomes research Research in Higher Education 40 IssueID1 61–86

    Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    S. W. Raudenbush A. S. Bryk (2002) Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods Sage Publications Thousand Oaks, CA

    Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    F. H. T. Rhoads (2001) The Creation of the Future:The Role of the American University Cornell University Press Ithaca, NY

    Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    R. Rosenthal R. L. Rosnow (1991) Essentials of Behavioral Research: Methods and Data Analysis McGraw-Hill New York

    Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    L. S. Shulman P. Hutchings (1998) About the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching Menlo Park, CA

    Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    F. K. Stage D. Hossler (2000) Where is the Student? Linking Student Behaviors, College Choiceand College Persistence J. M. Braxton (Eds) Reworking the student departure puzzle Vanderbilt University Press Nashville 170–195

    Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    F. K. Stage P. Muller J. Kinzie A. Simmons (1998) Creating Learning Centered Classrooms: What Does Learning Theory Have to Say ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Reports Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    V. Tinto (1993) Rethinking the Causes and Cures of Student Attrition. 2nd ed. University of Chicago Press Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    V. Tinto (2000) Linking learning and leaving: Exploring the role of the college classroom in student departure J. M. Braxton (Eds) Reworking the student departure puzzle Vanderbilt University Press Nashville 81–94

    Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    UmbachP. D., and KuhG. D. Student experiences with diversity at liberal arts colleges: Another claim for distinctiveness. The Journal Higher Education. (in press)

  42. 42.

    J. Van Maanen (1979) ArticleTitleThe fact of fiction in organizational ethnography Administrative Science Quarterly 24 539–550

    Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Wingspread Group on Higher Education. (1993). An American Imperative: Higher Expectations for Higher Education, Johnson Foundation, Racine, WI.

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul D. Umbach.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Umbach, P.D., Wawrzynski, M.R. Faculty do Matter: The Role of College Faculty in Student Learning and Engagement. Res High Educ 46, 153–184 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-004-1598-1

Download citation

Keywords

  • college faculty
  • student engagement
  • effective educational practices
  • culture