Advertisement

Effects of climate change and fishing on the Pearl River Estuary ecosystem and fisheries

  • Zeyu Zeng
  • William W. L. CheungEmail author
  • Shiyu LiEmail author
  • Jiatang Hu
  • Ying Wang
Original Research

Abstract

Climate change poses a challenge to the management of marine ecosystems and fisheries. Estuarine ecosystems in particular are exposed to a broad range of environmental changes caused by the effects of climate change both on land and in the ocean, and such ecosystems have also had a long history of human disturbance from over-exploitation and habitat changes. In this study, we examine the effects of climate change and fishing on the Pearl River Estuary (PRE) ecosystem using Ecopath with Ecosim. Our results show that changes in net primary production and ocean warming are the dominant climatic factors impacting biomass and fisheries productivity in the PRE. Additionally, physiological changes of fishes and invertebrates that are induced by climate change were projected to be modified by trophic interactions. Overall, our study suggests that the combined effects of climate change and fishing will reduce the potential fisheries catches in the PRE. Reducing fishing efforts can reduce the impacts of climate change on selected functional groups; however, some prey fishes are expected to experience higher predation mortality and consequently decreases in biomass under low fishing intensity scenarios. Thus, our study highlights the non-linearity of the responses of estuarine ecosystems when climate change interacts with other human stressors.

Graphic abstract

In this study, the whole-ecosystem model (Ecopath with Ecosim) is used to examine the effects of climate change and fishing on a highly developed estuarine ecosystem (Pearl River Estuary, PRE) in the subtropical western Pacific. The oceans variables are extracted from the global earth system model (GFDL ESM2M), including changes in sea surface temperature (SST), hydrogen ion concentration (pH), dissolved oxygen (DO) concentration and net primary production (NPP) under the two scenarios RCP2.6 and RCP8.5. We developed a EwE model of the PRE ecosystem and simulated the effects of changing ocean conditions under alternative climate change scenarios as well as three fishing scenarios on the biodiversity and fisheries productivity of the PRE.

Keywords

Climate change Ocean warming Ocean acidification Net primary production Fishing effort Ecosim Pearl river estuary ecosystem 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 41306105) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Grant No. 17lgzd20) and supported by International Program for Ph.D. Candidates, Sun Yat-Sen University. We are grateful to Colette Wabnitz, Oai Li Chen, Vicky Lam, Yajie Liu, Lijie Duan and Shaotian Li, who provided very useful suggestions and comments. W. Cheung acknowledges funding support from the Nippon Founation-UBC Nereus Program and the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada.

Supplementary material

11160_2019_9574_MOESM1_ESM.docx (3.7 mb)
Supplementary file1 (DOCX 3812 kb)

References

  1. Ahrens RNM, Walters CJ, Christensen V (2012) Foraging arena theory. Fish Fish 13:41–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ainsworth CH, Pitcher TJ (2006) Modifying Kempton's species diversity index for use with ecosystem simulation models. Ecol Ind 6:623–630CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ainsworth CH, Samhouri JF, Busch DS, Cheung WWL, Dunne J, Okey TA (2011) Potential impacts of climate change on Northeast Pacific marine foodwebs and fisheries. ICES J Mar Sci 68:1217–1229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Alava JJ, Cisneros-Montemayor AM, Sumaila UR, Cheung WWL (2018) Projected amplification of food web bioaccumulation of MeHg and PCBs under climate change in the Northeastern Pacific. Sci Rep 8:13460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Asch RG, Pilcher DJ, Rivero-Calle S, Holding JM (2016) Demystifying models: answers to ten common questions that ecologists have about Earth system models. Limnol Oceanogr Bull 3:65–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brander KM (2007) Global fish production and climate change. Proc Natl Acad Sci 104:19709–19714CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Breitburg D, Levin LA, Oschlies A, Gregoire M, Chavez FP, Conley DJ, Garcon V et al (2018) Declining oxygen in the global ocean and coastal waters. Science 359:eaam7240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brown CJ, Fulton EA, Hobday AJ, Matear RJ, Possingham HP, Bulman C, Christensen V et al (2010) Effects of climate-driven primary production change on marine food webs: implications for fisheries and conservation. Glob Chang Biol 16:1194–1212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Buchary E, Pitcher T, Cheung W, Hutton T (2002) New ecopath models of the Hong Kong marine ecosystem. Spatial Simulations of Hong Kong’s Marine Ecosystem. Fish Centre Res Rep (This and all other Fisheries Centre research Reports cited therein can be freely downloaded from: https://www.fisheries.ubc.ca/publications/reports/fcrr.php) 10: 6–16
  10. Cheung WW (2007) Vulnerability of marine fishes to fishing: from global overview to the Northern South China Sea. University of British Columbia, VancouverGoogle Scholar
  11. Cheung WWL, Dunne J, Sarmiento JL, Pauly D (2011) Integrating ecophysiology and plankton dynamics into projected maximum fisheries catch potential under climate change in the Northeast Atlantic. ICES J Mar Sci 68:1008–1018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cheung WW, Watson R, Pauly D (2013) Signature of ocean warming in global fisheries catch. Nature 497:365–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cheung WWL, Brodeur RD, Okey TA, Pauly D (2015) Projecting future changes in distributions of pelagic fish species of Northeast Pacific shelf seas. Prog Oceanogr 130:19–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cheung WWL, Reygondeau G, Froicher TL (2016) Large benefits to marine fisheries of meeting the 1.5 degrees C global warming target. Science 354:1591–1594CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cheung WWL, Jones MC, Reygondeau G, Frolicher TL (2018) Opportunities for climate-risk reduction through effective fisheries management. Glob Chang Biol 24:5149–5163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Christensen V, Walters CJ (2004) Ecopath with Ecosim: methods, capabilities and limitations. Ecol Model 172:109–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Christensen V, Walters CJ, Pauly D (2005) Ecopath with Ecosim: a user’s guide. Fisheries Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, p 154Google Scholar
  18. Cornwall CE, Eddy TD (2015) Effects of near-future ocean acidification, fishing, and marine protection on a temperate coastal ecosystem. Conserv Biol 29:207–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Darling ES, Cote IM (2008) Quantifying the evidence for ecological synergies. Ecol Lett 11:1278–1286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Doney SC, Ruckelshaus M, Duffy JE, Barry JP, Chan F, English CA, Galindo HM et al (2012) Climate change impacts on marine ecosystems. Ann Rev Mar Sci 4:11–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Duan L (2009) Ecological modeling study on the fishery and coastal ecosystem in the Pearl River Estuary based on EwE. Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangzhou, p 106Google Scholar
  22. Duan L, Li S, Liu Y, Jiang T, Failler P (2009a) A trophic model of the Pearl River Delta coastal ecosystem. Ocean Coast Manag 52:359–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Duan LJ, Li SY, Liu Y, Moreau J, Christensen V (2009b) Modeling changes in the coastal ecosystem of the Pearl River Estuary from 1981 to 1998. Ecol Model 220:2802–2818CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Edwards M, Richardson AJ (2004) Impact of climate change on marine pelagic phenology and trophic mismatch. Nature 430:881–884CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Engelhard GH, Righton DA, Pinnegar JK (2014) Climate change and fishing: a century of shifting distribution in North Sea cod. Glob Chang Biol 20:2473–2483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gascuel D, Guénette S, Pauly D (2012) The trophic-level-based ecosystem modelling approach: theoretical overview and practical uses. ICES J Mar Sci 68:1403–1416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gattuso JP, Magnan A, Bille R, Cheung WW, Howes EL, Joos F, Allemand D et al (2015) OCEANOGRAPHY. Contrasting futures for ocean and society from different anthropogenic CO(2) emissions scenarios. Science 349:aac4722CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hunt GL, McKinnell S (2006) Interplay between top-down, bottom-up, and wasp-waist control in marine ecosystems. Prog Oceanogr 68:115–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Jackson JB, Kirby MX, Berger WH, Bjorndal KA, Botsford LW, Bourque BJ, Bradbury RH et al (2001) Historical overfishing and the recent collapse of coastal ecosystems. Science 293:629–637CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Jia X, Li C, Qiu Y (2005) Survey and evaluation of Guangdong marine fishery resources and the measures for sustainable utilization. Chinese Ocean Press, Beijing (in Chinese) Google Scholar
  31. Ke D, Guan Z, Yu H, Wu S, Han L, Jiang Y (2007) Environmental pollution and study trend in Pearl River Estuary. Mar Environ Sci 26(5):488–491 (in Chinese) Google Scholar
  32. Kirby RR, Beaugrand G, Lindley JA (2009) Synergistic effects of climate and fishing in a marine ecosystem. Ecosystems 12:548–561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Koenigstein S, Mark FC, Gößling-Reisemann S, Reuter H, Poertner H-O (2016) Modelling climate change impacts on marine fish populations: process-based integration of ocean warming, acidification and other environmental drivers. Fish Fish 17:972–1004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kroeker KJ, Kordas RL, Crim RN, Singh GG (2010) Meta-analysis reveals negative yet variable effects of ocean acidification on marine organisms. Ecol Lett 13:1419–1434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kroeker KJ, Kordas RL, Crim R, Hendriks IE, Ramajo L, Singh GS, Duarte CM et al (2013) Impacts of ocean acidification on marine organisms: quantifying sensitivities and interaction with warming. Glob Chang Biol 19:1884–1896CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. McOwen CJ, Cheung WWL, Rykaczewski RR, Watson RA, Wood LJ (2015) Is fisheries production within Large Marine Ecosystems determined by bottom-up or top-down forcing? Fish Fish 16:623–632CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Melzner F, Gobel S, Langenbuch M, Gutowska MA, Portner HO, Lucassen M (2009) Swimming performance in Atlantic Cod (Gadus morhua) following long-term (4–12 months) acclimation to elevated seawater P(CO2). Aquat Toxicol 92:30–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Moss R, Babiker W, Brinkman S, Calvo E, Carter T, Edmonds J, Elgizouli I et al (2008) Towards new scenarios for the analysis of emissions: climate change, impacts and response strategies. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Secretariat (IPCC), Noordwijkerhout. http://vuir.vu.edu.au/id/eprint/4819 Google Scholar
  39. Perry AL, Low PJ, Ellis JR, Reynolds JD (2005) Climate change and distribution shifts in marine fishes. Science 308:1912–1915CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Perry RI, Cury P, Brander K, Jennings S, Möllmann C, Planque B (2010) Sensitivity of marine systems to climate and fishing: concepts, issues and management responses. J Mar Syst 79:427–435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Pitcher TJ, Buchary E, Trujillo P (2002) Spatial simulations of Hong Kong's marine ecosystem: ecological and economic forecasting of marine protected areas with human-made reefs. Fisheries Centre, University of British Columbia, VancouverGoogle Scholar
  42. Pörtner HO, Farrell AP (2008) Physiology and climate change. Science 322:690–692CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Pörtner HO, Knust R (2007) Climate change affects marine fishes through the oxygen limitation of thermal tolerance. Science 315:95–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Pörtner H-O, Karl DM, Boyd PW, Cheung W, Lluch-Cota SE, Nojiri Y, Schmidt DN et al (2014) Ocean systems. In: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Secretariat (IPCC) (ed) Climate change 2014: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Part A: global and sectoral aspects. Contribution of working group II to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 411–484.  https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415379.011
  45. Qiu YS, Zeng XG, Chen T (2008) Fishery resources and management in the South China Sea. Chinese Ocean Press, Beijing (in Chinese) Google Scholar
  46. Roberts CM, O'Leary BC, McCauley DJ, Cury PM, Duarte CM, Lubchenco J, Pauly D et al (2017) Marine reserves can mitigate and promote adaptation to climate change. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 114:6167–6175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Savo V, Morton C, Lepofsky D (2017) Impacts of climate change for coastal fishers and implications for fisheries. Fish Fish 18:877–899CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Schmidtko S, Stramma L, Visbeck M (2017) Decline in global oceanic oxygen content during the past five decades. Nature 542:335–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Stock CA, Alexander MA, Bond NA, Brander KM, Cheung WWL, Curchitser EN, Delworth TL et al (2011) On the use of IPCC-class models to assess the impact of climate on Living Marine Resources. Prog Oceanogr 88:1–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Townhill BL, Pinnegar JK, Righton DA, Metcalfe JD (2017) Fisheries, low oxygen and climate change: how much do we really know? J Fish Biol 90:723–750CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Vaquer-Sunyer R, Duarte CM (2008) Thresholds of hypoxia for marine biodiversity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:15452–15457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Walters C, Pauly D, Christensen V, Kitchell JF (2000) Representing density dependent consequences of life history strategies in aquatic ecosystems: EcoSim II. Ecosystems 3:70–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Wang Y, Duan L, Li S, Zeng Z, Failler P (2015) Modeling the effect of the seasonal fishing moratorium on the Pearl River Estuary using ecosystem simulation. Ecol Model 312:406–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Wang Y, Hu J, Pan H, Li S, Failler P (2016) An integrated model for marine fishery management in the Pearl River Estuary: linking socio-economic systems and ecosystems. Marine Policy 64:135–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Wu RSS (2002) Hypoxia: from molecular responses to ecosystem responses. Mar Pollut Bull 45:35–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Zhang H, Li S (2010) Effects of physical and biochemical processes on the dissolved oxygen budget for the Pearl River Estuary during summer. J Mar Syst 79:65–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Environmental Pollution Control and Remediation Technology, School of Environmental Science and EngineeringSun Yat-Sen UniversityGuangzhouChina
  2. 2.Changing Ocean Research Unit, Institute for the Oceans and FisheriesThe University of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada
  3. 3.Zhejiang Provincial Key Research Institute of Philosophy and Social Sciences for Ecological Civilization, School of Economics and ManagementZhejiang Sci-Tech UniversityHangzhouChina

Personalised recommendations