Advertisement

Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries

, Volume 28, Issue 2, pp 417–433 | Cite as

Effects of pelagic longline hook size on species- and size-selectivity and survival

  • Eric Gilman
  • Milani Chaloupka
  • Michael Musyl
Research Paper

Abstract

Pelagic fisheries can have profound effects on ecosystem structure and functioning, affecting ecosystem services, including fisheries production, and threaten vulnerable bycatch species. Controlling hook size could manage the species- and size-selectivity and survival of target and incidental catch. To test this hypothesis, we conducted experimental pelagic longline fishing in the western tropical Pacific testing a control hook and two hooks with wider minimum widths. Data such as catch, length and condition were fit to response-specific Bayesian geo-additive generalized additive and linear mixed regression models. Model fits were assessed using posterior predictive check tests. Catch rates of both retained and discarded species were significantly higher on medium hooks. Target tuna species were significantly larger and had significantly higher at-vessel survival rates on wider hooks. Significantly larger billfishes, also market species, were caught on narrowest hooks. These effects of hook width on length and survival, however, are a much smaller determinant of economic value of the catch than effects on catch rates. If input controls are limiting, then, relative to medium hooks, continued use of narrowest hooks would maintain current economic viability without causing a significant increase in discard catch levels, including of vulnerable sharks. If market species output controls are limiting, because the ratio of retained to discarded catch on medium hooks was greater than on narrowest hooks, medium hooks would generate lower discard levels. Further research assessing single-factor effects of longline hook width is needed to support robust meta-analyses that account for fishery-specific effects.

Keywords

Bycatch Hook width Longline Selectivity Tuna 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was a project of The Nature Conservancy Indo-Pacific Tuna Program. We are grateful for at-sea data collection conducted by Sone Misross and Ivan Sesebo, MRAG Asia Pacific. We are thankful for the participation of Captains Zhang Ding Xin, Lin Quan Gui and Lu Jing De; and crew of F/V SLC901 and F/V HNY769. Logistical support was kindly provided by Terry Huang, Palau International Traders Inc.; Derrick Wang, Luen Thai Fishing Venture, Shane McGrath, MRAG Asia Pacific; and Mark Zimring Lotus Vermeer, Yvonne Ueda and Bibbie Kumangai, The Nature Conservancy. We are grateful for assistance provided by Matt Merrifield, The Nature Conservancy, with visualizing the spatial locations of research fishing sets. Steve Beverly, fisheries consultant, contributed to development of the data forms and the study design. Dan Curran, NOAA Fisheries, kindly assisted with hook minimum width and wire diameter measurements. We thank anonymous referees for comments that substantially improved the manuscript. We are extremely grateful to NOAA Fisheries for donating a portion of the hooks used in the experiment.

Supplementary material

11160_2017_9509_MOESM1_ESM.docx (485 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 484 kb)

References

  1. Afonso A, Santiago R, Hazin H, Hazin F (2012) Shark bycatch and mortality and hook bite-offs in pelagic longlines: interactions between hook types and leader materials. Fish Res 131–133:9–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aitkin M, Francis B, Hinde J, Darnell R (2010) Statistical modelling in R. Oxford Statistical Science Series 35. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  3. Bachiller E, Irigoien X (2013) Allometric relations and consequences for feeding in small pelagic fish in the Bay of Biscay. ICES J Mar Sci 70:232–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bolten A, Bjorndal K (2006) Experiment to evaluate gear modification on rates of sea turtle bycatch in the swordfish longline fishery in the azores—phase 5. Final Project Report. Archie Carr Center for Sea Turtle Research, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USAGoogle Scholar
  5. Broadhurst M, Suuronen P, Hulme A (2006) Estimating collateral mortality from towed fishing gear. Fish Fish 7:180–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bürkner P (In Press) brms: An R package for Bayesian multilevel models using Stan. J Stat Softw. doi: 10.18637/jss.v080.i01
  7. Burnham K, Anderson D, Huyvaert K (2011) AIC model selection and multimodel inference in behavioral ecology: some background, observations, and comparisons. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 65:23–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Campana S, Joyce W, Manning M (2009) Bycatch and discard mortality in commercially caught blue sharks Prionace glauca assessed using archival satellite pop-up tags. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 387:241–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carpenter B, Gelman A, Hoffman M et al (2017) Stan: a probabilistic programming language. J Stat Softw 76:1–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chambert T, Rotella J, Higgs M (2014) Use of posterior predictive checks as an inferential tool for investigating individual heterogeneity in animal population vital rates. Ecol Evol 4:1389–1397CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Clarke S, Sato M, Small C, Sullivan B, Inoue Y, Ochi D (2014) Bycatch in longline fisheries for tuna and tuna-like species: a global review of status and mitigation measures. FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Technical Paper 588. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, RomeGoogle Scholar
  12. Collinson K, Gascoigne J (2015) MSC pre-assessment of the federated states of micronesia yellowfin and bigeye tuna longline fishery. ME Certification, LymingtonGoogle Scholar
  13. Cooke S, Suski C (2004) Are circular hooks an effective tool for conserving marine and freshwater recreational catch-and-release fisheries? Aquat Conserv 14:299–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cooke S, Barthel B, Suski C, Siepker M, Philipp D (2005) Influence of circle hook size on hooking efficiency, injury, and size selectivity of bluegill with comments on circle hook conservation benefits in recreational fisheries. North Am J Fish Manag 25:211–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cortez-Zaragoza E, Dalzell P, Pauly D (1989) Hook selectivity of yellowfin tuna (Thunnus albacares) caught off Darigayos Cove, La Union, Philippines. J Appl Ichthyol 5:12–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cox S, Essington T, Kitchell J, Martell S, Walters C, Boggs C, Kaplan I (2002) Reconstructing ecosystem dynamics in the central Pacific Ocean, 1952–1998. II. A preliminary assessment of the trophic impacts of fishing and effects on tuna dynamics. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 59:1736–1747CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cramer J, Nakamura R, Dizon A, Ikehara W (1981) Burnt tuna: conditions leading to rapid deterioration in the quality of raw tuna. Mar Fish Rev 43:12–15Google Scholar
  18. Curran D, Beverly S (2012) Effects of 16/0 circle hooks on pelagic fish catches in three South Pacific albacore longline fisheries. Bull Mar Sci 88:485–497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Domingo A, Pons M, Jiménez S, Miller P, Barceló C, Swimmer Y (2012) Circle hook performance in the Uruguayan pelagic longline fishery. Bull Mar Sci 88:499–511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Epperly S, Watson J, Foster D, Shah A (2012) Anatomical hooking location and condition of animals captured with pelagic longlines: the grand banks experiments 2002–2003. Bull Mar Sci 88:513–527CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Erzini K, Goncalves J, Bentes L, Lino P, Ribeiro J (1998) Species and size selectivity in a ‘red’ sea bream longline ‘metier’ in the Algarve (southern Portugal). Aquat Living Resour 11:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. FAO (2010) Guidelines to reduce sea turtle mortality in fishing operations. FAO Technical Guidelines for Responsible Fisheries. By Gilman E, Bianchi G. ISBN: 978-92-106226-5. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, RomeGoogle Scholar
  23. Gabry J (2016) bayesplot: Plotting for Bayesian models. R package version 1.1.0. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=bayesplot
  24. Gelman A, Hill J (2007) Data analysis using regression and multilevel/hierarchical models. Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  25. Gelman A, Jakulin A, Pittau M, Su Y (2008) A weakly informative default prior distribution for logistic and other regression models. Ann Appl Stat 2:1360–1383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gelman A, Hwang J, Vehtari A (2014) Understanding predictive information criteria for Bayesian models. Stat Comput 24:997–1016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gilman E (2011) Bycatch governance and best practice mitigation technology in global tuna fisheries. Mar Policy 35:590–609CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gilman E, Hall M (2015) Potentially significant variables explaining bycatch and survival rates and alternative data collection protocols to harmonize tuna RFMOs’ pelagic longline observer programmes. Appendix 1 to WCPFC-SC11-2015/EB-IP-05. https://www.wcpfc.int/system/files/EB-IP-05%20LL%20Obs%20bycatch%20data%20fields%20Rev%201%2028%20July.pdf. Accessed 1 Oct 2015. Western and Central Pacific Fisheries Commission, Kolonia, Pohnpei, Federated States of Micronesia
  29. Gilman E, Huang H (2017) Review of effects of pelagic longline hook and bait type on sea turtle catch rate, anatomical hooking position and at-vessel mortality rate. Rev Fish Biol Fish 27:43–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gilman E, Passfield K, Nakamura K (2013) Performance of regional fisheries management organizations: ecosystem-based governance of bycatch and discards. Fish Fish 15:327–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gilman E, Owens M, Kraft T (2014) Ecological risk assessment of the Marshall Islands longline tuna fishery. Mar Policy 44:239–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gilman E, Chaloupka M, Merrifield M, Malsol N, Cook C (2015) Standardized catch and survival rates, and effect of a ban on shark retention, Palau pelagic longline fishery. Aquat Conserv 26:1031–1062CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Gilman E, Chaloupka M, Peschon J, Ellgen S (2016a) Risk factors for seabird bycatch in a pelagic longline tuna fishery. PLoS ONE 11:e0155477.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0155477 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. Gilman E, Chaloupka M, Swimmer Y, Piovano S (2016b) A cross-taxa assessment of pelagic longline bycatch mitigation measures: conflicts and mutual benefits to elasmobranchs. Fish Fish 17:748–784CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Gilman E, Weijerman M, Suuronen P (2017) Ecological data from observer programs underpin ecosystem-based fisheries management. ICES J Mar Sci.  https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsx032 Google Scholar
  36. Hall M (1996) On bycatches. Rev Fish Biol Fish 6:319–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hall M, Alverson D, Metuzal K (2000) By-catch: problems and solutions. Mar Pollut Bull 41:204–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Harrison X (2014) Using observation-level random effects to model over-dispersion in count data in ecology and evolution. PeerJ 2:e616.  https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.616 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  39. Hata D (2006) Incidental captures of seabirds in the U.S. Atlantic pelagic longline fishery, 1986–2005. http://www.acjv.org/Marine_Bird_page/Working_Group_Materials/Bycatch/2006%20Hata%20Report.pdf. Accessed 19 Sept 2013. Southeast Fisheries Science Center, National Marine Fisheries Service, Miami, Florida, USA
  40. Horodysky A, Graves J (2005) Application of pop-up satellite archival tag technology to estimate post-release survival of white marlin (Tetrapturus albidus) caught on circular and straight shank (“J”) hooks in the western North Atlantic recreational fishery. Fish Bull 103:84–96Google Scholar
  41. Leadley P, Pereira H, Alkemade R, Fernandez-Manjarres J, Proenca V, Scharlemann J, Walpole M (eds) (2010) Biodiversity scenarios: projections of 21st century change in biodiversity and associated ecosystem services. CBD Technical Series No. 50. Convention on Biological Diversity Secretariat, Montreal. ISBN: 92-9225-219-4Google Scholar
  42. Lewison R, Freeman S, Crowder L (2004) Quantifying the effects of fisheries on threatened species: the impact of pelagic longlines on loggerhead and leatherback sea turtles. Ecol Lett 7:221–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Li Y, Browder J, Jiao Y (2012) Hook effects on seabird bycatch in the United States Atlantic pelagic longline fishery. Bull Mar Sci 88:559–569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Link J (2002) What does ecosystem-based fisheries management mean? Fisheries 27:18–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Ménard F, Labrune C, Shin YJ, Asine AS, Bard FX (2006) Opportunistic predation in tuna: a size-based approach. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 323:223–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Molony B (2005) Estimates of the mortality of non-target species with an initial focus on seabirds, Turtles and Sharks. WCPFC-SC1 EB WP-1. Western and Central Pacific Fisheries Commission, Kolonia, Federated States of MicronesiaGoogle Scholar
  47. Morey R, Romeijn J, Rouder J (2016) The philosophy of Bayes factors and the quantification of statistical evidence. J Math Psychol 72:6–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Musyl M, Brill R, Curran D, Fragoso N, McNaughton L, Nielsen A, Kikkawa B, Moyes C (2011) Postrelease survival, vertical and horizontal movements, and thermal habitats of five species of pelagic sharks in the central Pacific Ocean. Fish Bull 109:341–361Google Scholar
  49. Nobrega C, Mendes P, Mendes E (2014) Factors that determine the quality of bigeye tuna, caught in the western tropical Atlantic Ocean. Arq Bras Med Vet Zoo 66:949–958CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Pacheco R (2013) La pesca con palangre pelágico en el Pacifico panameño. Aspectos operativos de la selectividad de los anzuelos y repercusiones en la captura incidental de tortugas marinas. Master’s Degree Thesis. http://rua.ua.es/dspace/handle/10045/36118. Accessed 11 Apr 2016. Universidad de Alicante. Departamento de Ciencias del Mar y Biología Aplicada, Alicante, Spain
  51. Pacheco J, Kerstetter D, Hazin F, Hazin H, Segundo R, Graves J, Carvalho F, Travassos P (2011) A comparison of circle hook and J hook performance in a western equatorial Atlantic Ocean pelagic longline fishery. Fish Res 107:39–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Park T, Casella G (2008) The Bayesian lasso. J Am Stat Assoc 103:681–686CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Pauly D, Alder J, Bakun A et al (2005) Marine fisheries systems. In: Baker J, Moreno P et al (eds) Ecosystems and human well-being: current state and trends. Findings of the condition and trends working group. Millennium ecosystem assessment, vol 1. Island Press, Washington, pp 477–511Google Scholar
  54. Pikitch E, Santora C, Babcock E et al (2004) Ecosystem-based fishery management. Science 305:346–347CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Piovano S, Simona C, Giacoma C (2010) Reducing longline bycatch: the larger the hook, the fewer the stingrays. Biol Conserv 143:261–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. PNA (2015) Palau arrangement for the management of the Western Pacific tuna fishery—management scheme. Longline Vessel Day Scheme. Parties to the Nauru Agreement, MajuroGoogle Scholar
  57. Sainsbury K, Punt A, Smith A (2000) Design of operational management strategies for achieving fishery ecosystem objectives. ICES J Mar Sci 57:731–741CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Scharf FS, Juanes F, Rountree RA (2000) Predator size-prey size relationships of marine fish predators: interspecific variation and effects of ontogeny and body size on trophic-niche breadth. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 208:229–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Shillinger G, Swithenbank A, Bailey H et al (2011) Vertical and horizontal habitat preferences of post-nesting leatherback turtles in the South Pacific Ocean. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 422:275–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Signorell A, Aho K, Alfons A et al (2016) DescTools: tools for descriptive statistics. R package version 0.99.18. R Core Team, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  61. Stan Development Team (2016) The stan C++ library, version 2.10.0. http://mc-stan.org/
  62. Stevens J, Bonfil R, Dulvy N, Walker P (2000) The effects of fishing on sharks, rays and chimaeras (chondrichthyans) and implications for marine ecosystems. ICES J Mar Sci 57:476–494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Stokes L, Hataway D, Epperly S et al (2011) Hook ingestion rates in loggerhead sea turtles Caretta caretta as a function of animal size, hook size, and bait. Endanger Species Res 14:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Vehtari A, Gelman A, Gabry J (2017) Practical Bayesian model evaluation using leave-one-out cross-validation and WAIC. Stat Comput.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11222-016-9696-4 Google Scholar
  65. Wackerly D, Mendenhall W, Scheaffer R (1986) Mathematical statistics with applications, 3rd edn. Duxbury Press, Pacific GroveGoogle Scholar
  66. Ward P, Myers R (2005) Shifts in open-ocean fish communities coinciding with the commencement of commercial fishing. Ecology 86:835–847CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Ward P, Lawrence E, Darbyshire R, Hindmarsh S (2008) Large-scale experiment shows that nylon leaders reduce shark bycatch and benefit pelagic longline fishers. Fish Res 90:100–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Wickham H (2016) ggplot2: Elegant graphics for data analysis, 2nd edn. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Yokota K, Kiyota M, Minami H (2006) Shark catch in a pelagic longline fishery: comparison of circle and tuna hooks. Fish Res 81:337–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Yokota K, Mituhasi T, Minami H, Kiyota M (2012) Perspectives on the morphological elements of circle hooks and their performance in pelagic longline fisheries. Bull Mar Sci 88:623–629CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Hawaii Pacific UniversityHonoluluUSA
  2. 2.Ecological Modelling Services and University of QueenslandSt. LuciaAustralia
  3. 3.Pelagic Research GroupHonoluluUSA

Personalised recommendations