Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

The use of hatchery technology for the conservation of Pacific and Atlantic salmon

  • Published:
Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Hatchery technology has been employed for the conservation of Pacific (Oncorhynchus spp.) and Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) for over 140 years. The initial societal paradigm was that nature is inefficient and hatcheries could be used to conserve stocks that were over utilized or suffering habitat degradation. Although these early hatcheries failed to meet their conservation objectives, they succeeded in developing the spawning-to-swimup fry culture technology used today. In the 1930s the paradigm shifted to artificial and natural production being equally effective and led to the closure of Federal hatcheries in areas with intact freshwater habitat. Hatcheries were maintained to mitigate for habitat loss from hydropower development. With the development of cost effective smolt production technology by 1960, the paradigm returned to nature being inefficient and ushered in the massive conservation utilization production of Pacific salmon that continues to this day. The early 1990s saw another paradigm shift with nature’s inefficiency recognized as being the foundation for evolution to maintain the fitness of salmon in their natural environment. This shift gave rise to a focus for hatchery technology to preserve stocks in their native habitats. Using hatcheries for preservation–conservation has become the norm for Atlantic salmon in the USA and Atlantic Canada and for Pacific salmon stocks listed under the Endangered Species Act in the USA or as species at risk in Canada.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allendorf FW, Waples RS (1996) Conservation and genetics of salmonid fishes. In: Harick JL, Avise JC (eds) Conservation genetics: case histories from nature. Chapman and Hall, New York, pp 238–280

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Argue AW, Hilborn R, Peterman RM, Staley JM, Walters CJ (1983) Strait of Georgia Chinook and coho fishery. Can Bull Fish Aquat Sci No 211. Canadian Department of Fisheries and Oceans, Ottawa

  • Baum ET (1997) Maine Atlantic salmon: a national treasure. Atlantic Salmon Unlimited, Hermon

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg II (1968) History of Washington State Department of Fisheries, 1890–1967. State of Washington Department of Fisheries, Olympia

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowlby HD, Gibson AJF (2011) Reduction in fitness limits the useful duration of supplementary rearing in an endangered salmon population. Ecol Appl 21:3032–3048

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brannon EL, Currens KP, Goodman D, Lichatowich JA, McConnaha WE, Riddell BE, Williams RN (1999) Review of artificial production of anadromous and resident fish in the Columbia river basin, Part I: a scientific basis for Columbia river production programs. Northwest Power Planning Council, Portland

    Google Scholar 

  • Busack CA, Currens KP (1995) Genetic risks and hazards in hatchery operations: fundamental concepts and issues. In: Schramm HL Jr, Piper RG (eds) Uses and effects of cultured fishes in aquatic ecosystems: symposium 15. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, pp 71–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Campton DE (1995) Genetic effects of hatchery fish on wild populations of Pacific salmon and steelhead: what do we really know? In: Schramm HL Jr, Piper RG (eds) Uses and effects of cultured fishes in aquatic ecosystems: symposium 15. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, pp 337–353

    Google Scholar 

  • Campton DE (1998) Genetic effects of hatcheries on wild populations of Pacific salmon and steelhead: overview of fact and speculation. In: Kinsel W, Brannon E (eds) Proceeding of Columbia river anadromous rehabilitation and passage symposium. University of Idaho Aquaculture Research Institute, Moscow, pp 1–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr JW, Whoriskey F, O’Reilly P (2004) Efficacy of releasing captive reared broodstock into an imperiled wild Atlantic salmon population as a recovery strategy. J Fish Biol 65:38–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CBFWA (1990) Review of the history, development, and management of anadromous fish production facilities in the Columbia river basin. Columbia Basin Fish and Wildlife Authority, Portland

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaput G (2012) Overview of the status of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) in the North Atlantic and trends in marine mortality. ICES J Mar Sci 69(9):1538–1548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark GH (1929) Sacramento-San Joaquin salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) fishery of California. Fish Bull No 17. California Division of Fish and Game, Sacramento

  • Cobb JN (1930) Pacific salmon fisheries Doc No 1092 Bureau of Fisheries. Washington DC

  • Colligan MA, Kocik JF, Kimball DC, Marancik G, McKeon JF, Nickerson PR (1999) Status review of anadromous Atlantic salmon in the United States. National Marine Fisheries Service/U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Joint Publication, Gloucester, Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook R, MacDonald J, Irvine JR (2008) Canadian enhanced salmonid production during 1978–2007 (1977–2006 brood years). NPAFC Doc. No. 1109

  • Davis B, Allee B, Amend D, Bachen B, Davidson B, Gharrett T, Marshall S, Wertheimer A (1985) FRED special report Alaska. Department of Fish and Game, Juneau

    Google Scholar 

  • de Mestral LG, O’Reilly PT, Jones R, Flanagan J, Herbinger CM (2013) Preliminary assessment of the environmental and selective effects of a captive breeding and rearing programme for endangered Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar. Fish Manag Ecol 20:75–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Department of Fisheries and Oceans web based Commercial Fisheries Landings (2012). http://www.dfo-mpo.gc.ca/stats/commercial/sea-maritimes-eng.htm. Accessed 7 Feb 2012

  • Dodson JJ, Gibson RJ, Cunjak RA, Friedland KD, de Leaniz CG, Gross MR, Roy S (1998) Elements in the development of conservation plans for Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). Can J Fish Aquat Sci 55(S1):312–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunfield RW (1985) The Atlantic salmon in the history of North America. Spec Publ Fish Aquat Sci 80

  • Elson PF (1957) The role of hatcheries in assuring maritime stocks of Atlantic salmon. Can Fish Cult 21:25–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Elson PF (1959) Developing effective use of hatchery-reared Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) in Canada. ICES J Mar Sci 148:69–71

    Google Scholar 

  • ENRI (2001) Evaluating Alaska’s ocean-ranching salmon hatcheries: biologic and management issues. University of Alaska Environment and Natural Resources Institute, Anchorage

    Google Scholar 

  • Fay CA, Bartron M, Craig S, Hecht A, Pruden J, Saunders R, Sheehan T, and Trial J (2006) Status review for anadromous Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) in the United States. National Marine Fisheries Service/U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Joint Publication, Gloucester, Massachusetts, p 294. http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/pdfs/statusreviews/atlanticsalmon.pdf. Accessed 20 Feb 2013

  • Flagg TA, Nash CE (1999) A conceptual framework for conservation hatchery strategies for Pacific salmonids. NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-NWFSC-38

  • Flagg TA, Waknitz FW, Maynard DJ, Milner GB, Mahnken CVW (1995) The effect of hatcheries on native coho salmon populations in the lower Columbia river. In: Schramm HL Jr, Piper RG (eds) Uses and effects of cultured fishes in aquatic ecosystems: symposium 15. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, pp 366–375

    Google Scholar 

  • Flagg TA, Berejikian BA, Colt JE, Dickhoff WW, Harrell LW, Maynard DJ, Nash CE, Strom MS, Iwamoto RN, Mahnken CVW (2000a) Ecological and behavioral impacts of artificial production strategies on the abundance of wild salmon populations. NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-NWFSC-41

  • Flagg TA, Maynard DJ, Mahnken CVW (2000b) Conservation hatcheries. In: Stickney RR (ed) Encyclopedia of aquaculture. John Wiley and Sons, New York, pp 174–177

    Google Scholar 

  • Flagg TA, Mahnken CVW, Iwamoto RN (2004) Conservation hatchery protocols for Pacific salmon. In: Nickum MJ, Mazik PM, Nickum JG, MacKinlay DD (eds) Propagated fish in resource management symposium 44. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, pp 603–619

    Google Scholar 

  • Forester RE (1936) Sockeye salmon propagation in British Columbia. Biol Board Canada Bull No 53

  • Gibson AJF, Jones RA, Bowlby HD (2009) Equilibrium analyses of a population’s response to recovery activities: a case study with Atlantic salmon. N Am J Fish Manag 29:958–974

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hard J (2002) Genetic risks of hatchery salmon production to wild salmon. In: Orr C, Gallugher P, Penikett J (eds) Hatcheries and the protection of wild salmon. Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, pp 72–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Hard JJ, Jones Jr RP, Delarm MR, Waples RS (1992) Pacific salmon and artificial propagation under the Endangered Species Act. NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-NWFSC-2

  • Harry J, Gale R, Hendee J (1969) Conservation: an upper-middle class social movement. J Leis Res 1:246–254

    Google Scholar 

  • Heard WR (1998) Do hatchery salmon affect the North Pacific Ocean ecosystem. NPAFC Bull 1:405–408

    Google Scholar 

  • Hindar K, Ryman N, Utter F (1991) Genetic effects of cultured fish on natural fish populations. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 48:945–957

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kocik JF, Brown RW (2002) From game fish to tame fish Atlantic salmon in North America, 1798 to 1998. In: Jones ML, Taylor WW, Lynch KD (eds) Sustaining North American salmon: perspectives across regions and discipline. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, pp 3–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Leitritz E (1961) A history of California’s fish hatcheries 1870–1960. Fish Bull No 150. California Department of Fish and Game, Sacramento

  • Leitritz E, Lewis RC (1980) Trout and salmon culture (hatchery methods). Fish Bull No 164. California Department of Fish and Game, Sacramento

  • Lichatowich J (1999) Salmon without rivers: a history of the Pacific salmon crisis. Island Press, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall TL, Farmer GJ, Cutting RE (1994) Atlantic salmon initiatives in Scottia-Fundy Region, Nova Scotia and New Brunswick. In: Proceedings of the New England Atlantic salmon management conference on a hard look at some tough issues, New England: Salmon Association, pp 116–123

  • Maynard DJ, Flagg TA, McAuley WC, Frost DA, Kluver B, Wastel M, Colt J, Dickhoff WW (2012) Fish culture technology and practices for captive broodstock rearing of ESA-listed salmon stocks. NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-NWFSC-117

  • McClure MM, Carlson SM, Beechie TJ, Pess GR, Jorgensen JC, Sogard SM, Sultan SE, Holzer BM, Travis J, Sanderson BL, Power ME, Carmichael RW (2008) Evolutionary consequences of habitat loss for Pacific anadromous salmonids. Evol Appl 1:300–318

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • McCrimmon H (1965) The beginnings of salmon culture in Canada. Can Geogr J 1965:3–11

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald J (1981) The stock concept and its application of British Columbia fisheries. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 38:1657–1664

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meister AL (1984) The marine migrations of tagged Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) of USA origin. ICES Doc CM 27

  • Miller AS, Sheehan TF, Renkawitz MD, Meister AL, Miller TJ (2012) Revisiting the marine migration of US Atlantic salmon using historical Carlin tag data. ICES J Mar Sci 69:1609–1615

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mobrand L, Barr J, Blankenship L, Campton D, Eveyln T, Flagg T, Mahnken C (2005) Hatchery reform in Washington State: principles and emerging issues. Fisheries 3(6):11–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moring JR (1986) Stocking anadromous species to restore or enhance fisheries. In: Stroud RH (ed) Fish culture in fisheries management: proceedings of a symposium on the role of fish culture in fisheries management. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, pp 59–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Moring JR (2000) The creation of the first public salmon hatchery in the United States. Fisheries 25:6–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moring JR, Marancik J, Griffiths F (1995) Changes in stocking strategies for Atlantic salmon restoration and rehabilitation in Maine, 1871–1993. Am Fish Soc Symp 15:38–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Naish KA, Taylor JE III, Levin PS, Quinn TP, Winton J, Huppert D, Hilborn R (2008) An evaluation of the effects of conservation and fishery enhancement hatcheries on wild populations of salmon. Adv Mar Biol 53:61–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nehlsen W, Williams JE, Lichatowich JA (1991) Pacific salmon at the crossroads: stocks at risk from California, Oregon, Idaho, and Washington. Fisheries 16:4–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noakes DJ, Beamish RJ, Sweeting R, King J (2000) Changing the balance: interactions between hatchery and wild Pacific coho salmon in the presence of regime shifts. NPAFC Bull 2:155–163

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Connell MF, Dempson JB, Mullins CC, Reddin DG, Bourgeois CE, Porter TR, Cochrance NM, Caines D (2003) Status of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) stocks of insular Newfoundland (SFAs 3-14A). Res Doc 2003/105. http://www.dfo-mpo.gc.ca/Library/314685.pdf. Accessed 7 Feb 2013

  • O’Reilly P, Doyle R (2007) Live gene banking of endangered populations of Atlantic salmon. In: Verspoor E, Stradmeyer L, Nielsen JL (eds) The Atlantic salmon: genetics, conservation and management. Wiley, Hoboken, pp 425–469

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Paquet PJ, Flagg T, Appleby A, Barr J, Blankenship L, Campton D, Delarm M, Evelyn T, Fast D, Gislason J, Kline P, Maynard D, Mobrand L, Nandor G, Seidel P, Smith S (2011) Hatcheries, conservation, and sustainable fisheries—achieving multiple goals: results of the Hatchery Scientific Review Group’s Columbia river basin review. Fisheries 36:547–561

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peek JM (1986) A review of wildlife management. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  • Pennell W, Barton BA (1996) Principles of salmonid culture. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterman RM, Holt CA, Rutherford MR (2012) The need for international cooperation to reduce competition among salmon for a common pool of prey resources in the North Pacific Ocean. NPAFC Tech Rep 8:99–101

    Google Scholar 

  • Piper RG, McElwain IB, Orme LE, McCraren JP, Fowler LG, Leonard LR (1982) Fish hatchery management. US Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Power G (1973) Salmon management-myths and magic. In: proceedings of the international symposium on the Atlantic salmon: management, biology and survival of the species, International Atlantic Salmon Foundation, Spec Pub 4:20–22

  • Rich WH (1920) Early history and seaward migration of Chinook salmon in the Columbia and Sacramento Rivers. US Bur Fish Bull 37:1–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Rich WH (1922) A statistical analysis of the results of the artificial propagation of Chinook salmon. Unpublished Manuscript, Manuscript Library, Northwest and Alaska Fisheries Science Center, National Marine Fisheries Service, Seattle

  • Ritter JA (1997) The contribution of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) enhancement to a sustainable resource. ICES J Mar Sci 54:1177–1187

    Google Scholar 

  • Roppel P (1982) Alaska salmon hatcheries, 1891–1959. National Marine Fisheries Service, Portland

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruggerone GT, Zimmermann M, Myers KW, Nielsen JL, Rogers DE (2003) Competition between Asian pink salmon (Oncorhynchus gorbuscha) and Alaskan sockeye salmon (O. nerka) in the North Pacific Ocean. Fish Oceanogr 12:209–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schalk RF (1986) Estimating salmon and steelhead usage in the Columbia Basin before 1850: the anthropological perspective. Northwest Environ J 2:22–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor JE (1999) Making salmon an environmental history of the Northwest fisheries crisis. University of Washington Press, Seattle

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Atlantic Salmon Assessment Committee (USASAC) (2012) Annual Report of the U.S. Atlantic Salmon Assessment Committee. Report No 24—2011 Activities. http://www.nefsc.noaa.gov/USASAC/Reports/USASAC2012-Report%2324-2011-Activities.pdf. Accessed 12 Feb 2013

  • Vreeland RR (1989) Evaluation of the contribution of fall Chinook salmon reared at Columbia river hatcheries to the Pacific salmon fisheries. Report No. DOE/BP-39638-4, Bonneville Power Administration, Portland

  • Wahle RJ, Vreeland RR (1978) Bioeconomic contribution to Columbia River hatchery fall Chinook salmon, 1961 and 1964 broods, to the Pacific salmon fisheries. Fish Bull 76:179–208

    Google Scholar 

  • Wahle RJ, Vreeland RR, Lander RH (1974) Bioeconomic contribution of Columbia River hatchery coho salmon, 1965 and 1966 broods, to the Pacific salmon fisheries. Fish Bull 72:139–169

    Google Scholar 

  • Waples RS (1991) Genetic interactions between hatchery and wild salmonids: lessons from the Pacific Northwest. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 48:124–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waples RS (1995) Genetic effects of stock transfers of fish. In: Philipp D (ed) Protection of aquatic biodiversity: proceeding of the World Fisheries Congress, Theme 3. Oxford and IBH, New Delhi, pp 51–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Wedemeyer GA (2001) Fish hatchery management. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda

    Google Scholar 

  • White HCA (1924) A quantitative determination of the number of survivors from the planting 5,000 trout fry in each of two streams. Contrib Can Biol Fish 2:135–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood EM (1953) A century of American fish culture, 1853–1953. Prog Fish Cult 15:147–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood A (2002) The history, goals and direction of the Salmonid Enhancement Program (SEP) in British Columbia. In: Orr C, Gallugher P, Penikett J (eds) Hatcheries and the protection of wild salmon. Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, pp 5–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright S (1981) Contemporary Pacific salmon fisheries management. N Am J Fish Manag 1:29–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Resource Utilization and Technology Division, Northwest Fisheries Science Center, National Marine Fisheries Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, P. O. Box 130, Manchester, WA, 98353, USA

    Desmond J. Maynard

  2. Division of Sea-run Fisheries and Habitat, Maine Department of Marine Resources, 650 State Street, Bangor, ME, 044401, USA

    Joan G. Trial

Authors
  1. Desmond J. Maynard
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Joan G. Trial
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Desmond J. Maynard.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Maynard, D.J., Trial, J.G. The use of hatchery technology for the conservation of Pacific and Atlantic salmon. Rev Fish Biol Fisheries 24, 803–817 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11160-013-9341-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11160-013-9341-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation