Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries

, Volume 22, Issue 2, pp 499–508 | Cite as

Temperature-dependent feeding interactions between two invasive fishes competing through interference and exploitation

  • Dalmas O. Oyugi
  • Julien Cucherousset
  • J. Robert Britton
Research Paper


Context-dependent ecological interactions between invasive species are important in determining the outcomes of their introductions. The consequences of competitive interactions between the Nile tilapia Oreochromis niloticus (interference competitor) and common carp Cyprinus carpio (exploitative competitor) were investigated here across a temperature gradient (20–28°C). These highly invasive fish are now present in many regions where populations increasingly coexist, inducing trophic interactions and niche overlaps. Experimental feeding and growth trials revealed the feeding rate (items s−1) and specific growth rate (% day−1) of these fishes were not significantly different at 24°C, but were significantly higher for C. carpio at 20°C and significantly higher for O. niloticus at 28°C. An additional experiment completed at 24°C revealed that O. niloticus rapidly form hierarchies, where dominant fish monopolise food resources through interference, resulting in their faster growth. Introductions of 1 and 3 C. carpio (an exploitative competitor) into the hierarchy had no effect on this food monopolisation as carp were excluded through aggression. The addition of 6 C. carpio did, however, significantly reduce the food intake of the dominant tilapia. This was due to increased exploitative competition rather than breaking of the hierarchy. The effect of adding 3 O. niloticus was similar to 6 C. carpio, suggesting inter- and intra-specific competitive strength was similar. These findings suggest when populations co-exist, temperature-dependent feeding interactions may result in the competitive exclusion of C. carpio through the aggressive interference by O. niloticus, potentially influencing invasion outcomes.


Oreochromis niloticus Cyprinus carpio Specific growth rate Interspecific competition Intraspecific competition 


  1. Baxter CV, Fausch KD, Murakami M, Chapman PL (2007) Invading rainbow trout usurp a terrestrial prey subsidy from native charr and reduce their growth and abundance. Oecologia 153:461–470PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Blanchet S, Loot G, Bernatchez L, Dodson JJ (2007a) The disruption of dominance hierarchies by a non-native species: an individual based analysis. Oecologia 152:569–581PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blanchet S, Loot G, Grenouillet G, Brosse S (2007b) Competitive interactions between native and exotic salmonids: a combined field and laboratory demonstration. Ecol Freshw Fish 16:133–143Google Scholar
  4. Bohlin T, Sundstrom LF, Johnsson JI, Hojesjo J, Pettersson J (2002) Density-dependent growth in brown trout: effects of introducing wild and hatchery fish. J Anim Ecol 7:683–692CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bøhn T, Amundsen P-A (2001) The competitive edge of an invading specialist. Ecology 82:2150–2163Google Scholar
  6. Bøhn T, Amundsen PA, Sparrow A (2008) Competitive exclusion after invasion? Biol Invasions 10:359–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Britton JR, Cucherousset J, Grey J, Gozlan RE (2011) Determining the strength of exploitative competition from an introduced fish: roles of density, biomass and body size. Ecol Freshw Fish 20:74–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Canario AVM, Condeca J, Power DM (1998) The effect of stocking density on growth in the gilthead sea-bream Sparus aurata (L.). Aquat Res 29:177–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Connell JH (1983) On the prevalence and relative importance of interspecific competition: evidence from field experiments. Am Nat 122:661–696CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cross WT, Benke AC (2002) Intra- and interspecific competition among coexisting lotic snails. Oikos 96:251–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Crowl TA, Townsend CR, McIntosh AR (1992) The impact of introduced brown and rainbow trout on native fish: the case of Australasia. Rev Fish Biol Fisher 2:217–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cucherousset J, Olden JD (2011) The ecological impacts of non native freshwater fishes. Fisheries 36:215–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dick JTA, Montgomery I, Elwood RW (1993) Replacement of the indigenous amphipod Gammarus duebeni celticus by the introduced G. pulex: differential cannibalism and mutual predation. J Anim Ecol 62:79–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Diehl S, Eklov P (1995) Effects of piscivore-mediated habitat use on resources, diet, and growth of perch. Ecology 76:1712–1726CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fausch KD (1998) Interspecific competition and juvenile Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar): on testing effects and evaluating the evidence across scales. Can J Aquat Sci 55:218–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kennedy GJA, Strange CD (1986) The effects of intra- and inter-specific competition on the survival and growth of stocked juvenile Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar L., and resident trout, Salmo trutta L., in an upland stream. J Fish Biol 28:479–489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Korsu K, Huusko A, Muotka T (2009) Does the introduced brook trout (Salvelinus fontinalis) affect the growth of the native brown trout (Salmo trutta)? Naturwissenschaften 96:347–353PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lawler SP, Dritz D, Strange T, Holyoak M (1999) Effects of introduced mosquitofish and bullfrogs on the threatened California Red-legged frog. Conserv Biol 13:613–622CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lever C (1996) Naturalized fishes of the world. Academic Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  20. Martin CW, Valentine MM, Valentine JF (2010) Competitive interactions between invasive Nile tilapia and native fish: the potential for altered trophic exchange and modification of food webs. PloS One 10:e14395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mercado-Silva N, Helmus M, Vander Zanden MJ (2008) The effects of impoundments and invasive species on a river food web in Mexico’s central plateau. River Res Appl 25:1090–1108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Schoener TW (1983) Field experiments on interspecific competition. Am Nat 122:240–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Seiler SM, Keeley ER (2009) Competition between native and introduced salmonid fishes: cutthroat trout have lower growth rate in the presence of cutthroat—rainbow trout hybrids. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 66:133–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Simon KM, Townsend CR (2003) Impacts of freshwater invaders at different levels of ecological organisation, with emphasis on salmonids and ecosystem consequences. Freshw Biol 48:982–994CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Taniguchi Y, Rahel FJ, Novinger DC, Gerow KG (1998) Temperature mediation of competitive interactions among three fish species that replace each other along longitudinal stream gradients. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 55:1894–1901CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Van der Velde G, Rajagopal S, Kuyper-Kollenaar M et al (2006) Biological invasions: concepts to understand and predict a global threat. In: Bobbink R, Beltman B, Verhoeven JTA, Whigham DF (eds) Wetlands: functioning, biodiversity conservation and restoration, ecological studies, vol 191. Springer, Berlin, pp 61–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Van Riel MC, van der Velde G, Bij de Vaate A (2009) Interference competition between alien invasive gammaridean species. Biol Invasions 11:2119–2132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Weyl O (2006) Rapid invasion of a subtropical lake fishery in central Mozambique by Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus (Pisces: Cichlidae). Aquat Conserv 18:839–851CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Wijnhoven S, Van Riel MC, Van der Velde G (2003) Exotic and indigenous freshwater gammarid species: physiological tolerance to water temperature in relation to ionic content of the water. Aquat Ecol 37:151–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Wilson JC, Nibbelink NP, Peterson DL (2009) Thermal tolerance experiments help establish survival probabilities for tilapia, a group of potentially invasive aquatic species. Freshw Biol 54:1642–1650CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Zambrano L, Martinez-Meyer E, Menezes N, Townsend PA (2006) Invasive potential of common carp (Cyprinus carpio) and Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) in American freshwater systems. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 63:1903–1910CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Zambrano L, Valiente E, Vander Zanden M (2010) Food web overlap among native axolotl (Ambystoma mexicanum) and two exotic fishes: carp (Cyprinus carpio) and tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) in Xochimilco, Mexico City. Biol Invasions 12:3061–3069CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dalmas O. Oyugi
    • 1
    • 2
  • Julien Cucherousset
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
  • J. Robert Britton
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Biological SciencesUniversity of NairobiNairobiKenya
  2. 2.Centre for Conservation Ecology and Environmental Change, School of Applied SciencesBournemouth UniversityFern Barrow, PooleUK
  3. 3.CNRS, UPS, ENFA, UMR5174 EDB (Laboratoire Évolution et Diversité Biologique)ToulouseFrance
  4. 4.Université de Toulouse, UPS, UMR5174 EDBToulouseFrance

Personalised recommendations