Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries

, Volume 22, Issue 2, pp 437–455 | Cite as

Translocation of stream-dwelling salmonids in headwaters: insights from a 15-year reintroduction experience

  • Simone Vincenzi
  • Alain J. Crivelli
  • Dusan Jesensek
  • Giulio A. De Leo
Research Paper


Translocation programs are a common strategy to increase the number of viable populations of threatened freshwater fishes. Yet, only in a minority of cases the success or failure of translocations has been assessed through a quantitative analysis of demographic traits, compensatory responses, life-histories and population dynamics of the threatened species. A paradigmatic case a translocation program combining both management- and research-oriented activities is represented by the Marble Trout Conservation Program, which started in 1993 in the upper reaches of the Soca, Idirjca and Baca river basins (Slovenia) for the conservation of stream-dwelling marble trout Salmo marmoratus. In order to enhance the viability of the species, two new populations were created in 1996 by stocking 500 marble trout aged 1+ in previously fishless streams (Gorska and Zakojska) within the core habitat of the species. The new populations have been systematically monitored for 15 years by individually tagging and sampling marble trout. Our analyses show that deterministic extinction of marble trout populations are unlikely and that high-magnitude environmental stochasticity (i.e., severe floods) is the only main cause of local population extinction, despite the high resilience to flood-induced massive mortalities exhibited by marble trout through compensatory mechanisms (e.g., relaxation of density-dependent body growth and survival at low densities). Fishless headwaters, probably characterized by a history of recurrent severe floods, should not be considered as candidate sites for the creation of new populations. Fewer individuals than originally reintroduced (i.e., 500 fish aged 1+ in each stream) might be sufficient to establish viable populations, since compensatory mechanisms are likely to regulate population size around stream carrying capacity in a few years. Besides enhancing the species viability, translocation programs can provide an excellent framework for the estimation of ecological traits (e.g., life-histories, demography, population dynamics etc.), identify potential vulnerabilities and thus guide well-formed management actions for the threatened species.


Translocation Reintroduction Marble trout Flood Establishment Persistence 


  1. Allen KR (1969) Limitations on production in salmonid populations in streams. In: Northcote TG (ed) Symposium on salmon and trout in streams. University of British Columbia, Institute of Fisheries, British Columbia, Canada, pp 3–18Google Scholar
  2. Armstrong DP, Seddon PJ (2008) Directions in reintroduction biology. Trends Ecol Evol 23:20–25PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Armstrong JD, Kemp PS, Kennedy GJA, Ladle M, Milner NJ (2003) Habitat requirements of Atlantic salmon and brown trout in rivers and streams. Fish Res 62:143–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Armstrong DP, Castro I, Griffiths R (2007) Using adaptive management to determine requirements of reintroduced populations: the case of the New Zealand hihi. J Appl Ecol 44:953–962CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Behnke RJ (1992) Native trout of western North America. Am Fish Soc Monogr 6:1–275Google Scholar
  6. Berg S, Jørgensen J (1991) Stocking experiment with 0+ and 1+ trout parr, Salmo trutta L., of wild and hatchery origin: 1. Post-stocking mortality and smolt yield. J Fish Biol 39:151–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Berggren A (2001) Colonization success in Roesel’s bush-cricket Metrioptera roeseli: the effects of propagule size. Ecology 82:274–280Google Scholar
  8. Bernatchez L (2001) The evolutionary history of brown trout (Salmo trutta L.) inferred from phylogeographic, nested clade, and mismatch analyses of mithocondrial DNA variation. Evolution 55:351–379PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Berrebi P, Povz M, Jesensek D, Crivelli AJ (2000) The genetic diversity of native, stocked and hybrid populations of Marble trout in the Soca River, Slovenia. Heredity 85:277–287PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brook BW, O’Grady JJ, Chapman AP, Burgman MA, Akçakaya HR, Frankham R (2000) Predictive accuracy of population viability analysis in conservation biology. Nature 404:385–387PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Burnham KP, Anderson DR (1998) Model selection and inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. Caswell H (2001) Matrix population models: construction, analysis, and interpretation, 2nd edn. Sinauer Associates Inc., SunderlandGoogle Scholar
  13. Chapman DW (1966) Food and space as regulators of salmonid populations in streams. Am Nat 100:345–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cowx IG, Collares-Pereira MJ (2002) Freshwater fish conservation: options for the future. In: Collares-Pereira MJ, Cowx IG, Coelho MM (eds) Conservation of freshwater fishes: options for the future. Fishing News Books, Blackwell Science, Oxford, pp 443–452Google Scholar
  15. Crisp DT (1993) Population densities of juvenile trout (Salmo trutta) in five upland streams and their effects upon growth, survival and dispersal. J Appl Ecol 30:759–771Google Scholar
  16. Crivelli AJ, Poizat G, Berrebi P, Jesensek D, Rubin JF (2000) Conservation biology applied to fish: the example of a project for rehabilitating the Marble trout in Slovenia. Cybium 24:211–230Google Scholar
  17. Delling B (2002) Morphological distinction of the marble trout, Salmo marmoratus, in comparison to marbled Salmo trutta from River Otra, Norway. Cybium 26:283–300Google Scholar
  18. Deredec A, Courchamp F (2007) Importance of the Allee effect for reintroductions. Ecoscience 14:440–451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Deverill JI, Adams CE, Bean CW (1999) Prior residence, aggression and territory acquisition in hatchery-reared and wild brown trout. J Fish Biol 55:868–875CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Elliott JM (1990) Mechanisms responsible for population regulation in young migratory trout, Salmo trutta. III. The role of territorial behaviour. J Anim Ecol 59:803–818CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Elliott JM (1994) Quantitative ecology and the brown trout. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
  22. Elwood JW, Waters TF (1969) Effects of floods on food consumption and production rates of a stream brook trout population. T Am Fish Soc 98:253–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fischer J, Lindenmayer D (2000) An assessment of the published results of animal translocations. Biol Conserv 96:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Flather CH, Hayward GD, Beissinger SR, Stephens PA (2011) Minimum viable populations: is there a “magic number” for conservation practitioners? Trends Ecol Evol 26:307–316PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Frankel OH, Soule ME (1981) Conservation and evolution. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, EnglandGoogle Scholar
  26. Fraser DJ (2008) How well can captive breeding programs conserve biodiversity? A review of salmonids. Evol Appl 1:535–586Google Scholar
  27. Fumagalli L, Snoj A, Jesensek D, Balloux F, Jug T, Duron O, Brossier F, Crivelli AJ, Berrebi P (2002) Extreme differentiation among the remnant populations of marble trout (Salmo marmoratus) in Slovenia. Mol Ecol 11:2711–2716PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Grant JWA, Kramer DL (1990) Territory size as a predictor of the upper limit to population density of juvenile salmonids in streams. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 47:1724–1737CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Harig AL, Fausch KD (2002) Minimum habitat requirements for establishing translocated cutthroat trout populations. Ecol Appl 12:535–551CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hartman GF, Scrivener JC (1990) Impacts of forestry practices on a coastal stream ecosystem, Carnation Creek, British Columbia. Can B Fish Aquat Sci 223:1–148Google Scholar
  31. Imre IJ, Grant WA, Cunjak RA (2005) Density-dependent growth of young-of-the-year Atlanti salmon Salmo salar in Catamaran Brook, New Brunswick. J Anim Ecol 74:508–516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. IPCC (2007) Climate change 2007: working group I: the physical sciences basis. In: Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, Tignor M, Miller HL (eds) Contribution of working group 1 to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate Change, Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  33. Jenkins TM Jr, Diehl S, Kratz KW, Cooper SD (1999) Effects of population density on individual growth of brown trout in streams. Ecology 80:941–956CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Jensen AJ, Johnsen BO (1999) The functional relationship between peak spring floods and survival and growth of juvenile Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) and brown trout (Salmo trutta). Funct Ecol 13:778–785Google Scholar
  35. Katz RW, Parlange MB, Naveau P (2002) Statistics of extremes in hydrology. Adv Water Resour 25:1287–1304Google Scholar
  36. Kleiman, DG (1980) The sociobiology of captive propagation, in Conservation Biology. In: Soulè ME, Wilcox BA (eds) An evolutionary-ecological perspective, Sinauer, pp 243–261Google Scholar
  37. Kottelat M (1997) European freshwater fishes. Biologia Bratislava 52:1–271Google Scholar
  38. Kottelat M, Freyhof J (2007) Handbook of European freshwater fishes. Publications Kottelat, Switzerland, CornolGoogle Scholar
  39. Lamberti GA, Gregory SV, Ashkenas LR, Wildman RC, Moore KMS (1991) Stream ecosystem recovery following a catastrophic debris flow. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 48:196–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lebreton JD, Burnham KP, Clobert J, Anderson DR (1992) Modelling survival and testing biological hypotheses using marked animals: a unified approach with case-studies. Ecol Monogr 62:67–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Le Cren ED (1973) The population dynamics of young trout (Salmo trutta) in relation to density and territorial behaviour. Rep P.-V Reun Cons Int Explor Mer 164:241–246Google Scholar
  42. Letcher BH, Terrick TD (1998) Maturation of male age-0 Atlantic salmon following a massive, localized flood. J Fish Biol 53:1243–1252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lobon-Cervia J, Utrilla C, Rincon P, Amezcua F (1997) Environmentally induced spatio-temporal variations in the fecundity of brown trout Salmo trutta L.: trade-offs between egg size and number. Freshw Biol 38:277–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lorenzen K, Enberg K (2002) Density-dependent growth as a key mechanism in the regulation of fish populations: evidence from among-population comparisons. P R Soc Lond B Bio 269:49–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Maitland PS, Winfield IJ, McCarthy ID, Igoe F (2007) The status of Arctic charr Salvelinus alpinus in Britain and Ireland. Ecol Freshw Fish 16:6–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. McCullagh P, Nelder JA (1989) Generalized Linear Models. Chapman & Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar
  47. McCallum H (1994) Modelling translocation strategies for the bridled nailtail wallaby Onychogalea fraenata Gould, 1840. In Serena M (ed) Reintroduction biology of Australian and New Zealand Fauna. Surrey Beatty, pp 7–14Google Scholar
  48. McCarthy MA, Burgman MA, Ferson S (1995) Sensitivity analysis for models of population viability. Biol Conserv 73:93–100Google Scholar
  49. Meldgaard T, Crivelli AJ, Jesensek D, Poizat G, Rubin J-F, Berrebi P (2007) Hybridization mechanism between the endangered marble trout (Salmo marmoratus) and the brown trout (Salmo trutta) as revealed by in-stream experiments. Biol Conserv 136:602–611CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Milner NJ, Elliott JM, Armstrong JD, Gardiner R, Welton JS, Ladle M (2003) The natural control of salmon and trout populations in streams. Fish Res 62:111–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Min S-K, Zhang X, Zwiers FW, Hegerl GC (2011) Human contribution to more-intense precipitation extremes. Nature 470:378–381PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Morris WF, Doak DF (2002) Quantitative conservation biology. Sinauer Associates Inc., SunderlandGoogle Scholar
  53. Moyle PB, Sato GM (1991) On the design of preserves to protect native fishes. In: Minckley WL, Deacon JE (eds) Battle against extinction: native fish management in the American West. University of Arizona Press, Tucson, Arizona, USA, pp 155–173Google Scholar
  54. Moyle PB, Yoshiyama RM (1994) Protection of aquatic biodiversity in California: a five-tiered approach. Fisheries 19:6–18Google Scholar
  55. Newman RM (1993) A conceptual model for examining density dependence in the growth of stream trout. Ecol Freshw Fish 2:121–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Pall P, Aina T, Stone DA, Stott PA, Nozawa T, Hilberts AGJ, Lohmann D, Allen MR (2011) Anthropogenic greenhouse gas contribution to flood risk in England and Wales in autumn 2000. Nature 470:382–385PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Povz M (1995) Status of freshwater fishes in the Adriatic catchment of Slovenia. Biol Conserv 72:171–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Povz M, Jesensek D, Berrebi P, Crivelli AJ (1996) The Marble trout, Salmo trutta marmoratus, Cuvier 1817, in the Soca River basin, Slovenia. Tour du Valat Publication, ArlesGoogle Scholar
  59. Rieman B, Lee D, McIntyre J, Overton K, Thurow R (1993) Consideration of extinction risks for salmonids. USDA Forest Service Fish Habitat Relationship Technical Bulletin 14. Ogden, UtahGoogle Scholar
  60. Sarrazin F, Legendre S (2000) Demographic approach to releasing adults versus young in reintroductions. Conserv Biol 14:488–500Google Scholar
  61. Schoffmann J (1994) Zur gegenwätigen Situation des marmorierten Forelle (Salmo marmoratus Cuvier, 1817) in Albanien, ihrem südlichsten Verbreitungsraum. Osterreichs Fischerei 47:132–136Google Scholar
  62. Seddon PJ, Armstrong DP, Maloney RF (2007) Developing the science of reintroduction biology. Conserv Biol 21:303–312PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Smith KG, Darwall WRT (2006) The status and distribution of freshwater fish endemic to the mediterranean basin. IUCN Glang, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK, v+ 34 ppGoogle Scholar
  64. Snoj A, Maric S, Berrebi P, Crivelli AJ, Shumka S, Susnik S (2009) Genetic architecture of trout from Albania as revealed by mtDNA control region variation. Gen Sél Evol 41:22–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Sommani E (1961) Il Salmo marmoratus Cuv.: sua origine e distribuzione nell’Italia settentrionale. Bolletino di Pesca, Piscicoltura e Idrobiologia 15: 40–47. In Italian Google Scholar
  66. Thomas CD (2011) Translocation of species, climate change, and the end of trying to recreate past ecological communities. Trends Ecol Evol 26:216–221PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Towns DR, Ferreira SM (2001) Conservation of New Zealand lizards (Lacertilia: Scincidae) by translocation of small populations. Biol Conserv 98:211–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Van Deventer JS, Platts WS (1989) Microcomputer software system for generating population statistics from electrofishing data-users guide for Microfish 3.0. U.S. Forest Service General Technical Report INT-254Google Scholar
  69. Vincent RE (1960) Some influences of domes- tication upon three stocks of brook trout (Salvelinus fontinalis Mitchell). T Am Fish Soc 89:35–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Vincenzi S, Crivelli AJ, Jesensek D, Rubin J-F, De Leo GA (2007a) Early survival of marble trout Salmo marmoratus: evidence for density dependence? Ecol Freshw Fish 16:116–123Google Scholar
  71. Vincenzi S, Crivelli AJ, Jesensek D, Rubin J-F, De Leo GA (2007b) Density-dependent individual growth of marble trout (Salmo marmoratus) in the Soca and Idrijca river basins, Slovenia. Hydrobiologia 583:57–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Vincenzi S, Crivelli AJ, Jesensek D, Rubin J-F, Poizat G, De Leo GA (2008a) Potential factors controlling the population viability of newly introduced endangered marble trout populations. Biol Conserv 141:198–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Vincenzi S, Crivelli AJ, Jesensek D, De Leo GA (2008b) The role of density-dependent individual growth in the persistence of freshwater salmonid populations. Oecologia 156:523–534PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Vincenzi S, Crivelli AJ, Jesensek D, De Leo GA (2010a) The management of small, isolated salmonid populations: do we have to fix it if it aint broken? Anim Conserv 13:21–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Vincenzi S, Crivelli AJ, Jesensek D, De Leo GA (2010b) Individual growth and its implications for the recruitment dynamics of stream-dwelling marble trout (Salmo marmoratus). Ecol Freshw Fish 19:477–486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Vincenzi S, Crivelli AJ, Jesensek D, Rossi G, De Leo GA (2011a) Innocent until proven guilty? Stable coexistence of alien rainbow trout and native marble trout in a Slovenian stream. Naturwissenschaften 98:57–66PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Vincenzi S, Crivelli AJ, Giske J, Satterthwaite WH, Mangel M (2011b) Selective consequences of catastrophes for growth rates in a stream-dwelling salmonid. Oecologia. doi:10.1007/s00442-011-2096-8
  78. White GC, Burnham KP (1999) Program MARK: survival estimation for population of marked animals. Bird Study 46:120–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Williams JE, Sada DW, Williams CD et al (1988) American Fisheries Society guidelines for introductions of threatened and endangered fish. Fisheries 13:5–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Williams JE, Johnson JE, Hendrickson DA, Contrerasbalderas S, Williams JD, Navarromendoza M, Mcallister DE, Deacon JE (1989) Fishes of North America endangered, threatened, or of special concern. Fisheries 14:2–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Simone Vincenzi
    • 1
    • 2
  • Alain J. Crivelli
    • 3
  • Dusan Jesensek
    • 4
  • Giulio A. De Leo
    • 5
  1. 1.Center for Stock Assessment Research, Department of Applied Mathematics and StatisticsUniversity of CaliforniaSanta CruzUSA
  2. 2.MRAG AmericasCapitolaUSA
  3. 3.Station Biologique de la Tour du ValatArlesFrance
  4. 4.Tolmin Angling AssociationMost na SociSlovenia
  5. 5.Dipartimento di Scienze AmbientaliUniversità degli Studi di ParmaParmaItaly

Personalised recommendations