Skip to main content
Log in

How long would it take to become a giant squid?

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Laboratory and field studies suggest that cephalopod growth occurs rapidly and is linked to temperature throughout a short life span. For giant squid such as Architeuthis, a paucity of size-at-age data means that growth is only inferred from isolated field specimens, based on either statoliths or isotopic analyses of tissue. In this study we apply simple growth models to obtain projections of the life span required to achieve the Architeuthis average body mass in scenarios which include an energy balance between rates of food intake and expenditure on growth and metabolism. Although the analysis shows that a wide range for the estimated life span is possible, energy conservation suggests that achievement of a larger size would be assisted by slower exponential growth early on. The results are compared with a sparse set of size-at-age data obtained from male and female Architeuthis wild specimens and possibly hint at some behavioural differences between males and females.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arkhipkin AI, Bizikov VA (1997) Statolith shape and microstructure in studies in systematics, age and growth in planktonic paralarvae of gonatid squids (Cephalopoda, Oegopsida) from the western Bering Sea. J Plankton Res 19:1993–2030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arkhipkin AI, Bizikov VA, Krylov VV, Nesis KN (1996) Distribution, stock structure and growth of the squid Berryteuthis magister (Berry, 1913) (Cephalopoda, Gonatidae) during summer and fall in the western Berring Sea. Fish Bull 94:1–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Arkhipkin AI, Bizikov VA, Verkhunov AV (1998) Distribution and growth in juveniles of the squid Berryteuthis magister (Cephalopoda, Gonaditae) in the western Berring Sea. Sarsia 83:45–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Bigelow KA (1992) Age and growth in paralarvae of the mesopelagic squid Abralia trigonurabased on daily growth increments in statoliths. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 82:31–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Bigelow KA, Landgraf KC (1993) Hatch dates and growth of Ommastrephes bartramii paralarvae from Hawaiian waters as determined from statolith analysis. In: Okutani T, O’Dor RK, Kubodera T (eds) Recent advances in cephalopod fisheries biology. Tokai University Press, Tokyo, pp 15–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Erickson GM, Makovicky PJ, Currie PJ, Norell MA, Yerby SA, Brochu CA (2004) Gigantism and comparative life-history parameters of tyrannosaurid dinosaurs. Nature 430:772–775

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Forsythe JW, van Heukelem WF (1987) Growth. In: Boyle PR (ed), Cephalopod Life Cycles vol II, Comparative reviews. Academic Press, London, pp 135–156

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsythe JW (1993) A working hypothesis of how seasonal temperature change may impact the field growth of young cephalopods. In: Okutani T, O’Dor RK, Kubodera T (eds) Recent Advances in Cephalopod Fisheries Biology. Tokai University Press, Tokyo, pp 133–143

  • Gauldi RW, West IF (1994) Statocyst, statolith, and age estimation of the giant squid Architeuthis kirki. Veliger 37:93–109

    Google Scholar 

  • Grist EPM (2000) A circle map for a phytoplanktonic life cycle. Int J Bifurcation Chaos. 10(2):325–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grist EPM, des Clers S (1999) Seasonal and genotypic influences on life cycle synchronisation: further insights from annual squid. Ecol Modell 115:149–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grist EPM, Jackson GD (2004) Energy balance as a determinant of two-phase growth in cephalopods. Mar Freshw Res 55:395–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatfield EMC (1991) Post recruit growth of the Patagonian squid Loligo gahi (D’Orbigny). Bull Mar Sci 49:349–361

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatfield EMC, Hanlon RT, Forsythe JW, Grist EPM (2001) Laboratory testing of a growth hypothesis for juvenile squid Loligo pealii(Cephalopoda: Loliginidae). Can J Fish Aquat Sci 58:845–857

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson GD (1997) Age, growth and maturation of the deepwater squid Moroteuthis ingens (Cephalopoda: Onychoteuthidae) in New Zealand waters. Polar Biol 17:268–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson GD, O’Dor RK (2001) Time, space and the ecophysiology of squid growth, life in the fast lane. Vie Milieu 51:205–215

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson GD, Domeier ML (2003) The effects of an extraordinary El Niño/La Niña event on the size and growth of the squid Loligo opalescens off Southern California. Mar Biol 142:925–935

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson GD, Lu CC, Dunning M (1991) Microstructural growth rings in the statoliths of the giant squid Architeuthis. Veliger 34:331–334

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson GD, McKinnon JF, Lalas C, Ardern R, Buxton NG (1998) Food spectrum of the deepwater squid Moroteuthis ingens (Cephalopoda: Onychoteuthidae) in New Zealand waters. Polar Biol 20:56–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landman NH, Coshran JK, Cerrato R, Mak J, Roper CFE, Lu CC (2004) Habitat and age of the giant squid (Architeuthis sanctipauli) inferred from isotopic analyses. Mar Biol 144:685–691

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipinski M (1997) Morphology of giant squid Architeuthis statoliths. S Afr J Mar Sci 18:299–303

    Google Scholar 

  • Lordan C, Collins MA, Perales-Raya C (1998) Observations on morphology, age and diet of three Architeuthis caught off the West Coast of Ireland in 1995. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 78:9003–9917

    Google Scholar 

  • McNeil Alexander R (1999) Minimal metabolism (section 2.4 pages 26–32). In: Energy for animal life. Oxford University Press

  • Moltschaniwskyj NA (2004) Understanding the process of growth in cephalopods. Mar Freshw Res 55:379–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Dor RK, Wells MJ (1987) Energy and nutrient flow. In: PR Boyle (ed) Cephalopod life cycles vol II, Comparative reviews. Academic Press, London, pp 109–133

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Dor RK, Aitken J, Jackson GD (2005) Energy balance growth models: applications to cephalopods. Phuket Mar Bio Cent Res Bull 66:329–336

    Google Scholar 

  • Perez A, O’Dor RK (2000) Critical transitions in early life histories of short finned squid ilex illecebrocus as constructed from gladius growth. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the UK 80(3):509–514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seber GAF, Wild CJ (1989) Nonlinear Regression. John Wiley and Sons Inc., New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Seibel BA, Thuesen EV, Childress JJ, Gorodezky LA (1997) Decline in pelagic cephalopod metabolism with habitat depth reflects differences in locomotory efficiency. Biol Bull 192:267–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seibel BA, Thuesen EV, Childress JJ (2000) Light limitation on predator-prey interactions: consequences for metabolism and locomotion of deep sea cephalopods. Biol Bull 198:284–298

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Toms JD, Lesperance ML (2003) Piecewise regression: a tool for identifying ecological thresholds. Ecology 84(8):2034–2041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Villaneuva R (2000) Effect of temperature on statolith growth of the European squid Loligo vulgaris during early life. Mar Biol 136:449–460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Bertalanffy L (1957) Quantitative laws in metabolism and growth. Q Rev Biol 32:217–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yatsu A, Mori J (2000) Early growth of the autumn cohort of neon flying squid, Ommastrephes bartramii, in the North Pacific Ocean. Fish Res 45:189–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We especially thank Sophie des Clers and Natalie Moltschaniwskyj for several comments which greatly improved the original manuscript of this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eric P. M. Grist.

Appendices

Appendix 1

Life span t max as a function of transition age t*

The simple two-phase model of Eq. 2 implies a dependence between the final body mass B max and the critical transition age t* and hence that for any specified hatchling size A B , B max is a function of transition age t*, exponential body mass growth rate coefficient m B and life span t max . Equivalently, for a specified hatchling size A B , final body mass B max and exponential body mass growth rate coefficient m B , the relationship between life span t max and the transition age t*, by basic geometry is t max t* + (B max  − B*)/m B B* which on substituting for \({B^{\ast}=A_{B} e^{m_{B}t^{\ast}}}\)implies that t max is a function of the transition age t* given by

$$ t_{max} \,(t^{\ast} )=t^{\ast} +\left( {\frac{1}{m_B }} \right)\left[ {\left( {\frac{B_{max}}{A_B }} \right)e^{-m_B t^{\ast} }-1} \right] $$
(A1)

Appendix 2

Estimates for parameters q 1 and q 2

A. Parameter q 1

An estimate for the parameter q 1 can be obtained from observed food-intake-rate of captive individuals of the Australian Giant Cuttlefish Sepia apama (Grist and Jackson 2004). It was noted by O’Dor et al. (2005) that at a body mass of 229 g, the feeding rate F r was 36 g per day (hence 36/229 = 16% body mass per day), so with the energy equivalent in food (animal tissue) of 4.1868 kJ g −1 and typical cephalopod efficiencies of 50% wastage and 90% assimilation through digestion,

$$ q_{1}=F_{r}/ B^{0.75} = (0.5 \times 0.9) \times (36 \times 4.1868)/(229^{0.75}) = 1.15 \quad [\hbox{kJ/day/g}^{0.75}] $$
(A2)

B. Parameter q 2

Metabolic rate M r scales with B 0.75 where B is body mass and is proportional to oxygen consumption rate O c . Hence O c k 1 B 0.75 where k 1 is in practice also a temperature-dependent constant. Seibel et al. (2000) found that citrate synthase activity y cs is given by y cs  = aB b (where a and b are constants) and in squid mantle muscle is highly correlated with the whole animal oxygen consumption rate.

For a tentacle obtained from an Architeuthis estimated to have had a body mass B = 20,000g, they obtained at 20°C that y cs  = 0.76 and b = −0.25 and hence it follows that a = 0.76/(20000)−0.25 = 9.0380 so that

$$ y_{cs} = 9.038 B^{-0.25}\quad [\hbox{unspecified units/g}] $$
(A3)

For pelagic cephalopods in general, Seibel et al. (2000) found also that oxygen consumption rate O c [μ mol/g/h] can be expressed in terms of citrate synthase activity by the linear relationship

$$ O_{c}=0.72 y_{cs}-0.043\quad [\mu \hbox{mol/g/h}] $$
(A4)

Combining Eq. A3 and A4 together, an estimate for the oxygen consumption rate of Architeuthis at 20°C is given by O c = 0.72(9.0380 B −0.25) − 0.043 or

$$ O_{c}=6.5074 B^{-0.25}-0.043\quad [\mu \hbox{mol/g/h}] $$
(A5)

which, when expressed equivalently in ml/g/day (using a conversion factor of 0.5348) and evaluated over the whole animal body mass approximates to

$$ O_{c }=3.4802 B^{0.75}\quad [\hbox{ml/day}] $$
(A6)

The factor by which oxygen consumption rate (and hence k 1) would reduce when temperature is reduced from 20°C to 5°C was obtained as 0.7 from comparison of the metabolic rates determined for the deep sea squid Vampyroteuthis infernalis and Histeoteuthis heteropsis by Seibel et al. (1997, 2000).

At an ambient temperature of 5°C in the deep sea, an estimate for Architeuthis oxygen consumption rate is hence

$$ O_{c }=0.7 \times (3.4802 B^{0.75}) $$
(A7)
$$ =2.4361 B^{0.75}\quad [\hbox{ml/day}] $$
(A8)

Using the value of 0.01926 kJ/mL metabolic energy released per mL of oxygen expended, the metabolic rate at 5°C would then be M r = 0.01926 × (2.4361 B 0.75) or

$$ M_{r }=0.0469 B^{0.75}\quad[\hbox{kJ/day}] $$
(A9)

so that q 2 = 0.0469 day/kJ/g 0.75.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Grist, E.P.M., Jackson, G.D. How long would it take to become a giant squid?. Rev Fish Biol Fisheries 17, 385–399 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11160-007-9046-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11160-007-9046-x

Keywords

Navigation