Video and acoustic camera techniques for studying fish under ice: a review and comparison
- First Online:
- 480 Downloads
Researchers attempting to study the presence, abundance, size, and behavior of fish species in northern and arctic climates during winter face many challenges, including the presence of thick ice cover, snow cover, and, sometimes, extremely low temperatures. This paper describes and compares the use of video and acoustic cameras for determining fish presence and behavior in lakes, rivers, and streams with ice cover. Methods are provided for determining fish density and size, identifying species, and measuring swimming speed and successful applications of previous surveys of fish under the ice are described. These include drilling ice holes, selecting batteries and generators, deploying pan and tilt cameras, and using paired colored lasers to determine fish size and habitat associations. We also discuss use of infrared and white light to enhance image-capturing capabilities, deployment of digital recording systems and time-lapse techniques, and the use of imaging software. Data are presented from initial surveys with video and acoustic cameras in the Sagavanirktok River Delta, Alaska, during late winter 2004. These surveys represent the first known successful application of a dual-frequency identification sonar (DIDSONTM) acoustic camera under the ice that achieved fish detection and sizing at camera ranges up to 16 m. Feasibility tests of video and acoustic cameras for determining fish size and density at various turbidity levels are also presented. Comparisons are made of the different techniques in terms of suitability for achieving various fisheries research objectives. This information is intended to assist researchers in choosing the equipment that best meets their study needs.
KeywordsAcoustic camera DIDSON Fish surveys Video Ice Sagavanirktok River Alaska
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Belcher EO (2004) Case study: Alaska Department of Fish and Game uses DIDSON to count salmon swimming up-river to spawn. Available at http://www.soundmetrics.com/NEWS/REPORTS/AlaskaFishCaseStudy_ WApdf.
- Belcher EO, Matsuyama B, Trimble GM (2001) Object identification with acoustic lenses. In: An Ocean Odyssey – Oceans 2001 MTS/IEEE Conference Proceedings, vol. 1. Marine Technology Society, Washington, DC, pp 6–11Google Scholar
- Belcher EO, Hanot W, Burch J (2002) Dual-frequency identification sonar. In: Underwater Technology 2002 – Proceedings of the 2002 International Symposium on Underwater Technology. Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers, Inc., Piscataway, NJ, pp 187–192Google Scholar
- Bergström BI, Gustavsson A, Strömberg J-O (1992) Determination of abundance of gelatinous plankton with a remotely operated vehicle (ROV). Arch Hydrobiol 36:59–65Google Scholar
- Crawford RE, Jorgenson JK (1996) Quantitative studies of Arctic cod, Boreogadus saida schools: important energy stores in the Arctic food web. Arctic 49:181–193Google Scholar
- Crawford RE, Jorgenson J (1990) Density distribution of fish in the presence of whales at the Admiralty Inlet landfast ice edge. Arctic 43:215–222Google Scholar
- Fish JP, Carr HA (1990) Sound underwater images, a guide to the generation and interpretation of side scan sonar data. Lower Cape Pub Co, Orleans, MA, pp 189Google Scholar
- Jobling M (1995) Environmental biology of fishes. Fish and Fisheries Series 16, Chapman and Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Johnson RL, McKinstry CA, Mueller RP (2004) Chinook salmon adult abundance monitoring – hydroacoustic assessment of chinook salmon escapement to the Secesh River, Idaho. PNNL-14513, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WAGoogle Scholar
- Johnson GE, Hanks ME, Hedgespeth JB, McFadden BD, Moursund RA, Mueller RP, Skalski JR (2003) Hydroacoustic evaluation of turbine intake J-occlusions at the Dalles Dam. PNWD-3226, Battelle-Pacific Northwest Division, Richland, WAGoogle Scholar
- Lythgoe JN (1988) Light and vision in the aquatic environment. In: Atema J, Fay RR, Popper AN, Tavolga WN (eds) Sensory biology of aquatic animals. Springer-Verlag, New York, pp 57–82Google Scholar
- Maxwell SL, Gove NE (2004) The feasibility of estimating migrating salmon passage rates in turbid rivers using a Dual Frequency Identification Sonar (DIDSON) 2002. Regional Information Report 1 No. 2A04-05, Alaska Department of Fish and Game Division of Commercial Fisheries, Anchorage, AKGoogle Scholar
- Mueller RP, Moursund RA, Degerman TM, McMichael GA (2003) Feasibility of monitoring fall Chinook salmon fallback at Priest Rapids Dam using an acoustic camera 2001. In: McMichael GA et al (eds) Chinook salmon in the priest rapids project, Technical Appendix E-4.B, Public Utility District No. 2 of Grant County. Ephrata, WA, pp 4.4-1–4.4-18. Available at http://www.gcpud.org/relicensing.htm
- Oliver JS, Kvitek RG (1984) Side-scan sonar records and diver observations of gray whale (Eschrichticus robustus) feeding grounds. Biol Bull Acad Sci USSR 167:264–269Google Scholar
- Weiland MA, Carlson TJ (2003) Technologies for evaluating fish passage through turbines. PNNL-14437, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA (http://www.hydropower.id.doe.gov/)Google Scholar
- Whittington RJ, Forsberg CF, Dowdeswell JA (1997) Seismic and side-scan sonar investigations of recent sedimentation in an ice-proximal glacimarine setting, Kongsfjorden, North-west Spitsbergen. In: Davies TA, Bell T, Cooper A, Josenhans H, Polyak L, Solhein A, Stoker MS (eds) Glaciated continental margins: an atlas of acoustic images. Chapman and Hall, London, pp 175–178Google Scholar