Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries

, Volume 15, Issue 3, pp 191–199 | Cite as

Fishing Rights or Fishing Wrongs?

Special Segment: Rights Based Fisheries


Increasing attention is being paid to overfishing and the biological, economic, and social implications of persistent mismanagement of aquatic natural resources. In this chorus of concern, little attention is focused on sustainable fisheries, and the lessons to be learned from management systems that produce these successes. Although there is no one prescription for sustainability, a range of quota-based management tools have been used to eliminate the race for fish, increasing the incentives for long-term investment and efficiency. Variously referred to as fishing rights, tenure rights, or dedicated access privileges, quota-based fisheries confer a percentage (or quota) of the total allowable catch to named entities over some predetermined period, from short-term auction systems to intergenerational customary sea tenure. Whether a rights-based system stems from a traditional fishing rights system or has been recently introduced into modern commercial fisheries, achieving sustainability in the fishery is dependent on incentivizing the collective – from local communities to national fleets – to actively participate in self-regulation of the resource. Thus criticism of the approach often stems from the observation of the potential for cheating at the individual level (e.g., high grading, excessive discards), and the necessary exclusivity that accompanies any transition in management from open access to club membership. It is also worth noting that the resource in question – the fish – remain a public good, and as such, the public should be compensated – or at least not taxed – for their use. Thus the cost of fishery management, and the windfall profits of fishery conversion, should be shared. Rights-based management is not a silver bullet, and is probably not appropriate for all fisheries; however, the successes of the longline fisheries for Pacific halibut and sablefish in Alaska, the artisanal fisheries for loco in Chile and for spiny lobster in Mexico, and the Australian fisheries for Northern prawns and rock lobster, all clearly indicate that fishing rights should have a central place in the fisheries management toolbox.


auctions co-ops dedicated access privileges ITQ sea tenure sustainable fisheries Quotas 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Acheson, J.M. 1988Lobster Gangs of MaineUniversity Press of New EnglandHanover, NH181Google Scholar
  2. Acheson, J.M., Taylor, L. 2001The anatomy of the Maine lobster comanagement lawSoc. Nat. Resour.14425441Google Scholar
  3. Adams, T.J. 1998The interface between traditional and modern methods of fishery management in the Pacific IslandsOcean Coastal Manage.40127142Google Scholar
  4. Anderson, L.G. 1995A commentary on the views of environmental groups on access control in fisheriesOcean Coastal Manage.28165188Google Scholar
  5. Annala, J.H. 1996New Zealand’s ITQ system: Have the first eight years been a success or a failureRev. Fish Biol. Fisheries64362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Arnason, R. 1995The Icelandic FisheriesFishing News BooksOxford177Google Scholar
  7. Arnason, R. 2005Property rights in fisheries: Iceland’s experience with ITQsRev. Fish Biol. Fisheries15221241Google Scholar
  8. Aswani, S. 2005Customary sea tenure in Oceania as a case of rights-based fishery management: Does it work?Rev. Fish Biol. Fisheries15263285Google Scholar
  9. Barton, J. 2002Fisheries and fisheries management in Falkland Islands conservation zonesAquat. Conserv.: Mar. Freshwater Ecosyst.12127135Google Scholar
  10. Beakstead, D. and Brown, W.M. (2005) Provincial income disparities through an urban-rural lens: Evidence from the 2001 census. Analytical Paper. Statistics Canada. 11-624-MIE no. 012.Google Scholar
  11. Bromley, D.W. 2005Purging the frontier from our mind: Crafting a new fisheries policyRev. Fish Biol. Fisheries15193207Google Scholar
  12. Castilla, J.C., Manríquez, P., Alvarado, J., Rosson, A., Pino, C., Espoz, C., Soto, R., Oliva, D. and Defeo, O. (1998) Artisanal “Caletas” as units of production and co-managers of benthic invertebrates in Chile. In: Jamieson, G.S. and Campell, A. (eds.), Proceedings of the North Pacific Symposium on Invertebrate Stock Assessment and Management. Can. Spec. Publ. Fish. Aquat. Sci. Vol. 125, pp. 407–413.Google Scholar
  13. Castilla, J.C., Fernandez, M. 1998Small-scale benthic fisheries in Chile: On co-management and sustainable use of benthic invertebratesEcol. Appl.8S124S132Google Scholar
  14. Christy, F.T. 1997

    Economic waste in fisheries: Impediments to change and conditions for improvement

    Pikitch, E.K.Huppert, D.D.Sissenwine, M.P. eds. Global Trends: Fisheries ManagementAmerican Fisheries Society Symposium 20Bethesda2839
    Google Scholar
  15. Copes, P. 1986A critical review of the individual quota as a device in fisheries managementLand Econ.62278291Google Scholar
  16. Defeo, O., Castilla, J.C. 2005More than one bag for the world fishery crisis and keys for co-management successes in selected artisanal Latin American shellfisheriesRev. Fish Biol. Fisheries15243261Google Scholar
  17. Fujita, R., Bonzon, K. 2005Rights-based fisheries management: An environmentalist’s perspectiveRev. Fish Biol. Fisheries15287289Google Scholar
  18. Fujita, R., Bonzon, K., Wilen, J., Solow, A., Arnason, R., Cannon, J., Polasky, S. 2004

    Rationality of chaos? Global fisheries at a crossroads

    Glover, L.K.Earle, S.A. eds. Defying Ocean’s End: An Agenda for ActionIsland PressWashington139149
    Google Scholar
  19. Gauvin, J.R., Ward, J.M., Burgess, E.E. 1994Description and evaluation of the wreckfish fishery under individual transferable quotasMar. Resour. Econ.999118Google Scholar
  20. Gelcich, S., Edwards-Jones, G., Kaiser, M.J., Watson, E. 2005Using discourses for policy evaluation: The case of marine common property rights in ChileSoc. Nat. Resour.18377391Google Scholar
  21. Gonzalez, E., Norambuena, R., Garcia, M. 2001

    Initial allocation of harvesting rights in the Chilean fishery for Patagonian toothfish

    Shotton, R. eds. Case Studies on the Allocation of Transferable Quota Rights in FisheriesUN FAORome305321
    Google Scholar
  22. Gordon, H.S. 1954The Economic Theory of a common property resource: The fisheryJ. Political Econ.62124142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hannesson, R. 2005Rights based fishing: Use rights versus property rights to fishRev. Fish Biol. Fisheries15209219Google Scholar
  24. Hardin, G. 1968Tragedy of the commonsScience16212431248Google Scholar
  25. Hilborn, R., Branch, T.A., Ernst, B., Magnusson, A., Minte-Vera, C.V., Scheuerell, M.D., Valero, J.L. 2003State of the world’s fisheriesAnnu. Rev. Environ. Resour.28359399Google Scholar
  26. Holland, D.S., Ginter, J.J.C. 2001Common property institutions in the Alaskan groundfish fisheriesMar. Policy253342Google Scholar
  27. Huppert, D.D. 2005An overview of fishing rightsRev. Fish Biol. Fisheries15175191Google Scholar
  28. Ianelli, J. 2005Assessment and fisheries management of eastern Bering Sea walleye pollock: Is sustainability luck?Bull. Mar. Sci.76321335Google Scholar
  29. Jackson, J.B.C., Kirby, M.X., Berger, W.H., Bjorndal, K.A., Botsford, L.W., Bourque, B.J., Bradbury, R.H., Cooke, R., Erlandson, J., Estes, J.A., Hughes, T.P., Kidwell, S., Lange, C.B., Lenihan, H.S., Pandolfi, J.M., Peterson, C.H., Steneck, R.S., Tegner, M.J., Warner, R.R. 2001Historical overfishing and the recent collapse of coastal ecosystemsScience293629638PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Jennings, F.B. Jr. (1999) Scaring the fish: A critique of the NRC’s justification for individual transferable quotas (ITQs) and a ‘systems analysis’ of their likely effects. A report submitted to Greenpeace. Center for Ecological Economic and Ethical Education.Google Scholar
  31. Johannes, R.E. 1981Words of the Lagoon: Fishing and Marine Lore in the Palau District of MicronesiaUniversity of California PressBerkley, CAGoogle Scholar
  32. Johannes, R.E. 2002The renaissance of community-based marine resource management in OceaniaAnnu. Rev. Ecol. Syst.33317340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lack, M., Short, K. and Willock, A. (2003) Managing risk and uncertainty in deep-sea fisheries: Lessons from Orange Roughy. TRAFFIC Oceania and WWF Australia.Google Scholar
  34. Macinko, S., Bromley, D.W. 2002Who Owns America’s FisheriesIsland PressWashington, DC41Google Scholar
  35. Matulich, S.C., Mittelhammer, R.C., Reberte, C. 1996Towards a more complete model of individual transferable fishing quotas: Implications of incorporating the processing sectorJ. Environ. Econ. Manage.31112128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. McCay, B.J. 1995Social and ecological implications of ITQs: An overviewOcean Coastal Manage.28322Google Scholar
  37. Milazzo, M. 1998Subsidies in World Fisheries – A Re-examinationThe International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/World BankWashington, DC86World Bank Technical Paper No. 406.Google Scholar
  38. National Research Council1999aSharing the Fish: Toward a National Policy on Individual Fishing QuotasNational Academy PressWashington, DCGoogle Scholar
  39. National Research Council1999bThe Community Development Quota Program in AlaskaNational Academy PressWashington, DCGoogle Scholar
  40. National Research Council2003Cooperative Research in the National Marine Fisheries ServiceNational Academy PressWashington, DCGoogle Scholar
  41. Orensanz, J.M., Hilborn, R. and Parma, A.M. (2000) Harvesting Methuselah’s clams: Is the geoduck fishery sustainable, or just apparently so? Can. Stock Assess. Secr., Res. Doc. 2000/175. 68 pp.Google Scholar
  42. Pauly, D., Christensen, V., Guenette, S., Pitcher, T., Sumaila, U.R, Walters, C.J, Watson, R., Zeller, D. 2002Towards sustainability in world fisheriesNature418689695CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Peña-Torries, J. 1997The political economy of fishing regulations: The case of ChileMar. Resour. Econ.12253280Google Scholar
  44. Pikitch, E.K., Santora, C., Babcock, E.A., Bakun, A., Bonfil, R., Conover, D.O., Dayton, P., Doukakis, P., Fluharty, D., Henneman, B., Houde, E.D., Link, J., Livingston, P.A., Mangel, M., McAllister, M.K., Pope, J., Sainsbury, K.J. 2004Ecosystem-based fishery managementScience305346347CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Ruddle, K. 1989

    The organization of traditional inshore fishery management systems in the Pacific

    Neher, P.A.Arnason, R.Mollett, N. eds. Rights Based FishingKluwer Academic PublishingDordrecht, Netherlands7385
    Google Scholar
  46. Ruddle, K. 1998The context of policy design for existing community-based fisheries management systems in the Pacific IslandsOcean Coastal Manage.40105126Google Scholar
  47. Schreiber, D.K. 2001Co-management without involvement: The plight of fishing communitiesFish Fisheries2376384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Sissenwine, M.P., Rosenberg, A.A. 1993US fisheries: Status, long-term potential yields, and stock management ideasOceanus364854Google Scholar
  49. Smith, A.D.M., Sainsbury, K.J., Stevens, R.A. 1999Implementing effective fisheries-management systems – management strategy evaluation and the Australian partnership approachICES J. Mar. Sci.56967979CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization (UN FAO). (2002) Yearbook of Fishery Statistics. Vol. 91. Rome, 20 pp.Google Scholar
  51. US Commission on Ocean Policy (USCOP). (2004) An Ocean Blueprint for the 21st Century. Final Report. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  52. Virdin, J. and Schorr, D. (2001) Hard facts, hidden problems: A review of current data on fishing subsidies. World Wildlife Fund Technical Paper.Google Scholar
  53. Warren, B., Drouin, M. 2000Tribal fishing rightsPacific Fish.212631Google Scholar
  54. Wilen, J.E. 2005

    Property rights and the texture of rents in fisheries

    Leal, D.R. eds. Evolving Property Rights in Marine FisheriesRowan and Littlefield Publishers Inc.Lanham, MD4967
    Google Scholar
  55. Wilen, J.E., Homans, F.R. 1997

    Unraveling rent losses in modern fisheries: Production, market, or regulatory inefficiencies?

    Pikitch, E.K.Huppert, D.D.Sissenwine, M.P. eds. Global Trends: Fisheries ManagementAmerican Fisheries Society Symposium 20Bethesda, MD256263
    Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Aquatic and Fishery SciencesUniversity of Washington SeattleSeattleUSA

Personalised recommendations