Skip to main content
Log in

Bycatch quotas in the Gulf of Mexico shrimp trawl fishery: can they work?

  • Published:
Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Bycatch of unwanted, prohibited, or protected species is a problem in most commercial fisheries. Trawl fisheries are particularly prone to bycatch problems because trawls are not species-selective. In this paper, I review the history of finfish bycatch research in the Gulf of Mexico shrimp trawl fishery and explore the use of quotas to reduce finfish bycatch by examining four fisheries that currently use bycatch quotas: (1) the arrow squid trawl fishery of New Zealand, which uses fleet bycatch quotas for sea lion bycatch, (2) the Alaskan groundfish trawl fisheries, which use fleet quotas under a “vessel incentive program” for prohibited species, (3) the groundfish trawl fishery of British Columbia, Canada which uses individual vessel bycatch quotas for prohibited species, and (4) the multi-species trawl fisheries of New Zealand, which use catch balancing, or individual transferable quotas, for most commercially landed species. Based on the bycatch quota experiences in these fisheries, elements of successful bycatch quota programs include: (1) individual accountability, in the form of individual or cooperative bycatch quotas, rather than fleet quotas, (2) 100% observer coverage, (3) relatively small, manageable fleets, (4) limited landing ports that can be easily monitored, particularly if observer coverage is incomplete, (5) reliable enforcement, (6) penalties that are true disincentives, and (7) some flexibility in the system for fishermen to have alternatives to manage their bycatch. The Gulf of Mexico shrimp trawl fishery, with an estimated 20,000 licensed boats, is currently too large for individual bycatch quotas to be practical, although individual or cooperative bycatch quotas would be excellent strategies for reducing the bycatch of a smaller fleet. Mobile closed areas might be beneficial for reducing the bycatch of particular species, but these short-term closures would require real-time monitoring of bycatch rates and vessel monitoring systems on all vessels. However, under any management regime, incentives and/or rigorously enforced disincentives are the key to successful bycatch reduction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adkins, G. (1993) A comprehensive assessment of bycatch in the Louisiana shrimp fishery. Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries, Marine Fisheries Division, Technical Bulletin No. 42.

  • D.G. Ainley A.R. Gange ParticleDe L.L. Jones R.J. Beach (1981) ArticleTitleMortality of seabirds in high-seas salmon gill nets Fish. Bull. 79 IssueID4 800–806

    Google Scholar 

  • Alverson, D.L., Freeberg, M.H., Murawski, S.A. and Pope, J.G. (1994) A global assessment of fisheries bycatch and discards. Food and Agriculture Organization Fisheries Technical Paper No. 339, 233 pp.

  • Anderson, W.W. (1968) Fishes taken during shrimp trawling along the South Atlantic coast of the United States, 1931–1935. Bureau of Commercial Fisheries Biological Laboratory, Contribution No. 92. United States Fish and Wildlife Service, Special Scientific Report–Fisheries No. 570, Brunswick, GA, 60 pp.

  • Anderson, W.W. and Gehringer, J.W. (1965) Biological–statistical census of the species entering fisheries in the Cape Canaveral area. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Special Scientific Report – Fisheries No. 514, 79 pp.

  • J.H. Annala (1996) ArticleTitleNew Zealand’s ITQ system: have the first eight years been a success or a failure? Rev.Fish Biol. Fisher. 6 43–62

    Google Scholar 

  • F. Arreguin-Sanchez R.G. Castro-Melendez (2000) ArticleTitleOn the interdependence of sequential fisheries: the brown shrimp Farfantepenaeus aztecus fisheries in the northwestern Gulf of Mexico. Crustaceana 73 IssueID3 333–343

    Google Scholar 

  • F. Arreguin-Sanchez M. Zetina-Rejon S. Manickchand- Helleman M. Ramirez-Rodriguiz L. Vidal (2004) ArticleTitleSimulated response to harvesting strategies in an exploited ecosystem in the southwestern Gulf of Mexico Ecol. Model. 172 IssueID(2–4) 421–432

    Google Scholar 

  • Bahen, J.J., Murray, J.D. and Rulifson, R.A. (1993). Development and evaluation of finfish separator device and TED combination to reduce bycatch in the shrimp fishery. Final Report to MARFIN, Award No. NA17FD0101-01. University of North Carolina Sea Grant Program, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC.

  • D.M. Baltz (1993) Patterns in the distribution and abundance of fishes and macroinvertebrates in a Louisiana marsh: shrimp bycatch in the inshore fishery-independent trawl samples. Louisiana State University, Coastal Fisheries Institute Baton Rouge, LA

    Google Scholar 

  • J.K. Baum J.J. Meeuwig A.C.J. Vincent (2003) ArticleTitleBycatch of lined seahorses (Hippocampus erectus) in a Gulf of Mexico shrimp trawl fishery Fish. Bull. 101 IssueID4 721–731

    Google Scholar 

  • Bearden, C., Low, R., Rhodes, R., Van Dolan, R., Wenner, C., Wenner, E. and Whitaker, D. (1985) A review and analysis of commercial shrimp trawling in the sounds and bays of South Carolina. South Carolina Marine Resources Center, Technical Report No. 61, 51 pp.

  • R.J. Berry J.B. Harvey (1964) Mesh selectivity studies. U.S. Department of Interior, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Bureau of Commercial Fisheries Biological Laboratory Galveston, TX

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, R. J., and Benton, R.C. (1969) Discarding practices in the Gulf of Mexico shrimp fishery. Food and Agricultural Organization Fisheries Report No. 57(3), pp. 983–999.

  • Bess, R. (2002) Expanding New Zealand’s quota management system. Paper presented at International Institute of Fisheries Economics and Trade (IIFET) Conference, August 19–22, 2002, Wellington, New Zealand. [cited 2004 October 20]. Available from: http://www.fish.govt.nz/current/press/spcon-fpap.htm.

  • R.O. Boyd C.M. Dewees (1992) ArticleTitlePutting theory into practice: individual transferable quotas in New Zealand’s fisheries Soc. Natur. Resour. 5 179–198

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Branstetter (1997) Bycatch and its reduction in the Gulf of Mexico and South Atlantic shrimp fisheries. Gulf and South Atlantic Fisheries Development Foundation Inc. Suite 997, Lincoln Center, 5401 West Kennedy Boulevard, Tampa, Florida

    Google Scholar 

  • P.A. Breen R. Hilborn M.N. Maunder S.W. Kim (2003) ArticleTitleEffects of alternative control rules on the conflict between a fishery and a threatened sea lion (Phocarctos hookeri) Can. J. Fish. Aquatic Sci. 60 IssueID5 527–541

    Google Scholar 

  • J.A. Browder (1983) A simulation model of a near-shore marine ecosystem of the north-central Gulf of Mexico K.W. Turgeon (Eds) Marine Ecosystem Modelling Frederick, MD. NOAA Washington, DC 179–222

    Google Scholar 

  • Browder, J.A. (1992) An application of the ecosystem approach to fishery management research in the Gulf of Mexico. In: Proceedings of the shrimp trawl bycatch workshop, November 22–23, 1991. St. Petersburg, FL. Center for Marine Conservation, Washington, DC, pp. 8–10.

  • Browder, J. A. (1993) A pilot model of the Gulf of Mexico continental shelf. In: Christensen, V. and Pauly, D. (eds.), Trophic Models of Aquatic Ecosystems. ICLARM Conference Proceedings No. 26, pp. 279–284.

  • B.E. Brown J.A. Browder J. Powers C.P. Goodyear (1991) Biomass, yield models and management strategies for the Gulf of Mexico ecosystem K. Sherman (Eds) Biomass, Yield Models and Management Strategies AAAS Publication, Westview Press Boulder, CO 125–163

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Brown E.G. McCoy (1969) A review of the North Carolina scrap fishery. North Carolina Department of Conservation and Development,Division of Commercial and Sports Fisheries Raleigh, NC

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryan, C.E., Cody, T.J. and Matlock, G.C. (1982) Organisms captured by the commercial shrimp fleet on the Texas brown shrimp grounds. Texas Parks and Wildlife Department, Technical Series No. 31, 26 pp.

  • Burchfield, P.M. and Peña, L.J. (2003) A sea turtle stranding network as part of the Mexico/United States of America population restoration project for the Kemp’s ridley sea turtle. Final report to the National Marine Fisheries Service in partial fulfillment of service order #WC133F-02-SE-0290 [cited 2004 October 19]. Available from: http://www.sefsc.noaa.gov/PDFdocs/CR_Burchfield_Pena_Strandings_rep ort_2003.pdf

  • G.H. Burgess D.B. Snyder (1993) Fish bycatch from inshore shrimp fisheries in Florida. Lake Buena Vista, Florida, Southeastern Fisheries Association Tallahassee, FL 83–84

    Google Scholar 

  • C.Y. Burridge J.B. Robbins (2000) ArticleTitleBenefits of statistical blocking techniques in the design of gear evaluation trials: introducing the Latin Square design Fish. Res. 47 IssueID1 69–79

    Google Scholar 

  • N. Carter R. Colura (1996) Comparison of survival of bycatch associated with bait shrimping in three Texas estuarine areas. Texas Parks and Wildlife Department Perry R. Bass Marine Fisheries Research Station Palacios, TX

    Google Scholar 

  • M.I. Castro-Gonzales J.L.S. Barrita M.E.J. Silva S.M. Benavides F.P.G. Romo (1998) ArticleTitleChemical composition of shrimp by-catch fauna in Veracruz (Gulf of Mexico) Rev. Biol. Trop. 46 IssueID2 249–256

    Google Scholar 

  • M.E. Chittenden J.D. McEachran SuffixJr. (1976) Composition ecology and dynamics of demersal fish communities on the northwestern Gulf of Mexico continental shelf, with a similar synopsis for the entire Gulf. Final Report to Texas Sea Grant (TAMU-SG-76-208). Texas A&M University, College Station TX

    Google Scholar 

  • P.A. Christian D.L. Harrington (1987) Loggerhead turtle finfish and shrimp retention studies on four turtle excluder devices (TEDs). Georgia Dept. of Natural Resources, Social Circle GA 114–127

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Christian D.L. Harrington D.R. Amos R.G. Overman L.G. Parker J.B. Rivers (1993) Final report on the reduction of finfish capture in South Atlantic shrimp trawls. University of Georgia Marine Extension Service Brunswick, GA

    Google Scholar 

  • J.S. Coale (1992) Changes in bycatch using skimmer trawl in the North Carolina shrimp fishery. Dept. of Biology, East Carolina University Greenville, NC

    Google Scholar 

  • J.S. Coale R.A. Rulifson J.D. Murray R. Hines (1994) ArticleTitleComparisons of shrimp catch and bycatch between a skimmer trawl and an otter trawl in the North Carolina inshore shrimp fishery North Am. J. Fish. Manage. 14 751–768

    Google Scholar 

  • F.C. Coleman C.C. Koenig W.F. Herrnkind (1991) Survey of Florida inshore trawling bycatch and preliminary tests of by-catch reduction devices. Institute for Fishery Resource Ecology, Florida State University Tallahassee, FL

    Google Scholar 

  • F.C. Coleman C.C. Koenig W.F. Herrnkind (1992) Survey of Florida inshore trawling bycatch and preliminary tests of by-catch reduction devices. Institute for Fishery Resource Ecology, Florida State University Tallahassee, FL

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Colura B.W. Bumguardner (2001) ArticleTitleEffect of the salt-box catch–bycatch separation procedure, as used by the Texas shrimp industry, on short-term survival of bycatch Fish. Bull. 99 IssueID3 399–409

    Google Scholar 

  • R.D. Condrey D. Fuller (1992) The US Gulf shrimp fishery M.H. Glanz (Eds) Climate Variability, Climate Change, and Fisheries Cambridge University Press Cambridge, UK 89–119

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Cortes (1995) ArticleTitleDemographic analysis of the Atlantic sharpnose shark, Rhizoprionodon terraenovae, in the Gulf of Mexico Fish. Bull. 93 IssueID1 57–66

    Google Scholar 

  • D.T. Crouse L.B. Crowder H. Caswell (1987) ArticleTitleA stage-based population model for loggerhead sea turtles and implications for conservation Ecology 68 IssueID5 1412–1423

    Google Scholar 

  • D.H. Cushing (1984) Do discards affect the production of shrimps in the Gulf of Mexico J.S. Gulland B.J. Rothschild (Eds) Penaeid shrimps–their biology and management Fishing News Books, Ltd. Farnham, Surrey, UK 254–258

    Google Scholar 

  • S.L. Diamond (1999) The population-level impacts of shrimp trawl bycatch on Atlantic croaker. North Carolina State University Raleigh, NC

    Google Scholar 

  • S.L. Diamond (2003) ArticleTitleEstimation of bycatch in shrimp trawl fisheries: a comparison of estimation methods using field data and simulated data Fish. Bull. 101 IssueID3 484–500

    Google Scholar 

  • S.L. Diamond D.A. Hanan (1986) An estimate of harbor porpoise mortality in California set net fisheries Southwest Fisheries Science Center La Jolla, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • S.L. Diamond L.B. Crowder L.G. Cowell (1999) ArticleTitleCatch and bycatch: the qualitative effects of fisheries on population vital rates of Atlantic croaker Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 128 1085–1105

    Google Scholar 

  • S.L. Diamond L.G. Cowell L.B. Crowder (2000) ArticleTitlePopulation impacts of shrimp trawl bycatch on Atlantic croaker Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci 57 2010–2021

    Google Scholar 

  • N. Ehrhardt (1996) Impacts of TED and BRD designs on overall finfish bycatch reduction and their relative effects on management strategies adopted in directed finfish fisheries. University of Miami–Rosentiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Sciences Virginia Beach Drive,Miami, FL

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Engaas D. Foster B.D. Hataway J.W. Watson I. Workman (1999) ArticleTitleThe behavioral response of juvenile red snapper (Lutjanus campechanus) to shrimp trawls that utilize water flow modifications to induce escapement Mar. Technol. Soc. J. 33 IssueID2 43–50

    Google Scholar 

  • W.E. Fahy (1965a) Report of trash fish study in North Carolina in 1962. North Carolina Department of Conservation and Development, Division of Commercial and Sports Fisheries Raleigh, NC

    Google Scholar 

  • W.E. Fahy (1965b) Report of trash fish study in North Carolina in 1964. North Carolina Department of Conservation and Development, Division of Commercial and Sports Fisheries Raleigh, NC

    Google Scholar 

  • W.E. Fahy (1966) ArticleTitleSpecies composition of the North Carolina industrial fish fishery Commer. Fish. Rev. 28 IssueID7 1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Federal Register (1987) Sea turtle conservation; shrimp trawling requirements. 50 CFR Parts 272, 222, 227 and 52 FR 24244. June 27, 1987, Washington, DC.

  • Federal Register (1998) Fisheries of the Caribbean, Gulf of Mexico, and South Atlantic; Shrimp Fishery of the Gulf of Mexico; Amendment 9. 63(71): 970523122-8022-02. April 14, 1998, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Federal Register (2002) Fisheries of the Caribbean, Gulf of Mexico, and South Atlantic; Shrimp Fishery of the Gulf of Mexico; Amendment 11. 67(152): 011018254-2153-02. August 7, 2002, Washington, DC.

  • Federal Register (2003a) Endangered and threatened wildlife; sea turtle conservation requirements. 68(35):000320077-2302-03. February 21, 2003, Washington, DC.

  • Federal Register (2003b) Notice of decision on petition for rulemaking on bycatch. 68(47): 030224043-3043-01. March 11, 2003, Washington, DC.

  • Federal Register (2003c) Financial assistance for fisheries disasters. 68(102): 030506116-3116-01. May 28, 2003, Washington, DC.

  • D. Fertl (1994) Occurrence movements and behavior of bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) in association with the shrimp fishery in Galveston Bay, Texas. Texas A&M University, College Station TX

    Google Scholar 

  • R.B. Fisher (1992) Introduction to bycatch R.W. Schoning R.W. Jacobson D.L. Alverson T.H. Gentle J. Auyong (Eds) Proceedings of National Industry Bycatch Workshop February 4–6, 1992 Natural Resources Consultants Seattle,WA 5–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisheries and Oceans Canada (2000) News release: Groundfish trawl fishery opens. NR-PR-00-36E. 2000 April 28. Available from the internet URL: http://www.pac.dfo-mpo.gc.ca/comm/pages/release/p-releas/2000/nr0036_e.htm.

  • Fisheries and Oceans Canada (2003) Fish stocks of the Pacific Coast: online book. Available from: http://www-comm.pac.dfo-mpo.gc.ca/publications/speciesbook/groundfish/default_e. htm.

  • Fisheries Statistics of the United States 1942–1977. US Fish and Wildlife Service, Bureau of Commercial Fisheries, Statistical Digest Numbers 36–71.

  • D.G. Foster E. Scott-Denton (2004) Status of bycatch reduction device performance and research in North–Central and Western Gulf of Mexico. Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council, The Commons at Rivergate Tampa, FL

    Google Scholar 

  • B. Fuls (1995) Assessment of composition and magnitude of bycatch associated with the commercial shrimp trawling industry in central lower Texas coastal bays during the spring and fall Texas commercial bay-shrimp open seasons. Texas Parks and Wildlife Department Corpus Christi TX

    Google Scholar 

  • B. Fuls (2001) Evaluation of shrimp trawl bycatch reduction devices in Texas bays. Texas Parks and Wildlife Department, Corpus Christi TX

    Google Scholar 

  • B.J. Gallaway J.G. Cole L.R. Martin J.M. Nance M. Longnecker (2003a) ArticleTitleAn evaluation of an electronic logbook as a more accurate method of estimating spatial patterns of trawling effort and bycatch in the Gulf of Mexico shrimp fishery North Am. J. Fish Manage. 23 IssueID3 787–809

    Google Scholar 

  • B.J. Gallaway J.G. Cole L.R. Martin J.M. Nance M. Longnecker (2003b) ArticleTitleDescription of a simple electronic logbook designed to measure effort in the Gulf of Mexico shrimp fishery North Am. J. Fish. Manage. 23 IssueID2 581–589

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Gearhart (1996) Introduction of large mesh webbing in the belly of a traditional shrimp trawl to reduce bycatch in inshore waters. Eastern Carolina University Greenville,NC

    Google Scholar 

  • J.R. Gilbert K.M. Wynne (1984) Harbor seal populations and fisheries interactions with marine mammals in New England 1984. National Marine Fisheries Service, Woods Hole MA

    Google Scholar 

  • C.P. Goodyear (1991) Sensitivity of shrimp-bycatch mortality estimates to natural mortality for red snapper. National Marine Fisheries Service, Southeast Fisheries Science Center,Miami Laboratory Virginia Beach Drive, Miami, FL

    Google Scholar 

  • C.P. Goodyear (1992) Red snappers in US waters of the Gulf of Mexico. Southeast Fisheries Science Center,Miami Laboratory Virginia Beach Drive, Miami, FL

    Google Scholar 

  • C.P. Goodyear (1994) Red snappers in US waters of the Gulf of Mexico. Southeast Fisheries Science Center, Miami Laboratory Virginia Beach Drive, Miami, FL

    Google Scholar 

  • C.P. Goodyear (1995) Red snapper in US waters of the Gulf of Mexico. Southeast Fisheries Science Center,Miami Laboratory, Coastal Resources Division Virginia Beach Drive, Miami, FL

    Google Scholar 

  • C.P. Goodyear P. Phares (1990) Status of red snapper stocks of the Gulf of Mexico report for 1990. National Marine Fisheries Service Southeast Fisheries Science Center, Miami Laboratory, Coastal Resources Division Virginia Beach Drive, Miami, FL

    Google Scholar 

  • W. Griffin (2004) Discussion of days fished expansion in the Gulf of Mexico shrimp fishery. Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council,The Commons at Rivergate Tampa, Florida

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, W.L. and Shah, A.K. (1995) Estimation of standardized effort in the heterogeneous Gulf of Mexico shrimp fleet. MARFIN Final Report, Award Number NA37FF053.

  • GSAFDF (Gulf and South Atlantic Fisheries Development Foundation) (1995) Continued observer coverage of the Gulf of Mexico and South Atlantic shrimp fisheries to characterize the catch and evaluate the efficiency of bycatch reduction devices. Final Report (Award NA47FM0131). Gulf and South Atlantic Fisheries Development Foundation, Tampa, FL 33609.

  • InstitutionalAuthorNameGMFMC (Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council) (1980) Draft Fishery Management Plan for Groundfish in the Gulf of Mexico. Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council ,The Commons at Rivergate Tampa, FL

    Google Scholar 

  • InstitutionalAuthorNameGMFMC (Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council) (2002) Red snapper rebuilding amendment scooping document. Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council,The Commons at Rivergate Tampa, FL.

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Gunter (1936) ArticleTitleStudies of the destruction of marine fish by shrimp trawlers in Louisiana La. Cons. Rev. 18–24 45–46

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Gunter (1956) Should fish and game fishes become more or less abundant as pressure increases in the trash fish fishery of the Gulf of Mexico? LA Dept. of Wildlife and Fisheries New Orleans LA

    Google Scholar 

  • E.J. Gutherz G.J. Pellegrin SuffixJr. (1986) Report on snapper–grouper mortality by shrimp trawlers in the US Gulf of Mexico. The Commons at Rivergate Tampa, FL

    Google Scholar 

  • E.J. Gutherz G.J. Pellegrin SuffixJr. (1988) ArticleTitleEstimate of the catch of red snapper, Lutjanus campechanus, by shrimp trawlers in the United States Gulf of Mexico Mar. Fish. Rev. 59 IssueID1 17–25

    Google Scholar 

  • M.G. Haby R.J. Miget L.L. Falconer G.L. Graham (2003) A review of current conditions in the Texas shrimp industry,an examination of contributing factors and suggestions for remaining competitive in the global shrimp market. TAMU-SG-03-701. Texas A&M Agricultural Research and Extension Center, Agnes St. Corpus Christi

    Google Scholar 

  • M.A. Hall (1996) ArticleTitleOn bycatches Rev. Fish Biol. Fisher. 6 319–352

    Google Scholar 

  • M.A. Hall D.L. Alverson K.I. Metuzals (2000) ArticleTitleBy-catch: problems and solutions Mar. Pollut. Bull. 41 IssueID(1–6) 204–219

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrington, D.L. (1996) Finfish excluder devices in the South Atlantic shrimp fishery. In: Castro, K., Corey, T., DeAlteris, J. and Gagnon, C. (eds.), Proceedings of the East Coast Bycatch Conference, April 7–8, 1995, Newport, RI. Rhode Island Sea Grant, University of Rhode Island Bay Campus, Narragansett, RI. December 1996, pp. 91–94.

  • P.J. Harris J.M. Dean (1998) ArticleTitleCharacterization of king mackerel and Spanish mackerel bycatches of South Carolina shrimp trawlers North Am. J. Fish. Manage. 18 IssueID2 439–453

    Google Scholar 

  • D.S. Heales D.T. Brewer Y.G. Wang (2000) ArticleTitleSubsampling multi-species trawl catches from tropical northern Australia: does it matter which part of the catch is sampled? Fish.Res. 48 IssueID2 117–126

    Google Scholar 

  • D.S. Heales D.T. Brewer P.N. Jones (2003a) ArticleTitleSubsampling trawl catches from vessels using seawater hoppers: are catch composition estimates biased Fish. Res. 63 IssueID1 13–120

    Google Scholar 

  • D.S. Heales D.T. Brewer Y.G. Wang P.N. Jones (2003b) ArticleTitleDoes the size of subsamples taken from multispecies trawl catches affect estimates of catch composition and abundance? Fish.Bull. 101 IssueID4 790–799

    Google Scholar 

  • V.I. Hensley D.A. Hensley (1995) ArticleTitleFishes eaten by sooty terns and brown noddies in the Dry Tortugas, Florida B. Mar. Sci. 56 IssueID3 813–821

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Higgins J.C. Pearson (1927) Examination of the summer fisheries of Pamlico and Core Sounds, N.C., with special reference to the destruction of undersized fish and the protection of the gray trout, Cynosion regalis US. Gov. Printing Office Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • K.L. Hines R.A. Rulifson J.D. Murray (1999) ArticleTitlePerformance of low-profile skimmer trawls in the inshore shrimp fishery of North Carolina North Am. J. Fish. Manage. 19 IssueID2 569–580

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Hoar J. Hoey J. Nance C Nelson (Eds) (1992) A research plan addressing finfish bycatch in the Gulf of Mexico and South Atlantic Shrimp Fisheries. Gulf and South Atlantic Fisheries Development Foundation Inc. Tampa, FL

    Google Scholar 

  • H.D. Hoese (1973) ArticleTitleA trawl study of nearshore fishes and invertebrates of the Georgia coast Contrib. Mar. Sci. 17 63–98

    Google Scholar 

  • B.F. Holland SuffixJr. (1989) Evaluation of certified trawl efficiency devices (TEDs) in North Carolina’s nearshore ocean. Division of Marine Fisheries Morehead City, NC

    Google Scholar 

  • D.S. Holland J.J.C. Ginter (2001) ArticleTitleCommon property institutions in the Alaskan groundfish fisheries Mar. Policy 25 33–42

    Google Scholar 

  • InstitutionalAuthorNameIPHC (International Pacific Halibut Commission) (1996) Annual Report Seattle WA

    Google Scholar 

  • InstitutionalAuthorNameIPHC (International Pacific Halibut Commission) (1997) Annual Report Seattle WA

    Google Scholar 

  • InstitutionalAuthorNameIPHC (International Pacific Halibut Commission) (1998a) Annual Report Seattle WA

    Google Scholar 

  • InstitutionalAuthorNameIPHC (International Pacific Halibut Commission) (1998b) The Pacific halibut: biology fishery and management. Seattle WA

    Google Scholar 

  • InstitutionalAuthorNameIPHC (International Pacific Halibut Commission) (1999) Annual Report Seattle WA

    Google Scholar 

  • InstitutionalAuthorNameIPHC (International Pacific Halibut Commission) (2000) Annual Report Seattle WA

    Google Scholar 

  • InstitutionalAuthorNameIPHC (International Pacific Halibut Commission) (2001) Annual Report Seattle WA

    Google Scholar 

  • B. Jones (2004a) EBLUB small area estimation for red snapper bycatch from the Gulf of Mexico shrimp fleet. Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council, The Commons at Rivergate Tampa, FL

    Google Scholar 

  • B. Jones (2004b) Spatial modeling of red snapper shrimp fleet bycatch in the Gulf of Mexico. Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council, The Commons at Rivergate Tampa, FL

    Google Scholar 

  • L.L. Jones (1981) U.S. research on the incidental take of marine mammals by Japanese salmon mothership fishery National Marine Mammal Laboratory,Northwest and Alaska Fisheries Center NMFS, Seattle, WA

    Google Scholar 

  • R.K. Keiser SuffixJr. (1976) Species composition magnitude and utilization of the incidental catch of the South Carolina shrimp fishery. South Carolina Marine Resources Center Charleston, SC

    Google Scholar 

  • R.K. Keiser SuffixJr. (1977) The incidental catch from commercial shrimp trawlers of the South Atlantic states. South Carolina Wildlife and Marine Resources Department Charleston, SC

    Google Scholar 

  • C.J. Knowlton (1972) Fishes taken during commercial shrimping in Georgia’s close inshore ocean waters. Coastal Fisheries Office Game and Fish Division, Department of Natural Resources State of Georgia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latham, F.F. (1951) Evidence of fish loss due to shrimping in Pamlico Sound. Committee Report to Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission, November 1, 1951, 4 pp. (Appendix B)

  • M.J. Lindner (1936) A discussion of the shrimp trawl-fish problem. La. Conserv. Rev. 4 12–17 51

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Logan (2003) ArticleTitleMarine mammals and the mistaken minister Seafood New Zealand 11 IssueID4 18–20

    Google Scholar 

  • O. Lupton (1998) Certification of bycatch reduction devices in North Carolina. Pamlico County Schools Bayboro, NC 28515

    Google Scholar 

  • Lunz, G. R., McHugh, J.L., Roelofs, E.W., Tiller, R.E. and Atkinson, C.E. (1951) The destruction of small fish by the shrimp trawlers in Pamlico Sound, North Carolina. Report to the Chesapeake and South Atlantic Sections, Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission, November 1, 1951, 13 pp. + Appendices.

  • B.F. Manley A. Seyb D.J. Fletcher (2002) Bycatch of sea lions (Phocarctos hookeri) in New Zealand fisheries 1987/88 to 1995/96 and observer coverage. New Zealand Department of Conservation Science ,New Zealand Department of Conservation Wellington, New Zealand

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Marquez Millan O.A. Villanueva P.M. Burchfield (1989) Nesting population and production of hatchlings of Kemp’s ridley sea turtle at Rancho Nuevo Tamaulipas Mexico.

    Google Scholar 

  • E.X. Martinez J.M. Nance Z.P. Zein-Eldin J. Davis L. Rathmell D.A. Emiliani (1993) Trawling bycatch in the Galveston Bay system. Galveston Bay National Estuary Program Webster TX

    Google Scholar 

  • E.X. Martinez J.M. Nance R.J. Zimmerman (1996) A model for assessment of ecological interactions among living marine resources in the Gulf of Mexico: implications for bycatch management and shrimp production. The Commons at Rivergate Tampa, FL

    Google Scholar 

  • M.N. Maunder P.J. Starr R. Hilborn (2000) ArticleTitleA Bayesian analysis to estimate loss in squid catch due to the implementation of a sea lion population management plan Mar. Mammal Sci. 16 IssueID2 413–426

    Google Scholar 

  • S. McKenna (1996) Effectiveness of excluder devices on bycatch reduction and shrimp retention K. Castro T. Corey J. DeAlteris C. Gagnon (Eds) Proceedings of the East Coast Bycatch Conference Rhode Island Sea Grant, University of Rhode Island Bay Campus Narragansett, RI 106–112

    Google Scholar 

  • S.A. McKenna J.P. Monoghan SuffixJr. (1991) Gear development to improve management of commercial fisheries in North Carolina. Tampa FL

    Google Scholar 

  • S. McKenna J.P. Monaghan SuffixJr. (1993) Gear development to reduce bycatch in the North Carolina trawl fisheries. Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources North Carolina Division of Marine Fisheries Morehead City

    Google Scholar 

  • S. McKenna G. Judy C. P. Lewis J. Schoolfield (1996) Evaluation of trawl efficiency devices/bycatch reduction devices in estuarine and nearshore waters of North Carolina. North Carolina Division of Marine Fisheries Morehead City, NC

    Google Scholar 

  • A.D. Meister (1999) The New Zealand experience with fishery management: lessons learned. International Development Research Center Ottowa, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • D.L. Meyer M.S. Fonseca P.L. Murphey R.H. McMichael M.M. Byerly M.M. LaCroix P.E. Whitfield G.W. Thayer (1999) ArticleTitleEffects of live-bait shrimping on seagrass beds and fish bycatch in Tampa Bay, Florida Fish. Bull. 97 IssueID1 193–199

    Google Scholar 

  • B. Morris (1999) North Carolina bycatch reduction device certification. Pamlico County Schools Bayboro, NC 28515

    Google Scholar 

  • S.A. Murawski J.T. Finn (1988) ArticleTitleBiological bases for mixed-species fisheries: species co-distribution in relation to environmental and biotic variables Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 45 1720–1735

    Google Scholar 

  • J.D. Murray J.J. Bahen R.A. Rulifson (1992) ArticleTitleManagement considerations for by-catch in the North Carolina and Southeast shrimp fishery Fisheries 17 IssueID1 21–26

    Google Scholar 

  • J.D. Murray S.L. Diamond J.J. Bahen (1994) A program to distribute and evaluate bycatch reduction devices in inshore waters of North Carolina. University of North Carolina Sea Grant Program, North Carolina State University Raleigh, NC

    Google Scholar 

  • J.D. Murray J.L. Gearhardt R.A. Rulifson C.W. Wescott (1995) Introduction of larger mesh webbing in the belly and wings of traditional shrimp trawls to reduce bycatch in inshore waters. North Carolina State University University of North Carolina Sea Grant Program, Box 8605, , Raleigh, NC

    Google Scholar 

  • J.M. Nance (1992) Estimation of effort in the Gulf of Mexico shrimp fishery. Southeast Fisheries Science Center Galveston, TX

    Google Scholar 

  • Nance, J.M. (1993a). Gulf of Mexico Shrimp Fishery Recruitment Overfishing Definition–Workshop 2. NOAA Technical Memorandum, NMFS-SEFSC-323, 12 pp.

  • J.M. Nance (1993b) Effort trends for the Gulf of Mexico shrimp fishery. Southeast Fisheries Science Center Galveston, TX

    Google Scholar 

  • J.M. Nance (2004) Estimation of effort in the offshore shrimp trawl fishery of the Gulf of Mexico. Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council, The Commons at Rivergate Tampa, FL

    Google Scholar 

  • J.M. Nance N. Garfield J.A. Paredes (1989) A study of the social impact of the Texas shrimp closure J.S. Thomas L. Maril E.P. Durrenberger (Eds) Marine Resources Utilization Mississippi-Alabama Sea Grant Consortium, Mobile AL 81–83

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Nance E. Scott-Denton E. Martinez J. Watson A. Shah D. Foster (1997) Bycatch in the southeast shrimp trawl fishery. National Marine Fisheries Service, Galveston Laboratory Galveston, TX

    Google Scholar 

  • J.M. Nance D. Foster E. Martinez T. McIlwain S. Nichols R. Raulerson M. Schirripa E. Scott-Denton A. Shah J. Watson (1998) Report to Congress. Southeastern United States shrimp trawl bycatch program. National Marine Fisheries Service ,Southeast Fisheries Center Southeast Regional Office 9721 Executive Center Drive, St. Petersburg, FL

    Google Scholar 

  • InstitutionalAuthorNameNMFS (National Marine Fisheries Service) (1992a) Shrimp trawl bycatch characterization. Sampling Protocol Manual for Data Collection. National Marine Fisheries Service Southeast Fisheries Science Center Galveston, Texas, 4700 Avenue U, Galveston, TX

    Google Scholar 

  • InstitutionalAuthorNameNMFS (National Marine Fisheries Service) (1992b) Evaluation of bycatch reduction devices. Sampling Protocol Manual for Data Collection. National Marine Fisheries Service, Southeast Fisheries Science Center Galveston, Texas, Galveston, TX

    Google Scholar 

  • InstitutionalAuthorNameNMFS (National Marine Fisheries Service) (1993) Cruise results: Shrimp trawl bycatch reduction National Marine Fisheries Service, Southeast Fisheries Science Center, Pascagoula Laboratory Pascagoula, MS

    Google Scholar 

  • InstitutionalAuthorNameNMFS (National Marine Fisheries Service) (1995) Cooperative research program addressing finfish bycatch in the Gulf of Mexico and South Atlantic shrimp fisheries: a report to Congress. National Marine Fisheries Service, Southeast Fisheries Center Southeast Regional Office 9721 Executive Center Drive, St. Petersburg, FL

    Google Scholar 

  • InstitutionalAuthorNameNMFS (National Marine Fisheries Service) (1998) Managing the nation’s bycatch: priorities programs and actions for the National Marine Fisheries Service. National Marine Fisheries Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • NMFS (National Marine Fisheries Service) (2003a) Commer- cial fisheries database (Internet database). Available from the␣internet URL: http://www.st.nmfs.gov/pls/webpls/FT_ HELP.SPECIES Accessed November 11, 2003.

  • NMFS (National Marine Fisheries Service) (2003b) Closure summaries in the Alaskan groundfish fisheries, 1986–2000. (Internet database). National Marine Fisheries Service, Alaska Regional Office. Available from the internet URL: http://www.fakr.noaa.gov/sustainablefisheries/closure.html. Accessed November 11, 2003.

  • NMFS (National Marine Fisheries Service) (2003c) Vessel-specific bycatch rates, 1994–2000. (Internet database). National Marine Fisheries Service, Alaska Regional Office. Available from the internet URL: http://www.fakr.noaa.gov/2000/pscinfo.html. Accessed November 11, 2003. Each year’s list can be obtained by changing the year in the URL.

  • InstitutionalAuthorNameNRC (National Research Council) (1990) Decline of the sea turtles; causes and prevention. National Academy Press Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • InstitutionalAuthorNameNRC (National Research Council) (1999) Share the fish: towards a national policy on individual fishing quotas. National Academy Press Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • New Zealand Ministry of Fisheries (2003a) Press release: Auckland Islands squid fishery resumes. April 4, 2003. Available from the internet URL: http://www.fish.govt.nz/current/press/040403.htm

  • New Zealand Ministry of Fisheries (2003b) Draft strategy for managing the environmental effects of fishing. March 31, 2003. New Zealand Ministry of Fisheries, Wellington, New Zealand. Available from the internet URL: http://www.fish.govt.nz/sustainability/management_strategy/SMEEF_3%20Apr_03.pdf.

  • New Zealand Ministry of Fisheries (2003c) Press Release: Announcement of Auckland Islands marine reserve. Available from: http://www.fish.govt.nz/current/press/sp290103. htm.

  • New Zealand Ministry of Fisheries (2004a) Arrow squid (SQU). In: Summary of the Assessments of the Sustainability of Current TACCs and Recent Catch Levels and Status of␣the␣Stocks for the 2004-05 Fishing Year, pp. 50–65. Available from the internet URL: http://www.fish.govt.nz/ sustainability/research/stock/status1.html.

  • New Zealand Ministry of Fisheries (2004b) Proposed operational plan to manage the incidental capture of New Zealand sea lions in the squid (SQU) 6T trawl fishery for the 2004–05 fishing year. Initial Position Paper, Consultation Document, September 03, 2004. New Zealand Ministry of Fisheries, Wellington, New Zealand, 28 pp. Available from the inter- net URL: http://www.fish.govt.nz/sustainability/decisions/ sealions/2004-05-sea-lion-ipp-final.pdf.

  • S. Nichols (1990a) The spatial and temporal distribution of the bycatch of red snapper by the shrimp fishery in the offshore waters of the US Gulf of Mexico. National Marine Fisheries Service Southeast Fisheries Science Center, Pascagoula Laboratory Pascagoula, MS

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Nichols (1990b) Report of the workshop to evaluate potential management alternatives for reducing directed effort and shrimp trawl bycatch of red snapper. Report to the Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council National Marine Fisheries Service Southeast Fisheries Science Center, Pascagoula Laboratory Pascagoula, MS

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Nichols (1994) Update and revision of bycatch estimate for King and Spanish mackerel 1972–1993. National Marine Fisheries Service Southeast Fisheries Science Center, Pascagoula Laboratory Pascagoula, MS

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Nichols (1996a) An update on some issues relating to the distribution of red snapper bycatch. Southeast Fisheries Science Center, Pascagoula Laboratory,National Marine Fisheries Service Pascagoula, MS

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Nichols (1996b) An update of bycatch findings for mackerels and cobia in the Gulf of Mexico shrimp fishery. Southeast Fisheries Science Center, Pascagoula Laboratory,National Marine Fisheries Service Pascagoula, MS

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Nichols (1999) Overall effectiveness of BRDs. Final Report on the Red Snapper/Shrimp Research Program Summer 1998 Project Southeast Fisheries Science Center, Pascagoula Laboratory,National Marine Fisheries Service Pascagoula, MS

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Nichols (2004a) Some Bayesian approaches to estimation of shrimp fleet bycatch. Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council, The Commons at Rivergate Tampa, Florida

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Nichols (2004b) An update for the Bayesian estimation of shrimp fleet bycatch. Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council, The Commons at Rivergate Tampa, Florida

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Nichols A. Shah G. Pellegrin K. Mullin (1987) Estimates of annual shrimp fleet bycatch for thirteen species in the offshore waters of the Gulf of Mexico. National Marine Fisheries Service,Southeast Fisheries Science Center, Pascagoula Laboratory Pascagoula, MS

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Nichols A. Shah G. Pellegrin K. Mullin (1990) Updated estimates of shrimp fleet bycatch in the offshore waters of the Gulf of Mexico. National Marine Fisheries Service, Southeast Fisheries Science Center, Pascagoula Laboratory Pascagoula, MS

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Nichols G. Pellegrin (1992) Revision and update of estimates of shrimp fleet bycatch 1972–1991. National Marine Fisheries Service, Southeast Fisheries Science Center, Pascagoula Laboratory Pascagoula, MS

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Nichols J. Nance C.P. Goodyear A. Shah J. Watson (1995) Some considerations in determining bycatch reduction requirements. National Marine Fisheries Service, Southeast Fisheries Science Center, Pascagoula Laboratory Pascagoula, MS

    Google Scholar 

  • Oceana (2002) Petition for rulemaking, letter addressed to Donald L. Evans, US Secretary of Commerce. February 28,␣2002. Available from the internet URL: http://www. oceana.org/uploads/formal_petition.pdf

  • M. Ortiz C.M. Legault N.M. Ehrhardt (2000) ArticleTitleAn alternative method for estimating bycatch from the US shrimp trawl fishery in the Gulf of Mexico, 1972–1995 Fish. Bull. 98 583–599

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Parsons (2004) Behavior and swimming performance of red snapper: its application to shrimp trawl bycatch reduction. Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council, The Commons at Rivergate Tampa, FL

    Google Scholar 

  • Peacey, J. (2002) Managing catch limits in multi-species, ITQ fisheries. Paper presented at International Institute of Fisheries Economics and Trade (IIFET) Conference, August 19–22, 2002, Wellington, New Zealand. [2003 March 24]. [cited 2004 October 20]. Available from: http://www.fish.govt.nz/current/press/pr240303_2.htm.

  • K.B. Pearce D.W. Moye S.K. Strasser (1989) Evaluation of trawl excluder devices in the Pamlico Sound shrimp fishery Albemarle-Pamlico Estuarine Study,North Carolina Division of Marine Fisheries Morehead City, NC

    Google Scholar 

  • Pellegrin, G. Jr. (1982) Fish discards from the southeastern United States shrimp fishery. In: Fish Bycatch... Bonus from the Sea: a report of a technical consultation on shrimp by-catch utilization held in George, Guyana, 27–30 October 1981. FAO and International Development Research Centre, Ottowa, Canada (IDRC 198-e), pp. 51–54.

  • Pellegrin, G. Jr., Drummond, S.B. and Ford, R.S. Jr., (undated) The incidental catch of fish by the northern Gulf of Mexico shrimp fleet. Draft manuscript. National Marine Fisheries Service, Southeast Fisheries Science Center, Pascagoula Laboratory, Pascagoula, MS.

  • P. Perkins E. Edwards (1996) ArticleTitleA mixture model for estimating discarded bycatch from data with many zero observations: tuna discards in the eastern tropical Pacific Ocean Fish. Bull. 94 330–340

    Google Scholar 

  • Perret, W.S. and Bowman, P.E. (1993) Butterfly and skimmer nets in the Gulf of Mexico and their potential use elsewhere. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Shrimp Bycatch, May 24–27, 1992, Lake Buena Vista, Florida. Southeastern Fisheries Association, Tallahassee, FL, pp. 325–340.

  • Peuser, R. (ed.) (1996) Estimates of finfish bycatch in the South Atlantic shrimp fishery. Prepared by the SEAMAP South Atlantic Committee, Shrimp Bycatch Work Group, Final Report. Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission, April 1996, 64 pp.

  • J.E. Powers C.P. Goodyear G.P. Scott (1987) The potential effects of shrimp fleet bycatch on fisheries production of selected fish stocks in the Gulf of Mexico. Southeast Fisheries Science Center Miami Laboratory, Coastal Resources Division, Miami, FL

    Google Scholar 

  • Purvis, C.E. and McCoy, E.G. (1974) Pink–brown shrimp discard studies in the Core-Pamlico Sound area.North Carolina Department of Natural Resources and Community Development, Division of Marine Fisheries.

  • Renaud, M., Gitschlag, G., Klima, E., Shah, A., Nance, J., Caillouet, C., Zein-Eldin, Z. and Koi, D. (1990) Evaluation of the impacts of turtle excluder devices (TEDs) on shrimp catch rates in the Gulf of Mexico and South Atlantic, March 1988 through July 1989. NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-SEFC-254, 165 pp.

  • Renaud, M., Gitschlag, G., Klima, E., Shah, A., Koi, D. and Nance, J. (1991) Evaluation of the impacts of turtle excluder devices (TEDs) on shrimp catch rates in the Gulf of Mexico and South Atlantic, September 1989 through August 1990. NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-SEFC-288, 80 pp.

  • RFSAP (Reef Fish Stock Assessment Panel) (1999) September 1999 report of the Reef Fish Stock Assessment Panel. Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council, The Commons at Rivergate, Tampa, FL. Available from http://www.gulfcouncil.org./downloads/RFSAP-O99-final.pdf.

  • Renko, B.L. (1998) Management of Pacific Halibut Bycatch in the Alaskan Groundfish Fishery 1990–1996; the Vessel Incentive Program. MS Thesis. University of Washington, School of Marine Affairs, 164 pp.

  • Roelofs, E.W. (1950a) Mesh size and construction as a factor in releasing small fish and shrimp from trawl nets. U.S. Department of the Interior, Fishery Leaflet 382, 12 pp.

  • Roelofs, E.W. (1950b) Observations on the capture of small fish by the shrimp trawls. Reprinted from the 1950 Annual Report of the Institute of Fisheries Research of the University of North Carolina, Morehead City, NC. In: Lunz, G.R., McHugh, J.L., Roelofs, E.W., Tiller, R.E., Atkinson C.E. (eds.) 1951. The destruction of small fish by the shrimp trawlers in Pamlico Sound, North Carolina. Report to the Chesapeake and South Atlantic Sections, Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission, November 1, 1951, Appendix A, 4 pp.

  • C.M. Roithmayr (1965) ArticleTitleReview of industrial bottomfish fishery in northern Gulf of Mexico, 1959–1962 Commer. Fish. Rev. 27 IssueID1 1–6

    Google Scholar 

  • D.R. Rogers B.D. Rogers J.A. Silva Particlede V.L. Wright (1994) Evaluation of shrimp trawls designed to reduce bycatch in inshore waters of Louisiana. School of Forestry, Wildlife, and Fisheries, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center Baton Rouge, LA

    Google Scholar 

  • D.R. Rogers B.D. Rogers J.A. Silva Particlede V.L. Wright (1997a) ArticleTitleEffectiveness of four industry-developed bycatch reduction devices in Louisiana’s inshore waters Fish. Bull. 91 IssueID1 129–137

    Google Scholar 

  • D.R. Rogers B.D. Rogers J.A. Silva Particlede V.L. Wright J.W. Watson (1997b) ArticleTitleEvaluation of shrimp trawls equipped with bycatch reduction devices in inshore waters of Louisiana Fish. Res. 33 IssueID1–3 55–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, D.R., Wilson, C.A. and Baltz, D.M. (1998) Behavior of red snapper, Lutjanus campechanus, with respect to trawl modifications to reduce shrimp trawl bycatch. Final Report to MARFIN, Award Number NA57FF0049, 60 pp.

  • M. R. Ross S.R. Hokenson (1997) ArticleTitleShort-term mortality of discarded finfish bycatch in the Gulf of Maine fishery for northern shrimp Pandalus borealis North Am. J. Fish. Manage. 17 902–909

    Google Scholar 

  • Royal Forest and Bird Protection Society of New Zealand (2003a) New Zealand sea lions and the squid fishery. [Organization webpage]. Available from: http://www. forest-bird.org.nz/Marine/sealions/squidfishery.asp.

  • Royal Forest and Bird Protection Society of New Zealand (2003b) New Zealand sea lion fact sheet [Organization webpage]. Available from the internet URL: http://www. forest-bird.org.nz/Marine/sealions/factsheet.asp

  • R.A. Rulifson J.D. Murray J.J. Bahen (1992) ArticleTitleFinfish bycatch reduction in South Atlantic shrimp trawls using 3 designs of bycatch reduction devices Fisheries 17 IssueID1 1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Schirripa C. Legault (1999) Status of the red snapper in US waters of the Gulf of Mexico: updated through 1998. Sustainable Fisheries Division Miami, FL

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott-Denton, E. (2004) Observer coverage of the US Gulf of Mexico and Southeastern Atlantic shrimp fishery, February 1992–December 2003 – Methods. Working paper to the Red Snapper Stock Assessment Data Workshop, April, 2004. Document No. SEDAR7-DW-5. Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council, The Commons at Rivergate, Tampa, FL.

  • A.K. Shah (1999) Statistical Inference on overall reduction rate of BRDs. National Marine Fisheries Service, Southeast Fisheries Science Center, Pascagoula Laboratory Pascagoula, MS

    Google Scholar 

  • P.F. Sheridan J.A. Browder J.E. Powers (1984) Ecological interactions between penaeid shrimp and bottomfish assemblages J.S. Gulland B.J. Rothschild (Eds) Penaeid shrimps–their biology and management Fishing News Books, Ltd., Farnham, Surrey UK 235–254

    Google Scholar 

  • J.B. Siebenaler (1952) ArticleTitleStudies of ‘‘trash’’ caught by shrimp trawlers in Florida Proc. Gulf Carrib. Fish. Inst. 4 94–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, P. (undated) Managing biodiversity: invertebrate by-catch in seamount fisheries in the New Zealand Exclusive Economic Zone 1. NIWA (National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research), Wellington, New Zealand. Available from the internet URL: http://www.worldfish.org/Blue%20Millennium%20PDFs/Chapter%202-%20Smith%2 0Case%20Study.pdf.

  • SAFMC (South Atlantic Fishery Management Council) (1996) Bycatch reduction device testing protocol manual. South Atlantic Fishery Management Council, 1Charleston, SC.

  • P. Steele T.M. Burt K.H. Johnston S. Levett (2002) ArticleTitleEfficiency of bycatch reduction devices in small otter trawls used in the Florida shrimp fishery Fish. Bull. 100 338–350

    Google Scholar 

  • B.W. Stender C.A. Barans (1994) ArticleTitleComparison of the catch from tongue and two-seam shrimp nets off South Carolina North Am. J. Fish. Manage. 14 178–195

    Google Scholar 

  • L. Thomas (2002) ArticleTitleGiving marine mammals the slip Seafood New Zealand 10 IssueID10 18–22

    Google Scholar 

  • R.J. Trumble (1992) Looking beyond time-area management of bycatch–an example from Pacific halibut R.W. Schoning R.W. Jacobson D.L. Alverson T.H. Gentle J. Auyong (Eds) Proceedings of the National Industry Bycatch Workshop National Resources Consultants, Seattle WA 142–158

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Vaughan J. Nance (1998) Estimates of bycatch of mackerel and cobia in US South Atlantic shrimp trawls. Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council, The Commons at Rivergate, Tampa, Florida

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaughan, D.S., Seagraves, R.J. and West, K. (1991) An assessment of the status of the Atlantic weakfish stock, 1982–1988. Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission, Special Report No. 21. National Marine Fisheries Service, Beaufort Laboratory, Beaufort, NC, 29 pp.

  • R.A. Vendetti R.G. Overman L.G. Parker D.L. Harrington (1996) Improved methods and procedures for the transfer of technology and the education of constituency groups for devices that will reduce the bycatch in shrimp trawls. University of Georgia Marine Extension Service Brunswick, GA

    Google Scholar 

  • R.K. Wallace C.L. Robinson (1994) ArticleTitleBycatch and bycatch reduction in recreational shrimping Northeast Gulf Science 13 IssueID2 139–144

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren, J.R. (1981) Population analysis of the juvenile groundfish on the traditional shrimping grounds in Mississippi Sound before and after the opening of the shrimp season. MS Thesis. University of Southern Mississippi, 94 pp.

  • T.J. Wassenberg C.Y. Burridge M. Connell N. Gribble (1998) ArticleTitleA validation of short-duration scientific tows as a representation of long commercial-length tows: comparing the catch rates, size composition and species composition of prawn trawler catch in the far northern Great Barrier Reef, Australia Fish. Res. 36 IssueID1 35–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, J.W. (1989) Fish behavior and trawl design: potential for selective trawl development. In: C.M. Campbell (ed.), Proceedings of the World Symposium on Fishing Gear and Fishing Vessels. Marine Institute, St. Johns, NF, Canada. pp. 25–29.

  • J.W. Watson (1993) Status of knowledge in the United States relating fish behavior to the reduction of bycatch. Southeastern Fisheries Association Tallahassee, FL

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Watson (1995) Summary report on the status of bycatch reduction device development. Presentation to the South Atlantic Fishery Management Council. National Marine Fisheries Service Southeast Fisheries Science Center Pasca- goula Laboratory Pascagoula, MS

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Watson (1996) Summary report on the status of bycatch reduction device development. Presentation to the South Atlantic Fishery Management Council. National Marine Fisheries Service Southeast Fisheries Science Center,Pascagoula Laboratory Pascagoula, MS

    Google Scholar 

  • J.W. Watson J.F. Mitchell A.K. Shah (1986) ArticleTitleTrawling efficiency device: a new concept for selective shrimp trawling gear Fisheries 48 IssueID1 1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • J.W. Watson SuffixJr. C.W. Taylor (1990) Research on selective shrimp trawl design for penaeid shrimp in the United States: a review of selective shrimp trawl research in the United States since 1973. Narrangansett RI

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Watson I. Workman D. Foster C. Taylor A. Shah J. Barbour D. Hataway (1993) Status report on the potential of gear modifications to reduce finfish bycatch in shrimp trawls in the southeastern United States 1990–1992. Southeast Fisheries Science Center ,Pascagoula Laboratory Pascagoula, MS

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Watson Foster A. Shah (1997) Report on the results of evaluations of the Jones/Davis BRD. National Marine Fisheries Service,Southeast Fisheries Science Center, Pascagoula Laboratory Pascagoula, MS

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Watson A. Shah (1997) Results of BRD and proxy analyses. National Marine Fisheries Service,Southeast Fisheries Science Center, Pascagoula Laboratory Pascagoula, MS

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Watson D. Foster S. Nichols A. Shah J. Nance E. Scott-Denton (1999a) ArticleTitleThe development of bycatch reduction technology in the southeastern United States shrimp fishery Mar. Technol. Soc. J. 33 IssueID2 51–56

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Watson D. Foster A. Shah J. Nance (1999b) Summer 1998 red snapper/shrimp research program–BRD performance report. National Marine Fisheries Service, Southeast Fisheries Science Center, Pascagoula Laboratory Pascagoula, MS

    Google Scholar 

  • N.H. Watts G.J. Pellegrin (1982) ArticleTitleComparison of shrimp and finfish catch rates and ratios for Texas and Louisiana Mar. Fish. Rev. 44 IssueID9–10 44–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Wendell, F.E., Hardy, R.A. and Ames, J.A. (1986) Assessment of the incidental take of sea otters, Enhydra lutris, in gill and trammel nets. California Department of Fish and Game. Marine Resources Technical Report No. 54, 31 pp.

  • C.A. Wenner (1987) Results of tests on two different trawl efficiency devices (TED) in South Carolina coastal waters - final report. Marine Research Institute South Carolina Wildlife and Marine Resources Dept. Charleston, SC

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitaker, J.D., DeLancey, L.B. and Jenkins, J.E. (1989) A study of the experimental closure of South Carolina’s sounds and bays to commercial fishing. South Carolina Wildlife and Marine Resources Dept., Division of Marine Resources, Commercial Crustacean Management Section, Tech. Rep. No. 72, 54 pp.

  • D. Witherell C. Pautzke (1997) ArticleTitleA brief history of bycatch management measures foe eastern Bering Sea groundfish fisheries Mar. Fish. Rev. 59 IssueID4 15–22

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Wolff (1972) A study of North Carolina’s scrap fishery. North Carolina Department of Conservation and Development Division of Commercial and Sports Fisheries Raleigh, NC

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Woodward W. Griffin Y. Wui (2003) An integrated economic analysis of alternative bycatch commercial and recreational policies for the recovery of Gulf of Mexico red snapper. Texas A & M University College Station, TX

    Google Scholar 

  • I.K. Workman (1999) Fate of juvenile red snapper Lutjanus campechanus that escape from shrimp trawls. National Marine Fisheries Service, Southeast Fisheries Science Center, Pascagoula Laboratory Pascagoula, MS

    Google Scholar 

  • Workman, I.K. and Watson, J.W. (1995) Using trawlable webbing reefs as a step in the certification of shrimp trawl bycatch reduction devices. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Ecological System Enchancement Technology for Aquatic Environments, Oct. 29–Nov. 2, 1995, Tokyo, Japan.

  • I.K. Workman J.W. Watson C.W. Taylor SuffixJr. (1992) Trawl gear modifications to reduce bycatch in the southeastern United States shrimp fishery. Southeast Fisheries Science Center,Pascagoula Laboratory Pascagoula, MS

    Google Scholar 

  • I. Workman J. Watson D. Foster C. Taylor A. Shah J. Barbour (1994) Status report on the potential of gear modifications to reduce finfish bycatch in shrimp trawls in the southeastern United States. National Marine Fisheries Service Southeast Fisheries Science Center Pascagoula Laboratory Pascagoula, MS

    Google Scholar 

  • Y.M. Ye (2002) ArticleTitleBias in estimating bycatch-to-shrimp-ratios Aquat. Living Resour. 15 IssueID3 149–154

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sandra L. Diamond.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Diamond, S.L. Bycatch quotas in the Gulf of Mexico shrimp trawl fishery: can they work?. Rev Fish Biol Fisheries 14, 207–237 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11160-004-7121-0

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11160-004-7121-0

Keywords

Navigation