Introducing a tool to gauge curriculum quality under Sustainable Development Goal 4: The case of primary schools in Vietnam

Abstract

The purposes of the study presented in this article were twofold. One was to respond to the question: what makes a quality curriculum? within the framework of the fourth United Nations Sustainable Development Goal (SDG 4). The other was to develop and pilot an appropriate instrument to evaluate the quality of curricula in a sample of private schools in Vietnam. While public schools are still preparing for implementation of Vietnam’s New General Educational Curriculum, small adjustments are already being made to the curriculum in some private and international schools in Vietnam, which have been issued a curriculum customisation licence. Therefore, the pilot schools which participated in this study can serve as case studies for the upcoming major policy improvement in Vietnam’s public schools, thus providing guidance for Vietnamese policymakers, school principals and teachers. While there is no “one-size-fits-all” curriculum assessment formula, since each country exhibits distinctive features in its teaching and learning programme, the indicators developed by the authors for their study can be adjusted to suit the needs of other countries.

Résumé

Introduction d’un outil pour mesurer la qualité d’un curriculum à l’aune du quatrième Objectif de développement durable: le cas des écoles primaires au Viêt Nam – L’étude présentée dans cet article avait deux objectifs. Le premier était de se demander, à l’aune du quatrième Objectif de développement durable (ODD 4), ce qui fait qu’un curriculum est de bonne qualité. Le second consistait à développer et tester un outil approprié pour évaluer la qualité des curriculums dans un échantillon d’écoles privées au Viêt Nam. Tandis que les écoles publiques continuent de se préparer à la mise en œuvre du nouveau curriculum d’enseignement général du Viêt Nam, certains établissements privés et internationaux du pays, qui ont obtenu pour lui un permis de customisation, procèdent déjà à de petits ajustements. Par conséquent, les écoles pilotes qui ont participé à cette étude peuvent servir d’étude de cas pour l’importante amélioration politique à venir dans les écoles publiques vietnamiennes, fournissant ainsi une orientation aux décideurs politiques, aux directeurs d’école et aux enseignants. Bien qu’il n’existe pas de formule universelle d’évaluation des curriculums, les programmes d’enseignement et d’apprentissage des différents pays ne présentant pas les mêmes caractéristiques, les indicateurs élaborés par les auteurs de cette étude peuvent être adaptés aux besoins d’autres pays.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4

Notes

  1. 1.

    Target 4.A aims to “Build and upgrade education facilities that are child, disability and gender sensitive and provide safe, nonviolent, inclusive and effective learning environments for all” (UN 2015a, Targets and Indicators). Target 4.C aims to “substantially increase the supply of qualified teachers, including through international cooperation for teacher training in developing countries, especially least developed countries and small island developing states” by 2030 (ibid.).

  2. 2.

    “The curriculum currently in use [in the Republic of Korea] was fully revised in 2015 and will be fully applied on an annual basis by 2020” (Korean MoE 2019, p. 40).

  3. 3.

    The International Baccalaureate (IB) Middle Years Programme (MYP) and the Cambridge International General Certificate of Secondary Education (IGCSE) are two international school leaving certificates. “The former was developed in the mid-1990s and is currently being relaunched in a 21st-century approach. The latter programme of study was developed by University of Cambridge International Examinations in 1985 and has become popular in recent years among British domestic and international schools worldwide due to the clarity of its learning content” (Corlu 2014, p. 793).

  4. 4.

    The acronym CIS stands for Council of International Schools.

  5. 5.

    We go into more detail about rubrics later in the article. For now, in a nutshell, a rubric refers to “a set of instructions or rules” (OUP n.d.).

  6. 6.

    Formative assessment refers to ongoing assessment throughout the school year, while summative assessment refers to end-of-year assessment.

  7. 7.

    The detailed rubric is available from the authors upon request.

  8. 8.

    0 represents non-fulfilment; 4 represents full marks.

  9. 9.

    The Vietnamese national diploma is the certificate students receive when they pass the National High School Graduation Examination in their last year (grade 12) of upper secondary school.

References

  1. Applebee, A. N. (2008). Curriculum as conversation: Transforming traditions of teaching and learning. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bargainnier, S. (2003). Fundamentals of rubrics. Pacific Crest Faculty Development series. Hampton, NH: Pacific Crest. Retrieved 23 March 2020 from https://pcrest.com/research/fgb/1_4_2.pdf.

  3. CIS (Council of International Schools). (2019). Membership standards: Core standards for CIS membership (dedicated webpage). Leiden: CIS. Retrieved 23 March 2020 from https://www.cois.org/for-schools/membership-standards.

  4. Cooper, B. S., & Gargan, A. (2009). Rubrics in education: Old term, new meanings. Phi Delta Kappan, 91(1), 54–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172170909100109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Corlu, S. (2014). Which preparatory curriculum for the International Baccalaureate Diploma Programme is best? The challenge for international schools with regard to mathematics and science. International Review of Education, 60(6), 793–801. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-014-9446-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Doll, W. E., Jr. (1993). A post-modern perspective on curriculum. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Field, S., Kuczera, M., & Pont, B. (2007). No more failures: Ten steps to equity in education. Paris: OECD Publishing. Retrieved 13 March 2020 from https://www.oecd.org/education/school/45179151.pdf.

  8. Glatthorn, A. A., Boschee, F., Whitehead, B. M., & Boschee, B. F. (2018). Curriculum leadership: Strategies for development and implementation. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gohain, M. P. (2020). 15 Years on, schools to get new curriculum. The Times of India, updated 14 May (online newspaper article). Retrieved 17 June 2020 from https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/15-years-on-schools-to-get-new-curriculum/articleshow/75727846.cms.

  10. Harden, R. M., & Stamper, N. (1999). What is a spiral curriculum? Medical Teacher, 21(2), 141–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/01421599979752.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hoang, A. D. (2019). Fantastic educational gaps and where to find them: LERB—A model to classify inequity and inequality. Journal of International Education and Practice, 2(4), 19–28. https://doi.org/10.30564/jiep.v2i4.1309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Huong, T. T. (2010). Insights from Vietnam. In R. Johnstone (Ed.), Learning through English: Policies, challenges and prospects. Insights from East Asia (pp. 96–114). Kuala Lumpur: British Council. Retrieved 23 March 2020 from https://www.teachingenglish.org.uk/sites/teacheng/files/publication_1_-_learning_through_english.pdf.

  13. Janssen, G., Meier, V., & Trace, J. (2015). Building a better rubric: Mixed methods rubric revision. Assessing Writing, 26, 51–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2015.07.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Korean MoE (Ministry of Education). (2019). Education in Korea 2019. Sejong: Korean Ministry of Education. Retrieved 17 June 2020 from https://english.moe.go.kr/boardCnts/view.do?boardID=282&boardSeq=80325&lev=0&searchType=null&statusYN=W&page=1&s=english&m=0303&opType=N.

  15. Nhan Dan. (2016). Chủ tịch nước Trần Đại Quang tiếp Giám đốc Chương trình Giáo dục Công dân Toàn cầu của UNESCO [Vietnam President Tran Dai Quang met the Director of UNESCO’s Global Citizenship Education Programme]. Nhan Dan, 21 December (online newspaper article). Retrieved 20 April 2020 from https://www.nhandan.com.vn/nation_news/item/31617702-chu-tich-nuoc-tran-dai-quang-tiep-giam-doc-chuong-trinh-giao-duc-cong-dan-toan-cau-cua-unesco.html.

  16. NIER (National Institute for Educational Research). (1999). An international comparative study of school curriculums. Tokyo: National Institute for Educational Research.

    Google Scholar 

  17. OUP (Oxford University Press). (n.d.). Rubric. In Lexico.com (online dictionary). Detroit, MI: Lexico.com. Retrieved 18 June 2020 from https://www.lexico.com/definition/rubric.

  18. Reddy, Y. M., & Andrade, H. (2010). A review of rubric use in higher education. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(4), 435–448. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930902862859.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Roehrig, G. H., Kruse, R. A., & Kern, A. (2007). Teacher and school characteristics and their influence on curriculum implementation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(7), 883–907. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Stabback, P. (2016). What makes a quality curriculum? In-Progress Reflection No. 2. Current and Critical Issues in Curriculum and Learning series. IBE/2016/WP/CD/02. Geneva: UNESCO International Bureau of Education (IBE). Retrieved March 23, 2020 from https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000243975.

  21. Stanley, J., & McCoshen, A. (2012). Curriculum reform in Europe: The impact of learning outcomes. European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (CEDEFOP) report. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. Retrieved 23 March 2020 from https://www.cedefop.europa.eu/files/5529_en.pdf.

  22. Thuc Minh. (2016). Chủ tịch nước Trần Đại Quang: Đoàn kết, chung sức hành động, cùng phát triển bền vững [President Tran Dai Quang: Solidarity, joint action for sustainable development]. Thanh Nien, 30 August (online newspaper article). Retrieved 20 April 2020 from https://thanhnien.vn/the-gioi/chu-tich-nuoc-tran-dai-quang-doan-ket-chung-suc-hanh-dong-cung-phat-trien-ben-vung-739241.html.

  23. UN (United Nations). (2015a). Sustainable Development Goal 4: Quality education (dedicated webpage). Retrieved 20 April 2020 from https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/sdg4.

  24. UN. (2015b). Sustainable development knowledge platform. Retrieved 20 April 2020 from https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org.

  25. UN. (2016). Progress towards the Sustainable Development Goals: Report of the Secretary-General. Document Number E/2016/75. New York: United Nations Economic and Social Council. Retrieved 11 June 2020 from https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/files/report/2016/secretary-general-sdg-report-2016--EN.pdf.

  26. UN. (2018). Progress towards the Sustainable Development Goals: Report of the Secretary-General. Document Number E/2018/64. New York: United Nations Economic and Social Council. Retrieved 20 April 2020 from https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/files/report/2018/secretary-general-sdg-report-2018--EN.pdf.

  27. UN. (2019). Report of the Secretary-General on SDG progress 2019: Special edition. New York: United Nations. Retrieved 20 April 2020 from https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/24978Report_of_the_SG_on_SDG_Progress_2019.pdf.

  28. UNESCO (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization). (2015). Global citizenship education: Topics and learning objectives. Paris: UNESCO. Retrieved 11 June 2020 from https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000232993.

  29. UNESCO-IBE (International Bureau of Education). (2011). Republic of Korea. World Data on Education. Données mondiales de l’éducation. Datos Mundiales de Educación (7th edn 2010/2011; updated version June 2011). IBE/2011/CP/WDE/KO. Geneva: UNESCO-IBE. Retrieved 17 June 2020 from https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000193189.

  30. Van den Akker, J. J., Kuiper, W., & Hameyer, U. (Eds.). (2003). Curriculum landscapes and trends. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Vietnam Government. (2014). Nghị định số 20/2014/NĐ-CP: Về phổ cập giáo dục, xóa mù chữ [Decree Number 20/2014/ND-CP: Education Universalisation and Illiteracy Eradication]. Ha Noi: Government of Vietnam. Retrieved 20 April 2020 from https://luatvietnam.vn/giao-duc/nghi-dinh-20-2014-nd-cp-chinh-phu-85647-d1.html#noidung.

  32. Vietnam Government. (2018a). Vietnam’s voluntary national review on the implementation of the sustainable development goals. Ha Noi: Department for Science, Education, Natural Resources and Environment, Ministry of Planning and Investment. Retrieved 20 April 2020 from https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/19967VNR_of_Viet_Nam.pdf.

  33. Vietnam Government. (2018b). Nghị định số 86/2018/NĐ-CP: Quy định về hợp tác, đầu tư của nước ngoài trong lĩnh vực giáo dục [Decree Number 86/2018/ND-CP: Regulations on foreign collaboration and investment in education]. Retrieved 20 April 2020 from https://thuvienphapluat.vn/van-ban/dau-tu/Nghi-dinh-86-2018-ND-CP-quy-dinh-ve-hop-tac-dau-tu-cua-nuoc-ngoai-trong-linh-vuc-giao-duc-337783.aspx.

  34. Vietnam MoET (Ministry of Education and Training). (2008). Chỉ thị số 40/2008/CT-BGDĐT: Về việc phát động phong trào thi đua “xây dựng trường học thân thiện, học sinh tích cực” trong các trường phổ thông giai đoạn 2008–2013 [Directive Number 40/CT-BGDDT: Fostering friendly schools and proactive students in the period 2008–2013]. Ha Noi: Ministry of Education and Training. Retrieved 20 April 2020 from https://thuvienphapluat.vn/van-ban/giao-duc/Chi-thi-40-2008-CT-BGDDT-phat-dong-phong-trao-thi-dua-xay-dung-truong-hoc-than-thien-hoc-sinh-tich-cuc-truong-pho-thong-giai-doan-2008-2013-68464.aspx.

  35. Vietnam MoET. (2013). Hướng dẫn số 791/HD-BGDĐT: Thí điểm phát triển chương trình giáo dục nhà trường phổ thông [Instruction Number 791/HD-BGDDT: Encouraging high schools to develop a curriculum to meet the particular and specific needs of students]. Ha Noi: Ministry of Education and Training. Retrieved 20 April 2020 from https://thuvienphapluat.vn/van-ban/Giao-duc/Huong-dan-791-HD-BGDDT-2013-thi-diem-phat-trien-chuong-trinh-giao-duc-nha-truong-pho-thong-205503.aspx.

  36. Vietnam MoET. (2016). Quyết định số4996/QĐ-BGDĐT: Phê duyệt kế hoạch hành động về bình đẳng giới của ngành giáo dục giai đoạn 2016–2020 [Decision Number 4996/QD-BGDDT: Action plan on gender equality in education 2016–2020]. Ha Noi: Ministry of Education and Training. Retrieved 20 April 2020 from https://thuvienphapluat.vn/van-ban/Van-hoa-Xa-hoi/Quyet-dinh-4996-QD-BGDDT-Ke-hoach-hanh-dong-ve-binh-dang-gioi-cua-nganh-Giao-duc-2016-2020-331140.aspx.

  37. Vietnam MoET. (2017a). Quyết định số 2161/QĐ-BGDĐT: Ban hành kế hoạch thực hiện mục tiêu phát triển bền vững lĩnh vực giáo dục và đào tạo đến năm 2025 và định hướng đến năm 2030 [Decision Number 2161/QD-BGDDT: Implementation of sustainable development goals in education and training until 2025, and orientations up to 2030]. Ha Noi: Ministry of Education and Training. Retrieved 20 April 2020 from https://thuvienphapluat.vn/van-ban/Giao-duc/Quyet-dinh-2161-QD-BGDDT-2017-Ke-hoach-phat-trien-ben-vung-giao-duc-dao-tao-2025-2030-353688.aspx.

  38. Vietnam MoET. (2017b). Thông tư số: 14/2017/TT-BGDĐT: Ban hành quy định tiêu chuẩn, quy trình xây dựng, chỉnh sửa chương trình giáo dục phổ thông; tổ chức và hoạt động của hội đồng quốc gia thẩm định chương trình giáo dục phổ thông [Circular Number 14/TT-BGDDT: Standards, development and revision procedures of a national general education curriculum; regulation and operation of a National General Education Curriculum Evaluation Committee]. Ha Noi: Ministry of Education and Training. Retrieved 20 April 2020 from https://thuvienphapluat.vn/van-ban/giao-duc/Thong-tu-14-2017-TT-BGDDT-tieu-chuan-chinh-sua-chuong-trinh-giao-duc-pho-thong-353757.aspx.

  39. Vietnam MoET. (2018). Chương trình giáo dục phổ thông mới [New general education curriculum]. Ha Noi: Ministry of Education and Training. Retrieved 20 April 2020 from https://moet.gov.vn/tintuc/Pages/tin-hoat-dong-cua-bo.aspx?ItemID=5755.

  40. Vietnam National Assembly. (2014). Nghị quyết số 88/2014/QH13: Về đổi mới chương trình, sách giáo khoa giáo dục phổ thông [Resolution Number 88/2014/QH13: Innovating textbooks and a curriculum for general education]. Ha Noi: Vietnam National Assembly. Retrieved 20 April 2020 from https://thuvienphapluat.vn/van-ban/Giao-duc/Nghi-quyet-88-2014-QH13-doi-moi-chuong-trinh-sach-giao-khoa-giao-duc-pho-thong-260798.aspx.

  41. VPM (Vietnam Prime Minister). (2012a). Quyết định số 711/QĐ-TTg: Phê duyệt “Chiến lược phát triển giáo dục 2011–2020” [Decision Number 711/QD-TTg: Education development strategy 2011–2020]. Retrieved 20 April 2020 from https://thuvienphapluat.vn/van-ban/Giao-duc/Quyet-dinh-711-QD-TTg-nam-2012-Chien-luoc-phat-trien-giao-duc-2011-2020-141203.aspx.

  42. VPM. (2012b). Quyết định số 630/QĐ-TTg: Phê duyệt Chiến lược phát triển Dạy nghề thời kỳ 2011–2020 [Decision Number 630/QD-TTg: TVET development strategy 2011–2020]. Retrieved 20 April 2020 from https://www.chinhphu.vn/portal/page/portal/chinhphu/hethongvanban?mode=detail&document_id=159647.

  43. VPM. (2013a). Quyết định số 89/QĐ-TTg: Phê duyệt Đề án “Xây dựng xã hội học tập giai đoạn 2012–2020” [Decision number 89/QD-TTg: The framework for building a learning society for the period 2012–2020]. Retrieved 20 April 2020 from https://vanban.chinhphu.vn/portal/page/portal/chinhphu/hethongvanban?class_id=2&_page=1&mode=detail&document_id=165348.

  44. VPM. (2013b). Quyết định số 692/QĐ-TTg: Hê duyệt đề án “xóa mù chữ đến năm 2020” [Decision Number 692/QD-TTg: Scheme for stamping out illiteracy by 2020]. Retrieved 20 April 2020 from https://thuvienphapluat.vn/van-ban/Giao-duc/Quyet-dinh-692-QD-TTg-nam-2013-phe-duyet-De-an-Xoa-mu-chu-den-nam-2020-184543.aspx.

  45. VPM. (2016). Quyết định số 1982/QĐ-TTg: Phê duyệt khung trình độ quốc gia việt nam [Decision Number 1982/QD-TTg: Vietnamese qualifications framework]. Retrieved 20 April 2020 from https://thuvienphapluat.vn/van-ban/Giao-duc/Quyet-dinh-1982-QD-TTg-phe-duyet-khung-trinh-do-quoc-gia-Viet-Nam-2016-327841.aspx.

  46. VPM. (2017). Quyết định số 622/QĐ-TTg: Về việc ban hành kế hoạch hành động quốc gia thực hiện chương trình nghị sự 2030 vì sự phát triển bền vững [Decision Number 622/QD-TTg: National action plan for the implementation of the 2030 programme for sustainable development]. Retrieved 20 April 2020 from https://thuvienphapluat.vn/van-ban/Thuong-mai/Quyet-dinh-622-QD-TTg-2017-Ke-hoach-hanh-dong-quoc-gia-thuc-hien-Chuong-trinh-nghi-su-2030-348831.aspx.

  47. Vuong, Q. H. (2018). The (ir)rational consideration of the cost of science in transition economies. Nature Human Behaviour, 2, 5. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-017-0281-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Vuong, Q. H. (2019). Breaking barriers in publishing demands a proactive attitude. Nature Human Behaviour, 3, 1034. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0667-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Vuong, Q. H. (2020). Reform retractions to make them more transparent. Nature, 582(7811), 149–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Vuong, T. T., Semerák, V., & Vuong, Q. H. (2019). The Vietnamese economy at the crossroads. In R. Macdonald (Ed.), Southeast Asia and the ASEAN economic community (pp. 91–143). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan/Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  51. WSCUC (WASC Senior College and University Commission). (2013). Handbook of accreditation. Alameda, CA: Western Association of Schools and Colleges (WASC) Senior College and University Commission. Retrieved 20 April 2020 from https://www.wscuc.org/resources/handbook-accreditation-2013.

  52. World Bank. (2018). Growing smarter: Learning and equitable development in East Asia and Pacific. World Bank East Asia and Pacific Regional Reports series. Washington, DC: World Bank. Retrieved 23 March 2020 from https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/29365.

  53. World Bank. (2019). Government expenditure on education, total (% of GDP). Washington, DC: World Bank. Retrieved 23 March 2020 from https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SE.XPD.TOTL.GD.ZS.

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anh-Duc Hoang.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hoang, AD., Pham, HH., Nguyen, YC. et al. Introducing a tool to gauge curriculum quality under Sustainable Development Goal 4: The case of primary schools in Vietnam. Int Rev Educ 66, 457–485 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-020-09850-1

Download citation

Keywords

  • Curriculum evaluation
  • Sustainable Development Goal 4
  • Kindergarten to grade 12 (K-12) education
  • Education in Vietnam