How experiential learning in an informal setting promotes class equity and social and economic justice for children from “communities at promise”: An Australian perspective
- 1.5k Downloads
Educational research often portrays culturally, linguistically and economically disenfranchised (CLED) children’s disengagement from school learning as individual behaviour, ignoring the contribution of race, gender, socio-cultural, ethnic and social class factors. This paper analyses a specific community engagement programme in Australia which uses experiential learning in an informal setting. The programme, which has been running for seven years, partners pre-service teachers, volunteer high school students and volunteers from a national bank with primary schools where many pupils are experiencing learning difficulties and school engagement problems as a result of their socio-economic status, their poverty, and their ethnic and cultural diversity. Drawing on the perspectives of the children and volunteers participating in the pilot study, and privileging their voices, this paper illustrates how community partnerships may be developed and sustained. The programme’s conceptual framework of Connecting-Owning-Responding-Empowering (CORE) pedagogy is explored for its potential to enhance student engagement, achievement and empowerment through focused community involvement. The findings show that when students feel connected to and involved in their community, all participants are empowered in their learning and teaching.
KeywordsExperiential learning Informal education Student disengagement Social disadvantage Community involvement Connecting-Owning-Responding-Empowering (CORE) pedagogy
Comment l’apprentissage expérientiel en situation informelle favorise l’équité entre les classes et la justice sociale et économique pour les enfants de milieux défavorisés: une perspective australienne – La recherche éducative décrit fréquemment sous forme de comportement individuel le désengagement de l’apprentissage scolaire par les enfants défavorisés sur le plan culturel, linguistique et économique, en laissant de côté la contribution des facteurs d’ordre socio-culturel, ethnique, liés au sexe et à la classe sociale. L’auteur de l’article analyse un programme spécifique d’engagement communautaire en Australie, qui exploite l’apprentissage expérientiel dans une situation informelle. Déployé depuis sept ans, ce programme associe en un partenariat des enseignants en formation, des bénévoles étudiants et employés d’une banque nationale aux écoles primaires accueillant de nombreux élèves en difficulté d’apprentissage et d’engagement scolaire en raison de leur statut socioéconomique, leur pauvreté et leur diversité ethnique et culturelle. Partant des perspectives des enfants et des bénévoles qui ont participé à l’étude pilote, et privilégiant leurs avis, l’auteur illustre comment peuvent être élaborés et maintenus des partenariats communautaires. Le cadre conceptuel pour le programme pédagogique Relier-Posséder-Réagir-Autonomiser (Connecting-Owning-Responding-Empowering CORE) est exploré pour son potentiel à favoriser l’engagement, la performance et l’autonomie des élèves à travers l’implication communautaire. Les résultats démontrent que si les élèves se sentent reliés à leur communauté et impliqués dans celle-ci, tous les participants connaissent une autonomisation dans leur apprentissage et leur enseignement.
Firstly, thank you to the wonderful volunteers without whom the E-LINCs programme would not have seen the light of day. Also thank you to the visionary school principals and their staff who made it possible, and to the National Australia Bank, Foundation for Youth Australia and Schools First for believing in the programme. Finally, thank you to the children from whom we learn so much every time we meet.
- ABS (Australian Bureau of Statistics) (2010). 1370.0 – Measures of Australia’s Progress, 2010. Population. Overseas-born population: (1) Foreign-born in selected OECD countries – 1997 and 2007; and (2) Regions of birth, Proportion of Australia’s population, 30 June – 1999 and 2009 [online resource]. Retrieved 8 November 2016 from http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/Lookup/by%20Subject/1370.0~2010~Chapter~Overseas%20born%20population%20(3.6).
- Arcaira, E., Vile, J. D., & Reisner, E. R. (2010). Achieving high school graduation: Citizen Schools’ youth outcomes in Boston. Washington, DC: Policy Study Associates. Retrieved 17 October 2016 from www.policystudies.com/studies/?download=79&id=39.
- Berg, A., Melaville, A., & Blank, M. J. (2006). Community & family engagement: Principals share what works. Washington, DC: Coalition for Community Schools.Google Scholar
- Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J.-C. (1977). Reproduction in education, society, and culture. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Case, S., & Hadfield, M. (2006). Community involvement in the Networked Learning Communities Program. Nottingham, UK: National College for Educational Leadership.Google Scholar
- Citizen Schools (2009). Our model. Retrieved 22 November 2010 from http://www.citizenschools.org/whatwedo/ourmodel/.
- CMYI (Centre for Multicultural Youth Issues). (2003). Educational support issues for refugee & newly arrived young people. Carlton, VIC: Centre for Multicultural Youth Issues.Google Scholar
- DEECD (2008b). Smarter schools national partnerships in Victoria. Retrieved 22 November 2010 from http://www.education.vic.gov.au/about/directions/nationalpartnerships/default.htm.
- DEECD (Department of Education and Early Childhood Development). (2008a). Beyond the school gate: A guide to school partnerships. Draft for discussion. Melbourne, VIC: Department of Education and Early Childhood Development.Google Scholar
- Dorfman, P. (2008). Newcomer students: Bridges to success. Education Canada, 48(4), 36–40.Google Scholar
- Dorfman, D., & Fisher, A. (2002). Building relationships for student success: School-family-community partnerships and student achievement in the Northwest. Portland, OR: Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory (NWREL). Retrieved 19 October 2016 from http://oregonpirc.org/webfm_send/17.
- Goddard, C. (2007). 20 Questions about learning networks: A guide for school leaders. Nottingham, UK: National College for School Leadership. Retrieved 10 November 2016 from http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20140719134807/, http://nationalcollege.org.uk/docinfo?id=31340&filename=20-questions.pdf.
- Holloway, J. H. (2004). Research link. Educational Leadership, 61(8), 89–90.Google Scholar
- Israel, G. D., & Beaulieu, L. J. (2004a). Laying the foundations for employment: The role of social capital in educational achievement. The Review of Regional Studies, 34(3), 260–287.Google Scholar
- Lane, B. & Dorfman, D. (1997). Strengthening community networks: The basis for sustainable community renewal. Portland, OR: Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory. Retrieved 21 August 2008 from http://www.nwrel.org/ruraled/strengthening.html.
- Lingard, B., Ladwig, J., Mills, M., Bahr, M., Chant, D., Warry, M., et al. (2001). Queensland School Reform Longitudinal Study: Final report, vol.1. Report prepared for Education Queensland by the School of Education, The University of Queensland. Brisbane, QLD: University of Brisbane.Google Scholar
- Little, P., Wimer, C., & Weiss, H. B. (2008). After school programs in the 21st century: Their potential and what it takes to achieve it. Issues and opportunities in out-of-school time evaluation, 10, 1–12.Google Scholar
- MCEETYA (Ministerial Council on Education, Employment, Training and Youth Affairs). (1999). The Adelaide declaration on national goals for schooling in the twenty-first century. Melbourne, VIC: Ministerial Council on Education, Employment, Training and Youth Affairs.Google Scholar
- MCEETYA (Ministerial Council on Education, Employment, Training and Youth Affairs) (2008) Melbourne Declaration on educational goals for young Australians. Melbourne, VIC: Ministerial Council on Education, Employment, Training and Youth Affairs. Retrieved 19 October 2016 from http://www.curriculum.edu.au/verve/_resources/National_Declaration_on_the_Educational_Goals_for_Young_Australians.pdf.
- Melaville, A., Berg, A. C. & Blank, M. J. (2006). Community-based learning: Engaging students for success and citizenship. Washington, DC: Coalition for Community Schools. Retrieved 19 October 2016 from http://www.communityschools.org/assets/1/AssetManager/CBL_Book_1_27_06.pdf.
- Newmann, F. M. (1996). Authentic achievement: Restructuring schools for intellectual quality (1st ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
- Newmann, F., Bryk, A. S., & Nagaoka, J. K. (2001). Authentic intellectual work and standardized tests: Conflict or coexistence? Improving Chicago’s Schools. Chicago, IL: Consortium on Chicago School Research.Google Scholar
- Noel, J. (2010). Weaving teacher education into the fabric of urban schools. Teacher Education Quarterly, 37(3), 9–25.Google Scholar
- Onore, C., & Gilden, B. (2010). Preparing urban teachers as public professionals. Teacher Education Quarterly, 37(3), 25–44.Google Scholar
- Otero, G. G. (2003). RelationaLearning notebook. Melbourne, VIC: Hawker Brownlow Education.Google Scholar
- Otero, G., & West-Burnham, J. (2004). Educational leadership and social capital. Paper presented at the National College for School Leadership (NCSL) Leading Practice seminar on 24 November. Retrieved 19 October from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.495.927&rep=rep1&type=pdf.
- Plagens, G. (2003). Social capital and school performance: A local-level test. Paper presented at the annual conference of the American Political Science Association, held 28–31 August in Philadelphia, PA. Retrieved 12 July 2008 from http://eric.ed.gov/ERICDocs/data/ericdocs2sql/content_storage_01/0000019b/80/1b/77/df.pdf.
- Putnam, R. D. (Ed.). (2002). Democracies in flux: The Evolution of social capital in contemporary society. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Scales, P., Benson, P., & Mannes, M. (2002). Grading grown-ups 2002: How do American kids and adults relate? Key Findings from a national study. Minneapolis, MN: Search Institute.Google Scholar
- Stewart, H. (1998). At risk or marginalised? The implications of focussing on at-risk individual young people for workers with marginalised young people. YACVic Bits, 1, 4–5.Google Scholar
- Swadener, B. B. (1995). Children and families “at promise”: Deconstructing the discourse of risk. In B. B. Swadener & S. Lubeck (Eds.), Children and families “at promise”: Deconstructing the discourse of risk (pp. 17–49). Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
- VSPC (Victorian Settlement Planning Committee) (2005). Good practice principles: Guide for working with refugee young people. A project of the Victorian Settlement Planning Committee. Melbourne, VIC: Department for Victorian Communities.Google Scholar
- Zyngier, D. (2003). Connectedness – Isn’t it time that education came out from behind the classroom door and rediscovered Social Justice. Social Alternatives, 22(3), 41–49.Google Scholar
- Zyngier, D. (2007b). The challenge of student engagement – what the students say they want – putting young people at the centre of the conversation. LEARNing Landscapes, 1, 93–116.Google Scholar
- Zyngier, D., & Gale, T. (2003). Engaging programs: How are Australian schools responding to low student retention? Paper presented at the annual conference of the Australian Association for Research in Education (AARE), “Education risks, research & dilemmas”, held in Auckland, New Zealand, 29 November–3 December. Retrieved 19 October from http://www.aare.edu.au/data/publications/2003/zyn03472.pdf.