Advertisement

International Review of Education

, Volume 63, Issue 1, pp 29–49 | Cite as

Experiential learning and values education at a school youth camp: Maintaining Jewish culture and heritage

  • Zehavit GrossEmail author
  • Suzanne D. Rutland
Original Paper

Abstract

In our post-modern, globalised world, there is a risk of unique cultural heritages being lost. This loss contributes to the detriment of civilization, because individuals need to be rooted in their own specific identity in order to actively participate in community life. This article discusses a longitudinal case study of the efforts being made by Australian Jewish schools to maintain Jewish heritage through annual experiential religious education camps, coordinated in a programme called Counterpoint. The researchers’ aim was to analyse how a school youth camp can serve as a site for socialisation and education into a cultural and religious heritage through experiential learning and informal education. During research trips which took place over several years, interviews enabling insights into the process of experiential education were conducted with a total of three different Directors of Informal Jewish Education, two Jewish Studies heads, five participating teachers, seven youth leaders, as well as seven student focus groups. In their analysis of the semi-structured interviews, the authors of this article employed a grounded theory approach using a constant comparative method, which enabled a more nuanced understanding of the main phenomenon investigated. Over the years, they were able to observe two philosophical approaches, one of which focused more on socialisation, with immersion into experience, while the other focused on education, with immersion into Jewish knowledge. Their findings reveal that some educators aim to “transmit” knowledge through “evocation”, with the students involved in active learning; while others focus more on students’ “acquisition” of knowledge through transmission. Experiential learning activities were found to be more meaningful and powerful if they combined both approaches, leading to growth.

Keywords

Experiential learning Informal education Immersion Transmitting knowledge Evoking, acquiring 

Résumé

Apprentissage expérientiel et éducation aux valeurs dans un camp scolaire de jeunes : entretenir la culture et le patrimoine juifs – Dans notre monde post-moderne et planétarisé, les patrimoines culturels uniques risquent de disparaître. Cette perte a lieu au détriment de la civilisation, car les individus ont besoin d’être ancrés dans leur identité spécifique pour participer activement à la vie de leur communauté. Cet article présente une étude de cas longitudinale sur les efforts déployés par les écoles juives en Australie pour entretenir le patrimoine juif à travers des camps annuels d’éducation religieuse expérientielle, coordonnés par un programme baptisé Counterpoint. Les chercheurs avaient pour but d’explorer comment un camp scolaire de jeunes peut servir de lieu de socialisation et d’éducation à un patrimoine culturel et religieux à travers l’apprentissage expérientiel et l’éducation informelle. Lors de voyages d’études entrepris pendant plusieurs années, des entretiens permettant d’observer la démarche de l’éducation expérientielle ont été menés avec trois directeurs d’éducation juive informelle, deux responsables d’études juives, cinq enseignants, sept animateurs de jeunes et sept groupes de discussion étudiants. Pour analyser ces entretiens semi-structurés, les auteurs de l’article ont appliqué une approche théorique à base empirique qui utilise une méthode comparative constante permettant une appréhension plus nuancée du principal phénomène étudié. Ils ont pu observer au cours des années deux approches philosophiques, l’une davantage axée sur la socialisation, avec immersion dans l’expérience, l’autre sur l’éducation avec immersion dans le savoir juif. Leurs résultats révèlent que certains éducateurs visent à « transmettre » les connaissances par « évocation » , les élèves étant impliqués dans un apprentissage actif, alors que d’autres privilégient « l’acquisition » par transmission du savoir. Les activités d’apprentissage expérientiel semblent être plus porteuses de sens et efficaces quand elles associent les deux approches, qui mènent ainsi à une amplification.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The research for this paper was sponsored by the Pratt Foundation, Melbourne, Australia.

References

  1. Berger, P. L. (1990 [1967]). The sacred canopy. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
  2. Bryfman, D. (2008). The challenge of experiential Jewish education. In J. Reimer & S. A. Shavelson (Eds.), How Jewish experiential learning works (pp. 33–39). New York, NY: The Covenant Foundation and the Institute for Informal Jewish Education.Google Scholar
  3. Chazan, B. (2003). The philosophy of informal Jewish education. The encyclopedia of informal education (infed). Retrieved 17 Aug 2015 from http://www.infed.org/informaljewisheducation/informal_jewish_education.htm.
  4. Cremin, L. A. (1977). Traditions of American education. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  5. Dewey, J. (1963 [1938]). Experience and education. New York, NY: Collier Books.Google Scholar
  6. Geertz (1973). The interpretation of cultures: Selected essays. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  7. Graham, D. (2012). Education: A statistical analysis. Report series on the GEN08 Survey. Melbourne: Monash University and the Australian Centre for Jewish Civilisation. Retrieved 24 Oct 2016 from http://artsonline.monash.edu.au/gen08/files/2012/12/gen08-report5-education.pdf.
  8. Graham, D. (2014). The Jewish population of Australia: Key findings from the 2011 census. Melbourne: Monash University and the Jewish Communal Appeal.Google Scholar
  9. Gross, Z. (2010). Reflective teaching as a path to religious meaning-making and growth. Religious Education, 105(3), 265–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Jackson, M. (2006). “Serving time”: The relationship of good and bad teaching. Quality Assurance in Education, 14(4), 385–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jacobs, J. (1999). Experiential education: The main dish, not just a side course. Boulder, CO: Association for Experiential Education.Google Scholar
  12. Kahane, R. (1997). The origins of postmodern youth: Informal youth movements in a comparative perspective. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kahane, R. (2004). Toward a theory of informality and its implications. In Z. Gross & Y. Dror (Eds.), Education as a social challenge (pp. 129–152). Ramot, Tel-Aviv: Tel Aviv University Press (Hebrew).Google Scholar
  14. Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  15. Kress, J. S. (2014). Experiential Jewish education has arrived! Now what? Journal of Jewish Education, 80(3), 319–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Markus, A. (2011). Jewish continuity. Report series on the GEN08 Survey. Melbourne: Monash University and the Australian Centre for Jewish Civilisation. Retrieved 28 Oct 2016 from http://artsonline.monash.edu.au/gen08/files/2012/12/gen08-report2-jewish-continuity-overview.pdf.
  17. Parsons, T. (1967). Sociological theory and modern society. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  18. Raviv, Z. (2000). On truth, tradition, and respect in Jewish education. Journal of Jewish Communal Service, 76(4), 275–291.Google Scholar
  19. Reimer, J. (2007). Beyond more Jews doing Jewish: Clarifying the goals of informal Jewish education. Journal of Jewish Education, 73(1), 5–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Reisman, B. (1991). Informal Jewish education in the United States: A report for the Mandel Commission. New York: Mandel Foundation.Google Scholar
  21. Rutland, S. D. (2003). “If you will it, it is no dream”: The Moriah story. Sydney: Playright Publishers.Google Scholar
  22. Sagi, A. (2002). A critique of the Jewish identity discourse. In A. Sagi & N. Ilan (Eds.), Jewish culture in the eye of the storm. A jubilee book in honor of Yosef Ahituv (pp. 248–292). Tel-Aviv: Hakibutz Hameuchad and The Center of Jacob Herzog for Jewish Studies.Google Scholar
  23. Segalowitz, N., & Freed, B. F. (2004). Context, contact, and cognition in oral fluency acquisition: Learning Spanish in at home and study abroad contexts. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26(2), 173–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sfard, A. (1998). On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one. Educational Researcher, 27(2), 4–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Sfard, A. (2007). When the rules of discourse change, but nobody tells you: Making sense of mathematics learning from a commognitive standpoint. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 16(4), 567–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. (1997). Grounded theory in practice. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  27. Vannest, K. J., & Hagan-Burke, S. (2010). Teacher time use in special education: An objective snapshot. Remedial and Special Education, 31(2), 126–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Zajda, J., & Zajda, R. (2008). Experiential learning. In G. McCulloch & D. Crook (Eds.), The Routledge international encyclopedia of education (pp. 242–244). London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht and UNESCO Institute for Lifelong Learning 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of EducationBar Ilan UniversityRamat GanIsrael
  2. 2.Department of Hebrew, Biblical & Jewish StudiesUniversity of SydneyCamperdownAustralia

Personalised recommendations