Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Lifelong learning: Foundational models, underlying assumptions and critiques

  • Published:
International Review of Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Lifelong learning has become a catchword in almost all countries because of its growing influence on education policies in the globalised world. In the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) and the European Union (EU), the promotion of lifelong learning has been a strategy to speed up economic growth and become competitive. For UNESCO and the World Bank, lifelong learning has been a novel education model to improve educational policies and programmes in developing countries. In the existing body of literature on the topic, various models of lifelong learning are discussed. After reviewing a number of relevant seminal texts by proponents of a variety of schools, this paper argues that the vast number of approaches are actually built on two foundational models, which the author calls the “human capital model” and the “humanistic model”. The former aims to increase productive capacity by encouraging competition, privatisation and human capital formation so as to enhance economic growth. The latter aims to strengthen democracy and social welfare by fostering citizenship education, building social capital and expanding capability.

Résumé

Apprentissage tout au long de la vie : modèles de base, hypothèses sous-jacentes et critiques – L’apprentissage tout au long de la vie est devenu un mot d’ordre dans presque tous les pays en raison de son influence croissante sur les politiques éducatives dans un monde planétarisé. Pour l’Organisation de Coopération et de Développement Économiques (OCDE) et pour l’Union européenne (UE), promouvoir l’apprentissage tout au long de la vie est une stratégie censée accélérer la croissance économique et améliorer la compétitivité. Pour l’UNESCO et la Banque mondiale, il constitue un modèle éducatif original susceptible d’améliorer les politiques et programmes éducatifs dans les pays en développement. Divers modèles d’apprentissage tout au long de la vie sont présentés dans le corpus de documentation existant sur le sujet. Après avoir recensé plusieurs textes majeurs rédigés par des adeptes de divers établissements scolaires, l’auteur avance que le grand nombre d’approches dans le domaine reposent finalement sur deux modèles de base, qu’il appelle « modèle capital humain » et « modèle humanitaire ». Le premier vise à augmenter la capacité productive en encourageant la concurrence, la privatisation et la création d’un capital humain de sorte à soutenir la croissance économique. Le second tend à renforcer la démocratie et la protection sociale en valorisant l’éducation à la citoyenneté, la création d’un capital social et l’extension des capacités.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

Notes

  1. The General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS) is a 1995 treaty of the World Trade Organization (WTO) which was created to extend multilateral trading from the trade of merchandise to the trade of services.

  2. Sarvodaya, from sarva “all” + udaya “prosperity”, and shiksha “learning/instruction” (Sanskrit). A very rough translation would thus be “educational progress for all”.

References

  • Aitchison, J. (2003). Adult literacy and basic education: A SADC regional perspective. Adult Education and Development, 60, 161–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson-Levitt, K. M. (2003). Local meanings, global schooling: Anthropology and world culture theory. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan Ltd.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Antikainen, A. (2006). In search of the Nordic model in education. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 50(3), 229–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balatti, J., & Falk, I. (2002). Socioeconomic contributions of adult learning to community: A social capital perspective. Adult Education Quarterly, 52(4), 281–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ball, S. J. (2009). Privatising education, privatising education policy, privatising educational research: Network governance and the “competition state”. Journal of Education Policy, 24(1), 83–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G. S. (1962). Investment in human capital: A theoretical analysis. Journal of Political Economy, 70(5), 9–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G. S. (1975). Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis with special reference to education. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bélanger, P. (1995). Lifelong learning: The dialectics of “lifelong educations”. International Review of Education, 40(3–5), 353–381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhanji, Z. (2009). Transnational corporations in education: Filling the governance gap through new social norms and market multilateralism? Globalisation, Societies and Education, 6(1), 55–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biesta, G. J. (2011). Learning democracy in school and society: Education, lifelong learning, and the politics of citizenship. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bjørnåvold, J. & Coles, M. (2007). Governing education and training: The case of qualifications frameworks. European Journal of Vocational Training, 42/43(3/1), 203–235.

  • Blackmore, J. (2011). Bureaucratic, corporate/market and network governance: Shifting spaces for gender equity in education. Gender, Work & Organization, 18(5), 443–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. & Passeron, J. C. (1977). Reproduction in education, society and culture (Translated from the French by R. Nice). London, UK: Sage Publications.

  • Brown, P. (2000). The globalisation of positional competition? Sociology, 34(4), 633–653.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, P. (2003). The opportunity trap: Education and employment in a global economy. European Educational Research Journal, 2(1), 142–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, P., & Lauder, H. (2006). Globalisation, knowledge and the myth of the magnet economy. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 4(1), 25–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, P., & Tannock, S. (2009). Education, meritocracy and the global war for talent. Journal of Education Policy, 24(4), 377–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carnoy, M. (1995). Structural adjustment and the changing face of education. International Labour Review, 134(6), 653–673.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chattopadhay, T. (2014). School as a site of student social capital: An exploratory study from Brazil. International Journal of Educational Development, 34(1), 67–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coffield, F. (2000). Differing visions of a learning society: Research findings (Vol. 1). Bristol: Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colardyn, D., & Bjørnåvold, J. (2004). Validation of formal, non-formal, and informal learning: Policy and practices in EU member states. European Journal of Education, 39(1), 70–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colclough, C. (1996). Education and the market: Which parts of the neoliberal solution are correct? World Development, 24(4), 589–610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94(Supplement), S95–S120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coombs, P. H. (1985). The world crisis in education: The view from the eighties. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of the European Union (2010). Council conclusions of 11 May 2010 on competences supporting lifelong learning and the “new skills for new jobs” initiative. Official Journal of the European Union, C 135, 26.5.2010, pp. 8–11.

  • Delors, J., Mufti, I. A., Amagi, I., Carneiro, R., Chung, F., Geremek, B., et al. (1996). Learning: The treasure within. Paris: UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • EC (European Commission) (1994). Growth, competitiveness, and employment: The challenges and ways forward into the 21st century. White paper. Luxembourg/Lanham, MD: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities/Unipub.

  • EC (2000). Commission staff working paper. A memorandum on lifelong learning. Brussels: European Commission.

  • Esping-Andersen, G. (1989). The three political economies of the welfare state. Canadian Review of Sociology, 26(1), 10–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faure, E., Herrera, F., Kaddoura, A.-R., Lopes, H., Petrovsky, A. V., Rahnema, M., & Ward, F. C. (1972). Learning to be: The world of education today and tomorrow. Paris: UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Field, J. (1999). Human capital and social capital in Northern Ireland: Linking schools achievement and lifelong learning. Irish Educational Studies, 18(1), 234–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. (1997). Public schools: Make them private. Education Economics, 5(3), 341–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. (2009). Capitalism and freedom. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama, F. (2002). Social capital and development: The coming agenda. SAIS review, 22(1), 23–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, A. (2006). Models of lifelong learning and the “knowledge society”. Compare: A journal of comparative education, 36(3), 307–325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillage, J., & Pollard, E. (1998). Employability: Developing a framework for policy analysis. London: Institute for Employment Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • HM Treasury (2006). Prosperity for all in the global economy: World class skills. Final report. Leitch review of skills. London, UK: HM Treasury, The Stationery Office.

  • Husen, T. (1974). The learning society. London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutton, W. (1995). The state we’re in. London: Jonathan Cape.

    Google Scholar 

  • ICAE (International Council for Adult Education). (2013). Mission statement of the International Council for Adult Education (ICAE). Retrieved 19 November 2013. from http://www.icae2.org/index.php/en/about-us/mission.

  • Kilgore, D. (1999). Understanding learning in social movements: A theory of collective learning. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 18(3), 191–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koper, R., Giesbers, B., van Rosmalen, P., Sloep, P., van Bruggen, J., Tattersall, C., et al. (2005). A design model for lifelong learning networks. Interactive Learning Environment, 13(1–2), 71–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacCallum, G. C. (1967). Negative and positive freedom. The Philosophical Review, 76(3), 312–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Migheli, M. (2011). Capabilities and functionings: The role of social capital for accessing new capabilities. Review of Political Economy, 23(1), 133–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. (2002). Capabilities and social justice. International Studies Review, 4(2), 123–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. (2003). Capabilities as fundamental entitlements: Sen and social justice. Feminist Economics, 9(2/3), 33–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. (2011). Creating capabilities: The human development approach. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Odora Hoppers, C. A. (2009). From bandit colonialism to the modern triage society: Towards a moral and cognitive reconstruction of knowledge and citizenship. International Journal of African Renaissance Studies, 4(2), 168–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development) (1961). Policy conference on economic growth and investment in education, Washington 16–20 October. Summary report and conclusions. Keynote speeches. Paris: OECD.

  • OECD (1989). Education and the economy in a changing society. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (1996). Lifelong learning for all: Meeting of the Education Committee at ministerial level, 16–17 January 1996. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2011). Strong performers and successful reformers in education: Lessons from PISA for the United States. Paris: OECD.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2013). OECD skills outlook 2013: First results from the survey of adult skills. Paris: OECD Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olaniyan, D. A., & Okemakinde, T. (2008). Human capital theory: Implications for educational development. Pakistan Journal of Social Sciences, 5(5), 479–483.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pawson, R. (2006). Evidence-based policy: A realist perspective. London: SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preece, J. (2009). Lifelong learning and development: A southern perspective. New York, NY: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Psacharopoulos, G. (1972). Rates of return to investment in education around the world. Comparative Education Review, 16(1), 54–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. D. (1994). Social capital and public affairs. Bulletin of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 47(8), 5–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. D. (1995). Tuning in, tuning out: The strange disappearance of social capital in America. Political Science and Politics, 28(4), 664–683.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raduntz, H. (2007). The marketization of education within the global capitalist economy. In M. W. Apple, J. Kenway, & M. Singh (Eds.), Globalizing education: Policies, pedagogies & politics (pp. 231–245). New York, NY: Peter Lang Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricardo, D. (1891). Principles of political economy and taxation.Edited, with an introduction, essay notes and appendices by E. C. K (Gonner ed.). London: G. Bell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rizvi, F., & Lingard, B. (2010). Globalizing education policy. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, S., & Dale, R. (2013). The social justice implications of privatisation in education governance frameworks: A relational account. Oxford Review of Education, 39(4), 426–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, S., Mundy, K., & Verger, A. (2012). Public private partnerships in education: New actors and modes of governance in a globalizing world. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rubenson, K. (2004). Lifelong learning: A critical assessment of the political project. In P. Alheit, R. Becker-Schmidt, T. G. Johansen, L. Ploug, H. S. Oleson, & K. Rubenson (Eds.), Shaping an emerging reality: Researching lifelong learning (pp. 28–48). Roskilde: Roskilde University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubenson, K. (2006a). The Nordic model of lifelong learning. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 36(3), 327–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubenson, K. (2006b). Constructing the lifelong learning paradigm: Competing visions from the OECD and UNESCO. In S. Ehlers (Ed.), Milestones towards lifelong learning systems (pp. 151–170). Copenhagen: Danish University of Education Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubenson, K., & Desjardins, R. (2009). The impact of welfare state regimes on barriers to participation in adult education: A bounded agency model. Adult Education Quarterly, 59(3), 187–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saito, M. (2003). Amartya Sen’s capability approach to education: A critical exploration. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 37(1), 17–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, T. W. (1960). Capital formation by education. Journal of Political Economy, 68(6), 571–583.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, T. W. (1961). Investment in human capital. The American Economic Review, 51(1), 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (1997). Editorial: Human capital and human capability. World Development, 25(12), 1959–1961.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. New York, NY: Anchor Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. (1776). An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. London: W. Strahan and T. Cadell.

  • Spring, J. (2008). Globalization of education: An introduction. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J. E. (1999). Knowledge as a global public good. In I. Kaul, I. Grunberg & M. A. Stern (Eds), Global public goods: International cooperation in the 21st century (pp. 308–325). Published for the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). New York, NY/Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Stiglitz, J. E. (2012). The price of inequality: How today’s divided society endangers our future. New York, NY: WW Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tikly, L. (2011). Towards a framework for researching the quality of education in low-income countries. Comparative Education, 47(1), 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Titmuss, R. M. (1974). Social policy: An introduction. London: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torres, A. C. (2011). Dancing on the deck of the Titanic? Adult education, the nation-state and New Social Movements. International Review of Education, 57(1), 39–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tuijnman, A. (2003). A “Nordic Model” of adult education: What might be its defining parameters? International Journal of Educational Research, 39(3), 283–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tuijnman, A., & Boström, A.-K. (2002). Changing notions of lifelong education and lifelong learning. International Review of Education, 48(1), 93–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UN (United Nations) (1948). Universal declaration of human rights. Retrieved 22 November 2014 from http://www.un.org/en/documents/udhr/index.shtml#a26.

  • UNDP (United Nations Development Programme). (1990). Human development report 1990. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, M. (2006). Towards a capability-based theory of social justice for education policy-making. Journal of Education Policy, 21(2), 163–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WEF (World Economic Forum). (2013). The global competitiveness report 2013–2014. Geneva: World Economic Forum.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2003). Lifelong learning in the global knowledge economy: Challenges for developing countries. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2011). Learning for all: Investing in people’s knowledge and skills to promote development. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziguras, C. (2007). International trade in education services: Governing the liberalization and regulation of private enterprise. In M. W. Apple, J. Kenway, & M. Singh (Eds.), Globalizing education: Policies, pedagogies, and politics (pp. 93–112). New York, NY: Peter Lang Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author would like to thank Kjell Rubenson and Maren Elfert, University of British Columbia, for their feedback on an earlier draft of this paper. Acknowledgements also go to anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments and to Maya Kiesselbach, International Review of Education, for editing the paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kapil Dev Regmi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Regmi, K.D. Lifelong learning: Foundational models, underlying assumptions and critiques. Int Rev Educ 61, 133–151 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-015-9480-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-015-9480-2

Keywords

Navigation