Advertisement

International Review of Education

, Volume 60, Issue 6, pp 793–801 | Cite as

Which preparatory curriculum for the International Baccalaureate Diploma Programme is best? The challenge for international schools with regard to mathematics and science

  • M. Sencer Corlu
Research Note

Abstract

There are two mainstream curricula for international school students at the junior high level: the International Baccalaureate (IB) Middle Years Programme (MYP) and the Cambridge International General Certificate of Secondary Education (IGCSE). The former was developed in the mid-1990s and is currently being relaunched in a 21st-century approach. The latter programme of study was developed by University of Cambridge International Examinations in 1985 and has become popular in recent years among British domestic and international schools worldwide due to the clarity of its learning content. The prevailing uncertainty about which curriculum is best to prepare students for the IB Diploma Programme represents a challenge for international schools. The purpose of the current study is to develop a methodology through causal models which can explain the relationship between student performance in the IGCSE and the Diploma Programme with regard to mathematics and science. The data evaluated here consisted of external examination scores of students who attended a private international high school between the years 2005 and 2012. Two structural equation models were developed. The first model employed a maximum likelihood estimation, while the second model used a Bayesian estimation with a Markov Chain Monte Carlo method. Both models fit the data well. The evidence suggests that the IGCSE provides a good foundational preparation for the Diploma Programme in mathematics and science.

Keywords

International schools Middle Years Programme (MYP) International General Certificate of Secondary Education (IGCSE) Diploma Programme (DP) Mathematics education Science education Structural equation modelling 

Résumé

Quel programme préparatoire au diplôme du baccalauréat international est le meilleur ? Le défi des écoles internationales avec les mathématiques et les sciences en exemple – Il existe deux programmes principaux pour les élèves du premier cycle de l’enseignement secondaire des écoles internationales : le Programme de premier cycle secondaire (PPCS) de l’Organisation du Baccalauréat International (IB) et le Certificat général de l’enseignement secondaire (Cambridge International General Certificate of Secondary Education, IGCSE). Le premier a été introduit au milieu des années 1990 et est actuellement remanié selon une approche adaptée au XXIe siècle. Créé en 1995 par l’unité des examens internationaux de l’université de Cambridge, le second programme d’études est prisé ces dernières années par les écoles britanniques nationales et internationales implantées à l’étranger, en raison de la clarté de ses contenus éducatifs. L’incertitude actuelle sur le meilleur programme pour préparer les élèves au baccalauréat international constitue un défi pour les écoles internationales. L’étude présentée ici poursuivait l’objectif d’élaborer une méthodologie au moyen de modèles de causalité, qui peuvent expliquer la relation entre les résultats des élèves en mathématiques et en sciences et chacun des deux cursus. Les données évaluées dans ce but consistent en les notes obtenues aux examens externes des élèves inscrits dans une école secondaire internationale privée durant les années 2005 à 2012. Deux modèles par équations structurelles ont été élaborés. Le premier a utilisé une estimation de probabilité maximale, le second une estimation bayésienne avec une méthode de Monte Carlo par chaîne de Markov. Les deux modèles ont présenté une bonne adéquation des données. Les conclusions suggèrent que l’IGCSE fournit une bonne préparation de base en mathématiques et en sciences pour le programme du diplôme.

References

  1. Arbuckle, J. L. (2009). Amos 18 user’s guide. Crawfordville, FL: Amos Development Corporation.Google Scholar
  2. Barrett, P. (2007). Structural equation modelling: Adjudging model fit. Personality and Individual Differences, 42(5), 815–824.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bates, R. (2011). Schooling internationally: Globalisation, internationalisation and the future for international schools. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Bishop, J. H. (1995). The impact of curriculum-based external examinations on school priorities and student learning (CAHRS Working Paper #95-30). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University.Google Scholar
  5. Cambridge International Examinations (2013). Cambridge IGCSE. Accessed September 22, 2014, from http://www.cie.org.uk/programmes-and-qualifications/cambridge-secondary-2/cambridge-igcse.
  6. Cambridge, J., & Thompson, J. (2004). Internationalism and globalization as contexts for international education. Compare: A Journal of Comparative Education, 34(2), 161–175.Google Scholar
  7. Corlu, M. A., & Corlu, M. S. (2012). Scientific inquiry based professional development models in teacher education. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 12(1), 514–521.Google Scholar
  8. Corlu, M. S., Sagun, S., Yağız, B., Niğdelioğlu, R. M., Dulun, Ö., Özcan, T. & Ateşkan, A. (2014). Fen bilimleri ve matematik eğitimine küresel bir bakış: Uluslararası eğitim program ve prensiplerinin Türkiye ölçeğinde değerlendirilmesi [A global perspective to science and mathematics education: An evaluation of the international education programs in the Turkish context]. Paper presented at the XI. Ulusal Fen Bilimleri ve Matematik Kongresi, Adana, Turkey.Google Scholar
  9. Dunne, S., & Edwards, J. (2010). International schools as sites of social change. Journal of Research in International Education, 9(1), 24–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ellwood, C. (1999). IGCSE and IB Middle Years Programme: How compatible are they? International Schools Journal, 19(1), 35–44.Google Scholar
  11. Garton, B. (2000). Recruitment of teachers for international education. In M. Hayden & J. Thompson (Eds.), International schools and international education: Improving teaching, management and quality (pp. 85–95). London: Kogan Page.Google Scholar
  12. Guy, J. (2000). IBMYP and IGCSE: Are they really compatible? A response to Caroline Ellwood. Part I. International Schools Journal, 20(1), 10–17.Google Scholar
  13. Hayden, M. C. (2006). Introduction to international education: International schools and their communities. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  14. Hayden, M. C., & Thompson, J. J. (1998). International education: Perceptions of teachers in international schools. International Review of Education, 44(5/6), 549–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hofstein, A., & Lunetta, V. N. (2003). The laboratory in science education: Foundations for the twenty-first century. Science Education, 88(1), 28–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. IB (International Baccalaureate). (2011). Science across the IB continuum. Cardiff, Wales: International Baccalaureate.Google Scholar
  17. IB (International Baccalaureate). (2012). The IB Diploma Programme statistical bulletin. Den Haag, Netherlands: International Baccalaureate.Google Scholar
  18. IB (International Baccalaureate). (2013). Extended essay guide: First exams 2013. Cardiff: International Baccalaureate.Google Scholar
  19. Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  20. Li, M., Shavelson, R. J., Kupermintz, H., & Ruiz-Primo, M. A. (2002). On the relationship between mathematics and science achievement in the United States. In D. F. Robitalle & A. E. Beaton (Eds.), Secondary analysis of the TIMSS Data (pp. 233–249). Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Nashman-Smith, M., & Taylor, R. (2004). Integrating the IB MYP and IGCSE. International Schools Journal, 24(1), 19–25.Google Scholar
  22. Reimers, C. (2004). From MYP to diploma: An investigation of the impact of the Middle Years Programme on International Baccalaureate Diploma candidates. International Schools Journal, 24(2), 11–18.Google Scholar
  23. Richardson, H. (2010). Academies “want to teach IGCSEs”. Accessed 5 September 2014 from http://bbc.co.uk.
  24. Sagun, S., & Corlu, M. S. (2014). Resolving the dilemma of international school curriculum: The case of biology. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science, and Technology Education, 10(2), 153–158.Google Scholar
  25. Stobie, T. (2005). To what extent do the Middle Years Programme and Diploma Programme of the International Baccalaureate Organization provide a coherent and consistent educational continuum? International School Journal, 25(1), 30–40.Google Scholar
  26. Suldo, S. M., & Shaunessy-Dedrick, E. (2013). The psychosocial functioning of high school students in academically rigorous programs. Psychology in the Schools, 50(8), 823–843.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Tabachnick, G. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Experimental designs using ANOVA. Belmont, CA: Duxbury.Google Scholar
  28. Walker, G. R. (2000). One-way streets of our culture. International Schools Journal, 19(2), 11–19.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht and UNESCO Institute for Lifelong Learning 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Graduate School of EducationBilkent UniversityBilkentTurkey

Personalised recommendations