Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Efficient Learning for the Poor: New Insights into Literacy Acquisition for Children

  • Published:
International Review of Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Reading depends on the speed of visual recognition and capacity of short-term memory. To understand a sentence, the mind must read it fast enough to capture it within the limits of the short-term memory. This means that children must attain a minimum speed of fairly accurate reading to understand a passage. Learning to read involves “tricking” the brain into perceiving groups of letters as coherent words. This is achieved most efficiently by pairing small units consistently with sounds rather than learning entire words. To link the letters with sounds, explicit and extensive practice is needed; the more complex the spelling of a language, the more practice is necessary. However, schools of low-income students often waste instructional time and lack reading resources, so students cannot get sufficient practice to automatize reading and may remain illiterate for years. Lack of reading fluency in the early grades creates inefficiencies that affect the entire educational system. Neurocognitive research on reading points to benchmarks and monitoring indicators. All students should attain reading speeds of 45–60 words per minute by the end of grade 2 and 120–150 words per minute for grades 6–8.

Résumé

APPRENTISSAGE EFFICACE POUR LES PAUVRES : NOUVEAUX APERÇUS DE L’ACQUISITON DE L’ALPHABÉTISATION POUR LES ENFANTS – Lire dépend de la vitesse d’identification visuelle et de la capacité de la mémoire courte. Pour comprendre une phrase, l’esprit doit la lire assez rapidement pour s’en emparer dans les 12 secondes limites de la mémoire courte. Ceci signifie que les enfants doivent lire au moins 45–60 mots par minute pour comprendre un passage. La compréhension est étroitement liée à la vitesse et à l’exactitude de la lecture. Apprendre à lire implique “de duper” le cerveau pour qu’il perÇoive des groupes de lettres comme étant des mots cohérents. Ceci est réalisé plus efficacement lorsqu’on accouple de manière consistante des petites unités à des sons que lorsqu’on apprend des mots entiers. Pour relier les lettres avec des sons, une pratique explicite et étendue est nécessaire ; plus épeler un langage est complexe, plus la pratique est nécessaire. cependant, les écoles des étudiants à faible revenu perdent souvent du temps et manquent de ressources, de sorte que les étudiants ne peuvent obtenir de pratique suffisante pour automatiser la lecture et demeurent analphabètes des années durant. Le manque de maîtrise des premiers niveaux crée des incapacités qui se répercutent à travers tout le système d’éducation. La recherche neurocognitive sur la lecture souligne les repères et les indicateurs de contrôle. Tous les étudiants devraient atteindre des vitesses de lecture de 45–60 mots par minute vers la fin du niveau 2 et 150 mots par minute vers la fin des niveaux 6–8.

Zusammenfassung

EFFIZIENTES LERNEN FÜR DIE ARMEN: NEUE ERKENNTNISSE IN DER ALPHABETISIERUNG VON KINDERN – Lesen hängt von der Geschwindigkeit des visuellen Erkennens und vom Fassungsvermögen des Kurzzeitgedächtnisses ab. Damit der Verstand einen Satz verstehen kann, muss er ihn schnell genug, nämlich innerhalb der 12-Sekundengrenze des Kurzzeitgedächtnisses erfassen. Das heisst dass Kinder mindestens 45–60 Wörter pro Minute lesen mÜssen, um␣eine Textpassage zu verstehen. Das Begriffsvermögen ist aufs Engste mit der Lesegeschwindigkeit und –genauigkeit verbunden. Beim Lesenlernen “Überlistet” man␣gewissermaßen das Gehirn, Buchstabengruppen als zusammenhängende Worte wahrzunehmen. Dies erreicht man am effektivsten, indem man anstelle des Erlernens ganzer Worte kleine Einheiten gleichbleibend mit bestimmten Lauten verknüpft. Die Verknüpfung von Buchstaben mit Lauten bedarf allerdings regelmäßiger und gründlicher übung; je komplexer die Rechtschreibung einer Sprache, umso intensiver muss geübt werden. Nun besteht aber an Schulen mit einkommensschwachen Schülern häufig ein Mangel an Ressourcen und relativ viel Zeitverschwendung, so dass die Schüler nicht genug übung im automatisierten Lesen bekommen und auf Jahre hinaus Analphabeten bleiben. Mangelhafte Leseflüssigkeit in den ersten Klassen führt zu einer Inkompetenz, die sich durch das gesamte Bildungssystem hindurch fortsetzt. Die neurokognitive Leseforschung weist auf bestimmte Vergleichsmerkmale und Leistungsindikatoren hin. Alle Schüler sollten am Ende der zweiten Klasse eine Lesegeschwindigkeit von 45–60 Wörtern pro Minute erreicht haben und in den Klassen sechs bis acht über 150 Wörter pro Minute verfügen.

Resumen

APRENDIZAJE EFICIENTE PARA ALUMNOS DE ESCASOS RECURSOS: NUEVOS HALLAZGOS SOBRE CÓMO LOS NIÑOS ADQUIEREN LA LECTOESCRITURA. La lectura depende del reconocimiento visual y de la capacidad de la memoria a corto plazo. Para comprender una frase, la mente debe leerla con una velocidad suficiente para captarla dentro del límite de los 12 segundos de la memoria a corto plazo. Esto significa que los niÑos deben leer por lo menos 45 a 60 palabras por minuto para comprender un pasaje. La comprensiÓn se relaciona en forma muy compleja con la velocidad y la precisiÓn de la lectura. Aprender a leer implica “persuadir” a la mente a percibir grupos de letras como palabras coherentes. Esto se logra con mayor eficacia cuando se aparean en forma consistente pequeÑas unidades con sonidos, más que cuando se aprenden palabras enteras. Para relacionar las letras con sonidos se necesita una práctica explícita y extensa, y cuanto más complejo sea el deletreo de un lenguaje, mayor será la práctica necesaria. Sin embargo, las escuelas con alumnos de bajos ingresos muchas veces pierden tiempo y no disponen de suficientes recursos, por lo cual los estudiantes no pueden recibir la práctica que necesitan para automatizar la lectura, y así pueden pasar aÑos sin que superen el analfabetismo. La falta de fluidez en los primeros grados crea ineficiencias que pueden llegar a repercutir en todo el sistema educativo. La investigaciÓn neurocognitiva apunta a parámetros de comparaciÓn e indicadores de monitoreo. Todos los estudiantes deberían alcanzar velocidades de lectura de 45–60 palabras por minuto al finalizar el grado 2 y de 150 palabras por minuto en los grados 6–8.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abadzi Helen. 2004. Education for All or Just for the Smartest Poor? Prospects 34: 271–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abadzi H., Crouch L., Echegaray M. , Pasco C., Sampe. J. 2005. Monitoring Education-for-All Outcomes Through Rapid Learning Assessments: A Case Study from Perú. Prospects 35: 137–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abadzi, Helen. 2006a. Adult Illiteracy, Brain Architecture, and Empowerment of the Poor. Adult Education and Development 65:19–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Abadzi, Helen. 2006b. Efficient Learning for the Poor: Insights from the Frontier of Cognitive Neuroscience. World Bank: Directions in Development. Washington DC: World Bank

    Google Scholar 

  • Abadzi, Helen. 2007. Instructional Time Loss and Local-Level Governance. Prospects 37: 1, 3–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Abadzi, Helen. 2007. Absenteeism and Beyond: Instructional Time Loss and Consequences. Policy research working paper series no: WPS4376. Washington, DC: World Bank

  • Alloway T. P., Gathercole S. E., Pickering S. J. (2006). Verbal and visuo-spatial short-term and working memory in children: are they separable? Child Development 77: 1698–1716

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • August, D., M. Carlo, M. Calderon, and P. Proctor. 2005. Development of Literacy in Spanish-Speaking English-Language Learners: Findings from a Longitudinal Study of Elementary School Children. IDA Perspectives

  • Banerji, Rukmini, Madhav Chavan, and Usha Rane. 2004. Are we learning? A symposium on ensuring quality elementary education. Seminar 536 (http://www.india-seminar.com/2004/536.htm)

  • Barr, R., C. Blachowicz, C. Katz, and B. Kaufman. 2002. Reading Diagnosis for Teachers: An Instructional Approach (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon

  • Barrier, Emilie, Sekou Fernández, Jeannot Saa Tinguiano, and Gononan Traore. 1998. évaluation du système éducatif Guinéen. Sèvre: Centre International d’ ètudes Pédagogiques/Conakry: Cellule Nationale de Coordination de l’évaluation du Système éducatif

  • Begley, Sharon. 2007. The Case for Chutes and Ladders. Newsweek, October 22: 51

    Google Scholar 

  • Breznitz, Z. 1997a. “Effects of Accelerated Reading Rate on Memory for Text among Dyslexic Readers” Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 289–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breznitz, Z. 1997b. Enhancing the Reading of Dyslexic Children by Reading Acceleration and Auditory Masking. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 103–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cossu Guiseppe 1999. The Acquisition of Italian Orthography. In: M. Harris, G. Hatano (eds) Learning to Read and Write: A Cross-Linguistic Perspective, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowan, N. (2001). The Magical Number 4 in Short-Term Memory: A Reconsideration of Mental Storage Capacity. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 87–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crouch, Luis. 2007. Sample Size Considerations in Early Grade Reading Assessment. Washington, DC: Research Triangle Institute, unpublished report

  • de la Colina M. G., R. Parker, J. Hasbrouck, R. Lara-Alecio. 2001. Intensive Intervention in Reading Fluency for At-Risk Beginning Spanish Readers. Bilingual Research Journal 25(4), 417–452

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, M., and J. Towner. 2005. Evaluating An Oral Reading Fluency Cut-Score to Identify Second Grade Children Who Are At-Risk for Reading Failure. Paper submitted for publication

  • Cummins J., Swain M., K. Nakajima, J. Handscombe, D. Green, C. Tran. 1984. Linguistic interdependence among Japanese and Vietnamese immigrant students. In: C. Rivera (Ed), Communicative Competence Approaches to Language Proficiency Assessment: Research and Application (pp. 60–81). Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters

    Google Scholar 

  • Dempster Frank. 1988. The spacing effect: A case study in the failure to apply the results of psychological research. American Psychologist, 43, 627–634

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Equipo de Orientación Educativa de Marbella. 2003. Evaluación de la velocidad lectora oral y análisis de la correlación de esta variable con la nota global de junio. Consejería de Educación y Ciencia. Junta de Andalucía

  • Gathercole Susan E., Susan J. Pickering, Camilla Knight, Zoe Stegmann. 2004. Working memory skills and educational attainment: Evidence from national curriculum assessments at 7 and 14 years of age. Applied Cognitive Psychology 18, 1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagtvet B., S. A. H. Lyster 1998. Literacy Teaching in Scandinavia: Focus on Norway. In: V. Edwards (ed.), The Encyclopedia of Language and Education (pp. 225–234) Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagtvet B., S. A. H. Lyster. 2003. Spelling Errors of Good and Poor Decoders. In: N. Goulandris (ed.) Dyslexia in Different Languages: Cross-Linguistic Comparisons, London: Whurr Publishers: 181–207

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagtvet B. E, T. Helland, S. A. H. Lyster. 2005. Literacy Acquisition in Norwegian. In: R. M. Joshi, P. G. Aron (eds.) Handbook of Orthography and Literacy. Mahwah, NJ: Laurence Erlbaum

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanushek, Eric A., and Ludger Woessmann. 2007. The Role of Education Quality in Economic Growth. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 4122. Washington DC: World Bank

  • Harris M., G. Hatano. 1999. Introduction: A Cross-Linguistic Perspective on Learning to Read and Write. In: M. Harris, G. Hatano (eds.), Learning to Read and Write: A Cross-Linguistic Perspective. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartley, M., J. Swanson, and V. Eric. 1986. Retention of Basic Skills among Dropouts from Egyptian Primary Schools. Working paper series report no: EDT40. Washington, DC: World Bank

  • Hasbrouck J., G. A. Tindal. 2006. Oral Reading Fluency Norms: A Valuable Assessment Tool for Reading Teachers. The Reading Teacher 59, 636–644

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirschner P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work: An Analysis of the Failure of Constructivist, Discovery, Problem-Based Experiential and Inquiry-Based Teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korkman Marit, Sarah L. Kemp, Ursula Kirk. 2001. Effects of Age on Neurocognitive Measures of Children Ages 5 to 12: A Cross-Sectional Study on 800 Children from the United States. Developmental-Neuropsychology 20(1), 331–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LaBerge, D., and S. J. Samuels. 1974. Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Congnitive Psychology 6: 293–323

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson, Joanne. 2006. Multiple Literacies, Curriculum, and Instruction in Early Childhood and Elementary School. Theory Into Practice, 45, 319–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ledesma H. M. L., R. Morris. 2005. Language Factors Influencing Early Reading Development in Bilingual (Filipino-English) Boys. The International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 8(1), 1–19

    Google Scholar 

  • McCutchen D., V. W. Berninger. 1999. Those Who Know Teach Well: Helping Teachers Master Literacy-Related Subject Matter Knowledge. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 14, 215–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCutchen D., Abbott R. D., Green L. B., Beretvas S. N., Cox S., Potter N. S., Quiroga T., and Gray A. 2002. Beginning Literacy: Links Among Teacher Knowledge, Teacher Practice, and Student Learning. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35, 69–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metcalf, Janet. 2006. Principles of Cognitive Science in Education. APS Observer 2006 19(3)

  • Moats L. C., B. F. Foorman. 2003. Measuring teachers’ content knowledge of language and reading. Annals of Dyslexia, 53, 23–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nag, Sonali. 2007. Early Reading in Kannada: The Pace of Acquisition of Orthographic Knowledge and Phonemic Awareness. Journal of Research in Reading, 30, 7–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nag-Arulmani Sonali. 2003. Reading Difficulties in Indian Languages. In Nata Goulandris, Margaret Snowling (eds.), Dyslexia in Different Languages: Cross-Linguistic Comparisons, London: Whurr Publishers

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagy, Zoltan, Helena Westerberg, and Torkel Klingberg. 2004. Maturation of white matter is associated with the development of cognitive functions during childhood. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 16(7): 1227–1233

    Google Scholar 

  • Norton Elizabeth S., Ioulia Kovelman, Laura-Ann Petitto. 2007. Are there Separate Neural Systems for Spelling? New Insights into the Role of Rules and Memory in Spelling from Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Mind, Brain, and Education, 1, 48–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pelli, Dennis and Katharine Tillman. 2007. Parts, Wholes, and Context in Reading: A Triple Dissociation. PLoS ONE, August 2007, e 680

  • Pelli D. G., C. W. Burns, B. Farell, D. C. Moore-Page. 2006. Feature detection and letter identification. Vision Research, 46(28), 4646–4674

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peper R. J., R. E. Mayer. 1978. Note-Taking as a Generative Activity. Journal of Educational Psychology 70, 514–522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pérez Villar J. 1996. ¿Cómo lee mi paciente?: Contribución a la metodología del examen directo en psiquiatría de niños. Revista Cubana de Pediatría 68(3), 201–210

    Google Scholar 

  • Riedel, Brant. 2007. The Relation Between DIBELS, Reading Comprehension, and Vocabulary in Urban First-Grade Students. Reading Research Quarterly, 42, 546–567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seymour P., H. K. M. Aro, J. M. Erskine. 2003. “Foundation Literacy Acquisition in European Orthographies. British Journal of Psychology 94(2), 143–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaywitz, Sally. 2003. Overcoming Dyslexia. New York: Alfred Knopf

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow C. E., M. Susan Burns, P. Griffin (eds.). 1998. Preventing Reading Difficulties in Young Children. Committee on the Prevention of Reading Difficulties in Young Children. Washington DC: National Research Council

    Google Scholar 

  • Spear-Swerling L., P. Brucker. 2004. Preparing Novice Teachers to Develop Basic Reading and Spelling Skills in Children. Annals of Dyslexia, 54, 332–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spratt, J., and M. Tamba. 2005. Extending the Partnership: Involving Practitioners in the Data Analysis and Interpretation Process. Paper Presented March 23 at the Annual Conference of the Comparative and International Education Society, Palo Alto, California

  • Szűcs Dénes, Usha Goswami. 2007. Educational neuroscience: Defining a new discipline for the study of mental representations. Mind, Brain, and Education 1:3, 114–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan A., T. Nicholson. 1997. Flashcards Revisited: Training Poor Readers to Read Words Faster Improves their Comprehension of Text. Journal of Educational Psychology 89, 276–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO. 2002–2006. Education for All Global Monitoring Reports. Paris: UNESCO

  • Wimmer H., K. Landerl, U. Frith. 1999. Learning to read German. In: M. Harris, G. Hatano (eds.), Learning to Read and Write: A Cross-Linguistic Perspective. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press: 4–50

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank 2006. From Schooling Access to Learning Outcomes: An Unfinished Agenda. Washington DC: World Bank, Independent Evaluation Group

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Helen Abadzi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Abadzi, H. Efficient Learning for the Poor: New Insights into Literacy Acquisition for Children. Int Rev Educ 54, 581–604 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-008-9102-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-008-9102-3

Keywords

Navigation