Abstract
In Partisanship and Political Liberalism in Diverse Societies, Matteo Bonotti argues that the problem of political obligation can be solved for at least a sub-set of citizens, namely, for political partisans. Bonotti claims that the benefits that accrue to partisans in virtue of a principle of fair play warrant their observing a duty to obey the law. In this paper, I first point to the strength of the argument: it purports to generate a duty of all partisans to obey all laws, not just laws to do with the political system. I argue that this strong argument does not work, though a weaker argument, connecting partisanship to an obligation to obey laws to do with the political system, might. I suggest an alternative argument that might more securely connect the benefits of partisanship to an obligation to obey the law, one that is grounded in obligations of partisanship, especially those of highly visible members of parties.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Habermas, Jurgen. 1995. Reconciliation Through the Public Use of Reason: Remarks on John Rawls’ Political Liberalism. The Journal of Philosophy 92 (3): 109–131.
Honig, Bonnie. 1993. Political Theory and the Displacement of Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Weinstock, D. Partisanship and Political Obligation: Some Sceptical Thoughts. Res Publica 25, 475–486 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11158-019-09440-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11158-019-09440-5