Advertisement

Res Publica

, Volume 23, Issue 2, pp 159–177 | Cite as

Privacy, Neuroscience, and Neuro-Surveillance

  • Adam D. Moore
Article

Abstract

The beliefs, feelings, and thoughts that make up our streams of consciousness would seem to be inherently private. Nevertheless, modern neuroscience is offering to open up the sanctity of this domain to outside viewing. A common retort often voiced to this worry is something like, ‘Privacy is difficult to define and has no inherent moral value. What’s so great about privacy?’ In this article I will argue against these sentiments. A definition of privacy is offered along with an account of why privacy is morally valuable. In the remaining sections, several privacy protecting principles are defended that would limit various sorts of neuro-surveillance promised by advancements in neuroscience.

Keywords

Privacy Privacy rights Neuroscience Neuro-surveillance Brain-privacy Notice Consent Probable cause Waiving privacy Privacy as property 

References

  1. Allen, Anita. 2003. Why privacy isn’t everything: Feminist reflections on personal accountability. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
  2. Allen, Anita. 2008. The virtuous spy: Privacy as an ethical limit. The Monist 91: 3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Allen, Anita. 2011. Unpopular privacy: What must we hide?. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barnes, Grace M., Michael P. Farrell, and Sarbani Banerjee. 1994. Family influences on alcohol abuse and other problem behaviors among black and white adolescents in a general population sample. Journal of Research on Adolescence 4: 183–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baum, Andrew, and Stuart Koman. 1976. Differential response to anticipated crowding: Psychological effects of social and spatial density. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 34: 526–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Benn, S.I., and Gerald F. Gaus. 1983. Public and private in social life. New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
  7. Blackmun, Harry. 1973. Roe v. Wade, U.S. 410(153):164–165.Google Scholar
  8. Bonaci, Tamara, Ryan Calo, and Howard Jay Chizeck. 2014. App stores for the brain: Privacy & security in brain–computer interfaces. In 2014 IEEE International Symposium on Ethics in Science, Technology and Engineering. 1–7, 23–24.Google Scholar
  9. Chekroud Adam M., Jim A. C. Everett, Holly Bridge, and Miles Hewstone. 2014. A review of neuroimaging studies of race-related prejudice: Does amygdala response reflect threat? Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 8. http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00179/full#B60.
  10. Clauson-Kaas, J., A. Dzikus, C. Stephens, N. Hojlyng, and P. Aaby. 1996. Urban health: Human settlement indicators of crowding. Third World Planning Review 18: 349–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cox, Verne C., Paul B. Paulus, and Garvin McCain. 1984. Prison crowding research: The relevance of prison housing standards and a general approach regarding crowding phenomena. American Psychologist 39: 1148–1160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cyranoski, David. 2012. Neuroscience: The mind reader. http://www.nature.com/news/neuroscience-the-mind-reader-1.10816.
  13. Davis, Frederick. 1959. What do we mean by ‘Right to privacy’? South Dakota Law Review 4: 1–24.Google Scholar
  14. DeCew, Judith W. 1997. In pursuit of privacy: Law, ethics, and the rise of technology. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Douglas, William O. 1966. Osborn v. United States, 385 U.S. 323.Google Scholar
  16. Eaton, Nicholas, Robert F. Kruger, Wendy Johnson, Matt McGue, and William G. Iacono. 2009. Parental monitoring, personality, and delinquency: Further support for a reconceptualization of monitoring. Journal of Research in Personality 43: 49–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Edwards, John N., and Alan Booth. 1977. Crowding and human sexual behavior. Social Forces 55: 791–808.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Erikson, Erik H. 1963. Childhood and society. New York, NY: Norton.Google Scholar
  19. Farah, Martha J. 2011. Neuroscience and neuroethics in the 21st century. In The Oxford handbook of neuroethics, ed. Judy Illes, and Barbara J. Sahakian. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Farah, Martha J., Elizabeth M. Smith, Cyrena Gawuga, Dennis Lindsell, and Dean Foster. 2008. Brain imaging and brain privacy: A realistic concern? Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 21(1).Google Scholar
  21. Farahany, Nita. 2012. Incriminating thoughts. Stanford Law Review. 64.Google Scholar
  22. Farrington, David P., and Christopher P. Nuttall. 1980. Prison size, overcrowding, prison violence and recidivism. Journal of Criminal Justice. 8: 221–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Federspiel, William. 2008. 1984 Arrives: Thought (crime), technology, and the constitution. William and Mary Bill of Rights Journal. 16.Google Scholar
  24. Finn, David. 2006. Brain imaging and privacy: How recent advances in neuroimaging implicate privacy concerns. Bepress Legal Series. Working paper 1752.Google Scholar
  25. Fischbach, Ruth, and Janet Mindes. 2011. Why neuroethicists are needed. In The Oxford handbook of neuroethics, ed. Judy Illes, and Barbara J. Sahakian. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Fuller, Theodore D., John N. Edwards, Sairudee Vorakitphokatorn, and Santhat Sermsri. 1996. Chronic stress and psychological well-being: evidence from Thailand on household crowding. Social Science Medicine 42: 265–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gavison, Ruth. 1983. Information control: Availability and control. In Public and private in social life, ed. S. Benn, and G. Gaus, 113–134. New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
  28. Gligorov, Nada, and Stephen C. Krieger. 2010. Functional neuroimaging, free will, and privacy. In Healthcare and the effect of technology: developments, challenges and advancements, ed. Stéfane M. Kabene. Hershey, PA: Medical Information Science Reference.Google Scholar
  29. Gross, Hyman. 1971. Privacy and autonomy. In Privacy, ed. John W. Chapman, and J. Roland Pennock, 169–181. New York, NY: Atherton Press.Google Scholar
  30. Hallinan, Dara, Michael Friedewald, Philip Schütz, and Paul de Hert. 2014. Neurodata and neuroprivacy: Data protection outdated? Surveillance and Society 12(1): 55–72.Google Scholar
  31. Hare, Amanda L., Emily G. Marston, and Joseph P. Allen. 2011. Maternal acceptance and adolescents’ emotional communication: A longitudinal study. Journal of Youth and Adolescence 40: 744–751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hart, Allen J., Paul J. Whalen, Lisa M. Shin, Sean C. McInerney, Hakan Fischer, and L. Scott. 2000. Differential response in the human amygdala to racial outgroup vs ingroup face stimuli. NeuroReport 11: 2351–2355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Haynes, John-Dylan. 2012. Brain reading. In I know what you’re thinking: Brain imaging and mental privacy, ed. Sarah Richmond, Geraint Rees, and Sarah J.  L. Edwards. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Hobbes, Thomas. 1985. Leviathan: 1651. In Penguin Classics, ed. C. B. MacPheresonGoogle Scholar
  35. Kafka, Randy, and Perry London. 1991. Communication in relationships and adolescent substance use: The influence of parents and friends. Adolescence 26: 587–598.Google Scholar
  36. Kerr, Margaret, and Hakan Stattin. 2000. What parents know, how they know it, and several forms of adolescent adjustment: Further support for a reinterpretation of monitoring. Journal of Developmental Psychology. 36: 366–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kessler, Jane. 1966. Psychopathology of childhood. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  38. Laudon, Kenneth. 1996. Markets and privacy. Communications of the ACM 39: 93–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lessig, Lawrence. 2002. Privacy as property. Social Research 69: 247–269.Google Scholar
  40. Lever, Annabelle. 2016. Democracy, privacy, and security. In Privacy, security, and accountability, ed. Adam D. Moore. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield International.Google Scholar
  41. Lever, Annabelle. 2012. Neuroscience v. privacy? A democratic perspective. In I know what you’re thinking: Brain imaging and mental privacy, ed. S. Richmond, G. Rees, and S. J. L. Edwards. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Lewis, Tanya. 2013. Brain says guilty! Neural imaging may nab criminals. http://www.livescience.com/37091-brain-imaging-in-the-courtroom.html.
  43. Martinovic, Ivan, Doug Davies, Mario Frank, Daniele Perito, Tomas Ros, and Dawn Song. 2012. On the feasibility of side-channel attacks with brain-computer interfaces. In Proceedings of the 21st USENIX conference on security symposium. Berkeley, CA: USENIX Association.Google Scholar
  44. McCain, Garvin, Verne Cox, and Paul B. Paulus. 1980. The effect of prison crowding on inmate behavior. Washington DC: US Department of Justice.Google Scholar
  45. McGinley, Phyllis McGinley. 1959. A lost privilege. Province of the heart. New York, NY: Viking Press.Google Scholar
  46. Megargee, Edwin. 1977. The association of population density reduced space and uncomfortable temperatures with misconduct in a prison community. The American Journal of Community Psychology 5: 289–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Mill, John Stuart, 1859. On Liberty. London: Longman, Roberts & Green.Google Scholar
  48. Miller, Greg. 2014. Scientists can’t read your mind with brain scans (yet). http://www.wired.com/2014/04/brain-scan-mind-reading/.
  49. Moore, Adam D. 2000. Employee monitoring & computer technology: Evaluative surveillance v. privacy. Business Ethics Quarterly 10(3): 697–709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Moore, Adam D. 2001. Intellectual property and information control: Philosophic foundations and contemporary issues. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
  51. Moore, Adam D. 2003. Privacy: Its meaning and value. American Philosophical Quarterly 40: 215–227.Google Scholar
  52. Moore, Adam D. 2007. Toward informational privacy rights. San Diego Law Review 44: 809–845.Google Scholar
  53. Moore, Adam D. 2008. Defining Privacy. Journal of Social Philosophy 39: 411–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Moore, Adam D. 2010. Privacy rights: Moral and legal foundations. University Park, PA: Penn State University Press.Google Scholar
  55. Moore, Adam D. 2011. Privacy, security, and government surveillance: Wikileaks and the new accountability. Public Affairs Quarterly. 25.Google Scholar
  56. Moore, Adam D. 2016. Waiving privacy rights: Responsibility, paternalism, and liberty. Forthcoming, Brookings Institute Press. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2673717.
  57. Moreno, Jonathan D. 2011. Brain trust: neuroscience and national security in the 21st century. In The Oxford handbook of neuroethics, ed. Judy Illes, and Barbara J. Sahakian. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  58. Morgan, Griscom. 1972. Mental and social health and population density. Journal of Human Relations 20: 196–204.Google Scholar
  59. Mumford, Lewis. 1961. The city in history. New York, NY: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
  60. Murdock, George P. 1955. The universals of culture. In Readings in world anthropology, ed. E. Adamson Hoebel, Jesse D. Jennings, and Elmer R. Smith. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  61. Murphy, Emily R., and Henry T. Greely. 2011. What will be the limits of neuroscience-based mindreading in the law? In The Oxford handbook of neuroethics, ed. Judy Illes, and Barbara J. Sahakian. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  62. Newell, Bryce, Cheryl Metoyer, and Adam D. Moore. 2015. Privacy in the family. In The social dimensions of privacy, ed. Beate Roessler, and Dorota Mokrosinska. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  63. Nissenbaum, Helen. 2009. Privacy in context: Technology, policy, and the integrity of social life. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  64. Nissenbaum, Helen, and Finn Brunton. 2015. Obfuscation: A user’s guide for privacy and protest. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  65. Nussbaum, Martha C. 2000. Woman and human development: The capabilities approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Otis, James. 1761. In Opposition to writs of assistance. Delivered before the Superior Court. Boston, MA.Google Scholar
  67. Parent, W. A. 1983. Privacy, morality, and the law. Philosophy and Public Affairs 12: 269–288.Google Scholar
  68. Parker, Richard B. 1974. A definition of privacy. Rutgers Law Review 27: 275–296.Google Scholar
  69. Paulus, Paul B., Verne C. Cox, and Garvin McCain. 1978. Death rates, psychiatric commitments, blood pressure and perceived crowding as a function of institutional crowding. Environmental Psychology and Nonverbal Behavior 3: 107–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Pennock, J. Roland, and John W. Chapman. 1971. Privacy: Nomos XIII. New York, NY: Atherton Press.Google Scholar
  71. Phelps, Elizabeth A., Kevin J. O’Connor, William A. Cunningham, E. Sumie Funayama, J. Christopher Gatenby, John C. Gore, and Mahzarin R. Banaji. 2000. Performance on indirect measures of race evaluation predicts amygdala activation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 12: 729–738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Pitt, William (the elder, Earl of Chatham). 1763. Speech in the House of Lords. In Historical sketches of statesmen who flourished in the time of George III, vol. 1, by Henry Peter Brougham (London and Glasgow: R. Griffin and Co., 1839).Google Scholar
  73. Porporino, F. J., and K. Dudley. 1984. An analysis of the effects of overcrowding in Canadian penitentiaries. Ottawa: Research Division, Programs Branch, Solicitor General of Canada.Google Scholar
  74. Rachels, James. 1975. Why privacy is important. Philosophy and Public Affairs 4: 323–333.Google Scholar
  75. Richards, Neil, and Daniel Solove. 2007. Privacy’s other path: Recovering the law of confidentiality. The Georgetown Law Journal 96: 123–182.Google Scholar
  76. Richmond, Sara, Geraint Rees, and Sarah J. L. Edwards. 2012. I know what you’re thinking: Brain imaging and mental privacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Roberts, John M., and Thomas Gregor. 1971. Privacy: A cultural view. In Privacy, ed. J. Roland Pennock and John W. Chapman, 199–225. New York, NY: Atherton Press.Google Scholar
  78. Rossiter, Clinton. 1958. Aspects of liberty. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  79. Rössler, B. 2005. The value of privacy (trans. by Rupert, D. V.). Glasgow and Cambridge, UK: Polity.Google Scholar
  80. Ruback, R. Barry, and Timothy S. Carr. 1984. Crowding in a woman’s prison. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 14: 57–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Samuelson, Pamela. 2000. Privacy as intellectual property? Stanford Law Review. 52: 1125–1173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Schoeman, Ferdinand David. 1992. Privacy and social freedom. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Schwartz, Barry. 1968. The social psychology of privacy. American Journal of Sociology 73: 741–752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Slobogin, Christopher. 2005. Subpoenas and privacy. DePaul Law Review 54: 805.Google Scholar
  85. Spiro, Herbert J. 1971. Privacy in comparative perspective. In Privacy, ed. J. Roland Pennock and John W. Chapman, 121–148. New York, NY: Atherton Press.Google Scholar
  86. Spitz, Rene A. 1964. The derailment of dialogue. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association 12: 752–775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Stattin, Hakan, and Margaret Kerr. 2000. Parental monitoring: A reinterpretation. Child Development 71: 1072–1085.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Thomson, Judith Jarvis. 1975. The right to privacy. Philosophy and Public Affairs 4: 295–314.Google Scholar
  89. Warren, Samuel D., and Louis Brandeis. 1890. The right to privacy. The Harvard Law Review 4: 193–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Westin, Alan. 1967. Privacy and freedom. New York, NY: Atheneum.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Washington, Information SchoolSeattleUSA

Personalised recommendations