Advertisement

Res Publica

, Volume 22, Issue 3, pp 249–265 | Cite as

Chewing Over In Vitro Meat: Animal Ethics, Cannibalism and Social Progress

  • Josh Milburn
Winner of the PG Essay Prize

Abstract

Despite its potential for radically reducing the harm inflicted on nonhuman animals in the pursuit of food, there are a number of objections grounded in animal ethics to the development of in vitro meat. In this paper, I defend the possibility against three such concerns. I suggest that worries about reinforcing ideas of flesh as food and worries about the use of nonhuman animals in the production of in vitro meat can be overcome through appropriate safeguards and a fuller understanding of the interests that nonhuman animals actually possess. Worries about the technology reifying speciesist hierarchies of value are more troublesome, however. In response to this final challenge, I suggest that we should be open not just to the production of in vitro nonhuman flesh, but also in vitro human flesh. This leads to a consideration of the ethics of cannibalism. The paper ultimately defends the position that cannibalism simpliciter is not morally problematic, though a great many practices typically associated with it are. The consumption of in vitro human flesh, however, is able to avoid these problematic practices, and so should be considered permissible. I conclude that animal ethicists and vegans should be willing to cautiously embrace the production of in vitro flesh.

Keywords

In vitro meat Cannibalism Animal ethics Animal rights Food ethics Veganism 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This paper was written while I was reading for a doctorate in the School of Politics, International Studies and Philosophy, Queen’s University Belfast, funded by the Department of Employment and Learning, Northern Ireland. Special thanks are owed to my supervisors, David Archard and Jeremy Watkins. I would also like to thank the participants at a Queen’s University Belfast ethics reading group session—Cillian McBride, Tom Walker, Peter Schaber, Jeremy Watkins, Fabian Schuppert, Paddy McQueen, Hanhui Xu, Jamie Day and Andrew R. Thompson—for a lively discussion and some very helpful comments, and the editors and reviewers at Res Publica for selecting this paper and offering valuable suggestions. My thanks also go to David Archard and Jan Deckers for their comments on earlier versions of this article.

References

  1. Bailey, Christiane. 2013. Zoopolis: A political renewal of animal rights theories. Dialogue 52(4): 725–737. doi: 10.1017/S0012217313000851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cochrane, Alasdair. 2012. Animal rights without liberation. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Cole, Matthew, and Karen Morgan. 2013. Engineering freedom? A critique of biotechnological routes to animal liberation. Configurations 21(2): 201–229. doi: 10.1353/con.2013.0015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Deckers, Jan. 2013. In defence of the vegan project. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 10(2): 187–195. doi: 10.1007/s11673-013-9428-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Diamond, Cora. 2005. Eating meat and eating people. In Animal rights, eds. Cass R. Sunstein, and Martha C. Nussbaum, 93–107. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Donaldson, Sue, and Will Kymlicka. 2013. Zoopolis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Ebert, Rainer, and Tibor Machan. 2012. Innocent threats and the moral problem of carnivorous animals. Journal of Applied Philosophy 29(2): 146–159. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5930.2012.00561.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fischer, Bob, and Burkay Ozturk. 2016. Facsimiles of flesh. Journal of Applied Philosophy. doi: 10.1111/japp.12223.Google Scholar
  9. Francione, Gary, and Robert, Garner. 2010. The animal rights debate. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Garner, Robert. 2013. A theory of justice for animals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hopkins, Patrick D. 2015. Cultured meat in western media: The disproportionate coverage of vegetarian reactions, demographic realities, and implications for cultured meat marketing. Journal of Integrative Agriculture 14(2): 264–272. doi: 10.1016/S2095-3119(14)60883-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hopkins, Patrick D., and Austin Dacey. 2008. Vegetarian meat: Could technology save animals and satisfy meat eaters? Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 21(6): 579–596. doi: 10.1007/s10806-008-9110-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Horta, Oscar. 2013. Zoopolis, intervention, and the state of nature. Law, Ethics and Philosophy 1(1): 113–125.Google Scholar
  14. Kasperbauer, T.J., and Peter Sandøe. 2016. Killing as a welfare issue. In The ethics of killing animals, eds. Tatjana Višak, and Robert Garner, 17–31. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Kass, Leon R. 1997. The wisdom of repugnance: Why we should ban the cloning of humans. New Republic 216(22): 17–26.Google Scholar
  16. Laestadius, Linnea I. 2015. Public perceptions of the ethics of in vitro meat: Determining an appropriate course of action. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 28(5): 991–1009. doi: 10.1007/s10806-015-9573-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Laestadius, Linnea I., and Mark A. Caldwell. 2015. Is the future of meat palatable? Perceptions of in vitro meat as evidenced by online news comments. Public Health Nutrition 18(13): 2457–2467. doi: 10.1017/S1368980015000622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Litwack, Eric. 2006. The ethical and aesthetic defense of animal analogues: A reply to Turner. Between the Species 13(6): 1–14. doi: 10.15368/bts.2006v13n6.5.Google Scholar
  19. Lomasky, Loren. 2013. Is it wrong to eat animals? Social Philosophy and Policy 30(1–2): 177–200. doi: 10.1017/S0265052513000083.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Machan, Tibor. 2004. Putting humans first. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
  21. Mattick, Carolyn S., and Braden R. Allenby. 2012. Cultured meat: The systemic implications of an emerging technology. IEEE International Symposium on Sustainable Systems and Technology. doi: 10.1109/ISSST.2012.6228020.Google Scholar
  22. Milburn, Josh. 2014. The demandingness of Nozick’s ‘Lockean’ proviso. European Journal of Political Theory. doi: 10.1177/1474885114562978.Google Scholar
  23. Milburn, Josh. 2015. Not only humans eat meat: Companions, sentience, and vegan politics. Journal of Social Philosophy. 46(4): 449–462. doi: 10.1111/josp.12131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Milburn, Josh. Forthcoming-a. Robert Nozick on nonhuman animals: Rights, value and the meaning of life. In Ethical and political approaches to nonhuman animal issues, eds. Andrew Woodhall, and Gabriel Garmendia da Trindade. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  25. Milburn, Josh. Forthcoming-b. The animal lovers’ paradox? On the ethics of ‘pet food’. In Pets and people, ed. Christine D. Overall. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Miller, John. 2012. In vitro meat: Power, authenticity and vegetarianism. Journal for Critical Animal Studies 10(4): 41–63.Google Scholar
  27. Milligan, Tony. 2011. The wrongness of sex with animals. Public Affairs Quarterly 25(3): 241–255.Google Scholar
  28. Narveson, Jan. 1987. On a case for animal rights. The Monist 70(1): 31–49. doi: 10.5840/monist19877013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Nietzsche, Friedrich. 2000 [1886]. Beyond good and evil. In Basic writings of Nietzsche, trans. and ed. Walter Kaufmann, 191–435. New York, NY: Modern Library.Google Scholar
  30. Nietzsche, Friedrich. 2000 [1887]. On the genealogy of morals. In Basic writings of Nietzsche, trans. and ed. Walter Kaufmann, 449–599. New York, NY: Modern Library.Google Scholar
  31. Nussbaum, Martha. 2004. Hiding from humanity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Nussbaum, Martha. 2006. Frontiers of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  33. O’Sullivan, Siobhan. 2011. Animals, equality and democracy. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Pandya, Ryan. 2014. Milk without the moo. New Scientist 222(2975): 28–29. doi: 10.1016/S0262-4079(14)61260-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Piazza, Jared, Matthew B. Ruby, Steve Loughnan, Mischel Luong, Juliana Kulik, Hanne M. Watkins, and Mirra Seigerman. 2015. Rationalizing meat consumption. The 4Ns. Appetite 91: 114–128. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2015.04.011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Regan, Tom. 1984. The case for animal rights. Oakland, CA: California University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Schaefer, G. Owen, and Julian Savulescu. 2014. The ethics of producing in vitro meat. Journal of Applied Philosophy 31(2): 188–202. doi: 10.1111/japp.12056.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Schneider, Zachary. 2013. In vitro meat: Space travel, cannibalism, and federal regulation. Houston Law Review 50(3): 991–1025.Google Scholar
  39. Sebo, Jeff. 2006. The ethics of incest. Philosophy in the Contemporary World 13(1): 48–55. doi: 10.5840/pcw20061318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Singer, Peter. 1975. Animal liberation. New York, NY: Random House.Google Scholar
  41. Singer, Peter. 2011. Practical ethics, 3rd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Stephens, Neil. 2013. Growing meat in laboratories: The promise, ontology, and ethical boundary-work of using muscle cells to make food. Configurations 21(2): 159–181. doi: 10.1353/con.2013.0013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Turner, Susan. 2005. Beyond viande: The ethics of faux flesh, fake fur and thriftshop leather. Between the Species 13(5): 1–13. doi: 10.15368/bts.2005v13n5.6.Google Scholar
  44. van der Weele, Cor, and Clemens Driessen. 2013. Emerging profiles for cultured meat: Ethics through and as design. Animals 3(3): 647–662. doi: 10.3390/ani3030647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Višak, Tatjana. 2013. Killing happy animals. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  46. Waldron, Jeremy. 2012. Dignity, rank and rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wayne, Katherine. 2013. Permissible use and interdependence: Against principled veganism. Journal of Applied Philosophy 30(2): 160-175. doi: 10.1111/japp.12010.
  48. Wisnewski, J. Jeremy. 2004. A defense of cannibalism. Public Affairs Quarterly 18(3): 265–272.Google Scholar
  49. Wisnewski, J. Jeremy. 2014. Cannibalism. In Encyclopedia of food and agricultural ethics, eds. Paul B. Thompson, and David M. Kaplan, 279–289. Dordrecht: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-94-007-6167-4_28-8.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Politics, International Studies and PhilosophyQueen’s University BelfastBelfastUK
  2. 2.Department of PhilosophyQueen’s UniversityKingstonCanada

Personalised recommendations