Political Integrity and Dirty Hands: Compromise and the Ambiguities of Betrayal
- 392 Downloads
The claim that democratic politics is the art of compromise is a platitude but we seem allergic to compromise in politics when it happens. This essay explores this paradox. Taking my cue from Machiavelli’s claim that there exists a rift between a morally admirable and a virtuous political life, I argue that: (1) a ‘compromising disposition’ is an ambiguous virtue—something which is politically expedient but not necessarily morally admirable; (2) whilst uncongenial to moral integrity, a ‘compromising disposition’ constitutes an essential aspect of political integrity. In so doing, I question certain moralistic assumptions which fuel contemporary vilifications of compromise—that, in theory, democratic politics should be inhospitable to compromise and that political integrity should be akin to moral integrity—and which are shared by Walzer’s Dirty Hands thesis which professes to be sensitive to the realities of politics. These assumptions displace the complex realities of politics and misconstrue the standards of political excellence; they unsatisfactorily idealize political integrity and the messy context in which democratic politicians operate—a context characterized by a plurality of incompatible traditions, each with its own values and principles. Whilst commitment to a set of principles stemming from one’s tradition or pre-election promises implies commitment to realize these, leading a virtuous political life amidst such a grubby domain often requires abandoning some of these. An innocent, all-or-nothing pursuit of one’s principles in politics might prompt political disaster or defeat: an uncompromising disposition entails the entire abandonment of any hope of realizing all of those principles.
KeywordsCompromise Political integrity Dirty hands Democratic politics Moral conflict Betrayal
I am extremely grateful to Derek Edyvane, Kerri Woods and Jonathan Dean for reading earlier versions of this essay as well as for their fruitful feedback, encouragement and support. Earlier versions of this essay were presented at the 2014 Association for Legal and Social Philosophy Conference. I would like to thank the participants of the conference—and, in particular Matteo Bonotti and Jesse Tomalty—for their constructive feedback and suggestions. I have also benefited from discussions with Jonathan Allen on the topic of Dirty Hands. Finally, I would like to thank the University of Leeds and the ESRC for funding my research as well as the editors of Res Publica and two anonymous reviewers for their encouragement and helpful comments and suggestions.
- Arendt, Hannah. 1990. On revolution. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
- Beerbohm, Eric. 2012. In our name: The ethics of democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Bellamy, Richard. 2012. Compromise and the representation paradox: Coalition government and political integrity. Government and Opposition 47: 444–465.Google Scholar
- Benjamin, Martin. 1990. Splitting the difference: Compromise and integrity in ethics and politics. Kansas, KS: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
- Berlin, Isaiah. 1980. The originality of Machiavelli. In Against the current: Essays in the history of ideas, ed. Henry Hardy, 20–73. New York, NY: Viking.Google Scholar
- Berlin, Isaiah. 1990. The pursuit of the ideal. In The crooked timber of humanity: Chapters in the history of ideas, ed. Henry Hardy, 1–19. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
- Blattberg, Charles. 2013. Dirty hands. In The international encyclopaedia of ethics, ed. Hugh Lafollette. London: Wiley. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1968686. Accessed 10 Aug 2014.
- Blustein, Jeffrey. 1991. Care and commitment. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Boudreaux, Donald, and Dwight Lee. 1997. Politics as the art of confined compromise. Cato Journal 16: 365–381.Google Scholar
- Butterfield, Roger. 1946. Mr Mencken sounds off. Life Magazine 21: 45–52.Google Scholar
- Churchill, Winston. 1986. The second world war, vol. III. Boston, MA: Mariner Books.Google Scholar
- Elshtain, Jean Bethke. 1995. Democracy on trial. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
- Gray, John. 2001. Two faces of liberalism. New York: The New Press.Google Scholar
- Gray, John. 2005. Enlightenment’s wake: Politics and culture at the close of modern age. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Gutmann, Amy, and Dennis Thompson. 2011. Is there room for political compromise in an era of permanent campaigning? The Christian Science Monitor. http://www.csmonitor.com/Commentary/Opinion/2011/0104/Is-thereroom-for-political-compromise-in-an-era-of-permanent-campaigning. Accessed 03 Aug 2014.
- Gutmann, Amy, and Dennis Thompson. 2012. The spirit of compromise: Why governing demands it and campaigning undermines it. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Halfon, Mark. 1990. Integrity: A philosophical inquiry. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
- Himelfarb, Richard, and Rosanna Perotti. 2004. Principle over politics? The domestic policy of the George H. W. Bush presidency. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
- Hampshire, Stuart. 1989. Innocence and experience. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Hampshire, Stuart. 1993. Liberalism: The new twist. The New York Review of Books 40: 43–47.Google Scholar
- Hampshire, Stuart. 2000. Justice is conflict. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Honig, Bonnie. 1993. Political theory and the displacement of politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
- Jack, Linda. 2012. Nick Clegg is in too deep. The Guardian. http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2012/aug/23/nick-clegg-liberal-democrat-party. Accessed 10 Aug 2014.
- Laden, Anthony Simon. 2007. Reasonable deliberation, constructive power, and the struggle for recognition. In Recognition and power: Axel Honneth and the tradition of critical social theory, ed. Bert van den Brink, and David Owen, 270–281. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Luban, David. 1985. Bargaining and compromise: Recent work on negotiation and informal justice. Philosophy and Public Affairs 14: 397–416.Google Scholar
- Machiavelli, Niccolò. 1985. The discourses, ed. Bernard Crick. Trans. Leslie Walker. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
- Machiavelli, Niccolò. 1998. The prince. Trans. Harvey C. Mansfield. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Machiavelli, Niccolò. 1996. Discourses on Livy. Trans. Harvey C. Mansfield, and Nathan Tarcov. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Margalit, Avishai. 2012. Compromise and rotten compromises. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- May, Larry. 1996. The socially responsive self. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Meehan, Mary. 1984. In things touching conscience. Human Life Review 14–26.Google Scholar
- Mills, Claudia. 2000. Not a mere modus vivendi: The bases of allegiance to the just state. In The idea of a political liberalism, ed. Victoria Davion, and Clark Wolf, 190–203. New York, NY: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
- Philp, Mark. 2007. Political conduct. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Pollack, Sheldon. 1991. Tax reform: The 1980’s in perspective. Tax Law Review 6: 489–536.Google Scholar
- Rand, Ayn. 1996. The virtue of selfishness. New York, NY: Signet.Google Scholar
- Santayana, George. 1926. Soliloquies in England and later soliloquies. New York, NY: Charles Scribner’s Sons.Google Scholar
- Shklar, Judith N. 1989. The liberalism of fear. In Liberalism and the moral life, ed. Nancy L. Rosenblum, 21–38. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Smith, John W. 1990. How headline writers read Bush’s lips. Reading Eagle. https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=sOkxAAAAIBAJ&sjid=PuUFAAAAIBAJ&pg=1182,1989963&hl=en. Accessed 10 Aug 2014.
- Tillyris, Demetris. 2015b. The virtue of vice: A defence of hypocrisy in democratic politics, Contemporary Politics 22: 1–19. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13569775.2015.1112958#abstract.
- Tillyris, Demetris. 2015c. After the standard dirty hands thesis: Towards a dynamic account of dirty hands in politics, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice. http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10677-015-9604-6.
- The Mirror. 2012. Tuition fees vote: Hypocrisy and betrayal by Pinocchio Nick Clegg and his lying Lib Dems. http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/tuition-fees-vote-hypocrisy-and-betrayal-268141. Accessed 10 August 2014.
- Walzer, Michael. 1973. Political action: The problem of dirty hands. Philosophy and Public Affairs 2: 160–180.Google Scholar
- Walzer, Michael. 2004. Arguing about war. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
- Wilby, Peter. 2012. By his act of betrayal, Clegg will lose his greatest reward. The Guardian. http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2010/dec/14/betrayal-clegg-punish-alternative-vote. Accessed 10 Aug 2014.
- Williams, Bernard. 2002. In the beginning was the deed: Realism and moralism in political argument. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Williams, Bernard. 2006. Ethics and the limits of philosophy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Wittman, Donald. 1995. The myth of democratic failure. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar