Debates over egalitarianism for the most part are not concerned with constraints on achieving an egalitarian society, beyond discussions of the deficiencies of egalitarian theory itself. This paper looks beyond objections to egalitarianism as such and investigates the relevant psychological processes motivating people to resist various aspects of egalitarianism. I argue for two theses, one normative and one descriptive. The normative thesis holds that egalitarians must take psychological constraints into account when constructing egalitarian ideals. I draw from non-ideal theories in political philosophy, which aim to construct moral goals with current social and political constraints in mind, to argue that human psychology must be part of a non-ideal theory of egalitarianism. The descriptive thesis holds that the most fundamental psychological challenge to egalitarian ideals comes from what are called Just World Beliefs. A troubling result of Just World Beliefs, one that poses a prima facie obstacle to egalitarianism, is that people tend to dismiss or explain away any threats to their belief that the world is fundamentally just. The pervasiveness and severity of Just World Beliefs predicts that people will be resistant to egalitarian policies. My aim is to show how research on Just World Beliefs can help diagnose common problems for egalitarianism and assist in making realistic recommendations for bringing current societies closer to egalitarian ideals.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
Though of course exceptions will be made for those who are perceived as having given great effort (such as members of the military).
One proposed explanation for how people are capable of blaming victims for their suffering is that JWB actually reduce the mental states people attribute to victims, thus making it easier to ignore pain and suffering. For example, Kozak et al. (2006) gave participants a story involving a poor college student facing budget cuts at his job. In one condition he keeps the job, while in the other condition he loses his job and, as a result, struggles to pay bills and buy food for himself. The results showed that those who learned that the student had lost his job and was suffering actually reduced the mental states they were willing to attribute to him (including goals, attitudes, and emotions).
To clarify, it is thought that being reminded of the presence of injustice in the world has a similar effect as being reminded of one’s mortality. The link between JWB and mortality salience has good empirical grounding: for instance, prompting people to think about death leads them to be more suspicious of innocent victims; and conversely, presenting people with positive images of innocent victims increases death-related thoughts (see Landau et al. 2004).
An idea proposed in a slightly different form by Cohen (1989).
Anderson, Elizabeth. 1999. What is the point of equality? Ethics 109: 287–337.
Arneson, Richard. 1989. Equality and equality of opportunity for welfare. Philosophical Studies 56: 77–93.
Bargh, John, and Ezequiel Morsella. 2008. The unconscious mind. Perspectives on Psychological Science 3: 73–79.
Barry, Nicholas. 2006. Defending luck egalitarianism. Journal of Applied Philosophy 23: 89–107.
Beierlein, Constanze, Christina Werner, Siegfried Preiser, and Sonja Wermuth. 2011. Are just-world beliefs compatible with justifying inequality? Collective political efficacy as a moderator. Social Justice Research 24: 278–296.
Benabou, Ronald, and Jean Tirole. 2006. Belief in a just world and redistributive politics. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 121: 699–746.
Cohen, Gerald. 1989. On the currency of egalitarian justice. Ethics 99: 906–944.
Correia, Isabel, and Jorge Vala. 2003. When will a victim be secondarily victimized? The effect of observer’s belief in a just world, victim’s innocence and persistence of suffering. Social Justice Research 16: 379–400.
Deutsch, Morton. 1985. Distributive justice. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Dion, Kenneth, and Karen Dion. 1987. Belief in a just world and physical attractiveness stereotyping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 52: 775–780.
Dworkin, Ronald. 1981. What is equality? II. Equality of resources. Philosophy and Public Affairs 10: 283–345.
Dworkin, Ronald. 2000. Sovereign virtue: The theory and practice of equality. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Eidelman, Scott, and Christian Crandall. 2009. On the psychological advantage of the status quo. In Social and psychological bases of ideology and system justification, ed. John Jost, Aaron Kay, and Hulda Thorisdottir, 85–106. New York: Oxford University Press.
Ellard, John, and Douglas Bates. 1990. Evidence for the role of the justice motive in status generalization processes. Social Justice Research 4: 115–134.
Furnham, Adrian. 2003. Belief in a just world: Research progress over the past decade. Personality and Individual Differences 34: 795–817.
Greenwald, Anthony, and Mahzarin Banaji. 1995. Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychological Review 102: 4–27.
Hafer, Carolyn. 2000. Do innocent victims threaten the belief in a just world? Evidence from a modified stroop task. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 79: 165–173.
Hafer, Carolyn, and Laurent Bègue. 2005. Experimental research on just-world theory: Problems, developments, and future challenges. Psychological Bulletin 131: 128–167.
Haidt, Jonathan. 2012. The righteous mind. New York: Pantheon Books.
Hamlin, Alan, and Zofia Stemplowska. 2012. Theory, ideal theory and the theory of ideals. Political Studies Review 10: 48–62.
Heine, Steve. 2010. Cultural psychology. In Handbook of social psychology, 5th ed, ed. Susan Fiske, Daniel Gilbert, and Lindzey Gardner, 1423–1464. New York: John Wiley.
Hirschberger, Gilad. 2006. Terror management and attributions of blame to innocent victims: Reconciling compassionate and defensive responses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 9: 832–844.
Hurley, Susan. 2003. Justice, luck, and knowledge. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Jost, John, and Orsolya Hunyady. 2005. Antecedents and consequences of system-justifying ideologies. Current Directions in Psychological Science 14: 260–265.
Jost, John, Brett Pelham, Oliver Sheldon, and Bilian Sullivan. 2003. Social inequality and the reduction of ideological dissonance on behalf of the system. European Journal of Social Psychology 33: 13–36.
Kahneman, Daniel, Jack Knetsch, and Richard Thaler. 1991. The endowment effect, loss aversion, and status quo bias: Anomalies. Journal of Economic Perspectives 5: 193–206.
Kay, Aaron, Danielle Gaucher, Jennifer Peach, Kristin Laurin, Justin Friesen, Mark Zanna, and Steven Spencer. 2009. Inequality, discrimination, and the power of the status quo: Direct evidence for a motivation to see the way things are as the way they should be. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 97: 421–434.
Kay, Aaron, and John Jost. 2003. Complementary justice: Effects of “poor but happy” and “poor but honest” stereotype exemplars on system justification and implicit activation of the justice motive. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 85: 823–837.
Kozak, Megan, Abigail Marsh, and Daniel Wegner. 2006. What do I think you‘re doing? Action identification and mind attribution. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 90: 543–555.
Landau, Mark, et al. 2004. Deliver us from evil: The effects of mortality salience and reminders of 9/11 on support for President George W. Bush. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 30: 1136–1150.
Lerner, Melvin. 2003. The justice motive: Where social psychologists found it, how they lost it, and why they may not find it again. Personality and Social Psychology Review 7: 388–399.
Lerner, Melvin. 1980. The belief in the just world: A fundamental delusion. New York: Plenum.
Lerner, Melvin, and Dale Miller. 1978. Just world research and the attribution process: Looking back and ahead. Psychological Bulletin 85: 1030–1051.
Lerner, Melvin, and Carolyn Simmons. 1966. Observer’s reaction to the “innocent victim”: Compassion or rejection? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 4: 203–210.
Monteith, Margo, and Gina Walters. 1998. Egalitarianism, moral obligation, and prejudice-related personal standards. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 24: 186–199.
Murray, John, Jo Ann Spadafore, and William McIntosh. 2005. Belief in a just world and social perception: Evidence for automatic activation. Journal of Social Psychology 145: 35–47.
Petersen, Michael, Rune Slothuss, Rune Stubager, and Lise Togeby. 2011. Deservingness versus values in public opinion on welfare: The automaticity of the deservingness heuristic. European Journal of Political Research 50: 24–52.
Petersen, Michael, Daniel Sznycer, Leda Cosmides, and John Tooby. 2012. Who deserves help? Evolutionary psychology, social emotions, and public opinion about welfare. Political Psychology 33: 395–418.
Rawls, John. 1971. A theory of justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Scheffler, Samuel. 2003. What is egalitarianism? Philosophy and Public Affairs 31: 5–39.
Simmons, A.John. 2010. Ideal and nonideal theory. Philosophy and Public Affairs 38: 5–36.
Sleat, Matt. 2014. Realism, liberalism and non-ideal theory. Or, are there two ways to do realistic political theory? Political Studies. doi:10.1111/1467-9248.12152.
Stemplowska, Zofia, and Adam Swift. 2012. Ideal and nonideal theory. In The Oxford handbook of political philosophy, ed. David Estlund, 373–389. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sunstein, Cass. 2005. Laws of fear: Beyond the precautionary principle. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Valentini, Laura. 2012. Ideal vs. non-ideal theory: A conceptual map. Philosophy Compass 7: 654–664.
Van Parijs, Philippe. 1991. Why surfers should be fed: The liberal case for an unconditional basic income. Philosophy and Public Affairs 20: 101–131.
Verba, Sidney. 1987. Elites and the idea of equality. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Wakslak, Cheryl, John Jost, Tom Tyler, and Emmeline Chen. 2007. Moral outrage mediates the dampening effect of system justification on support for redistributive social policies. Psychological Science 18: 267–274.
Wiens, David. 2012. Prescribing institutions without ideal theory. Journal of Political Philosophy 20: 45–70.
Wiens, David. 2013. Demands of justice, feasible alternatives, and the need for causal analysis. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 16: 325–338.
Wolff, Jonathan. 1998. Fairness, respect, and the egalitarian ethos. Philosophy and Public Affairs 27: 97–122.
Wong, David. 2006. Natural moralities: A defense of pluralistic relativism. New York: Oxford University Press.
I am grateful to have received helpful comments on this paper from Linda Radzik, David Wright, Jake Greenblum, and an anonymous reviewer from Res Publica.
About this article
Cite this article
Kasperbauer, T.J. Psychological Constraints on Egalitarianism: The Challenge of Just World Beliefs. Res Publica 21, 217–234 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11158-015-9284-z
- Just World Beliefs
- Non-ideal theory
- Psychological constraints