Psychological Constraints on Egalitarianism: The Challenge of Just World Beliefs
- 303 Downloads
Debates over egalitarianism for the most part are not concerned with constraints on achieving an egalitarian society, beyond discussions of the deficiencies of egalitarian theory itself. This paper looks beyond objections to egalitarianism as such and investigates the relevant psychological processes motivating people to resist various aspects of egalitarianism. I argue for two theses, one normative and one descriptive. The normative thesis holds that egalitarians must take psychological constraints into account when constructing egalitarian ideals. I draw from non-ideal theories in political philosophy, which aim to construct moral goals with current social and political constraints in mind, to argue that human psychology must be part of a non-ideal theory of egalitarianism. The descriptive thesis holds that the most fundamental psychological challenge to egalitarian ideals comes from what are called Just World Beliefs. A troubling result of Just World Beliefs, one that poses a prima facie obstacle to egalitarianism, is that people tend to dismiss or explain away any threats to their belief that the world is fundamentally just. The pervasiveness and severity of Just World Beliefs predicts that people will be resistant to egalitarian policies. My aim is to show how research on Just World Beliefs can help diagnose common problems for egalitarianism and assist in making realistic recommendations for bringing current societies closer to egalitarian ideals.
KeywordsEgalitarianism Just World Beliefs Non-ideal theory Psychological constraints
I am grateful to have received helpful comments on this paper from Linda Radzik, David Wright, Jake Greenblum, and an anonymous reviewer from Res Publica.
- Deutsch, Morton. 1985. Distributive justice. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
- Dworkin, Ronald. 1981. What is equality? II. Equality of resources. Philosophy and Public Affairs 10: 283–345.Google Scholar
- Dworkin, Ronald. 2000. Sovereign virtue: The theory and practice of equality. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Haidt, Jonathan. 2012. The righteous mind. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
- Heine, Steve. 2010. Cultural psychology. In Handbook of social psychology, 5th ed, ed. Susan Fiske, Daniel Gilbert, and Lindzey Gardner, 1423–1464. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
- Hurley, Susan. 2003. Justice, luck, and knowledge. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Kay, Aaron, Danielle Gaucher, Jennifer Peach, Kristin Laurin, Justin Friesen, Mark Zanna, and Steven Spencer. 2009. Inequality, discrimination, and the power of the status quo: Direct evidence for a motivation to see the way things are as the way they should be. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 97: 421–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Rawls, John. 1971. A theory of justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Stemplowska, Zofia, and Adam Swift. 2012. Ideal and nonideal theory. In The Oxford handbook of political philosophy, ed. David Estlund, 373–389. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Van Parijs, Philippe. 1991. Why surfers should be fed: The liberal case for an unconditional basic income. Philosophy and Public Affairs 20: 101–131.Google Scholar
- Verba, Sidney. 1987. Elites and the idea of equality. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar