Can Culture Justify Infant Circumcision?
The paper addresses arguments in the recent philosophical and bioethical literature claiming that social and cultural benefits can justify non-therapeutic male infant circumcision. It rejects these claims by referring to the open future argument, according to which infant circumcision is morally unjustifiable because it violates the child’s right to an open future. The paper also addresses an important objection to the open future argument and examines the strength of the objection to refute the application of the argument to the circumcision case.
KeywordsInfant circumcision Ethics Culture Religion Rights Interests Future
- Cannold, Leslie. 2006. The ethics of neonatal male circumcision: Helping parents to decide. In Cutting to the core: Exploring the ethics of contested surgeries, ed. David Benatar, 47–63. New York: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
- Davis, Dena S. 1997a. The child’s right to open future: Yoder and beyond. Capital University Law Review 26: 93–105.Google Scholar
- Feinberg, Joel. 1992. The child’s right to open future. In Freedom and fulfillment: Philosophical essays, ed. Joel Feinberg, 76–98. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Gollaher, David L. 2001. Circumcision: A history of the world’s most controversial surgery. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
- Svoboda, J. Steven, Robert S. Van Howe, and James G. Dwyer. 2000. Informed consent for neonatal circumcision: An ethical and legal conundrum. Faculty Publications 167: 61–133.Google Scholar