Trespass, Animals and Democratic Engagement

We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

Since at least the 1970s, one of the stock standard tools in the animal protection movement’s arsenal has been illegal entry into factory farms and animal research facilities. This activity has been followed by the publication of images and footage captured inside those otherwise socially invisible places. This activity presents a conundrum: trespass is illegal and it is an apparent violation of private property rights. In this paper we argue that trespass onto private property can be justified as an act of civil disobedience. We look at one particular type of justification: the use of information gathered through trespass in public policy formation. We then animate this analysis both with an historical overview of the effects of sharing information about animal agriculture, and with a specific case study of trespass undertaken recently.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Althaus, Catherine, Peter Bridgman, and Glyn Davis. 2007. The Australian policy handbook. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Animal Liberation. 2010. Victory for pigs. http://animal-lib.org.au/newsletter-archive/archive/view/listid-2-animalliberationnewsletters/mailid-1258-/tmpl-component.html. Accessed 31 October 2012.

  3. Animal Liberation. 2012. Duck exposé on ABC 7.30. http://animal-lib.org.au/campaigns/310-duck-expose-on-abc-730.html. Accessed 16 September 2012.

  4. AnimalLibNSW. 2012. Duck out of waterAn animal liberation exposé. Online video. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8V0OFRrO3K4. Accessed 16 September 2012.

  5. Bacchi, Carol Lee. 1999. Women, policy and politics: The construction of policy problems. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bedau, Hugo A. 1961. On civil disobedience. Journal of Philosophy 58: 653–661.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bok, Sissela. 1999. Lying: Moral choice in public and private life. New York: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Brownlee, Kimberley. 2009. Civil disobedience. The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2010/entries/civil-disobedience. Accessed 16 September 2012.

  9. Campbell, Dana. 2012. Code of conduct ducks protection for farmed birds. Sydney Morning Herald. 22 June, http://www.smh.com.au/environment/animals/code-of-conduct-ducks-protections-for-farmed-birds-20120622-20sh6.html#ixzz1ygf0XtCM. Accessed 16 September 2012.

  10. Cass, R. Denis. 2002. The US Patriot Act and animal rights terrorism. Rutgers Law Journal 34: 187–234.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Cobb, Roger W., and Charles D. Elder. 1972. Participation in American politics: The dynamics of agenda-building. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Cochrane, Alasdair. 2009. Do animals have an interest in liberty? Political Studies 57(3): 660–679.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Disturbing footage prompts calls for duck farming changes: 7.30. (2012). Television program. Australian Broadcasting Corporation: Sydney, 19 June. http://www.abc.net.au/news/2012-06-19/disturbing-footage-prompts-calls-for-duck-farming/4080436?section=business). Accessed 16 September 2012.

  14. Elliott, Catherine, and Frances Quinn. 2007. Tort law, 7th ed. Harlow: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Favre, David. 2000. Equitable self-ownership for animals. Duke Law Journal 50: 473–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Fields, Gary and John R. Emshwiller 2011. The animal enterprise terrorism act sets an unusual standard for crime. The Wall Street Journal, September 27. http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424053111903791504576586790205241376.html Accessed 16 January 2013.

  17. Francione, Gary L. 1995. Animals, property, and the law. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Francione, Gary L. 1996. Rain without thunder: The ideology of the animal rights movement. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Greenawalt, Kent. 1991. Justifying nonviolent disobedience. In Civil disobedience in focus, ed. Hugo A. Bedau, 170–188. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Griffin, James. 2008. On human rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hettinger, Ned. 2001. Environmental disobedience. In A companion to environmental philosophy, ed. Dale Jamieson, 498–509. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kingdon, John W. 1984. Agendas, alternatives, and public policies. Boston: Little Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Lasswell, Harold D. 1951. The policy orientation. In The policy sciences: Recent developments in scope and method, ed. Daniel Lerner, and Harold D. Lasswell, 3–15. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Lateline. 2012a. NSW to toughen abattoir standards: Lateline. 2012. Television program. Australian Broadcasting Corporation: Sydney, 16 May. http://www.abc.net.au/lateline/content/2012/s3504523.htm Accessed 31 October 2012.

  25. Lateline. 2012b. Sheep export bans ignored: Lateline. 2012. Television program. Australian Broadcasting Corporation: Sydney, 6 September. http://www.abc.net.au/lateline/content/2012/s3584955.htm. Accessed 16 September 2012.

  26. Lavoie, Denise. 2012. Animal enterprise terrorism act: U.S asks judge to dismiss lawsuit against 2006 law. Huffington Post, 29 August. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/08/29/animal-enterprise-terrorism-act_n_1840356.html. Accessed 29 August 2012.

  27. Lovvorn, Jonathan R., and Nancy V. Perry. 2009. California Proposition 2: A watershed moment for animal law. Animal Law 15: 149–169.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Morreall, John. 1991. The justifiability of violent civil disobedience. In Civil disobedience in focus, ed. Hugo A. Bedau, 130–143. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  29. McKenna, Carol. 2000. Ruth Harrison. The Guardian, 6 July. http://www.guardian.co.uk/news/2000/jul/06/guardianobituaries. Accessed 16 September 2012.

  30. O’Sullivan, Siobhan. 2011. Animals, equality and democracy. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  31. PETA. n.d. About PETA. http://www.peta.org/about/default.aspx. Accessed 12 September 2012.

  32. Putnam, Robert. 1993. Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Rawls, John. 1996. Political liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Rawls, John. 1999. A theory of justice, revised edition. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

  35. Raz, Joseph. 1988. The morality of freedom. Oxford Scholarship Online.

  36. Rochefort, David A., and Roger W. Cobb. 1993. Problem definition, agenda access and policy choice. Policy Studies Journal 21: 56–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Rochefort, David A., and Roger W. Cobb. 1994. The politics of problem definition: Shaping the policy agenda. Lawrence, Kansas: University Press of Kansas.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Royal Society for the Protection of Animals. n.d. RSPCA Animals Australia Getup websites crash under huge demand in live exports campaign. http://www.rspca.org.au/news/rspca,-animals-australia,-getup-websites-crash-under-huge-demand-in-live-export-campaign.html. Accessed 16 September 2012.

  39. Sankoff, Peter. 2009. The welfare paradigm: Making the world a better place for animals? In Animal law in Australasia: a new dialogue, ed. Peter Sankoff & Steven White, 7–34. Leichhardt: The Federation Press.

  40. Sayer, Karen. 2010. ‘Animal machines’: The public response to extensive poultry production. Rural History 2010, http://www.ruralhistory2010.org/Papers/Sayer.pdf. Accessed 16 September 2012.

  41. Singer, Peter. 1991. Disobedience as a plea for reconsideration. In Civil disobedience in focus, ed. Hugo A. Bedau, 122–129. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Singer, Peter. 1993. Practical ethics, 2nd ed. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Singer, Peter. 1995. Animal liberation, 2nd ed. Pimlico: London.

  44. Smart, Brian. 1991. Defining civil disobedience. Civil disobedience in focus, ed. Hugo A. Bedau, 189–211. London: Routledge.

  45. Smith, Alexandra. 2012. More piglets ‘born free’ as producers voluntarily phase out sow stalls. Sydney Morning Herald, 16 April. http://www.smh.com.au/environment/animals/more-piglets-born-free-as-producers-voluntarily-phase-out-sow-stalls-20120415-1x1n8.html. Accessed 7 November 2012.

  46. Stone, Deborah A. 1988. Policy paradox and political reason. Glenview: Scott, Foresman.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Tannenbaum, Jerrold. 1995. Animals and the law: Property, cruelty, rights. Social Research 62: 539–569.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Tocqueville de, Alexis. 1835/1840. Democracy in America. London: Saunders and Otley.

  49. Townend, Christine. 1981. A voice for the animals: How animal liberation grew in Australia. Kenthurst: Kangaroo Press.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Voiceless. 2005. From paddocks to prisons: Pigs in New South Wales, Australia. Current practices, future directions. Paddington NSW: Voiceless.

  51. Voiceless. 2012. Factory farming. http://www.voiceless.org.au/the-issues/factory-farming. Accessed 16 September 2012.

  52. Voiceless. 2011. 2011 Grants recipients. http://old.voiceless.org.au/Grants/2011_Grants_Recipients. Accessed 16 September 2012.

  53. Wise, Steven M. 2000. Rattling the cage: Towards legal rights for animals. Cambridge: Perseus Books.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank John Hadley and Emma Larking for early conversations about the topic; they would also like to express their gratitude for the feedback provided by participants at Minding Animals Two (Utrecht), especially Tony Milligan and Robert Garner; the highly detailed and very constructive feedback provided by Tatjana Višak and Adrian Little; the insightful comments of the anonymous referees at Res Publica and the background research Gonzalo Villanueva undertook for sections of the paper.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Clare McCausland.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McCausland, C., O’Sullivan, S. & Brenton, S. Trespass, Animals and Democratic Engagement. Res Publica 19, 205–221 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11158-013-9214-x

Download citation

Keywords

  • Animals
  • Trespass
  • Civil disobedience
  • Public policy