Advertisement

Res Publica

, 17:355 | Cite as

The Normative Paradigm of Constitutional Democracy

  • Luigi FerrajoliEmail author
Article

Abstract

This piece criticizes traditional formal and procedural conceptions of democracy, which fail to account for the development of contemporary constitutional democracy. The latter is characterized by a substantive dimension with respect to the content of the decisions taken through the democratic process. The validity of such decision is conditioned by the respect and actualization of fundamental rights, which are established by the constitution. The limits and constraints established by the constitution require juridical science to play a critical and programmatic role vis-à-vis the ‘unlawful’ exercise of public powers, when these enter in contrast with the limits imposed by the constitution.

Keywords

Constitutional democracy Fundamental rights Unlawful law Deontic logic Juridical science 

References

  1. Bobbio, Noberto. 1955. Studi sulla teoria generale del diritto. Torino: Giappichelli.Google Scholar
  2. Bobbio, Norberto. 1965. Giusnaturalismo e positivismo giuridico. Milano: Edizioni di Comunità.Google Scholar
  3. Bobbio, Norberto. 1984. Il futuro della democrazia. Torino: Einaudi.Google Scholar
  4. Dahl, Robert A. 1956. A preface to democratic theory. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Ferrajoli, Luigi. 1989. Diritto e ragione: Teoria del diritto e della democrazia. Roma-Bari: Laterza Editori.Google Scholar
  6. Ferrajoli, Luigi. 1993. Il diritto come sistema di garanzie. Ragion Pratica. I: 143–161.Google Scholar
  7. Ferrajoli, Luigi. 2001a. Contra los poderes salvajes del mercado: para un constiucionalismo de derecho privado. In Estrategias y propuestas para la reforma del Estado, ed. Miguel Carbonell, et al., 99–110. Mexico City: Unam.Google Scholar
  8. Ferrajoli, Luigi. 2001b. Tre concetti di libertà (special issue on Motivi di Libertà). Democrazia e Diritto 40: 169–185.Google Scholar
  9. Ferrajoli, Luigi. 2002. Diritti fondamentali, 2nd ed. Roma-Bari: Laterza Editori.Google Scholar
  10. Ferrajoli, Luigi. 2003. Proprietà e libertà. Parolechiave 1: 13–29.Google Scholar
  11. Ferrajoli, Luigi. 2004. Per un costituzionalismo di diritto privato. Rivista Critica del Diritto Privato 1: 11–24.Google Scholar
  12. Ferrajoli, Luigi. 2007. Principia iuris. Teoria del diritto e della democrazia, 3 vols. Roma-Bari: Laterza Editori.Google Scholar
  13. Kelsen, Hans. 1929. Vom Wesen und Wert der Demokratie. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr.Google Scholar
  14. Kelsen, Hans. 1945. General theory of law and state (trans: Wedberg, A.). Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Kelsen, Hans. 1952. Law and peace in international relations. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Kelsen, Hans. 1955. Foundations of democracy. Ethics 66: 1–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kelsen, Hans. 1967. Pure theory of law (trans: Knight, M.). Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  18. Pace, Alessandro. 1996. La causa della rigidità costituzionale. Padova: Cedam.Google Scholar
  19. Pintore, Anna. 2000. Diritti insaziabili. Teoria politica 2: 3–20.Google Scholar
  20. Sartori, Giovanni. 1956. Democrazia e definizioni. Bologna: Mulino.Google Scholar
  21. Schumpeter, Joseph A. 1942. Capitalism, socialism and democracy. New York and London: Harper and Brothers.Google Scholar
  22. Waldron, Jeremy. 1999. The dignity of legislation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Facoltà di GiurisprudenzaUniversità Roma IIIRomeItaly

Personalised recommendations