Res Publica

, Volume 17, Issue 2, pp 157–174 | Cite as

Equality of Resources and the Problem of Recognition



Liberal egalitarianism is commonly criticized for being insufficiently sensitive to status inequalities and the effects of misrecognition. I examine this criticism as it applies to Ronald Dworkin’s ‘equality of resources’ and argue that, in fact, liberal egalitarians possess the resources to deal effectively with recognition-type issues. More precisely, while conceding that the distributive principles required to realize equality of resources must apply against a particular institutional background, I point out, following Dworkin, that among the principles guiding this background is a ‘principle of independence,’ and that this principle, properly interpreted, requires government to protect people against the disadvantageous effects of wrongful prejudicial discrimination. Moreover, I give an account of wrongful prejudice which is grounded in a particular interpretation of the abstract egalitarian principle Dworkin requires for a government to be legitimate and which goes a long way toward acknowledging status inequalities. Finally, I suggest other resources within the theory for responding to residual problems of recognition not addressed by the principle of independence.


Fraser Dworkin Equality of resources Recognition and status Prejudice Discrimination 


  1. Anderson, Elizabeth. 1999. What is the point of equality? Ethics 109(2): 287–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Appiah, Kwame Anthony. 2005. The ethics of identity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Arneson, Richard. 1989. Equality and equal opportunity for welfare. Philosophical Studies 56(1): 77–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arneson, Richard. 2006. What is wrongful discrimination? San Diego Law Review 43(4): 775–808.Google Scholar
  5. Barry, Brian. 2001. Culture and equality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Browne, Jude, and Marc Stears. 2005. Capabilities, resources, and systematic injustice: A case of gender inequality. Politics, Philosophy & Economics 4(3): 355–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Clayton, Matthew. 2000. The resources of liberal equality. Imprints 5(1): 63–84.Google Scholar
  8. Cohen, Gerald. 1989. On the currency of egalitarian justice. Ethics 99(4): 906–944.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dworkin, Ronald. 2000. Sovereign virtue: The theory and practice of equality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Dworkin, Ronald. 2002. ‘Sovereign virtue’ revisited. Ethics 113(1): 106–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dworkin, Ronald. 2006. Is democracy possible here? Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Fraser, Nancy. 1997. Justice interruptus. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Fraser, Nancy. 2003. Social justice in the age of identity politics: Redistribution, recognition, and participation. In Redistribution or recognition?, eds. Nancy Fraser and Axel Honneth, 7–109. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  14. Fraser, Nancy. 2008. Why overcoming prejudice is not enough: A rejoinder to Richard Rorty. In Adding insult to injury: Nancy Fraser debates her critics, ed. Kevin Olson, 82–88. Verso: New York.Google Scholar
  15. Galeotti, Anna Elisabetta. 2002. Toleration as recognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Honneth, Axel. 2003. Redistribution as recognition: A response to Nancy Fraser. In Redistribution or recognition?, eds. Nancy Fraser and Axel Honneth, 110–197. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  17. Lægaard, Sune. 2005. On the prospects of a liberal theory of recognition. Res Publica 11(4): 325–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mason, Andrew. 2000. Equality, personal responsibility, and gender socialisation. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 100(3): 227–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Pierik, Roland. 2006. Reparations for luck egalitarians. Journal of Social Philosophy 37(3): 423–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Pierik, Roland, and Ingrid Robeyns. 2007. Resources versus capabilities: Social endowments in egalitarian theory. Political Studies 55(1): 133–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Robeyns, Ingrid. 2003. Is Nancy Fraser’s critique of theories of distributive justice justified? Constellations 10(4): 538–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Taylor, Charles. 1994. The politics of recognition. In Multiculturalism Examining, ed. Amy Gutmann, 25–73. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Williams, Andrew. 2004. Equality, ambition and insurance. Supplement to the Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 78(1): 131–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Young, Iris Marion. 1990. Justice and the politics of difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Political ScienceAarhus UniversityÅrhus CDenmark

Personalised recommendations