Abstract
Rawls’ principle of fair equality of opportunity has been regularly discussed and criticized for being inadequate regarding natural inequalities. In so far as this egalitarian goal is sound, the purpose of the paper is to see how the prospect of radical genetic intervention might affect this particular inadequacy. I propose that, in a post-genetic setting, an appropriate response would be to extend the same rules regulating societal inequalities to a regulation of comparable genetic inequalities. I defend this stance against recent arguments from the authors of From Chance to Choice and from Colin Farrelly’s alternative of the genetic difference principle.
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Thanks and appreciation to Dr. Pete Morris, Noreen McGuire and Ann Feeney for their support and encouragement. My thanks also to the participants of the Ninth Manchester Graduate (Brave New World 2005) Conference in Political Theory, where a shorter version of this paper was read.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Feeney, O. Equality of whom? a genetic perspective on equality (of opportunity). Res Publica 12, 357–383 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11158-006-9017-4
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11158-006-9017-4