Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Retributivism and Multiple Offending

  • Published:
Res Publica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article addresses the question of how multiple offenders – that is, offenders who have committed more than one crime before they are apprehended – should be punished from a retributivist point of view. Two theories are evaluated, both defending the view that there should be a bulk discount for multiple offending. According to the first theory, a bulk discount follows from the idea of a punishment ceiling for types of crimes and the principle of parsimony in punishing. According to the second, the discount follows from a certain view on mercy. However, it is argued that both theories suffer from theoretical flaws and that they are also insufficient in practical terms. That is, they fail to provide a basis for the making of decisions about how multiple-offence cases should be dealt with by the criminal justice system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jesper Ryberg.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ryberg, J. Retributivism and Multiple Offending. Res Publica 11, 213–233 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11158-005-3522-8

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11158-005-3522-8

Keywords

Navigation