Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Valorization of digestates from urban or centralized biogas plants: a critical review

  • Review paper
  • Published:
Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Direct landspreading of anaerobic digestates is the most common digestate management strategy. Nevertheless, digestate post-treatment can be unavoidable, especially for environmental services providers operating large-scale anaerobic digestion (AD) facilities. This review aims to assess the technical feasibility of achieving value-added products from digestates from urban and/or centralized AD plants (UC-AD). An exhaustive effort was dedicated to identifying and clarifying the available processing technologies and specific issues that can be related to UC-AD digestates. The valorization options were classified according to the final product destination. The result is a useful information source for assessing digestate valorization pathway given a local market and context. Agriculture was the first destination to be considered, as it allows a more direct closing of nutrient and carbon cycles. Several processes exist either for concentrating desirable characteristics of digestates, enhancing organic matter stability or producing pure and reformulated fertilizers. Thermal conversion processes are either under development or full-scale demonstration. They allow to valorize the solids through the production of biofuels and/or biochar and in the coming future, to start a whole biorefinery system. Similarly, biomass harvesting processes such as microalgae are under upscaling, enabling to valorize the nutrients of the digestate liquid phase while producing renewable biomass from sunlight. Several value-added products were already obtained in laboratory to pilot conditions from UC-AD digestates, for example, biopesticides, biosurfactants and composite materials. Adding to technical challenges, the quality variation of digestates, regulation barriers, public acceptance and the difficult access to new markets are among the main obstacles to UC-AD digestates valorization into value-added products.

Graphic abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Internally defined as large scale AD plants receiving a wide diversity of waste streams and with an installed capacity superior to 30–50 kt/y.

  2. OFMSW: not source-separated. Defined operationally by the authors as the organic material obtained after mixed collection of municipal solid waste and separation by mechanical biological treatments (MBT).

Abbreviations

ABP:

Animal by-products

AC:

Activated carbon

AD:

AnAerobic digestion

DM:

Dry matter

FAO:

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations

GCV:

Gross calorific value

HLS:

Humic-like substances

HM:

Heavy metals

MBT:

Mechanical biological treatment

MSW:

Municipal solid waste

NA:

Not available

NUE:

Nutrient uptake efficiency

OFMSW:

Organic fraction of municipal solid waste

OLR:

Organic loading rate

OM:

Organic matter

OMP:

Organic micropollutants

RT:

Retention time

SS:

Sewage sludge

TAN:

Total ammoniacal nitrogen

TSS:

Total suspended solids

UC-AD:

Urban or centralized AD plants

TKN:

Total Kjhedal nitrogen

VFA:

Volatile fatty acids

VS:

Volatile solids

WWTP:

Wastewater treatment plant

ww:

Wet weight

References

Download references

Funding

SUEZ group: hosting and research financing. National Research Institute for Agriculture, Food and Environment (INRAE): hosting and research financing. Ph.D. Grant (2016–2019): French National Association for Research and Technology (ANRT) under the CIFRE Grant No. 2015/1499.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Authors’ contributions

F, Guilayn, Ph.D.: Conceptualization, literature research and writing. M. Rouez, Ph.D. and M. Crest, Ph.D Revision from the industry expertise perspective. D. Patureau, Ph.D. and J. Jimenez, Ph.D. Conceptualization and revision from a scientific perspective.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to F. Guilayn.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (XLSX 27 kb)

Supplementary material 2 (PDF 474 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Guilayn, F., Rouez, M., Crest, M. et al. Valorization of digestates from urban or centralized biogas plants: a critical review. Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol 19, 419–462 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11157-020-09531-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11157-020-09531-3

Keywords

Navigation