Clogging in horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetlands: influencing factors, research methods and remediation techniques

  • Mateus Pimentel de Matos
  • Marcos von Sperling
  • Antonio Teixeira de Matos
review paper
  • 26 Downloads

Abstract

The treatment of wastewater in constructed wetlands (CW) has been increasingly applied throughout the world, as it is an efficient technique for the removal of pollutants and presents low construction and operational costs. However, a major operational problem of these systems is clogging of the porous medium. Clogging of CW has therefore attracted the attention in several studies, but there are several gaps in the understanding of this phenomenon, especially with regards to its genesis. In order to evaluate the contribution of the influencing factors and to facilitate remediation, it is important to have methods that favor characterization of the real conditions of CW. In this review, the objective was to gather information on the main factors interfering in the clogging process of horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetlands, the available and the new methods for characterizing the degree of obstruction of the porous medium and the techniques/strategies for unclogging these systems.

Keywords

Bulking factor Hydraulic conductivity Wear Unclogging Swelling Plants 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the agencies CAPES, CNPq, FAPEMIG and UNESCO-IHE for their support to the research, Copasa for providing the site for the experimental units, CAPES for the scholarship of the first author and to the Federal University of Minas Gerais.

References

  1. Aiello R, Bagarello V, Iovino M, Marzo A, Toscano A (2016) Evaluation of clogging in full-scale subsurface flow constructed wetlands. Ecol Eng 95:505–513CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Albuquerque A, Oliveira J, Semitela S, Amaral L (2010) Evaluation of the effectiveness of horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetlands for different media. J Environ Sci 22(6):820–825CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Álvarez JA, Ruíz I, Soto M (2008) Anaerobic digesters as a pretreatment for constructed wetlands. Ecol Eng 33:54–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Amado L, Albuquerque A, Espírito Santo A (2012) Influence of storm water infiltration on the treatment capacity of a LECA-based horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetland. Ecol Eng 39:16–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Babatunde AO (2010) Engineered wetlands: concept, design and development of an alum sludge based constructed wetland system. VDM Verlag Dr. Müller Publishing, Saarbrücken, p 212Google Scholar
  6. Bancolè A, Brissaud F, Gnagne T (2003) Oxidation processes and clogging in intermittent unsaturated infiltration. Water Sci Technol 48:139–146Google Scholar
  7. Baptestini GCF, Matos AT, Borges AC (2016) Effect of reversal of the flow direction on hydrodynamic characteristics and plants cultivated in constructed wetland systems. Acta Sci Technol 38(1):49–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Baptestini CCF, Matos AT, Martinez MA, Borges AC, Matos MP (2017) Hydraulic conductivity variability in horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetlands. Eng Agríc 37(2):333–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Barreto AB, Vasconcellos R, von Sperling M, Kuschk P, Kappelmeyer U, Vasel JL (2015) Field application of a planted fixed bed reactor (PFR) for support media and rhizosphere investigation using undisturbed samples from full-scale constructed wetlands. Water Sci Technol 72(4):553–650CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Batchelor A, Loots P (1997) A critical evaluation of a pilot scale subsurface flow wetland: 10 years after commissioning. Water Sci Technol 35(5):337–343Google Scholar
  11. Behrends LL, Bailey E, Houke, L, Jansen, P, Smith, S (2006a) Non-invasive methods for treating and removing sludge from subsurface flow constructed wetlands I. In: Proceedings of the Annual National Onsite Wastewater Recycling Association (NOWRA) meeting, NOWRA, Baltimore, Maryland, pp 1–14Google Scholar
  12. Behrends LL, Bailey E, Houke L, Janen P, Smith S (2006b) Non-invasive methods for treating and removing sludge from subsurface flow constructed wetlands II. In: Proceedings of the 10th international conference on wetland systems for water pollution control; Ministério de Ambiente, do Ordenamento do Território e do Desenvolvimento Regional (MAOTDR) and IWA, Lisbon, Portugal, pp 1271–1281Google Scholar
  13. Bihan Y, Lessard P (2000) Monitoring biofilter clogging biochemical characteristics of the biomass. Water Res 34(17):4284–4294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Blazejeski R, Murat-Blazejewska S (1997) Soil clogging phenomena in constructed wetlands with subsurface flow. Water Sci Technol 35(5):183–188Google Scholar
  15. Brasil MS, Matos AT (2008) Evaluating hydrological and hydraulic aspects in subsurface-flow constructed wetland systems. Eng Sanit Ambient 13:323–328 (in Portuguese) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Brix H (1994) Functions of macrophytes in constructed wetlands. Water Sci Technol 29(4):71–78Google Scholar
  17. Brix H (1997) Do macrophytes play a role in constructed treatment wetlands? Water Sci Technol 35(5):11–17Google Scholar
  18. Carballeira T, Ruiz I, Soto M (2017) Aerobic and anaerobic biodegradability of accumulated solids in horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetlands. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 119:396–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Caselles-Osorio A, García J (2006) Performance of experimental horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetlands fed with dissolved particulate organic matter. Water Res 40:3603–3611CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Caselles-Osorio A, Puigagut J, Segú E, Vaello N, Granés F, Garcia D, Garcia J (2007) Solids accumulation in six full-scale subsurface flow constructed wetlands. Water Res 41:1388–1398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. CETESB (1999) Geophysical methods. Projeto CETESB-GTZ 6200:13 (in Portuguese)Google Scholar
  22. Chazarenc F, Merlin G, Gonthier Y (2003) Hydrodynamics of horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetlands. Ecol Eng 21:165–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Chazarenc F, Naylor S, Comeau Y, Merlin G, Brisson J (2010) Modeling the effect of plants and peat on evapotranspiration in constructed wetlands. Int J Chem Eng 2010:1–6Google Scholar
  24. Christensen BE, Characklis WG (1999) Physical and chemical properties of biofilms. In: Characklis WG, Marshall KC (eds) Biofilms. Wiley, New York, pp 523–584Google Scholar
  25. Cooper DJ, Griffin P, Cooper PF (2005) Factors affecting the longevity of sub-surface horizontal flow systems operating as tertiary treatment for sewage effluent. Water Sci Technol 51(9):127–135Google Scholar
  26. Cooper D, Griffin P, Cooper P (2008) Factors affecting the longevity of subsurface horizontal flow systems operating as tertiary treatment for sewage effluent. Chapter 17. In: Vymazal J (ed) Wastewater treatment, plant dynamics and management in constructed and natural wetlands, Institute of Systems Biology and Ecology Czech Academy of Sciences, Springer, pp 191–198Google Scholar
  27. Coppola A, Santini A, Botti P, Vacca S, Comegna V, Severino G (2004) Methodological approach for evaluating the response of soil hydrological behaviour to irrigation with treated municipal wastewater. J Hydrol 292:114–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Cunningham AB, Characklis WG, Abedeen F, Crawfors D (1991) Influence of biofilm accumulation on porous media hydrodynamics. Environ Sci Technol 25:1305–1310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Davison L, Headley TR, Pratt K (2005) Aspects of design, structure and performance and operation of reed beds-eight years’ experience in northeastern New South Wales, Australia. Water Sci Tech 51(10):129–138Google Scholar
  30. De la Varga D, Díaz MA, Ruiz I, Soto M (2013) Avoiding clogging in constructed wetlands by using anaerobic digesters as pretreatment. Ecol Eng 52:262–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Dillon P, Pavelic P, Massmann G, Barry K, Correll R (2001) Enhancement of the membrane filtration index (MFI) method for determining the clogging potential of turbid urban stormwater and reclaimed water used for aquifer storage and recovery. Desalination 140:153–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Dotro G, Langergraber G, Molle P, Nivala J, Puigagut J, Stein O, von Sperling M (2017) Treatment wetlands, biological wastewater treatment series, vol 7, 154pGoogle Scholar
  33. Fei M, Li J, Ting Z (2010) Reversing clogging in vertical-flow constructed wetlands by backwashing treatment. Adv Mater Res 129–131:1064–1068Google Scholar
  34. Flemming HC, Wingender J (2010) The biofilm matrix. Nat Rev Microbiol 8:623–633CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Fonder N, Headley T (2013) The taxonomy of treatment wetlands: a proposed classification and nomenclature system. Ecol Eng 51:203–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Fu GP, Wu ZB, Zhang S, Cheng SP, He F (2004) Studies on clogging of the constructed wetland. Chin Environ Sci 25(3):144–149Google Scholar
  37. Fu G, Zhang J, Chen W, Chen Z (2013) Medium clogging and the dynamics of organic matter accumulation in constructed wetlands. Ecol Eng 60:393–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. García J, Aguirre P, Mujeriego R, Huang Y, Ortiz L, Bayona JM (2004) Initial contaminant removal performance factors in horizontal flow reed beds used for treating urban wastewater. Water Res 38:1669–1678CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. García J, Aguirre P, Barragán J, Mujeriego R, Matamoros V, Bayona JM (2005) Effect of key design parameters on the efficiency of horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetlands. Ecol Eng 25:405–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Gari M, Pedescoll A, Bécares E, Hijosa-Valsero M, Sidrach-Cardona R, García J (2012) Effect of climatic conditions, season and wastewater quality on contaminant removal efficiency of two experimental constructed wetlands in different regions of Spain. Sci Total Environ 437:61–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Giraldi D, Ianelli R (2009) Measurements of water content distribution in vertical subsurface flow constructed wetlands using a capacitance probe: benefits and limitations. Desalination 243:182–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Griffin P, Wilson L, Cooper D (2008) Changes in the use, operation and design of sub-surface flow constructed wetlands in a major UK water utility. In: Proceedings of 11th international conference on wetland systems for water pollution control, Indore, India, pp 419–426Google Scholar
  43. Grismer ME, Carr MT, Shepherd HL (2001) Hydraulic characteristics of a subsurface flow constructed wetland for winery effluent treatment. Water Environ Res 73(4):466–477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Guofen H, Wei Z, Lianfang Z, Yunhui Z (2010) Applying solubilization treatment to reverse clogging in laboratory-scale vertical flow constructed wetland. Water Sci Technol 61(6):1479–1487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Hanson A (2002) Unplugging the bed of a subsurface-flow wetland using H2O2. In: Nehring KW, Brauning SE (eds) Wetlands and remediation II. Battelle Institute, Columbus, pp 281–287Google Scholar
  46. Herbert-Guillo D, Tribollet B, Festy D (2000) Influence of the hydrodynamics on the biofilm formation by mass transport analysis. Bioelectochemistry 53:119–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Hijosa-Valsero M, Sidrach-Cardona R, Martín-Villacorta J, Bécares E (2010) Optimization of performance assessment and design characteristics in constructed wetlands for the removal of organic matter. Chemosphere 81:651–657CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Hua GF, Zhu W, Zhao LF, Huang JY (2010) Clogging pattern in vertical flow constructed wetlands: insight from a laboratory study. J Hazard Mater 180:668–674CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Hua GF, Zhao ZW, Kong J, Guo R, Zeng YT, Zhao LF, Zhu QD (2014) Effects of plant roots on the hydraulic performance during the clogging process in mesocosm vertical flow constructed wetlands. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 21(22):13017–13026CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Huang Y, Latorre A, Barceló D, García J, Aguirre P, Mujeriego R, Bayona JM (2004) Factors affecting linear alkylbenzenes removal in subsurface flow constructed wetlands. Environ Sci Technol 38:2657–2663CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Hudcová T, Vymazal J, Dunajský MK (2013) Reconstruction of a constructed wetland with horizontal subsurface flow after 18 years of operation. Water Sci Technol 68(5):1195–1202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Hyánová E, Kriska-Dunajsky M, Rozkosny M, Sálek J (2006) The knowledge based on the research of the filtration properties of the filter media and on the determination of clogging causes. In: Proceedings of the 10th international conference on wetland systems for water pollution control, 23–29 Sept 2006, Ministério de Ambiente, do Ordenamento do Território e do Desenvolvimento Regional (MAOTDR) and IWA, Lisbon, Portugal, pp 1331–1338Google Scholar
  53. Kadlec RH (2003) Effects of pollutant speciation in treatment wetlands design. Ecol Eng 20:1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Kadlec RH, Knight RL (1996) Treatment wetlands. CRC Press, Boca Raton, p 893pGoogle Scholar
  55. Kadlec RH, Wallace RD (2009) Treatment wetlands, 2nd edn. CRC Press, FloridaGoogle Scholar
  56. Kadlec RH, Watson JT (1993) Hydraulics and solids accumulation in a gravel bed treatment wetland. In: Moshiri GA (ed) Constructed wetlands for water quality improvement. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, pp 227–235Google Scholar
  57. Karathanasis AD, Potter CL, Coyne MS (2003) Vegetation effects on fecal bacteria, BOD, and suspended solid removal in constructed wetlands treating domestic wastewater. Ecol Eng 20:157–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Khadhraoui M, Watanabe T, Kuroda M (2002) The effect of the physical structure of a porous Ca-based sorbent on its phosphorus removal capacity. Water Res 36:3711–3718CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Knowles PR, Davies PA (2009) A method for the in situ determination of the hydraulic conductivity of gravels as used in constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment. Desalin Water Treat 5(1–3):257–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Knowles PR, Griffin P, Davies PA (2010) Complementary methods to investigate the development of clogging within a horizontal subsurface flow tertiary treatment wetland. Water Res 44:320–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Knowles PR, Dotro G, Nivala J, Garcia J (2011) Clogging in subsurface flow treatment wetlands: occurrence and contributing factors. Ecol Eng 37:99–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Korkusuz EA, Beklioglu M, Demirer GN (2005) Comparison of the treatment performances of blast furnace slag-based and gravel-based vertical flow wetlands operated identically for domestic wastewater treatment in Turkey. Ecol Eng 24:187–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Labella A, Caniani D, Hughes-Riley T, Morris RH, Newton MI, Hawes P, Puigagut J, García J, Uggetti E (2015) Assessing the economic suitability of aeration and the influence of bed heating on constructed wetlands treatment efficiency and life-span. Ecol Eng 83:184–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Lancheros JC, Pumarejo CA, Quintana JC, Caselles-Osorio A, Martinez HAC (2017) Solids distribution and hydraulic conductivity in multi-cell horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetlands. Ecol Eng 107:49–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Langergraber G, Haberl R, Laber J, Pressl A (2003) Evaluation of substrate clogging processes in vertical flow constructed wetlands. Water Sci Technol 48(5):25–34Google Scholar
  66. Leverenz HL, Tchobanoglous G, Darby JL (2009) Clogging in intermittently dosed sand filters used for wastewater treatment. Water Res 43(3):695–705CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Levine AD, Tchobanoglous G, Asano T (1991) Size distributions of particulate contaminants in wastewater and their impact on treatability. Water Res 25:911–922CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Li HZ, Wang S, Ye JF, Xu ZX, Jin W (2011) A practical method for the restoration of clogged rural vertical subsurface flow constructed wetlands for domestic wastewater treatment using earthworm. Water Sci Technol 63(2):283–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Mancl K, Rector D (1999) Sand bioreactors for wastewater treatment for Ohio communities. Department of food, agricultural and biological engineering, The Ohio State University, Ohio, pp 876–899Google Scholar
  70. Marshall JS (2009) Discrete-element modeling of particulate aerosol flows. J Comput Phys 228:1541–1561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Matamoros V, Bayona JM (2006) Elimination of pharmaceuticals and personal care products in subsurface flow constructed wetlands. Environ Sci Technol 40(18):5811–5816CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Matos MP (2015) Clogging in subsurface horizontal flow constructed wetlands: main factors and methods of identification in planted and unplanted units. PhD thesis in sanitation, environment and water resources, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil, 301p (in Portuguese)Google Scholar
  73. Matos MP, von Sperling M, Matos AT, Passos RG (2015) Use of saline tracer for evaluating the clogging and hydrodynamic conditions in horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetland. Eng Agríc 85(6):1137–1148 (in Portuguese) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Matos MP, Barreto AB, Vasconcellos GR, Matos AT, Simões GF, von Sperling M (2017a) Difficulties and modifications in the use of available methods for hydraulic conductivity measurements in highly clogged horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetlands. Water Sci Technol 76(5):1666–1675CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Matos MP, von Sperling M, Matos AT, Aranha PRA, Santos MA, Pessoa FDB, Viola PDD (2016) Clogging in constructed wetlands: estimation of medium porosity by ground-penetrating radar. Proceedings, 15th IWA international conference on wetland systems for water pollution control, IWA Gdansk, Poland, 3–9 September, vol 2, pp 625–640Google Scholar
  76. Matos MP, von Sperling M, Matos AT, Miranda ST, Souza TD, Costa LM (2017b) Key factors in the clogging process of horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetlands receiving anaerobically treated sewage. Ecol Eng 106:588–596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Matos MP, von Sperling M, Matos AT, Dias DFC, Santos CRS (2018) Clogging and performance of horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetlands over 8 years of operation. Rev Eng Sanit Ambient (in Portuguese) (in press)Google Scholar
  78. Miranda ST, Matos AT, Baptestini GC, Borges AC (2016) Evaluation of unclogging aspects in horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetlands. Water Sci Technol 74(7):1594–1601CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Miranda ST, Matos AT, Matos MP, Borges AC, Baptestini GCF (2017) Characterization of clogging material from horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetland systems. Eng Agríc 37(3):463–470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Molle P, Lienard A, Grasmick A, Iwema A (2006) Effect of reeds and feeding operations on hydraulic behaviour of vertical flow constructed wetlands under hydraulic overloads. Water Res 40:606–612CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Morris RH, Knowles P (2011) Measurement techniques for wastewater filtration systems. In: Einschlag FSG (ed) Waste water—treatment and reutilization. Intechopen, Rijeka, pp 109–132Google Scholar
  82. Muñoz P, Drizo A, Hession WC (2006) Flow patterns of dairy wastewater constructed wetlands in a cold climate. Water Res 40:3209–3218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Nguyen LM (2000) Organic matter composition, microbial biomass and microbial activity in gravel-bed constructed wetlands treating farm dairy wastewaters. Ecol Eng 16(2):199–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Nivala J, Rousseau DPL (2009) Reversing clogging in subsurface-flow constructed wetlands by hydrogen peroxide treatment: two case studies. Water Sci Technol 59:2037–2046CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Nivala J, Hoos MB, Cross C, Wallace S, Parkin G (2007) Treatment of landfill leachate using an aerated, horizontal subsurface-flow constructed wetland. Sci Total Environ 380(1–3):19–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Nivala J, Knowles P, Dotro G, García J, Wallace S (2012) Clogging in subsurface-flow treatment wetlands: measurement, modeling and management. Water Res 46:1625–1640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Okabe S, Kuroda H, Watanabe Y (1998) Significance of biofilm structure on transport of inert particulates into biofilm. Water Sci Technol 38:163–170Google Scholar
  88. Paoli AC, von Sperling M (2013a) Evaluation of clogging in planted and unplanted horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetlands: solids accumulation and hydraulic conductivity reduction. Water Sci Technol 67(6):1345–1352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Paoli AC, von Sperling M (2013b) Evaluation of hydrodynamic conditions of horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetlands (planted and unplanted units). Rev Eletrôn Gestão Tecnol Ambient 1(2):213–222 (in Portuguese) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Pedescoll A, Uggetti E, Lllorens E, Granés F, Garcia D, Garcia J (2009) Practical method based on saturated hydraulic conductivity used to assess clogging in subsurface flow constructed wetlands. Ecol Eng 35:1216–1224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Pedescoll A, Corzo A, Álvarez E, Garcia J, Puigagut J (2011a) The effect of primary treatment and flow regime on clogging development in horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetlands: an experimental evaluation. Water Res 45:3579–3589CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Pedescoll A, Passos F, Alba E, Garcia J, Puigagut J (2011b) Mechanical resistance properties of gravel used in subsurface flow constructed wetlands: implications for clogging. Water Sci Technol 63(9):1801–1807CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Pedescoll A, Samsó R, Romero E, Puigagut J, Garcia J (2011c) Reliability, repeatability and accuracy of the falling head method for hydraulic conductivity measurements under laboratory conditions. Ecol Eng 37:754–757CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Platzer C, Mauch K (1997) Soil clogging in vertical flow reed beds—mechanisms, parameters, consequences and solutions? Water Sci Technol 35(5):175–181Google Scholar
  95. Pozo-Morales L, Franco M, Garvi D, Lebrato J (2013) Influence of the stone organization to avoid clogging in horizontal subsurface-flow treatment wetlands. Ecol Eng 54:136–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Reed SC, Brown DS (1992) Constructed wetland design—the first generation. Water Environ Res 64:776–781CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Rousseau DPL, Horton D, Vanrolleghem PA, de Pauw N (2005) Impact of operational maintenance on the asset life of storm reed beds. Water Sci Technol 51(9):243–250Google Scholar
  98. Rowe RK, Armstrong MD, Cullimore DR (2000) Particle size and clogging of granular media permeated with leachate. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 126(9):775–786CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Ruíz I, Díaz MA, Crujeiras B, García J, Soto M (2010) Solids hydrolysis and accumulation in a hybrid anaerobic digester constructed wetlands system. Ecol Eng 36:1007–1016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Sakadevan K, Bavor HJ (1998) Phosphate adsorption characteristics of soils, slags and zeolite to be used as substrates in constructed wetland systems. Water Res 32(2):393–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Samsó R, García J (2014) The cartridge theory: a description of the functioning of horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment, based on modelling results. Sci Total Environ 473–474:651–658CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Seifert D, Engesgaard P (2007) Use of tracer tests to investigate changes in flow and transport properties due to bioclogging of porous media. J Contam Hydrol 93:58–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Shen C, Yang D, Dong B (2010) A new operation mode solving clogging problems of horizontal subsurface constructed wetlands. Water Sci Technol 62(5):1045–1051CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Song HL, Nakano K, Taniguchi T, Nomura M, Nishimura O (2009) Estrogen removal from treated municipal effluent in small-scale constructed wetland with different depth. Biores Technol 100:2945–2951CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Stottmeister U, Wiessner A, Kuschk P, Kappelmeyer U, Kastner M, Bederski O, Muller RA, Moormann H (2003) Effects of plants and microorganisms in constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment. Biotechnol Adv 22:93–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Suliman F, French HK, Haugen LE, Sovik AK (2006) Change in flow and transport patterns in horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetlands as a result of biological growth. Ecol Eng 27:124–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Tang X, Eke PE, Scholz M, Huang S (2009) Seasonal variability in benzene removal by vertical-flow constructed wetland filters. Water Air Soil Pollut 202(14):259–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Tanner CT, Sukias JP (1995) Accumulation of organic solids in gravel-bed constructed wetlands. Water Sci Technol 32(3):229–239Google Scholar
  109. Tanner CC, Sukias JPS, Upsdell MP (1998a) Organic matter accumulation during maturation of gravel-bed constructed wetlands treating farm dairy wastewaters. Water Res 32:3046–3054CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Tanner CC, Sukias JPS, Upsdell MP (1998b) Relationships between loading rates and pollutant removal during maturation of gravel-bed constructed wetlands. J Environ Qual 27(2):448–458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Tapias J, Himi M, Lovera R, de la Rocha A, Foch M, Salvadó H, Casas A (2013) Assessing clogging development in infiltration-percolation systems for wastewater treatment by electrical resistivity and induced polarization methods. In: Geophysical research abstracts, EGU General Assembly, vol 15Google Scholar
  112. Turon C, Comas J, Poch M (2009) Constructed wetland clogging: a proposal for the integration and reuse of existing knowledge. Ecol Eng 35:1710–1718CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. USEPA (1993) Subsurface flow constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment: a technology assessment. United States Environmental Protection Agency, EPA 832-R-93-008, Washington, 87pGoogle Scholar
  114. USEPA (2000) Constructed wetlands treatment of municipal wastewaters. United States Environmental Protection Agency, EPA/625/R-99/010, Washington, DC, 166pGoogle Scholar
  115. Vandevivere P, Baveye P (1992) Saturated hydraulic conductivity reduction caused by aerobic bacteria in sand columns. Soil Sci Soc Am J 56(1):1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Vera I, García J, Sáez K, Moragas L, Vidal G (2011) Performance evaluation of eight years experience of constructed wetland systems in Catalonia as alternative treatment for small communities. Ecol Eng 37:364–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Vymazal J (2003) Distribution of iron, cadmium, nickel and lead in a constructed wetland receiving municipal sewage. In: Vymazal J (ed) Wetlands—nutrients, metals and mass cycling. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden, pp 341–363Google Scholar
  118. Vymazal J (2005) Horizontal sub-surface flow and hybrid constructed wetlands systems for wastewater treatment. Ecol Eng 25:478–490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. Vymazal J (2018) Does clogging affect long-term removal of organics and suspended solids in gravel-based horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetlands? Chem Eng J 331:663–674CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Vymazal J, Brix H, Cooper PF, Green MB, Haberl R (1998) Constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment in Europe. Backhuys Publishers, LeidenGoogle Scholar
  121. Wallace S, Knight R (2006) Small-scale constructed wetland treatment systems: feasibility, design criteria and O&M requirements, 1st edn. Water Environment Research Foundation (WERF), Alexandria, p 304Google Scholar
  122. Wang X, Xu XZ, Li HZ (2008) Effect of plant tillering and root development on hydrodynamics and wastewater purification of vertical down flow wetlands. J Tongji Univ (Nat Sci) 36(4):519–524 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  123. Wang D, Zhang Z, Li X, Zheng W, Ding Y, Yang B, Yang Q, Zeng T, Cao J, Yue X, Shen T, Zeng G, Deng J, He X (2010) Effects of earthworms on surface clogging characteristics of intermittent sand filters. Water Sci Technol 61(11):2881–2888CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. Whitney D, Rossman A, Hayden N (2003) Evaluating an existing subsurface flow constructed wetland in Akumal, Mexico. Ecol Eng 20:105–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. Winter KJ, Goetz D (2003) The impact of sewage composition on the soil clogging phenomena of vertical flow constructed wetlands. Water Sci Technol 48(5):9–14Google Scholar
  126. Wojciechowska E, Gajewska M, Obarska-Pempkowiak H (2010) Treatment of landfill leachate by constructed wetlands: three case studies. Pol J Environ Stud 19(3):643–650Google Scholar
  127. Wu H, Zhang J, Ngo HH, Guo W, Hu Z, Liang S, Fan J, Liu H (2015) A review on the sustainability of constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment: design and operation. Biores Technol 175:594–601CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. Xie XL, He F, Xu D, Wu Z (2010) Hydrodynamic aspects of particle clogging in the simulated vertical flow constructed using sand river as substrate. Fresenius Environ Bull 19(11):2567–2575Google Scholar
  129. Xu Q, Cui L, Zhang L, Li Z, Guangwei Y (2013) The effect of two factor combination of three kinds of loading on the soil clogging in vertical flow constructed wetland. Front Environ Sci 2(4):56–63Google Scholar
  130. Yan L, Wang SH, Huang J, Liu Y, Wang F (2008) Clogging characteristics of the subsurface flow wetland. Environ Sci 29(3):627–631 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  131. Zhao YQ, Sun G, Allen SJ (2004) Anti-sized reed bed system for animal wastewater treatment: a comparative study. Water Res 38:2907–2917CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  132. Zhao L, Zhu W, Tong W (2009) Clogging processes caused by biofilm growth and organic particle accumulation in lab-scale vertical flow constructed wetlands. J Environ Sci 21:750–757CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Engineering, Nucleus of Environmental and Sanitary EngineeringFederal University of LavrasLavrasBrazil
  2. 2.Department of Sanitary and Environmental EngineeringFederal University of Minas GeraisBelo HorizonteBrazil

Personalised recommendations