Mine tailing disposal sites: contamination problems, remedial options and phytocaps for sustainable remediation

  • Oznur Karaca
  • Claudio Cameselle
  • Krishna R. Reddy
review paper
  • 129 Downloads

Abstract

Mining practices and the absence of proper mine land reclamation has led to heavy metal contaminated sites with serious impact on the ecosystems and risk for human health. The origin of the contamination is often associated to mine tailing deposits because they are a source of the acid mine drainage (AMD). These areas are devoid of vegetation due to the harsh soil conditions that prevent the rooting of plant species. The remediation of these areas followed by revegetation is necessary to suppress the generation of the AMD and its negative effects on the ecosystems. Conventional remediation technologies for heavy metal contaminated sites are usually not applicable because of the high cost associated with chemicals and energy requirements, as well as the long treatment time to remediate large areas. In this study, the use of phytocapping for the remediation of mine tailing deposits and abandoned mine areas is reviewed. Phytocapping is cost effective, environmentally friendly and has multifunctional role against various problems of mine tailings: it provides erosion control, landscape rehabilitation, enhances the soil properties for further colonization of other more demanding vegetal species, reduces the leachability of metals downwards the groundwater, and favors the immobilization of metals forming less bioavailable species. The most critical step in phytocapping is the developing of the first vegetative cover because of the biotoxicity of the mine soil and mine tailings. Several amendment materials can be used to ameliorate soil conditions creating a favorable environment for the rooting of plants, as well as serving as a source of nutrients. Local plant species with fast growing are preferable because their adaptation to the soil and climate conditions favors their self-propagation.

Keywords

Phytoremediation Phytoextraction Phytostabilization Phytocapping Heavy metals Mine tailings 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) awarded a fellowship to Oznur Karaca, which made it possible to conduct this research at the University of Illinois at Chicago. Dr. Claudio Cameselle was awarded Fulbright Scholar (Ministry of Education, Spain, Program Salvador de Madariaga, ref: PRX16/00282) at the University of Illinois at Chicago.

References

  1. Adams A, Raman A, Hodgkins D (2013) How do the plants used in phytoremediation in constructed wetlands, a sustainable remediation strategy, perform in heavy-metal-contaminated mine sites? Water Environ J 27:373–386.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-6593.2012.00357.x Google Scholar
  2. Adesodun JK, Atayese MO, Agbaje TA et al (2010) Phytoremediation potentials of sunflowers (Tithonia diversifolia and Helianthus annuus) for metals in soils contaminated with zinc and lead nitrates. Water Air Soil Pollut 207:195–201.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-009-0128-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Akcil A, Koldas S (2006) Acid mine drainage (AMD): causes, treatment and case studies. J Clean Prod 14:1139–1145.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2004.09.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Alkorta I, Garbisu C (2001) Phytoremediation of organic contaminants in soils. Bioresour Technol 79:273–276.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(01)00016-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Andra SS, Datta R, Sarkar D et al (2009) Analysis of phytochelatin complexes in the lead tolerant vetiver grass [Vetiveria zizanioides (L.)] using liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry. Environ Pollut 157:2173–2183.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2009.02.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Andrade PCC, da Luz JAM, Campos AS, de Lima HM (2016) Cumulative impact assessment on air quality from multiple open pit mines. Clean Technol Environ Policy 18:483–492.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-015-1027-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Andreazza R, Bortolon L, Pieniz S, Camargo FAO (2013) Use of high-yielding bioenergy plant castor bean (Ricinus communis L.) as a potential phytoremediator for copper-contaminated soils. Pedosphere 23:651–661.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1002-0160(13)60057-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Armienta MA, Talavera M, Villasenor G et al (2004) Environmental behaviour of metals from tailings in shallow rivers: Taxco, central Mexico. Trans Inst Min Metall Sect B Appl Earth Sci 113:B76–B82.  https://doi.org/10.1179/037174504225004510 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Asensio V, Covelo EF, Kandeler E (2013) Soil management of copper mine tailing soils—sludge amendment and tree vegetation could improve biological soil quality. Sci Total Environ 456–457:82–90.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.03.061 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Aubertin M, Bussière B, Pabst T et al (2016) Review of the reclamation techniques for acid-generating mine wastes upon closure of disposal sites. Geotech Spec Publ 270:343–358Google Scholar
  11. Baker AJM, Reeves RD, McGrath SP (1991) In situ decontamination of heavy metal polluted soils using crops of metal-accumulating plants: a feasibility study. In: Hinchey RE, Offenbach RF (eds) In Situ Bioreclamation. Butterworth-Heinemann, Boston, pp 601–605Google Scholar
  12. Baker AJM, McGrath SP, Sidoli CMD, Reeves RD (1994) The possibility of in situ heavy metal decontamination of polluted soils using crops of metal-accumulating plants. Resour Conserv Recycl 11:41–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Baker A, McGrath S, Reeves R, Smith J (1999) Metal hyperaccumulator plants: a review of the ecology and physiology of a biological resource for phytoremediation of metal-polluted soils. In: Terry N (ed) Phytoremediation of contaminated soil and water. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 85–108Google Scholar
  14. Banks D, Younger PL, Arnesen R-T et al (1997) Mine-water chemistry: the good, the bad and the ugly. Environ Geol 32:157–174.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s002540050204 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bejan D, Bunce NJ (2015) Acid mine drainage: electrochemical approaches to prevention and remediation of acidity and toxic metals. J Appl Electrochem 45:1239–1254.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10800-015-0884-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bharti S, Banerjee TK (2012) Phytoremediation of the coalmine effluent. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 81:36–42.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2012.04.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Bilgin M, Tulun S (2016) Removal of heavy metals (Cu, Cd and Zn) from contaminated soils using EDTA and FeCl3. Glob Nest J 18:98–107Google Scholar
  18. Bolan N, Kunhikrishnan A, Thangarajan R et al (2014) Remediation of heavy metal(loid)s contaminated soils—to mobilize or to immobilize? J Hazard Mater 266:141–166.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.12.018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Broadhurst CL, Chaney RL, Davis AP et al (2015) Growth and cadmium phytoextraction by Swiss chard, maize, rice, Noccaea caerulescens, and Alyssum murale in pH adjusted biosolids amended soils. Int J Phytoremediation 17:25–39.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15226514.2013.828015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Brooks R, Anderson C, Stewart R, Robinson B (1999) Phytomining: growing a crop of a metal. Biologist 46:201–205Google Scholar
  21. Cameselle C (2015) Enhancement of electro-osmotic flow during the electrokinetic treatment of a contaminated soil. Electrochim Acta 181:31–38.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2015.02.191 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Cameselle C, Pena A (2016) Enhanced electromigration and electro-osmosis for the remediation of an agricultural soil contaminated with multiple heavy metals. Process Saf Environ Prot 104:209–217.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2016.09.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Cameselle C, Reddy KR (2012) Development and enhancement of electro-osmotic flow for the removal of contaminants from soils. Electrochim Acta 86:10–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Cameselle C, Chirakkara RA, Reddy KR (2013) Electrokinetic-enhanced phytoremediation of soils: status and opportunities. Chemosphere 93:626–636.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.06.029 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Chen Y, Shen Z, Li X (2004) The use of vetiver grass (Vetiveria zizanioides) in the phytoremediation of soils contaminated with heavy metals. Appl Geochem 19:1553–1565.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2004.02.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Chen J, Chen Y, Shi Z-Q, et al (2015) Phytoremediation to remove metals/metalloids from soils. In: Ansari A, Gill S, Gill R, Lanza G, Newman L (eds) Phytoremediation. Springer, Cham. pp 297–304  Google Scholar
  27. Cho Y, Bolick JA, Butcher DJ (2009) Phytoremediation of lead with green onions (Allium fistulosum) and uptake of arsenic compounds by moonlight ferns (Pteris cretica cv Mayii). Microchem J 91:6–8.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.microc.2008.05.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Conesa HM, Schulin R, Nowack B (2007) A laboratory study on revegetation and metal uptake in native plant species from neutral mine tailings. Water Air Soil Pollut 183:201–212.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-007-9369-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Davies M, Figueroa L, Wildeman T, Bucknam C (2016) The oxidative precipitation of thallium at alkaline ph for treatment of mining influenced water. Mine Water Environ 35:77–85.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10230-015-0349-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Dermont G, Bergeron M, Mercier G, Richer-Laflèche M (2008) Soil washing for metal removal: a review of physical/chemical technologies and field applications. J Hazard Mater 152:1–31.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.10.043 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Dewald CL, Henry J, Bruckerhoff S et al (1996) Guidelines for establishing warm season grass hedges for erosion control. J Soil Water Conserv 51:16–20Google Scholar
  32. Dold B, Fontboté L (2002) A mineralogical and geochemical study of element mobility in sulfide mine tailings of Fe oxide Cu–Au deposits from the Punta del Cobre belt, northern Chile. Chem Geol 189:135–163.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2541(02)00044-X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Doley D, Audet P (2013) Adopting novel ecosystems as suitable rehabilitation alternatives for former mine sites. Ecol Process 2:22.  https://doi.org/10.1186/2192-1709-2-22 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Edraki M, Baumgartl T, Manlapig E et al (2014) Designing mine tailings for better environmental, social and economic outcomes: a review of alternative approaches. J Clean Prod 84:411–420.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.04.079 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Felix H (1997) Field trials for in situ decontamination of heavy metal polluted soils using crops of metal-accumulating plants. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 160:525–529Google Scholar
  36. Fernández-Caliani JC, Barba-Brioso C, González I, Galán E (2009) Heavy metal pollution in soils around the abandoned mine sites of the Iberian Pyrite Belt (Southwest Spain). Water Air Soil Pollut 200:211–226.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-008-9905-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Foulds SA, Brewer PA, Macklin MG et al (2014) Flood-related contamination in catchments affected by historical metal mining: an unexpected and emerging hazard of climate change. Sci Total Environ 476–477:165–180.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.12.079 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Fu F, Wang Q (2011) Removal of heavy metal ions from wastewaters: a review. J Environ Manage 92:407–418.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.11.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Garbisu C, Alkorta I (2001) Phytoextraction: a cost-effective plant-based technology for the removal of metals from the environment. Bioresour Technol 77:229–236.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(00)00108-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Garcia LC, Ribeiro DB, de Oliveira Roque F et al (2017) Brazil’s worst mining disaster: corporations must be compelled to pay the actual environmental costs. Ecol Appl 27:5–9.  https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.1461 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Ghosh M, Singh SP (2005) A review on phytoremediation of heavy metals and utilization of its byproducts. Appl Ecol Environ Res 3:1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Ghosh M, Paul J, Jana A et al (2015) Use of the grass, Vetiveria zizanioides (L.) Nash for detoxification and phytoremediation of soils contaminated with fly ash from thermal power plants. Ecol Eng 74:258–265.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2014.10.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Gil-Loaiza J, White SA, Root RA et al (2016) Phytostabilization of mine tailings using compost-assisted direct planting: translating greenhouse results to the field. Sci Total Environ 565:451–461.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.04.168 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Hansen HK, Lamas V, Gutierrez C et al (2013) Electro-remediation of copper mine tailings. Comparing copper removal efficiencies for two tailings of different age. Miner Eng 41:1–8.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2012.10.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Harris MA, Rengasamy P (2004) Treatment of a potential soil capping for open-cut mines (Part 1): influence of prior management on responses to a phyto-organic amendment. Environ Geol 46:15–21.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00254-004-0971-x Google Scholar
  46. Hengen TJ, Squillace MK, O’Sullivan AD, Stone JJ (2014) Life cycle assessment analysis of active and passive acid mine drainage treatment technologies. Resour Conserv Recycl 86:160–167.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2014.01.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Henry HF, Burken JG, Maier RM et al (2013) Phytotechnologies—preventing exposures, improving public health. Int J Phytoremediation 15:889–899.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15226514.2012.760521 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Jambor JL, Blowes DW, Ritchie AIM (2003) Environmental aspects of mine wastes. Short course series, vol 31. Mineralogical Association of Canada, OntarioGoogle Scholar
  49. Jana U, Chassany V, Bertrand G et al (2012) Analysis of arsenic and antimony distribution within plants growing at an old mine site in Ouche (Cantal, France) and identification of species suitable for site revegetation. J Environ Manage 110:188–193.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.06.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Johansson L, Xydas C, Messios N et al (2005) Growth and Cu accumulation by plants grown on Cu containing mine tailings in Cyprus. Appl Geochem 20:101–107.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2004.07.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Johnson DB, Hallberg KB (2005) Acid mine drainage remediation options: a review. Sci Total Environ 338:3–14.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2004.09.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Jones PT, Geysen D, Tielemans Y et al (2013) Enhanced Landfill Mining in view of multiple resource recovery: a critical review. J Clean Prod 55:45–55.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.05.021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Kabas S, Faz A, Acosta JA et al (2012) Effect of marble waste and pig slurry on the growth of native vegetation and heavy metal mobility in a mine tailing pond. J Geochem Explor 123:69–76.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gexplo.2012.07.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Kabas S, Faz A, Acosta JA et al (2014) Marble wastes and pig slurry improve the environmental and plant-relevant properties of mine tailings. Environ Geochem Health 36:41–54.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10653-013-9517-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Kalinowski T, Halden RU (2012) Can stress enhance phytoremediation of polychlorinated biphenyls? Environ Eng Sci 29:1047–1052.  https://doi.org/10.1089/ees.2012.0089 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Karaca O, Cameselle C, Reddy KR (2016a) Characterization of heavy metals in mine tailings and lake sediments: implications on remediation. Geotech Spec Publ 273:12–21.  https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784480168.002 Google Scholar
  57. Karaca O, Cameselle C, Reddy KR (2016b) Electrokinetic removal of heavy metals from mine tailings and acid lake sediments from Can Basin, Turkey. Geotech Spec Publ 273:225–234.  https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784480168.023 Google Scholar
  58. Keeling SM, Stewart RB, Anderson CWN, Robinson BH (2003) Nickel and Cobalt Phytoextraction by the hyperaccumulator Berkheya coddii: implications for polymetallic phytomining and phytoremediation. Int J Phytoremediation 5:235–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Khan FI, Husain T, Hejazi R (2004) An overview and analysis of site remediation technologies. J Environ Manage 71:95–122.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2004.02.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Koptsik GN (2014) Problems and prospects concerning the phytoremediation of heavy metal polluted soils: a review. Eurasian Soil Sci 47:923–939.  https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064229314090075 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Kumari A, Lal B, Rai UN (2016) Assessment of native plant species for phytoremediation of heavy metals growing in the vicinity of NTPC sites, Kahalgaon, India. Int J Phytoremediation 18:592–597.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15226514.2015.1086301 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Lamb DT, Venkatraman K, Bolan N et al (2014) Phytocapping: an alternative technology for the sustainable management of landfill sites. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 44:561–637.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10643389.2012.728823 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Lechner AM, Baumgartl T, Matthew P, Glenn V (2016) The impact of underground longwall mining on prime agricultural land: a review and research agenda. Land Degrad Dev 27:1650–1663.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.2303 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Lei L, Song C, Xie X et al (2010) Acid mine drainage and heavy metal contamination in groundwater of metal sulfide mine at arid territory (BS mine, Western Australia). Trans Nonferrous Met Soc China 20:1488–1493.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1003-6326(09)60326-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Leštan D, Luo C-L, Li X-D (2008) The use of chelating agents in the remediation of metal-contaminated soils: a review. Environ Pollut 153:3–13.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2007.11.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Li MS (2006) Ecological restoration of mineland with particular reference to the metalliferous mine wasteland in China: a review of research and practice. Sci Total Environ 357:38–53.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2005.05.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Lu Y, Song S, Wang R et al (2015) Impacts of soil and water pollution on food safety and health risks in China. Environ Int 77:5–15.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2014.12.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Mahar A, Wang P, Ali A et al (2016) Challenges and opportunities in the phytoremediation of heavy metals contaminated soils: a review. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 126:111–121.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2015.12.023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Marchiol L, Assolari S, Sacco P, Zerbi G (2004) Phytoextraction of heavy metals by canola (Brassica napus) and radish (Raphanus sativus) grown on multicontaminated soil. Environ Pollut 132:21–27.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2004.04.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Matlock MM, Howerton BS, Atwood DA (2002) Chemical precipitation of heavy metals from acid mine drainage. Water Res 36:4757–4764.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(02)00149-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Mayes WM, Jarvis AP, Burke IT et al (2011) Dispersal and attenuation of trace contaminants downstream of the Ajka bauxite residue (red mud) depository failure, Hungary. Environ Sci Technol 45:5147–5155.  https://doi.org/10.1021/es200850y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Meers E, Ruttens A, Hopgood M et al (2005) Potential of Brassic rapa, Cannabis sativa, Helianthus annuus and Zea mays for phytoextraction of heavy metals from calcareous dredged sediment derived soils. Chemosphere 61:561–572.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2005.02.026 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Mendez MO, Maier RM (2007) Phytostabilization of mine tailings in arid and semiarid environments—an emerging remediation technology. Environ Health Perspect 116:278–283.  https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.10608 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Mendez MO, Maier RM (2008) Phytoremediation of mine tailings in temperate and arid environments. Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol 7:47–59.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11157-007-9125-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Mishra VK, Upadhyaya AR, Pandey SK, Tripathi BD (2008) Heavy metal pollution induced due to coal mining effluent on surrounding aquatic ecosystem and its management through naturally occurring aquatic macrophytes. Bioresour Technol 99:930–936.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2007.03.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Moynahan OS, Zabinski CA, Gannon JE (2002) Microbial community structure and carbon-utilization diversity in a mine tailings revegetation study. Restor Ecol 10:77–87.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1526-100X.2002.10108.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Mulligan CN, Yong RN, Gibbs BF (2001) Remediation technologies for metal-contaminated soils and groundwater: an evaluation. Eng Geol 60:193–207.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0013-7952(00)00101-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Navarro MC, Pérez-Sirvent C, Martínez-Sánchez MJ et al (2008) Abandoned mine sites as a source of contamination by heavy metals: a case study in a semi-arid zone. J Geochem Explor 96:183–193.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gexplo.2007.04.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Obiri-Nyarko F, Grajales-Mesa SJ, Malina G (2014) An overview of permeable reactive barriers for in situ sustainable groundwater remediation. Chemosphere 111:243–259.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.03.112 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Okieimen FE, Emwanta DO, Odikayo OO (2012) Stabilization of heavy metals in CCA contaminated soil. Int J Appl Environ Sci 7:215–232Google Scholar
  81. Omer AM (2008) Energy, environment and sustainable development. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 12:2265–2300.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2007.05.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Parra A, Zornoza R, Conesa E et al (2014) Seedling emergence, growth and trace elements tolerance and accumulation by Lamiaceae species in a mine soil. Chemosphere 113:132–140.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.04.090 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Pascual JA, Garcia C, Hernandez T et al (2000) Soil microbial activity as a biomarker of degradation and remediation processes. Soil Biol Biochem 32:1877–1883.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-0717(00)00161-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Paz-Alberto AM, Sigua GC (2013) Phytoremediation: a green technology to remove environmental pollutants. Am J Clim Change 02:71–86.  https://doi.org/10.4236/ajcc.2013.21008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Peppas A, Komnitsas K, Halikia I (2000) Use of organic covers for acid mine drainage control. Miner Eng 13:563–574.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0892-6875(00)00036-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Perkins WT, Bird G, Jacobs SR, Devoy C (2016) Field-scale study of the influence of differing remediation strategies on trace metal geochemistry in metal mine tailings from the Irish Midlands. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23:5592–5608.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-5725-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Petersen J (2016) Heap leaching as a key technology for recovery of values from low-grade ores—a brief overview. Hydrometallurgy 165:206–212.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydromet.2015.09.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Petticrew EL, Albers SJ, Baldwin SA et al (2015) The impact of a catastrophic mine tailings impoundment spill into one of North America’s largest fjord lakes: Quesnel Lake, British Columbia, Canada. Geophys Res Lett 42:3347–3355.  https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL063345 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Phillips P, Bender J, Simms R et al (1995) Manganese removal from acid coal-mine drainage by a pond containing green algae and microbial mat. Water Sci Technol 31:161–170.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0273-1223(95)00503-F Google Scholar
  90. Pilon-Smits EA, Freeman JL (2006) Environmental cleanup using plants: biotechnological advances and ecological considerations. Front Ecol Environ 4:203–210.  https://doi.org/10.1890/1540-9295(2006)004[0203:ECUPBA]2.0.CO;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Pinto PX, Al-Abed SR, Balz DA et al (2016) Bench-scale and pilot-scale treatment technologies for the removal of total dissolved solids from coal mine water: a review. Mine Water Environ 35:94–112.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10230-015-0351-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Pollard AJ, Reeves RD, Baker AJM (2014) Facultative hyperaccumulation of heavy metals and metalloids. Plant Sci 217–218:8–17.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2013.11.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Rakotonimaro TV, Neculita CM, Bussière B et al (2017) Recovery and reuse of sludge from active and passive treatment of mine drainage-impacted waters: a review. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24:73–91.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-7733-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Raskin I, Smith RD, Salt DE (1997) Phytoremediation of metals: using plants to remove pollutants from the environment. Curr Opin Biotechnol 8:221–226.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0958-1669(97)80106-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Reddy K, Adams J (2015) Sustainable remediation of contaminated sites. Momentum Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  96. Reddy KR, Cameselle C (2009) Electrochemical remediation technologies for polluted soils, sediments and groundwater. Wiley, HobokenCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Riaza A, Buzzi J, García-Meléndez E et al (2011) Monitoring the extent of contamination from acid mine drainage in the Iberian pyrite belt (SW Spain) using hyperspectral imagery. Remote Sens 3:2166–2186.  https://doi.org/10.3390/rs3102166 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Ricart MT, Cameselle C, Lucas T, Lema JM (1999) Manganese removal from spiked kaolinitic soil and sludge by electromigration. Sep Sci Technol 34:3227–3241.  https://doi.org/10.1081/SS-100100832 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Robinson B (1999) Soil amendments affecting nickel and cobalt uptake by Berkheya coddii: potential use for phytomining and phytoremediation. Ann Bot 84:689–694.  https://doi.org/10.1006/anbo.1999.0970 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Robinson BH, Leblanc M, Petit D et al (1998) The potential of Thlaspi caerulescens for phytoremediation of contaminated soils. Plant Soil 203:47–56.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004328816645 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Rodríguez L, Ruiz E, Alonso-Azcárate J, Rincón J (2009) Heavy metal distribution and chemical speciation in tailings and soils around a Pb–Zn mine in Spain. J Environ Manage 90:1106–1116.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.04.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Roongtanakiat N, Chairoj P (2001) Uptake potential of some heavy metals by vetiver grass. Kasetsart J Nat Sci 35:46–50Google Scholar
  103. Rosario K, Iverson SL, Henderson DA et al (2007) Bacterial community changes during plant establishment at the San Pedro River mine tailings site. J Environ Qual 36:1249.  https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2006.0315 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Saathoff AJ, Ahner B, Spanswick RM, Walker LP (2011) Detection of phytochelatin in the xylem sap of Brassica napus. Environ Eng Sci 28:103–111.  https://doi.org/10.1089/ees.2010.0183 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Sánchez-Andrea I, Sanz JL, Bijmans MFM, Stams AJM (2014) Sulfate reduction at low pH to remediate acid mine drainage. J Hazard Mater 269:98–109.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.12.032 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Sánchez-Andrea I, Stams AJM, Weijma J et al (2016) A case in support of implementing innovative bio-processes in the metal mining industry. FEMS Microbiol Lett.  https://doi.org/10.1093/femsle/fnw106 Google Scholar
  107. Sandrin TR, Chech AM, Maier RM (2000) A rhamnolipid biosurfactant reduces cadmium toxicity during naphthalene biodegradation. Appl Environ Microbiol 66:4585–4588.  https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.66.10.4585-4588.2000 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Sharma HD, Reddy KR (2004) Geoenvironmental engineering: site remediation, waste containment, and emerging waste management technologies. Wiley, HobokenGoogle Scholar
  109. Sheoran AS, Bhandari S (2005) Treatment of mine water by a microbial mat: bench-scale experiments. Mine Water Environ 24:38–42.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10230-005-0069-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Sheoran V, Sheoran AS, Poonia P (2012) Phytoremediation of metal contaminated mining sites. Int J Earth Sci Eng 5:428–436Google Scholar
  111. Simate GS, Ndlovu S (2014) Acid mine drainage: challenges and opportunities. J Environ Chem Eng 2:1785–1803.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2014.07.021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Sinclair L, Thompson J (2015) In situ leaching of copper: challenges and future prospects. Hydrometallurgy 157:306–324.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydromet.2015.08.022 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Singh AN, Raghubanshi AS, Singh JS (2002) Plantations as a tool for mine spoil restoration. Curr Sci 82:1436–1441Google Scholar
  114. Skousen J, Zipper CE, Rose A et al (2017) Review of passive systems for acid mine drainage treatment. Mine Water Environ 36:133–153.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10230-016-0417-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Spurgeon DJ, Hopkin SP (1996) Effects of variations of the organic matter content and pH of soils on the availability and toxicity of zinc to the earthworm Eisenia fetida. Pedobiologia 40:80–96Google Scholar
  116. Stevenson FJ, Cole MA (1999) Cycles of soils: carbon, nitrogen, phosphorus, sulfur, micronutrients. Wiley, HobokenGoogle Scholar
  117. Switzer C, Pironi P, Gerhard JI et al (2009) Self-sustaining smoldering combustion: a novel remediation process for non-aqueous-phase liquids in porous media. Environ Sci Technol 43:5871–5877.  https://doi.org/10.1021/es803483s CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Taggart MA, Figuerola J, Green AJ et al (2006) After the Aznalcóllar mine spill: arsenic, zinc, selenium, lead and copper levels in the livers and bones of five waterfowl species. Environ Res 100:349–361.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2005.07.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. Takáč P, Szabová T, Kozáková L et al (2009) Heavy metals and their bioavailability from soils in the long-term polluted Central Spiš region of SR. Plant Soil Environ 55:167–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Tamás J, Kovács E (2005) Vegetation pattern and heavy metal accumulation at a mine tailing at Gyöngyösoroszi, Hungary. Z Naturforschung Sect C J Biosci 60:362–367Google Scholar
  121. Thakur S, Singh L, Wahid ZA et al (2016) Plant-driven removal of heavy metals from soil: uptake, translocation, tolerance mechanism, challenges, and future perspectives. Environ Monit Assess 188:206.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-016-5211-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. Thangavel P, Subbhuraam CV (2004) Phytoextraction: role of hyperaccumulators in metal contaminated soils. Proc Indian Natl Sci Acad Part B 70:109–130Google Scholar
  123. Tischew S, Kirmer A (2007) Implementation of basic studies in the ecological restoration of surface-mined land. Restor Ecol 15:321–325.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-100X.2007.00217.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. Tordoff GM, Baker AJM, Willis AJ (2000) Current approaches to the revegetation and reclamation of metalliferous mine wastes. Chemosphere 41:219–228.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-6535(99)00414-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. Turan M, Esringü A (2007) Phytoremediation based on canola (Brassica napus L.) and Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L.) planted on spiked soil by aliquot amount of Cd, Cu, Pb, and Zn. Plant Soil Environ 53:7–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. USEPA (2000) Introduction to phytoremediation. US Environmental Protection Agency. Report nº EPA/600/R-99/107Google Scholar
  127. USEPA (2012) Green Remediation Best Management Practices: Mining Sites. US Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response. Report nº EPA 542-F-12-028Google Scholar
  128. Vázquez S, Agha R, Granado A et al (2006) Use of white lupin plant for phytostabilization of Cd and As polluted acid soil. Water Air Soil Pollut 177:349–365.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-006-9178-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  129. Visoottiviseth P, Francesconi K, Sridokchan W (2002) The potential of Thai indigenous plant species for the phytoremediation of arsenic contaminated land. Environ Pollut 118:453–461.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0269-7491(01)00293-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  130. Vogel-Mikuš K, Drobne D, Regvar M (2005) Zn, Cd and Pb accumulation and arbuscular mycorrhizal colonisation of pennycress Thlaspi praecox Wulf. (Brassicaceae) from the vicinity of a lead mine and smelter in Slovenia. Environ Pollut 133:233–242.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2004.06.021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  131. Walls LD, Li LY, Hall KJ (2013) Trace metal contamination due to acid rock drainage and its impacts on the fish-bearing Pennask Creek watershed, British Columbia. Water Air Soil Pollut.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-013-1675-1 Google Scholar
  132. Wang F-H, Zhang F, Chen Y-J et al (2015a) A comparative study on the heavy metal solidification/stabilization performance of four chemical solidifying agents in municipal solid waste incineration fly ash. J Hazard Mater 300:451–458.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.07.037 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  133. Wang J, Jiang J, Li D et al (2015b) Removal of Pb and Zn from contaminated soil by different washing methods: the influence of reagents and ultrasound. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22:20084–20091.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-5219-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  134. Wasay SA, Barrington S, Tokunaga S (2001) Organic acids for the in situ remediation of soils polluted by heavy metals: soil flushing in columns. Water Air Soil Pollut 127:301–314.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005251915165 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  135. Wei S, Zhou Q, Koval PV (2006) Flowering stage characteristics of cadmium hyperaccumulator Solanum nigrum L. and their significance to phytoremediation. Sci Total Environ 369:441–446.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2006.06.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  136. Whiting SN, Reeves RD, Richards D et al (2004) Research priorities for conservation of metallophyte biodiversity and their potential for restoration and site remediation. Restor Ecol 12:106–116.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1061-2971.2004.00367.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  137. Wong MH (2003) Ecological restoration of mine degraded soils, with emphasis on metal contaminated soils. Chemosphere 50:775–780.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-6535(02)00232-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  138. Wu H, Zhang J, Ngo HH et al (2015) A review on the sustainability of constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment: design and operation. Bioresour Technol 175:594–601.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.10.068 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  139. Yang B, Shu WS, Ye ZH et al (2003) Growth and metal accumulation in vetiver and two Sesbania species on lead/zinc mine tailings. Chemosphere 52:1593–1600.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-6535(03)00499-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  140. Yao Z, Li J, Xie H, Yu C (2012) Review on remediation technologies of soil contaminated by heavy metals. Procedia Environ Sci 16:722–729.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proenv.2012.10.099 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  141. Yerel Kandemir S, Ankara H (2015) A review of acid mine drainage in Turkey. 24th International Mining Congress and Exhibition of Turkey, IMCET15 Antalya, Turkey, 14–17 April, pp 1432–1435Google Scholar
  142. Zhang X, Xia H, Li Z et al (2010) Potential of four forage grasses in remediation of Cd and Zn contaminated soils. Bioresour Technol 101:2063–2066.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2009.11.065 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  143. Zhang S, Li T, Huang H et al (2012) Cd accumulation and phytostabilization potential of dominant plants surrounding mining tailings. Environ Sci Pollut Res 19:3879–3888.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-012-1060-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  144. Zhang SJ, Li TX, Huang HG et al (2014) Phytoremediation of cadmium using plant species of Athyrium wardii (Hook.). Int J Environ Sci Technol 11:757–764.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-013-0384-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  145. Zhuang P, McBride MB, Xia H et al (2009) Health risk from heavy metals via consumption of food crops in the vicinity of Dabaoshan mine, South China. Sci Total Environ 407:1551–1561.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2008.10.061 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  146. Ziemkiewicz PF, Skousen JG, Simmons J (2003) Long-term performance of passive acid mine drainage treatment systems. Mine Water Environ 22:118–129.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10230-003-0012-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  147. Zornoza P, Millán R, Sierra MJ et al (2010) Efficiency of white lupin in the removal of mercury from contaminated soils: soil and hydroponic experiments. J Environ Sci 22:421–427.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1001-0742(09)60124-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Geological EngineeringÇanakkale Onsekiz Mart UniversityÇanakkaleTurkey
  2. 2.Department of Chemical EngineeringUniversity of VigoVigoSpain
  3. 3.Department of Civil and Materials EngineeringUniversity of Illinois at ChicagoChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations