Skip to main content
Log in

Rotating biological contactors: a review on main factors affecting performance

  • Review Paper
  • Published:
Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Rotating biological contactors (RBCs) constitute a very unique and superior alternative for biodegradable matter and nitrogen removal on account of their feasibility, simplicity of design and operation, short start-up, low land area requirement, low energy consumption, low operating and maintenance cost and treatment efficiency. The present review of RBCs focus on parameters that affect performance like rotational speed, organic and hydraulic loading rates, retention time, biofilm support media, staging, temperature, influent wastewater characteristics, biofilm characteristics, dissolved oxygen levels, effluent and solids recirculation, step-feeding and medium submergence. Some RBCs scale-up and design considerations, operational problems and comparison with other wastewater treatment systems are also reported.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abou-Elela SI, Nasr FA, El-Shafai SA Wastewater management in small- and medium-size enterprises: case studies. Environmentalist (in preparation)

  • Alemzadeh I, Vossoughi M (2001) Biodegradation of toluene by an attached biofilm in a rotating biological contactor. Process Biochem 36:707–711

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Andreottola G, Foladori P, Ragazzi M, Tatàno F (2000a) Experimental comparison between MBBR and activated sludge system for the treatment of municipal wastewater. Water Sci Technol 41(4–5):375–382

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Andreottola G, Foladori P, Ragazzi M (2000b) Upgrading of a small wastewater treatment plant in a cold climate region using a moving bed biofilm reactor (MBBR) system. Water Sci Technol 41(1):177–185

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • ATV (1989) Arbeitsblatt A135: Grundsätze für die Bemessung von Tropfkörpern und Tauchkörpern mit Anschlußwerten über 500 Einwohnergleichwerten, 2, Auflage, AbwassertechnischeVereinigung e. V., St Augustin, Germany

  • Axelsson J, Nilsson U, Terrazas E, Aliaga TA, Welander U (2006) Decolourization of the textile dyes Reactive Red 2 and Reactive Blue 4 using Bjerkandera sp. Strain BOL 13 in a continuous rotating biological contactor reactor. Enzyme Microb Technol 39:32–37

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ayoub GM, Saikaly P (2004) The combined effect of step-feed and recycling on RBC performance. Water Res 38:3009–3016

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee G (1997a) Hydraulics of bench-scale rotating biological contactor. Water Res 31:2500–2510

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee G (1997b) Treatment of phenolic wastewater in RBC reactor. Water Res 31:705–714

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Benefield LD, Randall RW (1980) Biological process design for wastewater treatment. Prentice-Hall Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Brar SK, Gupta SK (2000) Biodegradation of trichloroethylene in a rotating biological contactor. Water Res 34:4207–4214

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brazil BL (2006) Performance and operation of a rotating biological contactor in a tilapia recirculating aquaculture system. Aquac Eng 34:261–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cema G, Wiszniowski J, Zabczyński S, Zablocka-Godlewska E, Raszka A, Surmacz-Górska J (2007) Biological nitrogen removal from landfill leachate by deammonification assisted by heterotrophic denitrification in a rotating biological contactor (RBC). Water Sci Technol 55(8–9):35–42

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Costley SC, Wallis FM (2000) Effect of flow rate on heavy metal accumulation by rotating biological contactor (RBC) biofilms. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 24:244–250

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Galvan A, Urbina P, de Castro F (2000) Characterization of filamentous microorganisms in rotating biological contactor biofilms of wastewater treatment plants. Bioprocess Eng 22:257–260

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Grady CPL Jr (1982) Modelling of biological fixed films–A state of the art review. In: Wu YC, Smith ED, Miller RD, Patken (eds) Proceedings of the 1st international conference on fixed-film biological processes, April 20–23. University of Pittsburgh, Ohio, USA, pp 344–403

  • Grady CPL Jr, Daigger GT, Lim HC (1999) Rotating biological contactor. In: Grady CPL Jr, Daigger GT, Lim HC (eds) Biological wastewater treatment. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 907–947

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin P, Findlay GE (2000) Process and engineering improvements to rotating biological contactor design. Water Sci Technol 41(1):137–144

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Guimarães C, Porto P, Oliveira R, Mota M (2005) Continuous decolourization of a sugar refinery wastewater in a modified rotating biological contactor with Phanerochaete chrysosporium immobilized on polyurethane foam disks. Process Biochem 40:535–540

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta AB, Gupta SK (2001) Simultaneous carbon and nitrogen removal from high strength domestic wastewater in an aerobic RBC biofilm. Water Res 35:1714–1722

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hanhan O, Orhon D, Krauth Kh, Gunder B (2005) Evaluation of denitrification potential of rotating biological contactors for treatment of municipal wastewater. Water Sci Technol 51(11):131–139

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hoccheimer JN, Wheaton FW (1998) Biological filters: trickling filters and RBC design. In: Libey GS, Timmons MB (eds) Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on recirculation Aquaculture, July 16–19. Roanoke, VA, USA, pp 291–318

  • Israni SHI, Koli SS, Patwardhan AW, Melo JS, D’souza SF (2002) Phenol degradation in rotational biological contactors. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 77:1050–1057

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jahren SJ, Rintala JA, Ødegaard H (2002) Aerobic moving bed biofilm reactor treating thermomechanical pulping whitewater under thermophilic conditions. Water Res 36:1067–1075

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Janczukowicz W, Klimiuk E (1992) The influence of the raw wastes dosing system on technological parameters of the rotating biological disc (RBC) process. Bioresour Technol 42:241–245

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Klees R, Silverstein J (1992) Improved biological nitrification using recirculation in rotating biological contactors. Water Sci Technol 26(3–4):545–553

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Laquidara MJ, Blanc FC, O’Shaughnessy JC (1986) Development of biofilm, operating characteristics and operational control in the anaerobic rotating biological contactor process. J Water Pollut Control Fed 58:107–114

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Le Groupe Teknika (1988) Les disques pour le traitement des eaux usées des petites et moyennes municipalités. Rapport final, Project de développement technologique No. DT87.001

  • Lu C, Yeh AC (1995) Treatment of high-strength organic wastewaters using an anaerobic rotating biological contactor. Environ Int 21:313–323

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lu C, Li HC, Lee LY (1997a) Effects of disc rotational speed and submergence on the performance of an anaerobic rotating biological contactor. Environ Int 23:253–263

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lu C, Lin MR, Li HC, Lee LY (1997b) Temperature effects on the performance of an anaerobic rotating biological contactor. Environ Technol 18:711–720

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Majumder PS, Gupta SK (2007) Removal of chlorophenols in sequential anaerobic-aerobic reactors. Bioresour Technol 98:118–129

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Malandra L, Wolfaardt G, Zietsman A, Viljoen-Bloom M (2003) Microbiology of a biological contactor for winery wastewater treatment. Water Res 37:4125–4134

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Martín-Cereceda M, Serrano S, Guinea A (2001a) Biofilm communities and operational monitoring of a rotating biological contactor system. Water Air Soil Pollut 126:193–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martín-Cereceda M, Alvarez AM, Serrano S, Guinea A (2001b) Confocal and light microscope examination of protozoa and other microorganisms in the biofilms from a rotating biological contactor wastewater treatment plant. Acta Protozool 40:263–272

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathure P, Patwardhan AW (2005) Comparison of mass transfer efficiency in horizontal rotating packed beds and rotating biological contactors. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 80:413–419

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mba D, Bannister RH, Findlay GE (1999) Mechanical redesign of the rotating biological contactor. Water Res 33:3679–3688

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mohseni-Bandpi A, Elliott DJ (1996) Nitrate removal from groundwater using an anoxic aerobic rotating biological contactor. Water Sci Technol 34(1–2):323–330

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • MSE (Métallerie du Sud Est) (2006) Filières d’épuration adaptées aux petites collectivités: les disques biologiques. MSE. Journées Techniques de l’Ascomade, France, http://www.dklik.planetb.fr/ascomade_demo/upload/ouvrage/1145352132.pdf (Visited in December 2007)

  • Nahid P, Vossoughi M, Alemzadeh I (2001) Treatment of bakers yeast wastewater with a Biopack system. Process Biochem 37:447–451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Najafpour G, Yieng HA, Younesi H, Zinatizadeh A (2005) Effect of organic loading on performance of rotating biological contactors using palm oil mill effluents. Process Biochem 40:2879–2884

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Najafpour GD, Zinatizadeh AAL, Lee LK (2006) Performance of a three-stage aerobic RBC reactor in food canning wastewater treatment. Biochem Eng J 30:297–302

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nasr FA, Badr NM, Doma HS (2006) Flavour industry wastewater management case study. Environmentalist 26:31–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nasr FA, Doma HS, Abdel-Halim HS, El-Shafai SA (2007) Chemical industry wastewater treatment. Environmentalist 27:275–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neu KE (1994) Upgrading of rotating biological contactor (RBC) systems to achieve higher effluent quality, including biological nutrient enrichment and reduction techniques. Water Sci Technol 29(12):197–206

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nowak O (2000) Upgrading of wastewater treatment plants equipped with rotating biological contactors to nitrification and P removal. Water Sci Technol 41(1):145–153

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Okabe S, Hiratia K Ozawa Y, Watanabe Y (1996) Spatial microbial distributions of nitrifiers and heterotrophs in mixed-population biofilms. Biotechnol Bioeng 50:24–35

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Patwardhan AW (2003) Rotating biological contactors: a review. Ind Eng Chem Res 42:2035–2051

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Radwan KH, Ramanujam TK (1997) Studies on organic removal of 2,4-dichlorophenol wastewaters using a modified RBC. Bioprocess Eng 16:219–223

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ramsay J, Shin M, Wong S, Goode C (2006) Amaranth decoloration by Trametes versicolor in a rotating biological contacting reactor. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 33:791–795

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rodgers M, Zhan XM (2003) Moving-medium biofilm reactors. Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol 2:213–224

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Saikaly P, Ayoub GM (2003) Ammonia nitrogen removal in step-feed rotating biological contactors. Water Air Soil Pollut 150:177–191

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Salvadó H, Palomo A, Mas M, Puigagut J, Gracia MP (2004) Dynamics of nematodes in a high organic loading rotating biological contactors. Water Res 38:2571–2578

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schwingle TA, Lepak AJ, Wenta RJ (2005) Refining applications. Hydrocarbon Engineering. January

  • Selvam K, Swaminathan K, Song MH, Chae K-S (2002) Biological treatment of a pulp and paper industry effluent by Fomes lividus and Trametes versicolor. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 18:523–526

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sirianuntapiboon S (2006) Treatment of wastewater containing Cl2 residue by packed cage rotating biological contactor (RBC) system. Bioresour Technol 97:1735–1744

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sirianuntapiboon S, Chuamkaew C (2007) Packed cage rotating biological contactor system for treatment of cyanide wastewater. Bioresour Technol 98:266–272

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Spengel DB, Dzombak DA (1992) Biokinetic modeling and scale-up considerations for rotating biological contactors. Water Environ Res 64:223–234

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Surampalli RY, Baumann ER (1997) Role of supplemental aeration in improving overloaded first-stage RBC performance. Water Air Soil Pollut 98:1–15

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tawfik A, Klapwijk B, el-Gohary F, Lettinga G (2002) Treatment of anaerobically pre-treated domestic sewage by a rotating biological contactor. Water Res 36:147–155

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tawfik A, Temmink H, Zeeman G, Klapwijk B (2006) Sewage treatment in a rotating biological contactor (RBC) system. Water Air Soil Pollut 175:275–289

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tchobanoglous G, Burton FL (1991) Wastewater engineering: treatment, disposal and reuse. Metcalf & Eddy, 3rd ed. McGraw-Hill International Editions, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Teixeira P, Oliveira R (2001) Denitrification in a closed rotating biological contactor: effect of disk submergence. Process Biochem 37:345–349

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Torkian A, Hashemian SJ, Alinejad K (2003) Posttreatment of upflow anaerobic sludge blanket-treated industrial wastewater by a rotating biological contactor. Water Environ Res 75:232–237

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • US Filter (1998) Applying the rotating biological contactor process. US Filter. Bulletin No. USF 315-13A6, http://www.waow.net/Brochures/RBC.pdf (Visited in December 2007)

  • Van Buuren (1991) Post-treatment methods for effluent of UASB reactors treating domestic sewage. Internal report No. 91-3. Wageningen University, Department of Environmental Technology, The Netherlands

  • Wanner J, Sýkora M, Kos M, Miklenda J, Grau P (1990) Packed-cage RBC with combined cultivation of suspended and fixed-film biomass. Water Sci Technol 22(1–2):101–111

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ware AJ, Pescod MB, Storch B (1990) Evaluation of alternatives to conventional disc support media for rotating biological contactors. Water Sci Technol 22(1–2):113–117

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Watanabe Y, Bang DY, Itoh K, Matsui K (1994) Nitrogen removal from wastewaters by a bio-reactor with partially and fully submerged rotating biofilms. Water Sci Technol 29(10–11):431–438

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • WEF (Water Environment Federation) & ASCE (American Society of Civil Engineers) (1998) Design of municipal wastewater treatment plants, WEF Manual of practice No. 8, ASCE Manual and report on engineering practice No. 76. Alexandria and Reston, USA

  • Zao-yan Y, Zhen-san F (1990) Treatment of leather and fur wastewater by a rotating biological contactor. Water Sci Technol 22(1–2):119–126

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors fully acknowledge the financial support provided by Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia (FCT) through grant SFRH/BD/24715/2005.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Cortez.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cortez, S., Teixeira, P., Oliveira, R. et al. Rotating biological contactors: a review on main factors affecting performance. Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol 7, 155–172 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11157-008-9127-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11157-008-9127-x

Keywords

Navigation