Abstract
We introduce an intraday measure of trade-time clustering which estimates periodic grouping of trades, integrating volume and trade duration. This measure consistently detects informed trading superior to volume and duration. We find that in stable markets, both lagged information flow and liquidity are positively associated with trade-time clustering, while in volatile markets only lagged liquidity is. Trade-time clustering is positively associated with contemporaneous price impact, price volatility, and market efficiency, suggesting that trade clustering contributes to price discovery. Following increased trade-time clustering, we observe more aggressive orders from informed traders, but less high-frequency trading in stable markets.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
While we use 5Â min intervals to examine the intraday determinants and effects of time clustering, the same calculations can be applied to different time intervals for different purposes e.g. daily time clustering, 1Â min, 1Â s, etc.
We do not assert that time precedence suggests causation. Rather, we are exploring associations between time clustering and pre-existing market conditions.
See Bessembinder and Kaufman (1997), for the discussion on the difference between quoted spread and effective spread.
Bertsimas and Lo (1998) theoretically explore the relation between order splitting strategy and trading cost.
Chakravarty, Jain, Upson, and Wood (2012) show that ISO orders are associated with informed institutional trading.
Located at https://bit.ly/3PObJ1w.
As a robustness test, we also define duration as the average time between trades t and t-1 and trades t and t + 1. The results are qualitatively similar.
In the rare case that we encounter multiple (j) trades at the same timestamp, the duration of all but the first listed trade is calculated as 1/j milliseconds.
In the online internet appendix (https://bit.ly/3PObJ1w), we demonstrate several scenarios of possible trading patterns and show how trade-level and aggregate time clustering correctly identifies concentrated trading, while not being biased by overall volume and average duration.
Chiyachantana et al. (2004) find that the price impact of institutional (block) trades varies under different market conditions. The price impact is higher for of institutional buy orders in bullish market while it is higher for institutional sell orders in bearish market. They argue that these institutional trades are on the same side of the market and liquidity demanders, and thus have higher trading cost. Trade-time clustering might have the same pattern as price impact of institutional trades because time clustering is likely driven in part by with institutional trading.
The list of the stocks in our sample can be provided as requested.
See Appendix Table 10 for variable calculation descriptions.
See Kim and Stoll (2014) for additional proxies of informed trading.
The Seemingly Unrelated Regressions (SUR) process estimates the simultaneous variance–covariance of the coefficients of different models, and thus allows to examine the equality of coefficients across models using Chi-squared test.
However, it should also be noted that during the stable subsample, the S&P 500 increased by 0.17% while the S&P 500 decreased by 4.53% during the volatile subsample. The large market downtrend in the volatile subsample could be influencing these results more than volatility alone.
Due to their redundancy, these results and pertinent discussion are available in the internet appendix (https://bit.ly/3PObJ1w).
We confirm that these results also hold when regressing time clustering on the hypothesized variables of interest (and controls), both individually and in the same regression model. The results are omitted from the paper due to their similarity but are available upon request.
References
Admati AR, Pfleiderer P (1988) A theory of intraday patterns: volume and price variability. Rev Financ Stud 1(1):3–40. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/1.1.3
Ahn H, Bae K, Chan K (2001) Limit orders, depth, and volatility: evidence from the stock exchange of hong kong. J Financ 56(2):767–788. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.00345
Alexander GJ, Peterson MA (2007) An analysis of trade-size clustering and its relation to stealth trading. J Financ Econ 84(2):435–471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2006.02.005
Anand A, Chakravarty S (2009) Stealth trading in options markets. J Financ Quant Anal 42(1):167–187. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022109000002234
Ascioglu A, Comerton-Forde C, McInish TH (2007) Price clustering on Tokyo stock exchange. Financ Rev 42(2):289–301. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6288.2007.00172.x
Aslan H, Easley D, Hvidkjaer S, O’Hara M (2011) The characteristics of informed trading: implications for asset pricing. J Empir Financ 18(5):782–801. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jempfin.2011.08.001
Bamber LS, Barron OE, Stober TL (1999) Differential interpretation and trading volume. J Financ Quant Anal 34(3):369–386. https://doi.org/10.2307/2676264
Barardehi YH, Bernhardt D, Davies RJ (2019) Trade-time measures of liquidity. Rev Financ Stud 32(1):126–179. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhy012
Barclay MJ, Warner JB (1993) Stealth trading and volatility: which trades move prices? J Financ Econ 34(3):281–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(93)90029-B
Bertsimas D, Lo AW (1998) Optimal control of execution cost. J Financ Market 1(1):1–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1386-4181(97)00012-8
Bessembinder H, Kaufman HM (1997) A comparison of trade execution costs for NYSE and NASDAQ-listed stocks. J Financ Quant Anal 32(3):287–310. https://doi.org/10.2307/2331201
Bessembinder H, Seguin PJ (1993) Price volatility, trading volume, and market depth: evidence from futures markets. J Financ Quant Anal 28(1):21–39. https://doi.org/10.2307/2331149
Brown P, Walsh D, Yuen A (1997) The interaction between order imbalance and stock price. Pac Basin Financ J 5(5):539–557. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0927-538X(97)00019-X
Chakravarty S, Jain PK, Upson J, Wood R (2012) Clean sweep: informed trading through intermarket sweep orders. J Financ Quant Anal 47(2):415–435. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022109012000129
Chan K, Fong W (2000) Trade size, order imbalance, and the volatility-volume relation. J Financ Econ 57(2):247–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(00)00057-X
Chan LKC, Lakonishok J (1993) Institutional trades and intraday stock price behavior. J Financ Econ 33(2):173–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(93)90003-T
Chen T (2020) Trade-size clustering and informed trading in global markets. Int J Financ Econ 25(4):579–597. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.1768
Chen F, Diebold FX, Schorfheide F (2013) A Markov-switching multifractal inter-trade duration model, with application to US equities. J Econom 177(2):320–342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2013.04.016
Chiyachantana CN, Jain PK (2013) Institutional trading frictions. Working paper. https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/1796
Chiyachantana CN, Jain PK, Jiang C, Wood RA (2004) International evidence on institutional trading behavior and price impact. J Financ 59(2):869–898. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2004.00651.x
Chordia T, Subrahmanyam A (2004) Order imbalance and individual stock returns: theory and evidence. J Financ Econ 72(3):485–518. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(03)00175-2
Chung KH, Park SG, Ryu D (2016) Trade duration, informed trading, and option moneyness. Int Rev Econ Financ 44:395–411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2016.02.003
Duarte J, Young L (2009) Why is PIN priced? J Financ Econ 91(2):119–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2007.10.008
Dufour A, Engle RF (2000) Time and the price impact of a trade. J Financ 55(6):2467–2498. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.00297
Easley D, Lopez de Prado MM, O’Hara M (2012a) Flow toxicity and liquidity in a high-frequency world. Rev Financ Stud 25(5):1457–1493. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhs053
Easley D, Lopez de Prado MM, O’Hara M (2012b) The volume clock: insights into the high-frequency paradigm. J Portf Manag 39(1):19–29. https://doi.org/10.3905/jpm.2012.39.1.019
Fu F (2009) Idiosyncratic risk and the cross-section of expected stock returns. J Financ Econ 91(1):24–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2008.02.003
Goyal A, Santa-Clara P (2003) Idiosyncratic risk matters! J Financ 58(3):975–1007. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6261.00555
Harris L (1991) Stock price clustering and discreteness. Rev Financ Stud 4(3):389–415. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/4.3.389
Hasbrouck J, Saar G (2013) Low-latency trading. J Financ Market 16(4):646–679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.finmar.2013.05.003
Heston SL, Sadka R (2008) Seasonality in the cross-section of stock returns. J Financ Econ 87(2):418–445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2007.02.003
Hewlett P (2006) Clustering of order arrivals, price impact and trade path optimisation. In: Workshop on financial modeling with jump processes, Ecole Polytechnique, pp 6–8
Holden CW, Jacobsen S (2014) Liquidity measurement problems in fast, competitive markets: expensive and cheap solutions. J Financ 69(4):1747–1785. https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.12127
Holden CW, Subrahmanyam A (1992) Long-lived private information and imperfect competition. J Financ 47(1):247–270. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1992.tb03985.x
Huang RD, Masulis RW (2003) Trading activity and stock price volatility: evidence from London stock exchange. J Empir Financ 10(3):249–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0927-5398(02)00048-8
Jones CM, Kaul G, Lipson ML (1994) Transactions, volume, and volatility. Rev Financ Stud 7(4):631–651. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/7.4.631
Kaniel R, Liu H (2006) So what orders do informed traders use? J Bus 79(4):1867–1914. https://doi.org/10.1086/503651
Keim DB, Madhavan A (1995) Anatomy of the trading process empirical evidence on the behavior of institutional traders. J Financ Econ 37(3):371–398. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(94)00799-7
Kim ST, Stoll HR (2014) Are trading imbalances indicative of private information? J Financ Mark 20:151–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.finmar.2014.03.003
Kumar R, Popescu M (2014) The implied intra-day probability of informed trading. Rev Quant Financ Acc 42(2):357–371. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11156-013-0345-0
Kyle AS (1985) Continuous auctions and insider trading. Econometrica 53(6):1315–1335. https://doi.org/10.2307/1913210
Lai S, Ng L, Zhang B (2014) Does PIN affect equity prices around the world? J Financ Econ 114(1):178–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2014.06.005
Lee CMC (1992) Earnings news and small traders: an intraday analysis. J Account Econ 15:265–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-4101(92)90021-S
Lo AW, MacKinlay AC (1988) Stock market prices do not follow random walks: evidence from a simple specification test. Rev Financ Stud 1(1):41–66. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/1.1.41
Locke PR, Onayev Z (2005) Trade duration: information and trade disposition. Financ Rev 40(1):113–129. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0732-8516.2005.00095.x
Malkiel BG, Xu Y (2006) Idiosyncratic risk and security returns. https://www.academia.edu/
Manganelli S (2005) Duration, volume and volatility impact of trades. J Financ Mark 8(4):377–399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.finmar.2005.06.002
Menkhoff L, Osler CL, Schmeling M (2010) Limit-order submission strategies under asymmetric information. J Bank Financ 34(11):2665–2677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2010.05.007
Mohanram P, Rajgopal S (2009) Is PIN priced risk? J Account Econ 47(3):226–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2008.10.001
Moulton PC (2005) You can’t always get what you want: Trade-size clustering and quantity choice in liquidity. J Financ Econ 78(1):89–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2004.10.007
Muravyev D, Picard J (2022) Does trade clustering reduce trading costs? evidence from periodicity in algorithmic trading. Financ Manage 54(4):1201–1229. https://doi.org/10.1111/fima.12405
Nikolsko-Rzhevska O, Nikolsko-Rzhevskyy A, Black JR (2020) The life of U’s: order revisions on NASDAQ. J Bank Financ 111:105724. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2019.105724
O’Hara M (2003) Presidential address: liquidity and price discovery. J Financ 58(4):1335–1354. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6261.00569
O’Hara M (2015) High frequency market microstructure. J Financ Econ 116(2):257–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2015.01.003
O’Hara M, Yao C, Ye M (2014) What’s not there: odd lots and market data. J Financ 69(5):2199–2236. https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.12185
Ohta W (2006) An analysis of intraday patterns in price clustering on the Tokyo stock exchange. J Bank Financ 30(3):1023–1039. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2005.07.017
Petersen MA, Fialkowski D (1994) Posted versus effective spreads: good prices or bad quotes? J Financ Econ 35(3):269–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(94)90034-5
Saar G (2001) Price impact asymmetry of block trades: an institutional trading explanation. Rev Financ Stud 14(4):1153–1181. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/14.4.1153
Sun W, Rachev S, Fabozzi FJ, Kalev PS (2008) Fractals in trade duration: capturing long-range dependence and heavy tailedness in modeling trade duration. Ann Financ 4(2):217–241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10436-007-0078-y
Van Ness BF, Van Ness RA, Watson ED (2015) Canceling liquidity. J Financ Res 38(1):3–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfir.12051
Zellner A (1962) An efficient method of estimating seemingly unrelated regressions and tests for aggregation bias. J Am Stat Assoc 57(298):348–368. https://doi.org/10.2307/2281644
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
For helpful comments and suggestions, we thank Tom McInish, James Upson, Robert Van Ness, and the seminar participants at the Financial Infrastructure Stability and Cybersecurity Center, University of Memphis, University of Mississippi, University of Texas at El Paso, Saginaw Valley State University, Eastern Finance Association, Southern Finance Association, and Financial Management Association. The opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Office of Financial Research in the US Department of the Treasury, where Professor Jain is a fellow.
Appendix 1
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Black, J.R., Jain, P.K. & Sun, W. Trade-time clustering. Rev Quant Finan Acc 60, 1209–1242 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11156-023-01125-8
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11156-023-01125-8