Abstract
Employee stock options (ESOs) are call options granted by a company to its employees as a means to retain and to motivate them for working towards improvement of the company’s earning and management. ESOs have unique characteristics, such as: they have long maturity time, they are not tradable, and they can be exercised only after the vesting period. All these characteristics have significant implication on the valuation of ESOs. In this paper, we improve Hull–White ESO model using Bino-Trinomial tree method. We also modify a single psychological barrier on Hull–White model with moving psychological barriers based on empirical study that the ESO’s holders require the stock price to be at relatively high to induce voluntary exercise, yet later they will exercise at relatively low stock price near the time to maturity. Numerical experiments are given to verify the robustness of the proposed model and to analyze the sensitivity with respect to the model parameters. The ESO prices become cheaper if the holders degrade their psychological barriers.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ammann M, Seiz R (2004) Valuing employee stock options: does the model matter? Financ Anal J 60(5):21–37
Brickley J, Bhagat S, Lease R (1985) The impact of long-range managerial compensation plans on shareholder wealth. J Account Econ 7:115–129
Brisley N, Anderson CK (2008) Employee stock option valuation with an early exercise boundary. Financ Anal J 64(5):88–100
Carpenter JN (1998) The exercise and valuation of executive stock options. J Financ Econ 48:127–158
Cox J, Ross S, Rubinstein M (1979) Option pricing: a simplified approach. J Financ Econ 7:229–264
Cvitanic J, Wiener Z, Zapatero F (2008) Analytic pricing of employee stock options. Rev Financ Stud 21:683–724
Dai TS, Lyuu YD (2010) The bino-trinomial tree: a simple model for efficient and accurate option pricing. J Deriv 17(4):7–24
Figlewski S, Gao B (1999) The adaptive mesh model: a new approach to efficient option pricing. J Financ Econ 53:313–351
Financial Accounting Standards Board (2004) Statement of financial accounting standard no. 123R (Revised): share-based payment. ISSN 0885–9051. FAF, Connecticut.
Hall BJ, Murphy KJ (2002) Stock options for undiversified executives. J Account Econ 33:3–42
Hegemann S, Ismailescu I (2017) The effect of FASB statement no. 123R on stock repurchases: an empirical examination of management incentives. Rev Pac Basin Financ Mark Policies 20(02):1750012
Hemmer T, Matsunaga S, Shevlin T (1994) Estimating the “fair value” of employee stock options with expected early exercise. Account Horizons 8:23–42
Huddart S, Lang M (1996) Employee stock option exercises: an empirical analysis. J Account Econ 21:5–43
Hull J, White A (2004) How to value employee stock options. Financ Anal J 60:114–119
Kulatilaka N, Marcus AJ (1994) Valuing employee stock options. Financ Anal J 50(6):46–56
Lam SS, Chng BF (2006) Do executive stock option grants have value implications for firm performance? Rev Quant Financ Acc 26(3):249–274
Ritchken P (1995) On pricing barrier options. J Deriv 3:19–28
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chendra, E., Sidarto, K.A. An improved of Hull–White model for valuing Employee Stock Options (ESOs). Rev Quant Finan Acc 54, 651–669 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11156-019-00802-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11156-019-00802-x