Asymmetric sensitivity of executive bonus compensation to earnings and the effect of regulatory changes
- 139 Downloads
In this paper we examine the sensitivity of CEO bonus to earnings in the cases of good news and bad news, and compare these relationships in the periods before and after SOX. We find an asymmetric sensitivity of bonus to earnings. We also find that the asymmetric sensitivity of bonus to earnings exists before SOX but disappears post SOX. Regulatory changes brought forth by SOX, including personal certifications of financial reporting by CEOs and CFOs, the claw back provision, annual evaluation of internal controls and disclosure of any material weakness, and increased level of conservatism in firms and their auditors after SOX, offer an alternative mechanism to monitor executives, potentially reducing the ex post settling up problem. The findings show that regulatory changes affect compensation contracts and have implications for regulators, managers, politicians, investors, and academics in their assessment of the equitable relationship between executive efforts and executive bonus compensation.
KeywordsExecutive compensation The Sarbanes–Oxley Act Ex post settling up Asymmetric sensitivity
JEL ClassificationJ33 L2 M41
We’d like to thank Steve Balsam, Patrice Gelinas, David Kwon, Gerry Lobo, Bharat Sarath, Inho Suk, and participants at the 2018 Annual Conference on Pacific Basin Finance, Economics, Accounting, and Management, 2015 Canadian Academic Accounting Association Annual Meeting, and 2012 American Accounting Association Annual Conference for their helpful comments.
Data used in this study are available from public sources identified in the paper.
- Balsam S, Ryan D (1996) Response to tax law changes involving the deductibility of executive compensation: A model explaining behavior. J Am Tax Assoc 18:1–12Google Scholar
- Balsam S, Ryan D (2007) Limiting executive compensation: the case of CEOs hired after the imposition of 162(m). J Acc Audit Finance 22:599–621Google Scholar
- Gaver JJ, Gaver KM (1998) The relation between nonrecurring accounting transactions and CEO compensation. Acc Rev 73(2):235–253Google Scholar
- Johnson M, Porter S, Shackell M (2001) Stakeholder pressure and the structure of executive compensation. Working paper, University of MichiganGoogle Scholar
- Kwon SS, Yin J (2006) Executive compensation, investment opportunities, and earnings management: high-tech versus low-tech firms. J Acc Audit Financ 21(2):119–148Google Scholar
- Scott W (2006) Financial accounting theory, 4th edn. Pearson and Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle RiverGoogle Scholar