Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Earnings quality and the heterogeneous relation between earnings and stock returns

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We adopt a heterogeneous regime switching method to examine the informativeness of accounting earnings for stock returns. We identify two distinct time-series regimes in terms of the relation between earnings and returns. In the low volatility regime (typical of bull markets), earnings are moderately informative for stock returns. But in high volatility market conditions (typical of financial crisis), earnings are strongly related to returns. Our evidence suggests that earnings are more informative to investors when uncertainty and risk is high which is consistent with the idea that during market downturns investors rely more on fundamental information about the firm. Next, we identify groups of firms that follow similar regime dynamics. We find that the importance of accounting earnings for returns in each of the market regimes varies across firms: certain firms spend more time in a regime where their earnings are highly relevant to returns, and other firms spend more time in a regime where earnings are moderately relevant to returns. We also show that firms with poorer accrual quality have a greater probability of belonging to the high volatility regime.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. For a review of earnings-based models, see Penman (2012).

  2. In this paper we take the common view that value relevance is a direct measure of the usefulness of earnings to stock returns (Joos and Lang 1994; Collins et al. 1997; Francis and Schipper 1999; Lev and Zarowin 1999; Barth et al. 2001; Francis et al. 2004). Other ways of assessing the usefulness of earnings include: market reaction to earnings announcements (Ball and Brown 1968; Beaver 1968), correlation between earnings and cash flows (Lev et al. 2010), and reliability of earnings-based models (Dechow et al. 1999; Francis et al. 2000).

  3. For example, Kim et al. (2012) use portfolio tests and find that accounting earnings are not more useful for investors than cash flows or working capital.

  4. A review of the earnings quality metrics is beyond the scope of our study. See for example Dechow et al. (2010) for an extended review of earnings quality and Walker (2013) for accrual based measures.

  5. The earnings variable represents the “stock” element and the earnings change variable represents the “flow” element in the model (see for example Penman (2012) for a revision of earnings-based models). The correlation between the two variables is 0.42.

  6. Regarding the industry and quarter indicators included in the model (not tabulated) we find the following results. In the high volatility regime, industries 1 (agriculture), 4 (transportation and communication) and 7 (services) are significantly different from industry 3 (industrial and electronics), and quarter 2 is significantly different from quarter 1. In the low volatility regime, industries 1 and 6 (finance) are significantly different from industry 3, and quarters 2 and 3 are significantly different from quarter 1.

  7. Results on model selection are available from the authors upon request. We also experimented other solutions in terms of number of regimes and clusters. However, based on the BIC selection criterion, we conclude that a model with two regimes and two clusters is the best. The solution with two regimes is in line with the finance literature that suggests stock markets alternate between boom and downturn periods. This way the two regime solution has the advantage of allowing simple economic interpretation of the results.

  8. To avoid bias due to the use of earnings in the returns regime switching model, we do not estimate measures of earnings quality that rely on stock returns. This way we ensure there is no mechanical relation between the regime switching model and the earnings quality models.

  9. Another relevant firm fundamental that is not included in the model is cash flow volatility (standard deviation of cash flow from operation scaled by total assets over the eight quarter window). We do not include it in the tabulated results because Compustat does not report cash flow from operations for several sample firms and thus including the variable would reduce considerably the number of observations. When we re-estimate the model including cash flow volatility we obtain the same results for earnings quality and find that cash flow volatility is higher for cluster 2 firms but only in the persistence and smoothness models.

  10. Using the mean values yields similar results.

References

  • Aktas N, Bodt E, Cousin JG (2007) Event studies with a contaminated estimation period. J Corp Finance 13(1):129–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alam P, Liu M, Liu Z, Peng X (2015) Stock options, idiosyncratic volatility, and earnings quality. Rev Pac Basin Financ Mark Polit 18(2):1–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Amir E, Lev B (1996) Value-relevance of nonfinancial information: The wireless communications industry. J Acc Econ 22(1–3):3–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ang A, Bekaert G (2002) International asset allocation with regime shifts. Rev Financ Stud 15(4):1137–1187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balachandran S, Mohanram P (2011) Is the decline in the value relevance of accounting driven by increased conservatism? Rev Acc Stud 16(2):272–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ball R, Brown P (1968) An empirical evaluation of accounting income numbers. J Acc Res 6(2):159–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barth ME, Beaver WH, Landsman WR (2001) The relevance of the value relevance literature for financial accounting standard setting: another view. J Acc Econ 31(1–3):77–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barth ME, Konchitchki Y, Landsman WR (2013) Cost of capital and earnings transparency. J Acc Econ 55(2–3):206–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beaver WH (1968) The informational content of annual earnings announcements. J Acc Res 6:67–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beaver WH (1998) Financial reporting. An accounting revolution, 3rd edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  • Bekaert G, Harvey CR (1995) Time-varying world market integration. J Finance 50(2):403–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beneish M, Harvey C (1998) Measurement error and nonlinearity in the earnings-returns relation. Rev Quant Finance Acc 11:219–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown P (2013) International financial reporting standards: What are the benefits? Acc Bus Res 41(3):269–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown S, Lo K, Lys T (1999) Use of R2 in accounting research: measuring changes in value relevance over the last four decades. J Acc Econ 28(2):83–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgstahler D, Hail L, Leuz C (2006) The importance of reporting incentives: earnings management in private and public European firms. Acc Rev 81(5):983–1016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cahan S, Emanuel D, Sun J (2009) The effect of earnings quality on country-level institutions on the value relevance of earnings. Rev Quant Finance Acc 33:371–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen V, Tiras S (2015) ‘Other information’ as an explanatory factor for the opposite market reactions to earnings surprises. Rev Quant Finance Acc 45(4):757–784

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins D, Kothari S (1989) An analysis of intertemporal and cross-sectional determinants of earnings response coefficients. J Acc Econ 11(1–2):143–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins DW, Maydew EL, Weiss IS (1997) Changes in the value-relevance of earnings and book values over the past forty years. J Acc Econ 24(1):39–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins DW, Li OZ, Xie H (2009) What drives the increased informativeness of earnings announcements over time? Rev Acc Stud 14(1):1–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Core JE, Guay WR, Buskirk AV (2003) Market valuations in the new economy: an investigation of what has changed. J Acc Econ 34(1–3):43–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dechow P (1994) Accounting earnings and cash flows as measures of firm performance: the role of accounting accruals. J Acc Econ 18(1):3–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dechow P, Dichev I (2002) The quality of accruals and earnings: the role of accrual estimation errors. Acc Rev 77(4):35–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dechow PM, Hutton AP, Richard GS (1999) An empirical assessment of the residual income valuation model. J Acc Econ 26(1–3):1–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dechow PM, Ge W, Schrand C (2010) Understanding earnings quality: a review of the proxies, their determinants and their consequences. J Acc Econ 50(2–3):344–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dias JG, Ramos SB (2014) The aftermath of the subprime crisis: a clustering analysis of world banking sector. Rev Quant Finance Account 42(2):293–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dias JG, Vermunt JK, Ramos S (2008) Heterogeneous hidden Markov models. In: Brito P (ed) COMPSTAT2008. Proceedings in computational statistics. Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg, pp 373–380

  • Dontoh A, Radhakrishnan S, Ronen J (2004) The declining value-relevance of accounting information and non-information-based trading: an empirical evidence. Contemp Acc Res 21(4):795–812

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Easton PD, Harris TS (1991) Earnings as an explanatory variable for returns. J Acc Res 29(1):19–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Easton PD, Harris TS, Ohlson JA (1992) Aggregate accounting earnings can explain most of security returns: the case of long return intervals. J Acc Econ 15(2–3):119–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards S, Biscarri JG, Gracia FP (2003) Stock market cycles, financial liberalization and volatility. J Int Money Finance 22(7):925–955

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fama EF (1970) Efficient capital markets: a review of theory and empirical work. J Finance 25(2):383–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Financial Accounting Standards Board (2010) Statement of financial accounting concepts no. 8. conceptual framework for financial reporting . Chapter 1: the objective of general purpose financial reporting

  • Firth M, Li Y, Wang S (2008) Valuing IPOs using price-earnings multiples disclosed by IPO firms in an emerging capital market. Rev Pac Basin Finan Mark Policies 11(3):429–463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Francis B, Hasan I, Li L (2016) Abnormal real operations, real earnings management, and subsequent crashes in stock prices. Rev Quant Finance Acc 46(2):217–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Francis J, Schipper K (1999) Have financial statements lost their relevance? J Acc Res 37(2):319–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Francis J, Olsson P, Dennis O (2000) Comparing the accuracy and explainability of dividend, free cash flow, and abnormal earnings equity value estimates. J Acc Res 38(1):45–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Francis J, LaFond R, Olsson P, Schipper K (2004) Cost of equity and earnings attributes. Acc Rev 79(4):967–1010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frank K (2002) The effect of growth on the value relevance of accounting data. J Bus Res 55(1):69–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman R, Koch A, Li H (2011) Can historical returns-earnings relations predict price responses to earnings news? Rev Quant Finance Acc 37(1):35–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • French KR, Schwert GW, Stambaugh RF (1987) Expected stock returns and volatility. J Financ Econ 19(1):3–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Givoly D, Hayn H (2000) The changing time-series properties of earnings, cash flows and accruals: has financial reporting become more conservative? J Acc Econ 29(3):287–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton JD (1989) A new approach to the economic analysis of nonstationary time series and the business cycle. Econometrica 57(2):357–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayn C (1995) The information content of losses. J Acc Econ 20(2):125–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hwang S, Satchell S, Pereira P (2007) How persistent is stock return volatility? An answer with markov regime switching stochastic volatility models. J Bus Finance Acc 34(5–6):1002–1024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Accounting Standards Board (2010) The conceptual framework for financial reporting. Chapter 1: the objective of general purpose financial reporting

  • Jaggi B, Mitra S, Hossain H (2015) Earnings quality, internal control weaknesses and industry-specialist audits. Rev Quant Finance Acc 45(1):1–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joos P, Lang M (1994) The effects of accounting diversity: evidence from the european union. J Acc Res 32(1):141–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim J, Lipka R, Sami H (2012) Portfolio performance and accounting measures of earnings: an alternative look at usefulness. Rev Quant Finance Acc 38(1):87–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim J, Li J, Sun F (2013) Pension contributions and earnings quality. Rev Pac Basin Financ Mark Policies 16(1):1–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kothari SP, Shanken J (2003) Time-series variation in value-relevance regressions: discussion of Core, Guay, and Buskirk and new evidence. J Acc Econ 34(1–3):69–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kraft A, Lee BS, Lopatta K (2014) Management earnings forecasts, insider trading, and information asymmetry. J Corp Finance 26:96–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krolzig HM (2001) Business cycle measurement in the presence of structural change: international evidence. Int J Forecast 17(3):349–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuo CY (2017) Is the accuracy of stock value forecasting relevant to industry factors or firm-specific factors? An empirical study of the Ohlson model. Rev Quant Finance Acc. doi:10.1007/s11156-016-0587-8

  • Lamont O (1998) Earnings and earnings expectations. J Finance 53(5):1563–1587

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lang M, Maffett M (2011) Transparency and liquidity uncertainty in crisis periods. J Acc Econ 52(2–3):101–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lang M, Lins K, Maffett M (2012) Transparency, liquidity, and valuation: international evidence on when transparency matters most. J Acc Res 50(3):729–774

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leung WS, Taylor N, Evans KP (2014) Predictability of bank stock returns during the recent financial crisis. Working paper, Cardiff University

  • Leuz C, Wysocki P (2016) The economics of disclosure and financial reporting regulation: evidence and suggestions for future research. J Acc Res 54(2):525–622

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lev B (1987) On the usefulness of earnings and earnings research: lessons and directions from two decades of empirical research. J Acc Res 27:153–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lev B, Zarowin P (1999) The boundaries of financial reporting and how to extend them. J Acc Res 37(2):353–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lev B, Li S, Sougiannis T (2010) The usefulness of accounting estimates for predicting cash flows and earnings. Rev Acc Stud 15(4):779–807

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipe R (1990) The relation between stock returns and accounting earnings given alternative information. Acc Rev 65(1):49–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipe R, Kormendi R (1994) Mean reversion in annual earnings and its implications for security valuation. Rev Quant Finance Acc 4:27–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Livnat J, Zarowin P (1990) The incremental information content of cash flow components. J Acc Econ 13(1):25–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lundholm RJ, Myers L (2002) Bringing the future forward: the effect of disclosure on the returns-earnings relation. J Acc Res 40(3):809–839

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paeglis I, Veeren P (2013) Speed and consequences of venture capitalist post-IPO exit. J Corp Finance 12:104–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Penman SH (2012) Financial statement analysis and security valuation, fifth edn. McGraw-Hill/Irwin, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajgopal S, Venkatachalam M (2011) Financial reporting quality and idiosyncratic return volatility. J Acc Econ 51(1–2):1–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramos SB, Vermunt JK, Dias JG (2011) When markets fall down: are emerging markets all the same? Int J Finance Econ 16(4):324–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan S, Zarowin PA (2003) Why has the contemporaneous linear returns-earnings relation declined? Acc Rev 78(2):523–553

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz G (1978) Estimating the dimension of a model. Ann Stat 6(2):461–464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwert GW (1989) Why does stock market volatility change over time? J Finance 44(5):1115–1153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwert GW (2011) Stock volatility during the recent financial crisis. Eur Financ Manag 17(5):789–805

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strong N (1993) The relation between returns and earnings: evidence from the UK. Acc Bus Res 24:69–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan H, Mathews J (2010) Identification and analysis of industry cycles. J Bus Res 63:454–462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang H, Chang C (2015) Does corporate governance affect the relationship between earnings management and firm performance? An endogenous switching regression model. Rev Quant Finance Acc 45:33–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker M (2013) How far can we trust earnings numbers? What research tells us about earnings management. Acc Bus Res 43(4):445–481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watts R, Zimmerman J (1986) Positive accounting theory. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu J, Zhu X (2013) Predicting stock returns: a regime-switching combination approach and economic links. J Bank Finance 37(11):4120–4133

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Editor and two anonymous reviewers for their suggestions, which were helpful in improving the paper. Financial support from Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia is greatly acknowledged (PTDC/EGE-GES/103223/2008 and UID/GES/00315/2013).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Instituto Universitário de Lisboa (ISCTE-IUL), BRU-IUL, Avenida das Forças Armadas, 1649-026, Lisboa, Portugal

    Helena Isidro & José G. Dias

Authors
  1. Helena Isidro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. José G. Dias
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to José G. Dias.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Isidro, H., Dias, J.G. Earnings quality and the heterogeneous relation between earnings and stock returns. Rev Quant Finan Acc 49, 1143–1165 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11156-017-0619-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11156-017-0619-z

Keywords

JEL Classification

Search

Navigation