Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting

, Volume 36, Issue 1, pp 83–104 | Cite as

Pricing and hedging volatility smile under multifactor interest rate models

Original Research


The paper extends Amin and Morton (1994), Zeto (2002), and Kuo and Paxson (2006) by considering jump-diffusion model of Das (1999) with various volatility functions in pricing and hedging Euribor options across strikes and maturities. Adding the jump element into a diffusion model helps capturing volatility smiles in the interest rate options markets, but specifying the mean-reversion volatility function improves the most. A humped volatility function with the additional jump component yields better in-sample and out-of-sample valuation, but level-dependent volatility becomes more crucial for hedging. The specification of volatility function is more crucial than merely adding jumps into any model and the effect of jumps declines as the maturity of options is longer.


Jump-diffusion models HJM models Volatility smile Euribor options 

JEL Classification

G12 G13 


  1. Amin KI, Morton AJ (1994) Implied volatility functions in arbitrage-free term structure models. J Financ Econ 35:141–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andrews D (1991) Heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation consistent covariance matrix estimation. Econometrica 59:817–858CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bakshi G, Cao C, Chen Z (1997) Empirical performance of alternative option pricing models. J Finance 52(5):2003–2049CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bates D (1996) Dollar jump fears, 1984–1992: distributional abnormalities implicit in currency options. J Int Money Finance 15:65–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bates DS (2000) Post-’87 crash fears in the S&P 500 futures option market. J Econom 94:181–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Campbell J, Lo A, MacKinlay C (1997) The econometrics of financial markets. Princeton University Press, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  7. Cox JC, Ingersoll JE, Ross SA (1985) A theory of the term structure of interest rates. Econometrica 53:385–407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Das SR (1999) A direct discrete-time approach to Poisson-Gaussian bond option pricing in the Heath-Jarrow-Morton Model. J Econ Dyn Control 23:333–369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Das SR (2002) The surprise element: jumps in interest rates. J Econom 106:27–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Derman E, Kani I (1994) Riding on the smile. Risk 7:32–39Google Scholar
  11. Diebold FX, Mariano RS (1995) Comparing predictive accuracy. J Bus Econ Stat 13:253–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dumas B, Fleming J, Whaley RE (1998) Implied volatility functions: empirical tests. J Finance 53:2059–2105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Eraker B (2004) Do stock prices and volatility jump? Reconciling evidence from spot and option prices. J Finance 59:1367–1403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Flesaker B (1993) Testing the Heath-Jarrow-Morton/Ho-Lee Model of interest rate contingent claims pricing. J Financ Quant Anal 28:483–495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gupta A, Subrahmanyam MG (2005) Pricing and hedging interest rate options: evidence from cap-floor markets. J Bank Finance 29:701–733Google Scholar
  16. Harvey CR, Whaley RE (1992) Market volatility prediction and the efficiency of the S&P 100 index option market. J Financ Econ 31:43–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Heath D, Jarrow R, Morton A (1992a) Bond pricing and the term structure of interest rates: a new methodology for contingent claims valuation. Econometrica 60:77–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Heath D, Jarrow R, Morton A, Spindel M (1992b) Easier done than said. Risk 5:77–80Google Scholar
  19. Heston SL (1993) A closed-form solution for options with stochastic volatility with applications to bond and currency options. Rev Financ Stud 6:327–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hull J, White A (1987) The pricing of options on assets with stochastic volatilities. J Finance 42:281–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jarrow R, Li H, Zhao F (2007) Interest rate caps “Smile” Too! But can the libor market models capture the smile? J Finance 62:345–381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Johannes M (2004) The statistical and economic role of jumps in interest rates. J Finance 59:227–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kramin MV, Kramin TV, Young SD, Dharan VG (2005) A simple induction approach and an efficient trinomial lattice for multi-state variable interest rate derivatives models. Rev Quant Financ Acc 24:199–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kramin MV, Nandi S, Shulman AL (2008) A multi-factor Markovian HJM model for pricing American interest rate derivatives. Rev Quant Financ Acc 31:359–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kuo ID, Lin YN (2007) Pricing and Hedging Euribor options with multifactor interest rate models. Rev Futures Mark 355–383Google Scholar
  26. Kuo ID, Paxson DA (2006) Multifactor implied volatility functions for HJM Models. J Futures Mark 26:809–833CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kuo ID, Wang KL (2009) Implied deterministic volatility functions: an empirical test for Euribor options. J Futures Mark 29:319–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Longstaff FA, Santa-Clara PP, Schwartz ES (2001) The relative valuation of caps and swaptions: theory and empirical evidence. J Finance 56:2067–2109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Moraleda JM, Vorst TCF (1997) Pricing American interest rate claims with humped volatility models. J Bank Finance 21:1131–1157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Newey WK, West KD (1987) A simple semi-definite heteroscedasticity and autocorrelation consistent covariance matrix. Econometric 55:703–708CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Piazzesi M (2005) Bond yields and the federal reserve. J Polit Econ 113:311–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ritchken P, Chuang I (1999) Interest rate option pricing with volatility humps. Rev Deriv Res 3:237–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rubinstein M (1994) Implied binomial trees. J Finance 49:771–818CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Whaley RE (1986) Valuation of American futures options: theory and empirical tests. J Finance 4:127–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Zeto SYM (2002) Pricing and Hedging American fixed-income derivatives with implied volatility structures in the two-factor Heath-Jarrow-Morton Model. J Futures Mark 22:839–875CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of FinanceTunghai UniversityTaichungTaiwan

Personalised recommendations