Advertisement

Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting

, Volume 34, Issue 1, pp 81–93 | Cite as

Binary response and logistic regression in recent accounting research publications: a methodological note

  • Wenxia Ge
  • G. A. Whitmore
Original Research

Abstract

We review 31 articles in leading accounting journals that performed a logistic regression analysis for a binary dependent variable. Our review shows that many of these articles have ambiguities and errors in the presentation of the logistic regression model. We explain that incorrect presentations of the model, even in conjunction with a correct analysis, may lead to a serious misinterpretation of research findings. Two articles are critiqued to demonstrate the reporting problems. Our note is a call for improvement in model presentation and related statistical analysis in the accounting field.

Keywords

Binary response variable Discriminant analysis Logistic regression Accounting research 

JEL Classification

M40 M49 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We appreciate the helpful comments from Cheng F. Lee (the editor), an anonymous referee, and workshop participants at the 2007 AAA Southeast Regional Meeting held in Atlanta, US. This research is supported in part by a research grant from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (Whitmore).

References

  1. Baginski SP, Hassell JM, Kimbrough MD (2002) The effect of legal environment on voluntary disclosure: evidence from management earnings forecasts issued in US and Canadian markets. Account Rev 77(1):25–50. doi: 10.2308/accr.2002.77.1.25 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baginski SP, Hassell JM, Kimbrough MD (2004) Why do managers explain their earnings forecasts? J Account Res 42(1):1–29. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-679X.2004.00127.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beasley MS (1996) An empirical analysis of the relation between the board of director composition and financial statement fraud. Account Rev 71(4):443–465Google Scholar
  4. Beatty A, Weber J (2003) The effects of debt contracting on voluntary accounting method changes. Account Rev 78(1):119–142. doi: 10.2308/accr.2003.78.1.119 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bell TB, Tabor RH (1991) Empirical analysis of audit uncertainty qualifications. J Account Res 29(2):350–370. doi: 10.2307/2491053 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bonner SE, Palmrose ZV, Yong SM (1998) Fraud type and auditor litigation: an analysis of SEC accounting and auditing enforcement releases. Account Rev 73(4):503–532Google Scholar
  7. Botosan CA, Harris MS (2000) Motivations for a change in disclosure frequency and its consequences: an examination of voluntary quarterly segment disclosures. J Account Res 38(2):329–353. doi: 10.2307/2672936 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bushee BJ (1998) The influence of institutional investors on myopic R&D investment behavior. Account Rev 73(3):305–333Google Scholar
  9. Carcello JV, Palmrose ZV (1994) Auditor litigation and modified reporting on bankrupt clients. J Account Res 32:1–30. doi: 10.2307/2491436 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chaney PK, Jeter DC, Shaw PE (1997) Client-auditor realignment and restrictions on auditor solicitation. Account Rev 72(3):433–453Google Scholar
  11. Chen KCW, Wei KCJ (1993) Creditors’ decisions to waive violations of accounting-based debt covenants. Account Rev 68(2):218–232Google Scholar
  12. Choi BB, Collins DW, Johnson WB (1997) Valuation implications of reliability differences: the case of nonpension postretirement obligations. Account Rev 72(3):351–383Google Scholar
  13. Erickson M (1998) The effect of taxes on the structure of corporate acquisitions. J Account Res 36(2):279–298. doi: 10.2307/2491478 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Frankel RM, Johnson MF, Nelson KK (2002) The relation between auditors’ fees for nonaudit services and earnings management. Account Rev 77(supplement):71–105. doi: 10.2308/accr.2002.77.s-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ghicas DC (1990) Determinants of actuarial cost method changes for pension accounting and funding. Account Rev 65(2):384–405Google Scholar
  16. Hackenbrack K, Jensen KL, Payne JL (2000) The effect of a bidding restriction on the audit services market. J Account Res 38(2):355–374. doi: 10.2307/2672937 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Harris MS (1998) The association between competition and managers’ business segment reporting decisions. J Account Res 36(1):111–128. doi: 10.2307/2491323 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Heninger WG (2001) The association between auditor litigation and abnormal accruals. Account Rev 76(1):111–126. doi: 10.2308/accr.2001.76.1.111 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hunton JE, McEwen RA (1997) An assessment of the relation between analysts’ earnings forecast accuracy, motivational incentives and cognitive information search strategy. Account Rev 72(4):497–515Google Scholar
  20. Jeter DC, Shaw PE (1995) Solicitation and auditor reporting decisions. Account Rev 70(2):293–315Google Scholar
  21. Johnson RA, Wichern DW (1992) Applied multivariate data analysis. Prentice Hall, Englewood CliffsGoogle Scholar
  22. Krishnan J, Krishnan J (1997) Litigation risk and auditor resignations. Account Rev 72(4):539–560Google Scholar
  23. Lee TA, Ingram RW, Howard TP (1999) The difference between earnings and operating cash flow as an indicator of financial reporting fraud. Contemp Account Res 16(4):749–786CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Louwers TJ (1998) The relation between going-concern opinions and the auditor’s loss function. J Account Res 36(1):143–156. doi: 10.2307/2491325 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Maddala GS (1991) A perspective on the use of limited-dependent and qualitative variables models in accounting research. Account Rev 66(4):788–807Google Scholar
  26. McCullagh P, Nelder JA (1989) Generalized linear models, 2nd edn. Chapman & Hall, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  27. Menon K, Williams DD (1991) Auditor credibility and initial public offerings. Account Rev 66(2):313–332Google Scholar
  28. Mikhail MB, Walther BR, Willis RH (1999) Does forecast accuracy matter to security analysts. Account Rev 74(2):185–200. doi: 10.2308/accr.1999.74.2.185 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mutchler JF, Hopwood W, McKeown JM (1997) The influence of contrary information and mitigating factors on audit opinion decisions on bankrupt companies. J Account Res 35(2):295–310. doi: 10.2307/2491367 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Newberry KJ (1998) Foreign tax credit limitations and capital structure decisions. J Account Res 36(1):157–166. doi: 10.2307/2491326 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Penman SH (1992) Financial statement information and the pricing of earnings changes. Account Rev 67(3):563–577Google Scholar
  32. Roberts RW, Glezen GW, Jones TW (1990) Determinants of auditor change in the public sector. J Account Res 28(1):220–228. doi: 10.2307/2491226 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Schwartz KB, Soo BS (1996) Evidence of regulatory noncompliance with SEC disclosure rules on auditor changes. Account Rev 71(4):555–572Google Scholar
  34. Stone M, Rasp J (1991) Tradeoffs in the choice between logit and OLS for accounting choice studies. Account Rev 66(1):170–187Google Scholar
  35. Summers SL, Sweeney JT (1998) Fraudulently misstated financial statements and insider trading: an empirical analysis. Account Rev 73(1):131–146Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Asper School of BusinessUniversity of ManitobaWinnipegCanada
  2. 2.Desautels Faculty of ManagementMcGill UniversityMontrealCanada

Personalised recommendations