Disclosure and the cost of equity in international cross-listing

  • Tim V. Eaton
  • John R. Nofsinger
  • Daniel G. Weaver
Original Paper

Abstract

In this paper, we examine the relationship between disclosure level and the cost of equity capital for a sample of international firms cross-listing on the New York Stock Exchange. Increased disclosure has the potential to reduce information asymmetry, reduce the cost of financing and increase analyst following. Using an international asset pricing model, we find that listing firms experience a decrease in both disclosure risk and systematic risk while matching firms do not. Further, we find that the magnitude of the decrease is related to three types of disclosure: accounting standards; analyst following; and exchange/regulatory investor protection. Our results suggest that increased disclosure through accounting standards is beneficial to investors and that disclosure can be accomplished through information intermediaries, e.g., analyst following. For firms with the lowest levels of disclosure prior to cross-listing, all three types of disclosure appear to be valuable.

Keywords

International accounting standards Disclosure Cost of equity Analyst following 

JEL Classifications

G38 K22 M41 

References

  1. Ali, A., & Hwang, L. S. (2000). Country-specific factors related to financial reporting and the value relevance of accounting data. Journal of Accounting Research, 38, 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amihud, Y., & Mendelson, H. (1986). Asset prices and the bid ask spread. Journal of Financial Economics, 17, 223–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Amir, E., Harris, T. S., & Venuti, E. K. (1993). A comparison of the value-relevance of US versus non-US GAAP accounting measures using form 20-F reconciliations. Journal of Accounting Research, 31, 230–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ashbaugh, H., & Olsson, P. (2002). An exploratory study of the valuation properties of cross-listing firms’ IAS and US GAAP earnings and book values. Accounting Review, 77(1), 107–126.Google Scholar
  5. Bailey, W., Karolyi, G. A., & Salva, C. (2006). The economic consequences of increased disclosure: Evidence from international cross-listings. Journal of Financial Economics, 81(1), 175–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baker, K., Nofsinger, J., & Weaver, D. (2002). International cross listing and visibility. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 37(3), 495–521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bartov, E., Goldberg, S. R., & Myungsun, K. (2005). Comparative value relevance among German, US and internaional accounting standards: A global perspective. Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance, 20(2), 95–119.Google Scholar
  8. Botosan, C. A. (1997). Disclosure level and the cost of equity capital. Accounting Review, 72, 323–349.Google Scholar
  9. Botosan, C. A., & Plumlee, M. A. (2002). A re-examination of disclosure level and expected cost of equity capital. Journal of Accounting Research, 40(1), 21–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Campbell, J., Hermanson, H., & McAllister, J. (2002). Obstacles to international accounting standards convergence. Journal of Accountancy (May), 21–24.Google Scholar
  11. Carrieri, F., Errunza, V., & Majerbi, B. (2006). Does emerging market exchange risk affect global equity prices? Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 41, 511–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cheng, C., Collins, D., & Huang, H. (2006). Shareholder rights, financial disclosure, and the cost of equity capital. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 27, 175–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Coffee, J. (2002). Racing toward the top? The impact of cross-listing and stock market competition on international corporate governance. Northwestern University Law Review, 93, 641–708.Google Scholar
  14. Doidge, C., Karolyi, G. A., & Stulz, R. M. (2004). Why are foreign firms listed in the US worth more? Journal of Financial Economics, 71, 205–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Easley, D., & O’Hara, M. (2004). Information and the cost of capital. Journal of Finance, 59, 1553–1583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Errunza, V., Miller, D.P. (2000). Market segmentation and the cost of capital in international equity markets. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 35, 577–600CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fama, E., & French, K. (1993). Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds. Journal of Financial Economics, 33, 3–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fama, E., French, K. (1998). Value versus growth: The international evidence. Journal of Finance, 53, 1975–1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ferson, W., Sarkissian, S., & Simin, T. (1999). The alpha factor asset pricing model: A parable. Journal of Financial Markets, 2, 49–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Foerster, S. R., & Karolyi, G. A. (1999). The effects of market segmentation and investor recognition on asset prices: Evidence from foreign stocks listing in the US. Journal of Finance, 54, 981–1013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Foerster, S. R., Karolyi, G. A. (2000). The long-run performance of global equity offerings. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 35, 499–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Griffin, J. (2002). Are the Fama and French factors global or country specific. Review of Financial Studies, 15, 783–803.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Harris, M. S., & Muller, K. A. III (1999). The market valuation of IAS versus US-GAAP accounting measures using Form 20-F reconciliations. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 26, 285–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Healy, P. M., & Palepu, K. G. (2001). Information asymmetry, corporate disclosure, and the capital markets: A review of the empirical disclosure literature. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 31, 405–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Henry, P. B. (2000). Stock market liberalization, economic reform, and emerging market equity prices. Journal of Finance, 55, 529–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Huddart, S., Hughes, J. S., & Brunnermeier, M. (1999). Disclosure requirements and stock exchange listing choice in an international context. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 26, 237–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hung, M. (2000). Accounting standards and value relevance of financial statements: an international analysis. Journal of Accounting & Economics, 30(3), 401–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Irani, A. (2004). The effect of regulation fair disclosure on the relevance of conference calls to financial analysts. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 22, 15–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Jain, P. (2003) Institutional design and liquidity on stock exchanges around the world, Working Paper, Indiana University.Google Scholar
  30. Jorion, P. (1991). The pricing of exchange rate risk in the stock market. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 26(3), 363–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lakonishok, J., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. (1994). Contrarian Investment, Extrapolation and Risk. Journal of Finance, 49(5)1541–1578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (1998). Law and finance. Journal of Political Economy, 106, 1113–1155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A., (1999). The quality of government. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 15, 222–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lang, M. H., Lins, K. V., & Miller, D. P. (2003a). ADRs, analysts, and accuracy: Does cross listing in the US improve a firm’s information environment and increase market value? Journal of Accounting Research, 41, 317–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lang, M. H., Lins, K. V., & Miller, D. P. (2004). Concentrated control, analyst following and valuation: Do analysts matter most when investors are protected least? Journal of Accounting Research, 42, 589–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lang, M. H., & Lundholm, R. (1993). Cross-sectional determinants of analyst ratings of corporate disclosures. Journal of Accounting Research, 31, 246–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lang, M. H., Smith-Raedy, J., & Yetman, M. H. (2003b). How representative are firms that are cross listed in the United States? An analysis of accounting quality. Journal of Accounting Research, 41, 363–386.Google Scholar
  38. Leuz, C. (2003). IAS versus US GAAP: Information asymmetry-based evidence from Germany’s new market. Journal of Accounting Research, 41(3), 445–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Merton, R. C. (1987). Presidential address: A simple model of capital market equilibrium with incomplete information. Journal of Finance, 42, 483–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. NYSE Research, www.nyse.comGoogle Scholar
  41. Patro, D., Wald, J., & Wu, Y. (2002). Explaining exchange rate risk in world stock markets: A panel approach. Journal of Banking and Finance, 26, 1951–1972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Quinn, L. (2004). What’s the state of international accounting standards? Strategic Finance (April), 35–39Google Scholar
  43. Reason, T. (2002). On the same page. CFO, 18 (5), 89–92.Google Scholar
  44. Rees, L., & Elgers, P. (1997). The market’s valuation of nonreported accounting measures: Retrospective reconciliations of non-US and US GAAP. Journal of Accounting Research, 35, 115–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Reese, W. Jr., & Weisbach, M. (2002). Protection of minority shareholder interests, cross listings in the United States, and subsequent equity offerings. Journal of Financial Economics, 66, 65–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Stulz, R. M. (1999). Globalization, corporate finance, and the cost of capital. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 12(3), 8–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Valero-Tonone, M. (2002). The effects of cross-listing on rival firms, Arizona State University, Working paper.Google Scholar
  48. White, H. (1980). A heteroscedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and direct test for heteroscedasticity. Econometrica, 48, 817–838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tim V. Eaton
    • 1
  • John R. Nofsinger
    • 2
  • Daniel G. Weaver
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Accountancy, Richard T. Farmer School of BusinessMiami UniversityOxfordUSA
  2. 2.Depertment of Finance, College of BusinessWashington State UniversityPullmanUSA
  3. 3.Weaver Department of FinanceRutgers Business School, Rutgers UniversityPiscataway, NJUSA

Personalised recommendations