Skip to main content
Log in

Order preferencing, adverse-selection costs, and the probability of information-based trading

  • Published:
Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although prior studies offer various conjectures on the causes and consequences of order preferencing, there is only limited empirical evidence. In this study, we show that the extent of order preferencing is significantly and negatively related to both the adverse-selection component of the spread and the probability of information-based trading. This result is consistent with the prediction of the clientele-pricing hypothesis that dealers (brokers) selectively purchase (internalize) orders based on information content. Our results suggest that order preferencing may not be as harmful as some researchers have suggested and offer some rationale for its prevalence in securities markets with heterogeneously informed traders.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barclay M, Hendershott T, McCormick DT (2003) Information and trading on Electronic Communications Networks. Journal of Finance 58:2637–2665

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Battalio R, Greene J, Jennings R (1997) Do competing specialists and preferencing dealers affect market quality? Review of Financial Studies 10:969–993

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Battalio R, Holden C (2001) A simple model of payment for order flow, internalization, and total trading costs. Journal of Financial Markets 4:33–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Battalio R, Jennings R, Selway J (2001a) The potential for clientele pricing when making markets in financial securities. Journal of Financial Markets 4:85–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Battalio R, Jennings R, Selway J (2001b) The relationship among market-making revenue, payment for order flow, and trading costs for market orders. Journal of Financial Services Research 19:39–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benveniste L, Marcus A, Wilhelm W (1992) What’s special about the specialist? Journal of Financial Economics 32:61–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bessembinder H (2003) Issues in assessing trade execution costs. Journal of Financial Markets 6:233–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloomfield R, O’Hara M (1998) Does order preferencing matter? Journal of Financial Economics 50:3–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chung KH, Chuwonganant C, McCormick DT (2004) Order preferencing and market quality on NASDAQ before and after decimalization. Journal of Financial Economics 71: 581–612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Easley D, Hvidkjaer S, O’Hara M (2002) Is information risk a determinant of asset returns? Journal of Finance 57:2185–2221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Easley D, Kiefer N, O’Hara M (1996) Cream-skimming or profit sharing? The curious role of purchased order flow. Journal of Finance 51:811–834

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Easley D, Kiefer N, O’Hara M (1997a) One day in the life of a very common stock. Review of Financial Studies 10:805–835

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Easley D, Kiefer N, O’Hara M (1997b) The information content of the trading process. Journal of Empirical Finance 4:159–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glosten L, Harris L (1988) Estimating the components of the bid-ask spread. Journal of Financial Economics 21:123–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heidle H, Huang R (2002) Information-based trading in dealer and auction markets: An analysis of exchange listings. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 37:391–424

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansch O, Naik N, Viswanathan S (1999) Preferencing, internalization, best execution, and dealer profits. Journal of Finance 54:1799–1828

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang R (2002) The quality of ECN and NASDAQ market maker quotes. Journal of Finance 57:1285–1319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kandel E, Marx L (1997) NASDAQ market structure and spread patterns. Journal of Financial Economics 45:61–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kandel E, Marx L (1999) Payments for order flow on NASDAQ. Journal of Finance 54:35–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kluger B, Wyatt S (2002) Preferencing, internalization of order flow, and tacit collusion: Evidence from experiments. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 37:449–469

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee C, Ready M (1991) Inferring trade direction from intraday data. Journal of Finance 46:733–746

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin J, Sanger G, Booth G (1995) Trade size and components of the bid-ask spreads. Review of Financial Studies 8:1153–1183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parlour C, Rajan U (2003) Payment for order flow. Journal of Financial Economics 68:379–411

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson M, Sirri E (2003) Order preferencing and market quality on US equity exchanges. Review of Financial Studies 16:385–415

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kee H. Chung.

Additional information

JEL Classification G18 · G19

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chung, K.H., Chuwonganant, C. & McCormick, D.T. Order preferencing, adverse-selection costs, and the probability of information-based trading. Rev Quant Finan Acc 27, 343–364 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11156-006-0042-3

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11156-006-0042-3

Keywords

Navigation