Skip to main content
Log in

Panel Cointegration Analysis of Audit Pricing Model

  • Published:
Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper addresses two issues that arise from testing and estimating cointegration in accounting research. The first issue is the failure to use more powerful cointegration tests by earlier researchers. This has led to the problem of low test power in the cointegration procedures employed in the earlier accounting literature. Another issue that has not received much attention in earlier studies of audit pricing is the endogeneity bias that arises from the endogenous nature of the regressors. Commonly used regressors such as auditee size and auditee complexity are endogenous and are often related to audit fees through a system of simultaneous equations. Endogeneity bias suggests that the conventional OLS estimators are biased.

Using more powerful panel sample estimation procedures, we find that elasticities of total assets are in general under-estimated in the earlier studies when the conventional OLS method was used. We also find that the earlier studies tend to under-state the effects of the foreign subsidiary ratio and over-state the effect of the ratio of account receivables to total assets on audit fees.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Choi, I., “Unit Root Tests for Panel Data.” Journal of International Money and Finance 20, 249–272 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chou, W. L. and C. C. Chao, “Are Currency Devaluations Effective? A Panel Unit Root Test.” Economics Letters 72, 19–25 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chung, D. Y. and W. D. Lindsay, “The Pricing of Audit Services: The Canadian Perspective.” Contemporary Accounting Research 5 (Fall), 19–46 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  • Craswell, A. T. and J. R. Francis, “Pricing Initial Audit Engagements: A Test of Competing Theories.” The Accounting Review 74 (April), 201–216 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  • Craswell, A. T., J. R. Francis and S. L. Taylor “Auditor Brand Name Reputations and Industry Specializations.” Journal of Accounting and Economics 20, 297–322 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dickey, D. A. and W.A. Fuller, “Distributions of the Estimators for Autoregressive Time Series with A Unit Root.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 74, 427–431 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  • _________ “Likelihood Ratio Statistics for Autoregressive Time Series with A Unit Root.” Econometrica49, 1057–1072 (1981).

  • Elliott, G., T. J. Rothenberg, and J. H. Stock, “Efficient Tests for an Autoregressive Unit Root,” Econometrica 64, 813–836 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  • Engle, R. and C. W. J. Granger, “Cointegration and Error-Correction: Representation, Estimation, and Testing.” Econometrica 55, 251–276 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  • Francis, J. R., “The Effect of Audit Firm Size on Audit Prices, A Study of The Australian Market.” Journal of Accounting and Economics 6 (Aug.), 133–151 (1984).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Francis, J. R. and D. T. Simon, “A Test of Audit Pricing in the Small-client Segment of the US Audit Market.” Accounting Review 62, 145–157 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  • Granger, Clive W. J., “Some properties of Time Series Data and Their Use in Econometric Model Specification.” Journal of Econometrics 49, 121–130 (1981).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granger, C. W. J. and P. Newbold, “Spurious Regressions in Econometrics.” Journal of Econometrics 35, 143–159 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, A. and P. Collier, “Audit Fees and Auditor Change; an Investigation of the Persistence of Fee Reduction by Type of Change.” Journal of Business Finance & Accounting 23, 3–28 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedges, L. V. and I. Olkin, Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis. Orlando: Academic Press, Inc (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  • Im, K. S.; M. H. Pesaran and Y. Shin, “Testing for Unit Roots in Heterogeneous Panels.” Journal of Econometrics 115, 53–74 (2003).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Johansen, S., “Statistical Analysis of Cointegration Vectors.” Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 12, 231–154 (1988).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johansen, S., “Estimation and Hypothesis Testing of Cointegration Vectors in Gaussian Vector Autoregressive Models.” Econometrica 59, 1551–1580 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kao, C., “Spurious Regression and Residual-Based Tests for Cointegration in Panel Data.” Journal of Econometrics 90, 1–44 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kao, C. and M. Chiang, “On the Estimation and Inference of a Cointegrated Regression in Panel Data.” In Badi H. Baltagi (ed.), Nonstationary Panels, Panel Cointegration, and Dynamic Panels. Advances in Econometrics vol. 15 Amsterdam: Elsevier Science, JAI, pp. 179–222 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kao, C., M. Chiang and B. Chen, “International R&D Spillovers: An Application of Estimation and Inference in Panel Cointegration.” Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics Special Issue, 691–709 (1999).

  • Levin, A., C. F. Lin and C. S. J. Chu, “Unit Root Tests in Panel Data: Asymptotic and Finite-Sample Properties.” Journal of Econometrics 108, 1–24 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, D. S., “Audit Market Share, Product differentiation and Audit Fee.” Accounting and Business Research 26, 315–324 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  • McCoskey, S. and C. Kao, “A Residual-based Test for the Null of Cointegration in Panel Data.” Econometric Reviews 17, 57–84 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  • Moon, H. R. and P. C. B. Phillips, “Maximum Likelihood Estimation in Panels with Incidental Trends.” Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 61, 711–747 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, C. R., and C. I. Plosser, “Trends and Random Walks in Macro-Economic Time Series.” Journal of Monetary Economics 10, 139–162 (1982).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ohlson, J., “Earnings, Book Values, and Dividends in Security Valuation.” Contemporary Accounting Research 11, 661–687 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmrose, Z. V., “Audit Fees and Auditor Size.” Journal of Accounting Research 24 (Spring), 97–110 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pantula, S. G., G. Gonzalez-Farias, and W.A. Fuller, “A Comparison of Unit-Root Test Criteria.” Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 12, 449–459 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedroni, P., “Panel Cointegration: Asymptotic and Finite Sample Properties of Pooled Time Series Tests with An Application to the PPP Hypothesis.” Econometric Theory 20, 597–625 (2004).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Pedroni, P., “Critical Values for Cointegration Tests in Heterogeneous Panels with Multiple Regressors.” Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 61, 653–670 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, P. C. B. and P. Perron, “Testing for a Unit Root in Time Series Regression.” Biometrica 75, 335–346 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  • Qi, D., Y. W. Wu and B. Xiang, “Stationarity and Cointegration Tests of the Ohlson Model.” Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance 15, 141–160 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  • Quah, D., “Exploiting Cross-Section Variations for Unit Root Inference in Dynamic Data.” Economics Letters 44, 9–19 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, D. T., “The Audit Services Market: Additional Empirical Evidence.” Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory 5 (Fall), 71–78 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, D. T. and J. R. Francis, “The Effects of Auditor Change on Audit Fees: Tests of Price Cutting and Price Recovery.” The Accounting Review 63, 255–269 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  • Simunic, D. A., “The Pricing of Audit Services: Theory and Evidence.” Journal of Accounting Research 18, 161–190 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  • Turpen, R. A., “Differential Pricing on Auditors’ Initial Engagements: Further Evidence.” Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 9 (Spring), 60–76 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittington, G. and M. Tippett, “The Components of Accounting Ratios as Co-integrated Variables.” Journal of Business, Finance and Accounting 26, 1245–1273 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wooldridge, J. M., Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. Cambridge: The MIT Press (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, Chunchi, C. Kao and C. F. Lee, “Time-Series Properties of Financial Series and Implications for Modeling.” Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance 11, 277–303 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dominica Suk-yee Lee.

Additional information

JEL Classification: C33, M41

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chou, W.L., Lee, D.Sy. Panel Cointegration Analysis of Audit Pricing Model. Rev Quant Finan Acc 24, 423–439 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11156-005-7021-y

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11156-005-7021-y

Key words

Navigation