Skip to main content
Log in

Surgery for acromegaly: Evolution of the techniques and outcomes

  • Published:
Reviews in Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents an overview of the evolution of pituitary surgery for acromegaly. It begins with the first case, attempted in 1893, through the initial transsphenoidal successes in 1907–1910, to the development of effective craniotomy approaches, and ultimately to the resurrection of the transsphenoidal approach in the 1970s and thereafter. Today, the minimally endoscopic transnasal endoscopic approach is fast becoming the norm. Indications for surgery include active acromegaly, visual loss and other forms of mass effect, pituitary tumor apoplexy, and failure of other therapies (medical, radiation). Contraindications include advanced age, debility or other medical conditions increasing the risk of general anaesthesia or surgery. Surgery for acromegaly has the advantage of immediate lowering of the growth hormone excess, with endocrine remission rates of 70% for microadenomas and 50% for macroadenomas. When surgery fails to obtain remission, a program of therapy is designed for the patient to include adjunctive medical therapy (dopamine agonists, somatostatin analogs, and growth hormone receptor antagonists), radiation therapy or radiosurgery (Gamma knife, Cyberknife, etc.).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Attanasio R, Epaminonda P, Motti E, Giugni E, Ventrella L, Cozzi R, et al. Gamma-knife radiosurgery in acromegaly: a 4-year follow-up study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2003;88:3105–12.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Beauregard C, Truong U, Hardy J, Serri O. Long-term outcome and mortality after transsphenoidal adenomectomy for acromegaly. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2003;58:86–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Biermasz NR, van Dulken H, Roelfsema F. Ten-year follow-up results of transsphenoidal microsurgery in acromegaly. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2000;85:4596–602.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Caton R, Paul FT. Notes of a case of acromegaly treated by operation. Br Med J. 1893;2:1421–3.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cohen-Gadol AA, Laws ER, Spencer DD, De Salles AA. The evolution of Harvey Cushing's surgical approach to pituitary tumors from transsphenoidal to transfrontal. J Neurosurg. 2005;103:372–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cushing H. Partial hypophysectomy for acromegaly: with remarks on the function of the hypophysis. Ann Surg. 1909;50:1002–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. De P, Rees DA, Davies N, John R, Neal J, Mills RG, et al. Transsphenoidal surgery for acromegaly in Wales: results based on stringent criteria of remission. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2003;88:3567–72.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Freda PU, Wardlaw SL, Post KD. Long-term endocrinological follow-up evaluation in 115 patients who underwent transsphenoidal surgery for acromegaly. J Neurosurg. 1998;89:353–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Guiot G, Derome P, Wislawski J. Neurosurgical problems and criteria of therapeutic efficiency in acromegaly. Neurochirurgie. 1971;17:5–10.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hardy J. Microadenectomy or microhypophysectomy. J Neurosurg. 1978;48:668.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hardy J. The transsphenoidal surgical approach to the pituitary. Hosp Pract. 1979;14:81–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hardy J, Vezina JL. Transsphenoidal neurosurgery of intracranial neoplasm. Adv Neurol. 1976;15:261–73.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Hirsch O. Endonasal method of operation on pituitary tumors; report of two cases. Arch Neurol Psychiatry. 1950;63:158–62.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Hirsch O. Pituitary tumors; a borderland between cranial and trans-sphenoidal surgery. N Engl J Med. 1956;254:937–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Horsley V. On the technique of operations on the central nervous system. Br Med J. 1906;2:411–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kreutzer J, Vance ML, Lopes MB, Laws ER Jr. Surgical management of GH-secreting pituitary adenomas: an outcome study using modern remission criteria. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2001;86:4072–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Roberts BK, Ouyang DL, Lad SP, Chang SD, Harsh GRT, Adler JR Jr., et al. Efficacy and safety of CyberKnife radiosurgery for acromegaly. Pituitary. 2007;10:19–25.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Schloffer H. Erfolgreiche Operation eines Hypophysentumors auf nasalem wege. Wein Klin Wochenschr. 1907;20:621–4.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Schloffer H. Zur Frage der Operationen an der Hypophyse. Beitr Klin Chir. 1906;50:767–817.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Swearingen B, Barker FG 2nd, Katznelson L, Biller BM, Grinspoon S, Klibanski A, et al. Long-term mortality after transsphenoidal surgery and adjunctive therapy for acromegaly. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1998;83:3419–26.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Edward R. Laws.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Laws, E.R. Surgery for acromegaly: Evolution of the techniques and outcomes. Rev Endocr Metab Disord 9, 67–70 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11154-007-9064-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11154-007-9064-y

Keywords

Navigation