Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

‘Everybody would agree’ – a novel Wittgensteinian approach to philosophy of religion

  • Article
  • Published:
International Journal for Philosophy of Religion Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this article, a novel Wittgensteinian approach to philosophy of religion is presented which uses autobiographical exposition as a way of clarifying religious concepts. After analyzing what Wittgenstein is trying to accomplish in his philosophical approach, Wittgenstein’s type of grammatical inquiry into concept formation is applied to religion in this very straightforward manner. How a child learns to use religious concepts and how people check whether the child is using these concepts correctly, reminds us of the actual role these concepts play in our discourses. In the third and fourth sections, the Wittgensteinian investigation of concept formation into religion conducted in this article is used to establish that the two common criticisms, namely that a Wittgensteinian approach fails to acknowledge that for believers God is real and that religious conflicts exist, are misplaced. It is shown that a Wittgensteinian approach in philosophy of religion merits renewed attention.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anscombe, G. E. M. (1954). Misinformation: What Wittgenstein Really Said. The Tablet, 17 April

  • Burley, M. (2019). Religious Diversity and Conceptual Schemes: Critically Appraising Internalist Pluralism. Sophia, 58(2), 283–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Citron, G. (2012). Simple Objects of Comparison for Complex Grammars: An Alternative Strand in Wittgenstein’s Later Remarks on Religion. Philosophical Investigations, 35(1), 18–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferreira, M. J. (2001). Normativity and Reference in a Wittgensteinian Philosophy of Religion. Faith and Philosophy, 18(4), 443–464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glock, H. J. (1996). A Wittgenstein Dictionary. Oxford: Blackwell

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gomulka, J. (2015). Wittgensteinian Philosophy of Religion: Looking for A Common Ground. Filozofiareligii.pl, 1, pp. 171–198

  • Hacker, P. M. S. (2012). Wittgenstein on Grammar, Theses and Dogmatism. Philosophical Investigations, 35(1), 1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kroesbergen, H. (2019). The Language of Faith in Southern Africa; Spirit World, Power, Community, Holism. Cape Town: AOSIS

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kroesbergen, H. (2021). Faith Envy; Kierkegaard, Wittgenstein and Weil on Desirable Faith. Washington, DC: Lexington Books/Fortress Academic

    Google Scholar 

  • Law, S. (2016). Wittgensteinian Accounts of Religious Belief: Non-Cognitivist, Juicer, and Atheist-minus. European Journal of Philosophy, 25(4), 1186–1207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGinn, M. (2001). Grammar in the Philosophical Investigations. Eds. Oskari Kuusela and Marie McGinn, The Oxford Handbook of Wittgenstein. Oxford: Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Mounce, H. O. (1997). The Two Pragmatisms; From Peirce to Rorty. London: Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  • Moyal-Sharrock, D. (2013). Beyond Hacker’s Wittgenstein: Discussion of HACKER, Peter (2012) ‘Wittgenstein on Grammar, Theses and Dogmatism’ Philosophical Investigations 35:1, January 2012, 1–17. Philosophical Investigations, 36(4), pp. 355–380

  • Phillips, D. Z. (2000). Recovering religious concepts.; Closing epistemic divides. London: Palgrave Macmillan

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rhees, R. (1997). In D. Z. Phillips (Ed.), Rush Rhees on Religion and Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruhr, M. (Ed.). (1995). Philosophy and the grammar of religious belief. London: Palgrave Macmillan. T.Tessin

    Google Scholar 

  • Satris, S. (2014). Wittgenstein’s Lectures on Religious Belief. Philosophical Investigations, 37(1), 18–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weston, M. (2009). Howard Mounce: Wittgensteinian Transcendent Realism? Sense and Reality: Essays Out of Swansea, 10, pp. 103–124

  • Wittgenstein, L. (1966). In C. Barrett (Ed.), Lectures and conversations on aesthetics, psychology and religious belief. Oxford: Blackwell

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L. (1969). On Certainty. Oxford: Basil Blackwell

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L. (1998). In von G. H. Wright (Ed.), Culture and Value; Revised Edition. Oxford: Blackwell

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L. (2009). [1953]). In G. E. M. Anscombe, P. M. S. Hacker, & J. Schulte (Eds.), Philosophical Investigations (4th ed.). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell

    Google Scholar 

  • Zizek, S. (2014). Event: Philosophy in Transit. London: Penguin

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa

    Hermen Kroesbergen

Authors
  1. Hermen Kroesbergen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hermen Kroesbergen.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kroesbergen, H. ‘Everybody would agree’ – a novel Wittgensteinian approach to philosophy of religion. Int J Philos Relig 92, 49–63 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-022-09827-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-022-09827-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation