Skip to main content
Log in

On the value of faith and faithfulness

  • Article
  • Published:
International Journal for Philosophy of Religion Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There was a time when Greco-Roman culture recognized faith as an indispensable social good. More recently, however, the value of faith has been called into question, particularly in connection with religious commitment. What, if anything, is valuable about faith—in the context of ordinary human relations or as a distinctive stance people might take in relation to God? I approach this question by examining the role that faith talk played both in ancient Jewish and Christian communities and in the larger Greco-Roman culture in which Christian faith talk evolved. I locate the value of faith and faithfulness in the context of relationships involving trust and loyalty and argue that what is most distinctively valuable about faith is the function it plays in sustaining relationships through various kinds of challenges, including through evidentially unfavorable circumstances and significant periods of doubt. In light of this discussion, I set out a view of relational faith and, taking Mother Teresa as an exemplar, argue for two further conclusions. First, faith can play the valuable role that it plays in sustaining relationships even without belief of the salient propositions. Second, in at least some circumstances, in order for faith to play this valuable role in a way that does not require epistemic opinions that fail to fit one’s evidence, it is important that faith does not require such belief.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Comparisons of Israel’s fidelity or infidelity to a faithful or unfaithful spouse is particularly prominent in the prophetic literature: Hosea 1:2–3:5; 4:10–15; Micah 1:7; Zephaniah 3:1–7; Malachi 2:11–16; Ezekiel 16:1–63; 23:1–49; Isaiah 1:21; 50:1–2; 54:5–8; 57:2–10; 61:10–62:5; Jeremiah 2:23–25; 3:1–23; 22:20–23; see also: Deuteronomy 23:17–18; Proverbs 1:20, 2:16–19; 23:27–28. All four of the gospels and Paul take Christ as a symbolic “bridegroom” of his followers or of the church (e.g., Matt 9:15; 25:1; Mark 2:19–20; Luke 5:34–35; John 3:29; Eph 5:32–33; see also: 1 Cor 7:1, 7, 32–34). This nuptial imagery carries into later theological traditions. In The Liberty of a Christian (1520), Luther speaks of the “wedding ring of faith” and writes: “Faith unites to soul with Christ as a bride is united with her bridegroom.” Mother Teresa explicitly understood her own vows and the vows of sisters in the Missionaries of Charity order she founded, as a marriage to the crucified Christ.

  2. Strictly speaking, I am focusing on Judeo–Christian faith as the human contribution to what one takes (perhaps mistakenly) to be a relationship. One could have faith in God even if God does not exist. That faith would consist in that complex of attitudes and actions (a psychological and behavioral stance) that constitute the response and are involved in inaugurating and maintaining it.

References

  • Barr, J. (1961). The semantics of biblical language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brueggemann, W. (2002). Reverberations of faith. Louisville, KY: John Knox Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bultmann, R., & Weiser, A. (1968). πιστεύω, πίστις, πιστός, πιστόω, ἄπιστος, ἀπιστέω, ἀπιστία, ὀλιγόπιστος, ὀλιγοπιστία. In G. Kittel, G. W. Bromiley & G. Friedrich (Eds.), Theological dictionary of the new testament (Vol. 6, pp. 174–228). Grand Rapids, MI: Wm. B. Eerdmans.

  • Cicero, M. T. (1903). (70 BCE). In verrem (“against verres”), 2.5. In M. T. Cicero (Ed.), The orations of Marcus Tullius Cicero (pp. 166–167) (C. D. Yonge, Trans.). London: George Bell & Sons.

  • De Vaan, M. (2008). Etymological dictionary of Latin and the other Italic languages (Leiden Indo-European etymological dictionary series; 7). Leiden: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donfried, K. P., & Powell, M. A. (2011). Faith. In M. A. Powell (Ed.), The Harpercollins Bible dictionary (revised and updated) (3rd ed.). New York: HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, J. D. G. (2007). Faith, faithfulness. In K. D. Sakenfeld (Ed.), The new interpreter’s dictionary of the Bible. Nashville, TN: Abingdon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzmeyer, J. (1981). The Gospel according to Luke I-IX: Introduction, translation, and notes (anchor Bible, vol. 28). Garden City, MI: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Healey, J. P. (1992). Faith: Old testament. In D. N. Freedman (Ed.), The anchor Yale Bible dictionary (Vol. 2). New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard-Snyder, D. (2013). Propositional faith: What it is and what it is not. American Philosophical Quarterly, 50, 357–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard-Snyder, D. (2016a). Markan Faith. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion, doi:10.1007/s11153-016-9601-2.

  • Howard-Snyder, F. (2016b). The pearl of great price. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion. doi:10.1007/s11153-016-9605-y.

  • Johnson, M. (2011). An unquenchable thirst: A memoir. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolodiejchuk, B. (Ed.). (2007). Mother Teresa: Come be my light: The private writings of the ‘Saint of Calcutta’. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lebens, S. (2016). The life of faith as a work of art: A rabbinic theology of faith. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion. doi:10.1007/s11153-016-9600-3.

  • Lindsay, D. (1993). The roots and development of the πίστ—Word group as faith terminology. Journal for the Study of the New Testament, 49, 103–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lührmann, D. (1992). Faith: New testament. In D. N. Freedman (Ed.), The anchor Yale Bible dictionary (Vol. 2) (F. W. Hughes, Trans.). New York: Doubleday.

  • Malcolm, F., & Scott, M. (2016) Faith, Belief and Fictionalism. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, (forthcoming).

  • McKaughan, D. J. (2013). Authentic faith and acknowledged risk: Dissolving the problem of faith and reason. Religious Studies: An International Journal for the Philosophy of Religion, 49(1), 101–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKaughan, D. J. (2014). Faith as active commitment. Presented at the nature and value of faith conference. St. Louis, MO: St. Louis University. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YrgVd96h2WA.

  • McKaughan, D. J. (2015). Religious violence. In G. Oppy (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of contemporary philosophy of religion. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKaughan, D. J. (2016). Action-centered faith, doubt, and rationality. Journal of Philosophical Research, 41, 71–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, T. (2015). Roman faith and Christian faith: Pistis and fides in the early roman empire and early Churches. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Perry, E. (1953). The meaning of ‘emuna in the old testament. Journal of Bible and Religion, 21(4), 252–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ringe, D. (2006). From proto-Indo-European to proto-Germanic. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watkins, C. (Ed.). (2011). The American heritage dictionary of Indo-European roots (3rd ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This project was made possible through the support of a Grant from Templeton Religion Trust. The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of Templeton Religion Trust. I would like especially to thank Trent Dougherty, Dan Howard-Snyder, Jonathan Kvanvig, Sam Lebens, Matthew Lee, Michael Pace, Dale Tuggy, and the participants in the 2016 Faith Project Summer Seminar (June–July 2016) and also Sara Koenig and participants at “The Virtue of Faith” conference in Bellingham, WA (September 22–24 2016) for discussion and feedback on earlier versions of this project. Funding was supported by John Templeton Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel J. McKaughan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

McKaughan, D.J. On the value of faith and faithfulness. Int J Philos Relig 81, 7–29 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-016-9606-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-016-9606-x

Keywords

Navigation