Divine thoughts and Fregean propositional realism

Article

DOI: 10.1007/s11153-014-9445-6

Cite this article as:
Ruloff, C.P. Int J Philos Relig (2014) 76: 41. doi:10.1007/s11153-014-9445-6

Abstract

Anderson and Welty have recently advanced an argument for the claim that the laws of logic are ontologically dependent upon a necessarily existent mind, i.e. God. In this paper I argue that a key premise of Anderson and Welty’s argument—viz., a premise which asserts that \(x\) is intrinsically intentional only if \(x\) is mind-dependent—is false, for on a broadly Fregean account of propositions, propositions are intrinsically intentional but not mind-dependent.

Keywords

Frege Propositions God Representation 

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Kwantlen Polytechnic UniversitySurreyCanada

Personalised recommendations