Perfection, near-perfection, maximality, and Anselmian Theism

Article

Abstract

Anselmian theists claim (a) that there is a being than which none greater can be conceived; and (b) that it is knowable on purely—solely, entirely—a priori grounds that there is a being than which none greater can be conceived. In this paper, I argue that Anselmian Theism gains traction by conflating different interpretations of the key description ‘being than which no greater can be conceived’. In particular, I insist that it is very important to distinguish between ideal excellence and maximal possible excellence. At the end of my paper, I illustrate the importance of this distinction by applying my discussion to the recent defence of Anselmian Theism in Nagasawa (Philos Q 58:577–591, 2008).

Keywords

Anselmian Theism God Nagasawa Ontological argument Perfection 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Nagasawa Y. (2008) A new defence of Anselmian Theism. Philosophical Quarterly 58: 577–591CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Oppy, G. (1998). Critical notice of Frank J. Tipler (1995) The physics of immortality. The Secular Web Library. http://www.infidels.org/library/modern/graham_oppy/tipler.html
  3. Oppy G. (2000) Colonising the galaxies. Sophia 39: 117–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Oppy G. (2006) Philosophical perspectives on infinity. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Sobel J. (2004) Logic and theism. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  6. Tipler F. (1994) The physics of immortality. Macmillan, LondonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Philosophy and BioethicsMonash UniversityClaytonAustralia

Personalised recommendations